I don't think I did anything.In post 1147, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ugh. Buj you owe me a trust sheep when I ask for it.
No you didn't do anything wrong and it still makes sense to lynch but it would've been nice if you trusted me to let A50 do his thing. It's not always optimal to follow him but I knew he was the vig and wanted to let him try for his perfect score. I'm mostly frustrated because he's got a better role than I thought.In post 1150, DuckDuckJab wrote:I don't think I did anything.In post 1147, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ugh. Buj you owe me a trust sheep when I ask for it.
It wasn't that I didn't know what A50 was doing (I didn't know they were a super vig sure, but like yeah I doubted he was a commuter). I just didn't agree that no lynch makes any difference.
Also I didn't force him to claim. I'm surprised he even thought his explanation would change my mind. I still don't understand how no lynch is better.
-BuJ
You don't really get a say sorry. You tried to guilty me and now there's evidence for another scum member so you follow whatever A50 and DDJ want to do for tonight. We have to leash you or waste A50s check on you. He's going to die so Id rather we take down all my scum reads in one go. Flubber lynch, LA blocked, omo checked.In post 1149, themilkcartonkid wrote:Cheeky, I dont think flubber should be the lynch. Omo and la are way luckier and could slide past, I think flubber is more of a confirm at night sort of thing. I'm all for omo or la, I would say la because the replacement might be super charismatic or really great scum. I dont know if I would ever be able to trust an la replacement as town because of that. I'd rather conf omo and then flubber or gamma. Mainly gamma
Well I'm def not purposefully low level lol, what a thing to walk in on when wanting to get back into the gameIn post 1123, themilkcartonkid wrote:So at this point I'm super certain scum is in omo, la, and gamma. I think the low amount of play is not scum for all of them, but at least one of them is purposefully low level. The game is stalling after a good flurry because they are barely checking in
This is wildly OP but I'll give you a pass. It's the mod I'm gonna have words with if this is real btw.In post 1128, Almost50 wrote:FFS, I AM THE BLOODY VIG AND I HAVE THE BLOODY INFO I NEED!
First off, let me come clean: I lied about being a Commuter. I didn't know how to handle my "slip" otherwise. And yes, it was a slip indeed, just not a "scum slip".
My role is bizarre. I simply submit a list of 3 living players each night. If one (and exactly one) of them is Scum, they die and the scum kill is blocked. If none, 2 or all 3 are scum my action fails and the scum NK goes through.
On N1 I picked DDJ as a slot I hard TR'd. My 2nd choice would have been in Cheeky/Flubber/LA (as TRs), and Robert as the 3rd (the counterwagon to a flipped townie), and I decided to go for a Cheeky. If it ended up with someone else dying I would have assumed Robert was Town because DDJ was already all but confirmed in my eyes and Cheeky was close enough and was not on the lynch wagon on D1. I guess I was a bit lucky with Robert, thus confirming the other 2 as Town and from then on it was an easy job.
On N2 I was torn between 2 thoughts: Pick 3 others and see what happens (at best it could have confirmed 2 more townies, but at worst it could have resulted in mine or DDJ/Cheeky's death at the hands of the Mafia and I would have taken a step back rather than forward, so to speak). I picked the alternative of using my 2 confirmed townies with someone I suspected, so as to either kill scum or confirm a third townie 100%. I picked joges over milk.
N3 is going to be even easier. I am using DDJ+Cheeky+milk. Either milk dies or he is confirmed a townie.
The thing is if we hypothetically assume milk to be Town then we most probably lose a Townie tonight due to the Mafia kill. And now that I fully claimed I suspect that Townie would be me. This is partially why I didn't want to out, because as long as they thought I was a Commuter they would not have risked shooting me anyway, and especially so with the situation they're in. They simply cannot afford a failed NK.
The other reason was for fear they may have a Doctor or a roleblocker. *Sigh*
At first I thought NO WAY we have a JK with my role. Then it hit me: WHAT IF the game had went another route on D1 and I wasn't as lucky on N1? There would have been every chance that >I< would be the NK (the designer certainly didn't account for my "slip" resulting in me faking Commuter, did they?). If that was the case then would the Town be without an investigative/protective for the rest of the game? Because my role IS THE BLOODY INVESTIGATIVE, PROTECTIVE AND KILLING ROLE ALL IN ONE. That's why I didn't go for a milky lynch and decided it's better to verify him via my night action. It makes sense that a JK may exist as a backup for my role minus the killing part. Also the investigative part of his in nerfed compared to mine under the current situation.
Now how bloody hard would it have been for you to just trust me on a MECHANICAL DECISION? It has nothing to do with "gut" or "associative tells" or anything like that. A purely mechanical play by someone in the know.
wdym you know?In post 1145, CheekyTeeky wrote:I knowIn post 1128, Almost50 wrote:FFS, I AM THE BLOODY VIG AND I HAVE THE BLOODY INFO I NEED!
Why the eff did you guys make him claim?
How would it be LA?In post 1153, CheekyTeeky wrote:You don't really get a say sorry. You tried to guilty me and now there's evidence for another scum member so you follow whatever A50 and DDJ want to do for tonight. We have to leash you or waste A50s check on you. He's going to die so Id rather we take down all my scum reads in one go. Flubber lynch, LA blocked, omo checked.In post 1149, themilkcartonkid wrote:Cheeky, I dont think flubber should be the lynch. Omo and la are way luckier and could slide past, I think flubber is more of a confirm at night sort of thing. I'm all for omo or la, I would say la because the replacement might be super charismatic or really great scum. I dont know if I would ever be able to trust an la replacement as town because of that. I'd rather conf omo and then flubber or gamma. Mainly gamma
Omo is the most likely scum so A50 needs to vig it to stop other kills going through. Lady A is next most likely so you need to Jail keep that to prove your role. If A50 dies we know its Lady A or you.
