Mini 1939 - Organization XIII (Game Over)
- II Xigbar
-
II Xigbar Goon
- II Xigbar
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 592
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- VII Saix
-
VII Saix Goon
- VII Saix
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 252
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Vex, not yet. Lynch Axel with me. At best he is a VT now that he has used his power (so he says).In post 1474, II Xigbar wrote:We share 2/3 of our scumreads. Why don't you get past the fact that you feel the urge to policy lynch me and instead direct your energy at lynching Vexscum?- XI Marluxia
-
XI Marluxia Goon
- XI Marluxia
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 117
- Joined: July 20, 2017
If you bring the fire and get a Vexen wagon back, you have my scythe. If you don't, I'll be protecting my town reads in the best way I have available to me - supporting wagons that aren't completely terrible.In post 1321, II Xigbar wrote:Yes they're both scum so why did you unvote one of themThe Graceful Assassin- XI Marluxia
-
XI Marluxia Goon
- XI Marluxia
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 117
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Your argument seems to be that Luxord should understand your suspicion of his vote because my vote came after his and didn't have reasoning behind it and could or could not be a bus. I wouldn't be convinced by that argument, although I don't really know what "being convinced" looks like when presented with an argument like this one.In post 1427, VI Zexion wrote:you voted Demyx with reasoning that may or may not be good, if you're town and Demyx is scum and Marluxia is scum then she hopped on for the bus at basically the exact moment you'd expect.The Graceful Assassin- I Xemnas
-
I Xemnas Goon
- I Xemnas
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 310
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Who are you addressing?In post 1474, II Xigbar wrote:We share 2/3 of our scumreads. Why don't you get past the fact that you feel the urge to policy lynch me and instead direct your energy at lynching Vexscum?
I feel like this is addressed to me but it doesn't make sense if it is.The Superior of the In-Between- V Lexaeus
-
V Lexaeus Goon
- V Lexaeus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 175
- Joined: July 20, 2017
You're really still on about this?In post 1476, VII Saix wrote:
Vex, not yet. Lynch Axel with me. At best he is a VT now that he has used his power (so he says).In post 1474, II Xigbar wrote:We share 2/3 of our scumreads. Why don't you get past the fact that you feel the urge to policy lynch me and instead direct your energy at lynching Vexscum?
The night skip literally had AXEL'S FACE ALL OVER IT
What's ONE good reason to doubt that he's the one who used it? Just oneThe Taciturn Stalwart- V Lexaeus
-
V Lexaeus Goon
- V Lexaeus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 175
- Joined: July 20, 2017
In what universe does "Go back to hibernating" mean "wake the fuck up?"In post 1445, VII Saix wrote:
What is a scum to gain from doing that to a confirmed town?In post 1370, I Xemnas wrote:
Saix' behavior toward my predecessor is one approach scum sometimes take - denigrate, isolate and demotivate. Town frustrated with a disengaged IC looks different, from what I've seen.
Your slot was already demotivated and isolated without me having to do anything. I may have denigrated them a bit to shake them out of the slumber. I was the only one hankering them to wake the fuck up. They didn't. So, they got replaced.
Scum has plenty to gain from doing that to conftown, such as silencing them or fostering distrust.
You can't lynch him, but you can still limit his usefulness to TownThe Taciturn Stalwart- V Lexaeus
-
V Lexaeus Goon
- V Lexaeus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 175
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- V Lexaeus
-
V Lexaeus Goon
- V Lexaeus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 175
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Nonsense, you're not ruining anything!In post 1422, X Luxord wrote:Nah I'm fucking tired of how I act in mafia games.
If I'm already ruining the game it's only going to get worse.
Sorry for shitting up your game Anti.
I'm not going to let it happen again.
At least not from my perspectiveThe Taciturn Stalwart- I Xemnas
-
I Xemnas Goon
- I Xemnas
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 310
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Nice, original line of attack you have there.In post 1481, V Lexaeus wrote:
In what universe does "Go back to hibernating" mean "wake the fuck up?"In post 1445, VII Saix wrote:
What is a scum to gain from doing that to a confirmed town?In post 1370, I Xemnas wrote:
Saix' behavior toward my predecessor is one approach scum sometimes take - denigrate, isolate and demotivate. Town frustrated with a disengaged IC looks different, from what I've seen.
Your slot was already demotivated and isolated without me having to do anything. I may have denigrated them a bit to shake them out of the slumber. I was the only one hankering them to wake the fuck up. They didn't. So, they got replaced.
Scum has plenty to gain from doing that to conftown, such as silencing them or fostering distrust.
