Page 30 of 141

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 4:19 am
by RadiantCowbells
"like i should"

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:08 am
by Varsoon
As you should.
You can call catching an L for laying down scummy play a 'policy lynch' all you want
Fact of the matter is that you're still laying down scummy play.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:19 am
by RadiantCowbells
you can mislynch me but you can't survive the day after.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:21 am
by Varsoon
That's a gamble I'm willing to take.
That's how confident I am in my read on you.
You don't back down with a flush when you are sure your opponent is bluffing on a two-pair.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 6:30 am
by Elbirn
In post 718, Gamma Emerald wrote:That’s a needlessly convoluted way to say if one of RC and FB are scum you don’t think it’s FB
FoS: mutantdevle
Can you actually vote for Mutant if you think hes sus? I dont like weak-ass suspicion flinging, this game needs hard stances and wagons like yesterday

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 9:24 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 729, Elbirn wrote:
In post 718, Gamma Emerald wrote:That’s a needlessly convoluted way to say if one of RC and FB are scum you don’t think it’s FB
FoS: mutantdevle
Can you actually vote for Mutant if you think hes sus? I dont like weak-ass suspicion flinging, this game needs hard stances and wagons like yesterday
Actually his last post describing his Fire TR I liked a fair amount
I do want him to respond to this though

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 9:44 am
by mutantdevle
In post 730, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 729, Elbirn wrote:
In post 718, Gamma Emerald wrote:That’s a needlessly convoluted way to say if one of RC and FB are scum you don’t think it’s FB
FoS: mutantdevle
Can you actually vote for Mutant if you think hes sus? I dont like weak-ass suspicion flinging, this game needs hard stances and wagons like yesterday
Actually his last post describing his Fire TR I liked a fair amount
I do want him to respond to this though
Oh okay. I was going to respond to this originally but felt I didn't need to as I figured my response would be of too little significance.

I assume the 'convoluted' part you are referring to is: "if FB AND RC != scum team then FB != scum." My explanation for that is I just didn't know how to phrase it lol. So I just wrote it out as if I was writing pseudo code.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 9:50 am
by Gamma Emerald
Fair enough, that actually resolves my issue a fair amount

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 10:59 am
by NicoRobin
Portgas D. Ace is awesome.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 11:22 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 733, NicoRobin wrote:Portgas D. Ace is awesome.
You wanna contribute or you wanna get lynched?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 12:08 pm
by jjh927
Gonna do a votecount as soon as I get the chance

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 1:07 pm
by Nibbui
In post 734, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 733, NicoRobin wrote:Portgas D. Ace is awesome.
You wanna contribute or you wanna get lynched?
both is fine as well.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 1:28 pm
by jjh927
Votecount #4:

PlayerVotesVoters
Firebringer
4
NicoRobin, northsidegal, MariaR, Elbirn
Varsoon
2
Gamma Emerald, RadiantCowbells
mutantdevle
2
Kokichi Oma, Nibbui
RadiantCowbells
2
Varsoon, Not Known 15
Not voting
---
mutantdevle, Firebringer, ChibiBear


With 13 alive it's 7 to achieve majority for the lynch

The day will end in (expired on 2018-12-16 10:00:00).

The next minigame will begin in (expired on 2018-12-09 10:00:00).

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 1:33 pm
by Gamma Emerald
There’s a broken countdown tag in the votecount

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 1:35 pm
by jjh927
In post 738, Gamma Emerald wrote:
There’s a broken countdown tag in the votecount
No there's not but there was a broken quote.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 2:51 pm
by Elbirn
In post 717, mutantdevle wrote:I really can't see why people scum read firebringer tbh. I don't recall anything overly town about him but he's never said anything that's irked me. I'm currently of the opinion that if FB AND RC != scum team then FB != scum.
In post 720, mutantdevle wrote:Actually, I think a NSG-FB scum team would make sense but I don't scum read NSG so that's not anything to apply to FB. So basically I'd rather RC be lynched before FB unless NSG flips scum. But I have no interest in any of that right now and my point is that I don't think we should be voting for FB.
I'm sorry but what even is your read on either of these two. Without tying them together please, I dont do pre flip bullshit

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 2:54 pm
by Elbirn
Nah it's all wishy washy crap and tying together two people you dont explicitly scumread and hypothesizing them as a team for idk what reason

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mutantdevle

Get gone

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 2:57 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 722, mutantdevle wrote:
In post 721, Varsoon wrote:
In post 717, mutantdevle wrote:I really can't see why people scum read firebringer tbh. I don't recall anything overly town about him but he's never said anything that's irked me. I'm currently of the opinion that if FB AND RC != scum team then FB != scum.
You don't think scum would actively avoid stepping on town toes in order to avoid catching flak/attention?
Of course they would if they wanted to play safely. But I don't get the impression that FB is doing that. I also don't think that, from my limited experience, that FB is the kind of person that favours playing safe. Additionally, by the logic that you have just given me, you are suggesting that the main people you think that FB is interacting with is scum because he's 'avoiding stepping on town's toes'. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't that include you?
I like this post
It feels inventive and has a towny fire to it

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 3:01 pm
by Firebringer
In post 741, Elbirn wrote:Nah it's all wishy washy crap and tying together two people you dont explicitly scumread and hypothesizing them as a team for idk what reason

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mutantdevle

Get gone
u just jumped past varsoon as my biggest scum read now elbirn.
nothing in those posts were scummy

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 3:02 pm
by Gamma Emerald
I kinda agree
While the second post quoted could read that way I don’t see that at all in the first post

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 3:11 pm
by Varsoon
In post 722, mutantdevle wrote: Of course they would if they wanted to play safely. But I don't get the impression that FB is doing that. I also don't think that, from my limited experience, that FB is the kind of person that favours playing safe. Additionally, by the logic that you have just given me, you are suggesting that the main people you think that FB is interacting with is scum because he's 'avoiding stepping on town's toes'. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't that include you?
I don't think he's the kind of person that favors playing, aaaaayyy
I'm not saying his interactions are only with scum or town, but that he's played in a way that specifically avoids accountability and dodges confrontations unless he's an instigator.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 3:12 pm
by Firebringer
In post 745, Varsoon wrote:
In post 722, mutantdevle wrote: Of course they would if they wanted to play safely. But I don't get the impression that FB is doing that. I also don't think that, from my limited experience, that FB is the kind of person that favours playing safe. Additionally, by the logic that you have just given me, you are suggesting that the main people you think that FB is interacting with is scum because he's 'avoiding stepping on town's toes'. Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't that include you?
I don't think he's the kind of person that favors playing, aaaaayyy
I'm not saying his interactions are only with scum or town, but that he's played in a way that specifically avoids accountability and dodges confrontations unless he's an instigator.
I am under attack

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 3:16 pm
by Varsoon
I dunno man you kinda do that as either alignment though so I dunno that I really buy the 'firebringer a scum' argument here
Also also the wagon comp on you was NicoRobin, northsidegal, MariaR, and Elbirn. I don't trust most those dudes right now.

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 3:19 pm
by Firebringer
I don't understand ur read on me because it seems like u scumread me but ur wiggling around it as if "ehhh w/e"

I think theres at least 4 posts you implying I am scum with rc, and now ur like "I have no read on him because nothing he is doing is something he wouldn't do as another alignment".

do you think its fair for me to say ur other posts imply a scumread on me?

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2018 3:26 pm
by Firebringer
I went back through ur iso not seeing the posts I thought u posted.
am I going mad?