Someone correct me if my logic has gone wrong somewhere.
A50 claimed no scum NKs - scum were dying at night - a50 wanted to skip day to go to night = vig A50 going for a perfect score.In post 1156, Gamma Emerald wrote:wdym you know?
I think LA getting genuinely flustered every SOD and her weird associations with robert could point to her being scum. I'm trying to blanket cover every person I'm not townreading.In post 1157, Gamma Emerald wrote:How would it be LA?
im back with my comp now so i gotta read now...In post 1160, Almost50 wrote:I'm wondering if LA will be replaced soon. I am also wondering if Omo is playing for time. Overall I'm not happy with the current level of activity, but maybe it's because it the weekend.
that doesnt really seem like a good reason for a massclaim at all.In post 1032, Gamma Emerald wrote:But we also have something that’s been stopping the scum kills
i mean that's kinda a wack analysis, I wasn't reallyIn post 1033, CheekyTeeky wrote: Omochao and skitter do look pretty bad. Being on Thor and then not wanting to be on the DLA wagon after everyone's analysis on Thor's wagon.
Can I ask you why IIn post 1046, CheekyTeeky wrote:In post 853, Omochao wrote:yikes/10 post hereIn post 841, joges wrote:I don't like limiting ourselves to options when there's no way yet to know 100% it had any scum on it. But I would be interested in maybe seeing thoughts from people about who they feel on that wagon is most likely to be scum. But I do not like trying to limit ourselves to only the votes on Thor's wagon.In post 827, Gamma Emerald wrote:That’s a very good flip. Anyone have reason tonotlynch off Thor’s wagon today?The fuck even. Omo explain how you didn't vote joges here? That's worse tha Lady A pretending he didn't exist.In post 854, Omochao wrote:lynching between {milk, skitter} seems good for today. lady angel is good pick for scum off wagon for staying on Robert for so long, but she's also lurking so it's hard to make that argument.
VOTE: milkcarton
repeated posts calling him yikes? I don't remember anything like that. Also saying that I said that while joges was under suspicion seems like revisionism here, I don't think that joges was under suspicion at all when I said that he had a yikes/10 post. About it being underwhelming, same as above, how does not having reason to not vote equate to having a reason to? I think it would have been weird to vote joges at the post. Also seems strange to distance by calling one post bad and not including him in my lynch pool? idk I just don't like this take.In post 1109, skitter30 wrote: not really vibing no-lynch honestly
VOTE: omochao
i think this is where i want to go; i disliked how he was positioning to push like half of the thor wagon at the start of day2, and his repeated posts calling joges 'yikes' when joges was under suspicion without really doing anything about it feels distance-y; his post above in response to cheeky calling him out is underwhelming and he can't really explain why he didn't really vote him ever
In post 1123, themilkcartonkid wrote:So at this point I'm super certain scum is in omo, la, and gamma. I think the low amount of play is not scum for all of them, but at least one of them is purposefully low level. The game is stalling after a good flurry because they are barely checking in
feels too op to believe especially since both scum have flipped goon iircIn post 1128, Almost50 wrote: My role is bizarre. I simply submit a list of 3 living players each night. If one (and exactly one) of them is Scum, they die and the scum kill is blocked. If none, 2 or all 3 are scum my action fails and the scum NK goes through.
In post 1164, Omochao wrote:what's your best bet for who's sandbagging with their posting level.In post 1123, themilkcartonkid wrote:So at this point I'm super certain scum is in omo, la, and gamma. I think the low amount of play is not scum for all of them, but at least one of them is purposefully low level. The game is stalling after a good flurry because they are barely checking in
In post 1165, Omochao wrote:In post 1164, Omochao wrote:what's your best bet for who's sandbagging with their posting level.In post 1123, themilkcartonkid wrote:So at this point I'm super certain scum is in omo, la, and gamma. I think the low amount of play is not scum for all of them, but at least one of them is purposefully low level. The game is stalling after a good flurry because they are barely checking in
I do nowIn post 1166, DoubtingThomas wrote:Didnt read and i dont really wanna
i think a50 should check milk; i still think that a50's role in conjunction with a jk doesn't make super much sense together honestlyIn post 1153, CheekyTeeky wrote:You don't really get a say sorry. You tried to guilty me and now there's evidence for another scum member so you follow whatever A50 and DDJ want to do for tonight. We have to leash you or waste A50s check on you. He's going to die so Id rather we take down all my scum reads in one go. Flubber lynch, LA blocked, omo checked.
In post 1163, Omochao wrote:repeated posts calling him yikes? I don't remember anything like that. Also saying that I said that while joges was under suspicion seems like revisionism here, I don't think that joges was under suspicion at all when I said that he had a yikes/10 post. About it being underwhelming, same as above, how does not having reason to not vote equate to having a reason to? I think it would have been weird to vote joges at the post. Also seems strange to distance by calling one post bad and not including him in my lynch pool? idk I just don't like this take.
ok, how are you planning on contributing to solving this game then?In post 1166, DoubtingThomas wrote:Didnt read and i dont really wanna