Mini 1939 - Organization XIII (Game Over)
- VI Zexion
-
VI Zexion
- VI Zexion
-
VI Zexion Goon
- VI Zexion
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 315
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Being normal = way overrates yo.In post 1448, X Luxord wrote:No normal human being gets this annoyed at someone being disinterested in playing an online forum game.- X Luxord
-
X Luxord Goon
- X Luxord
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- VI Zexion
-
VI Zexion
- VII Saix
-
VII Saix Goon
- VII Saix
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 252
- Joined: July 20, 2017
More interesting will be to know what you think about my experience.In post 1380, IV Vexen wrote:
There isn't a single right way to play mafia. There are many wrong ways to play mafia. Let's try an experiment though.In post 1315, XI Marluxia wrote:
Not everything that you believe is true. You may have a strong opinion on the "right way to play mafia", but there isn't an established right way to play mafia.In post 1191, IV Vexen wrote:There are places where he demonstrates an understanding of mafia and how to play it that directly clash with other posts he makes where he demonstrates no such understandings.
If he's new but has a few games under his belt, some of your discrepancies are null and void.
He hasn't talked about his skill level at all and hasn't pretended to be a caricature of a mafia player, so the only reason you think he's new is because you disagree with some things that he said. That's insane.
@SaixIs your experience level with forum based mafia:
A. 0-1 completed games.
B. 2-5 completed games.
C. 6-15 completed games.
D. 16-100 completed games.
E. 101+ completed games.- IX Demyx
-
IX Demyx Goon
- IX Demyx
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 344
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Naah, I shouldn't be playing this game.In post 1447, X Luxord wrote:I'm stupid.
You're fine.
Like.
I don't really like the way you're playing here in general
but I'm clearly the problem here.
Lol.
Ur grievances are justified.The Melodious Nocturne- IX Demyx
-
IX Demyx Goon
- IX Demyx
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 344
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Okay let's sing don't stop believing by journey.In post 1450, VI Zexion wrote:I'm always down for a sing-song.The Melodious Nocturne- VII Saix
-
VII Saix Goon
- VII Saix
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 252
- Joined: July 20, 2017
You can make me?! Try.In post 1384, IV Vexen wrote:Oh?
I can make him.
Saix will answer the question because to not answer it is an admission that he's attempting to obfuscate his skill level. There is almost no information gained other than that from that post, and it doesn't meaningfully narrow down his identity.
Honestly I'm surprised no one started this game with RQS given the fact that it WOULD actually be useful in this game, as opposed to most games.- VI Zexion
-
VI Zexion
- IX Demyx
-
IX Demyx Goon
- IX Demyx
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 344
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- VI Zexion
-
VI Zexion
- IX Demyx
-
IX Demyx Goon
- IX Demyx
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 344
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- VI Zexion
-
VI Zexion Goon
- VI Zexion
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 315
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- VII Saix
-
VII Saix
- I Xemnas
-
I Xemnas Goon
- I Xemnas
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 310
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Undercutting the confirmed town's reads and stances are really the only thing scum can do with confirmed town, assuming the confirmed town is at all on the right track. If they can get the confirmed town player to doubt themselves, even better.In post 1445, VII Saix wrote:
What is a scum to gain from doing that to a confirmed town?In post 1370, I Xemnas wrote:
Saix' behavior toward my predecessor is one approach scum sometimes take - denigrate, isolate and demotivate. Town frustrated with a disengaged IC looks different, from what I've seen.
Your slot was already demotivated and isolated without me having to do anything. I may have denigrated them a bit to shake them out of the slumber. I was the only one hankering them to wake the fuck up. They didn't. So, they got replaced.
Your post read more like a "get out" than a "wake up".
I guess the flip side is that a disengaged and demotivated confirmed town is vastly preferable to a replacement. Anyone who replaces into this slot (or any other slot in the game) is doing so because they want to play the game.The Superior of the In-Between- I Xemnas
-
I Xemnas Goon
- I Xemnas
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 310
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Is there a reason not to answer?In post 1457, VII Saix wrote:
You can make me?! Try.In post 1384, IV Vexen wrote:Oh?
I can make him.
Saix will answer the question because to not answer it is an admission that he's attempting to obfuscate his skill level. There is almost no information gained other than that from that post, and it doesn't meaningfully narrow down his identity.
Honestly I'm surprised no one started this game with RQS given the fact that it WOULD actually be useful in this game, as opposed to most games.The Superior of the In-Between- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- I Xemnas
-
I Xemnas Goon
- I Xemnas
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 310
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Vexen case?In post 1466, II Xigbar wrote:Vexen was pushing Saix? so there you go.
Also, now there's also Vexion, but I think she's already won the game for scum since town is being really dumb.The Superior of the In-Between- I Xemnas
-
I Xemnas Goon
- I Xemnas
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 310
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Regarding Roxas, assuming it's not a brilliant emulation.