You can't lynch him, but you can still limit his usefulness to TownThe Superior of the In-Between- Heartless
-
Heartless Jack of All Trades
- Heartless
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: August 8, 2014
Vote Count 2.9
Xigbar [2] - Saïx, Xaldin
Vexen [1] - Xigbar
Saïx [5] - Lexaeus, Vexen, Axel, Demyx, Zexion
Demyx [2] - Roxas, Marluxia
Xigbar [1] - Luxord
Luxord [1] - Xemnas
Not Voting: No one
6 to lynch
Deadline: (expired on 2017-09-18 02:19:22).[/color]- X Luxord
-
X Luxord Goon
- X Luxord
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- X Luxord
-
X Luxord Goon
- X Luxord
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: July 20, 2017
I believe the implication is that Xig doesn't think Axel's power makes him town.In post 1480, V Lexaeus wrote:The night skip literally had AXEL'S FACE ALL OVER IT
What's ONE good reason to doubt that he's the one who used it? Just one- I Xemnas
-
I Xemnas Goon
- I Xemnas
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 310
- Joined: July 20, 2017
6 to lynch with 12 alive is hated.In post 1486, X Luxord wrote:Shouldn't Saix be dead right now if everyone is hated?
I don't like this wagon.The Superior of the In-Between- Heartless
-
Heartless Jack of All Trades
- Heartless
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6296
- Joined: August 8, 2014
In post 1486, X Luxord wrote:Shouldn't Saix be dead right now if everyone is hated?As 12 are currently alive, it would usually take 7 votes to lynch. The "6 to lynch" already takes into account the global hated modifier. :3- I Xemnas
-
I Xemnas Goon
- I Xemnas
- X Luxord
-
X Luxord
- IX Demyx
-
IX Demyx Goon
- IX Demyx
- I Xemnas
-
I Xemnas Goon
- I Xemnas
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 310
- Joined: July 20, 2017
- VII Saix
-
VII Saix
- IX Demyx
-
IX Demyx Goon
- IX Demyx
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 344
- Joined: July 20, 2017
We got on wrong foot, hi my name is demyx.
Let's lynch scum together!The Melodious Nocturne- I Xemnas
-
I Xemnas Goon
- I Xemnas
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 310
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Do we have mutual scumreads?
The Superior of the In-Between- V Lexaeus
-
V Lexaeus Goon
- V Lexaeus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 175
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Yeah, it is actually, considering I brought it up several pages ago but you just ignored it so you could handwave it away now.In post 1484, I Xemnas wrote:
Nice, original line of attack you have there.In post 1481, V Lexaeus wrote:
In what universe does "Go back to hibernating" mean "wake the fuck up?"In post 1445, VII Saix wrote:
What is a scum to gain from doing that to a confirmed town?In post 1370, I Xemnas wrote:
Saix' behavior toward my predecessor is one approach scum sometimes take - denigrate, isolate and demotivate. Town frustrated with a disengaged IC looks different, from what I've seen.
Your slot was already demotivated and isolated without me having to do anything. I may have denigrated them a bit to shake them out of the slumber. I was the only one hankering them to wake the fuck up. They didn't. So, they got replaced.
Scum has plenty to gain from doing that to conftown, such as silencing them or fostering distrust.
You can't lynch him, but you can still limit his usefulness to TownThe Taciturn Stalwart- V Lexaeus
-
V Lexaeus Goon
- V Lexaeus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 175
- Joined: July 20, 2017
Xigbar, yes.In post 1487, X Luxord wrote:
I believe the implication is that Xig doesn't think Axel's power makes him town.In post 1480, V Lexaeus wrote:The night skip literally had AXEL'S FACE ALL OVER IT
What's ONE good reason to doubt that he's the one who used it? Just one
Saix is actually trying to say Axel's not the one who did it for some bullshit reason.The Taciturn Stalwart- V Lexaeus
-
V Lexaeus Goon
- V Lexaeus
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 175
- Joined: July 20, 2017
What don't you like about it?In post 1488, I Xemnas wrote:
6 to lynch with 12 alive is hated.In post 1486, X Luxord wrote:Shouldn't Saix be dead right now if everyone is hated?
I don't like this wagon.
It's been hovering around four/five pretty much all day, so it's not like it just came out of nowhere.The Taciturn Stalwart - V Lexaeus
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- V Lexaeus
- V Lexaeus
- I Xemnas
- IX Demyx
- I Xemnas
- Heartless
- I Xemnas
- X Luxord
- X Luxord
- Heartless
- I Xemnas
- V Lexaeus
- V Lexaeus
- V Lexaeus
- V Lexaeus
- I Xemnas
- XI Marluxia
- XI Marluxia
- VII Saix
- II Xigbar