Roxas' self-assurance and ability to form reads quickly seems to be a cyclic thing. My impression of her recent play in other games is that she's been in uncertainty mode. In this game, she's projecting a lot of certainty about her reads. This transition seems relatively fast.
Not being explainy seems odd, mostly because she's not explaining the lack of explainyness in more detail, and the lack of explaining reads is usually hand-in-hand with having unsure reads not strong ones. Not always, but often.
I'm not sure this = scum for her. But, I think it might.The Superior of the In-Between- VII Saix
-
VII Saix Goon
- VII Saix
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 252
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Since you yourself have come up with a loophole in your theory, I hope you see the light.In post 1464, I Xemnas wrote:
Undercutting the confirmed town's reads and stances are really the only thing scum can do with confirmed town, assuming the confirmed town is at all on the right track. If they can get the confirmed town player to doubt themselves, even better.In post 1445, VII Saix wrote:
What is a scum to gain from doing that to a confirmed town?In post 1370, I Xemnas wrote:
Saix' behavior toward my predecessor is one approach scum sometimes take - denigrate, isolate and demotivate. Town frustrated with a disengaged IC looks different, from what I've seen.
Your slot was already demotivated and isolated without me having to do anything. I may have denigrated them a bit to shake them out of the slumber. I was the only one hankering them to wake the fuck up. They didn't. So, they got replaced.
Your post read more like a "get out" than a "wake up".
I guess the flip side is that a disengaged and demotivated confirmed town is vastly preferable to a replacement. Anyone who replaces into this slot (or any other slot in the game) is doing so because they want to play the game.- I Xemnas
-
I Xemnas Goon
- I Xemnas
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 310
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Does Axel's ability make sense to you as a scum ability?In post 1449, VII Saix wrote:
Scum is within Axel, Vex and Xigbar.In post 1371, I Xemnas wrote:
Where are your reads at currently?In post 1366, VII Saix wrote:
You have every right to not like my approach.In post 1347, I Xemnas wrote:
I don't like your approach to my predecessor. I don't like your approach to me, either.In post 1303, VII Saix wrote:The point of that post was to let them know that their gimmick was noticed. It is good they left. They were not helping the game and appeared disinterested. Hopefully, you will be better.
Scumlean - Rox and maybe Lex.
Null - Lux
Everyone else town or townlean.The Superior of the In-Between- VII Saix
-
VII Saix Goon
- VII Saix
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 252
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Yes, there is. 2 reasons. First, I find that he is ordering me rather than asking. Second, I fail to see his point and what he is gonna get out of it.In post 1465, I Xemnas wrote:
Is there a reason not to answer?In post 1457, VII Saix wrote:
You can make me?! Try.In post 1384, IV Vexen wrote:Oh?
I can make him.
Saix will answer the question because to not answer it is an admission that he's attempting to obfuscate his skill level. There is almost no information gained other than that from that post, and it doesn't meaningfully narrow down his identity.
Honestly I'm surprised no one started this game with RQS given the fact that it WOULD actually be useful in this game, as opposed to most games.
First:
I would have gladly answered it. But challenging me like that - ordering me to comply instead of asking - I will not answer the question on principle.
Second:
I don't understand his premise for these two reasons:
1. If I have been projecting myself as inexperienced, there was no reason for me to crack the facade. Especially over a conversation with Xaldin where I was not at all under the pressure. If you go back to that convo, you will see that Vex/Axel/someone had in fact slotted me as someone who didn't even read that the night was skipped. So, if I really wanted to maintain my facade, I would have let them believe that.
2. The whole premise is built on me behaving in an inexperiened manner on D1. I said scums are less likely to be logical. Contentious as that may sound, where is an attempt to solicit my fucking response to that and understand what I think? Instead, they made up their mind by the end of D1 that I am a VI. I have no prblem if someone thinks of me as a moron, but now if they suddenly start thinking of me as a genius, it's their confusion and problem to sort out, not mine. And since it's their problem, the least they can do is ask nicely. If they can't even do that, and instead are thumping their chest how not responding to their question is a further indication of my scumminess, they will be ignored just as their slot was ignored a few pages ago.
I think it's really dumb and fascist to think that there's one simple rulebook to play mafia. You may think of my style as amateurish, but have the maturity to understand that everyone finds their own rules and tools. I had the exact same response as what Marlux posted, but I didn't type it coz it read damn defensive coming from me. I have learnt to keep my defensive attitude in check coz each of my defensive replies are taken out of context and made to look as if these defensive replies are now the reason why I am scum. I have largely succeeded in not yielding to provocation, and I would like to keep it like that. Not only that it leads to my slot's impending lynch, it also spoils the whole fun. So it's best to ignore people like Vex. - VII Saix
- I Xemnas
- VII Saix
- I Xemnas
- I Xemnas
- II Xigbar
- I Xemnas
- I Xemnas
- VI Zexion
- IX Demyx
- IX Demyx
- VII Saix
- IX Demyx
- IX Demyx
- VII Saix
- X Luxord
- VI Zexion