Yes, there's that.In post 340, Allomancer wrote:Well nothing really's gonna get done with the only wagon being on TGP while TGP is on V/LA, so there's that.
VOTE: Allomancer
Yes, there's that.In post 340, Allomancer wrote:Well nothing really's gonna get done with the only wagon being on TGP while TGP is on V/LA, so there's that.
Do you mean that I'll continue to not post after my VLA is over? Why would I do that? And also, even though I'm not posting a lot, I'm still more active than some. I haven't disappeared from the game completely.In post 343, Allomancer wrote:I mean we theoretically can, but right now, as I've said before, I don't find TGP particularly scummy and while he's not posting because he is v/la he'll stay that way.
I think unfortunately my V/LA is delaying the game. I'm sorry, and I'm really trying to fix that, but I don't think there's a ton I can do - I think we all agree that sometimes, you need to put your IRL health over your mafia life.In post 342, brassherald wrote:What, we can't move on someone who's VLA now? I know what to do in all my scum games with Allo
In post 345, Robert2424 wrote:This is Painful, if you want something done, do it yourself.
Vote Brass
So this is giving me scummy vibes and really seeming a bit odd. I don't recall either of them expressing suspicion of brass, so barring them being neighbors/masons (daytalk?) and having learned something we don't know, why would they both vote someone they didn't say was scummy before, one after the other, without explanation?
What do you see out of this vote? Allo seems towny to me, but you said he straw-maned RCE? However, you weren't going to vote him because you wanted to vote me, but had second thoughts about putting someone on V/LA at L-1?In post 350, Munchmellow wrote:Yes, there's that.In post 340, Allomancer wrote:Well nothing really's gonna get done with the only wagon being on TGP while TGP is on V/LA, so there's that.
VOTE: Allomancer
No, I meant that I currently don't find you scummy. Currently, you're not posting often because of you're v/la, so I'm obviously not going to start scumreading you until after your v/la when you pick up the posting.In post 351, TheGoldenParadox wrote:Do you mean that I'll continue to not post after my VLA is over? Why would I do that? And also, even though I'm not posting a lot, I'm still more active than some. I haven't disappeared from the game completely.In post 343, Allomancer wrote:I mean we theoretically can, but right now, as I've said before, I don't find TGP particularly scummy and while he's not posting because he is v/la he'll stay that way.
Legitimately, this is the first time I understood what you meant. I don't know about anyone else but I was super confused, thus my sarcastic comment earlier and no follow upIn post 352, Allomancer wrote:No, I meant that I currently don't find you scummy. Currently, you're not posting often because of you're v/la, so I'm obviously not going to start scumreading you until after your v/la when you pick up the posting.In post 351, TheGoldenParadox wrote:Do you mean that I'll continue to not post after my VLA is over? Why would I do that? And also, even though I'm not posting a lot, I'm still more active than some. I haven't disappeared from the game completely.In post 343, Allomancer wrote:I mean we theoretically can, but right now, as I've said before, I don't find TGP particularly scummy and while he's not posting because he is v/la he'll stay that way.
You said you'd be back active on Monday - so like 36hours from when I posted or more. My hesitation about putting V/LA player at L-1was still there and I agree - nothing's gonna get moving with only wagon being on V/LA player. So I voted my next scumlean. Why do you find that wierd?In post 351, TheGoldenParadox wrote:What do you see out of this vote? Allo seems towny to me, but you said he straw-maned RCE? However, you weren't going to vote him because you wanted to vote me, but had second thoughts about putting someone on V/LA at L-1? What happened?
This seems to me like another backtrack to me on 324.
Nothing has changed, I want activity. Nobody willing to do something, so I vote for the person with the most posts in the game.In post 351, TheGoldenParadox wrote:Do you mean that I'll continue to not post after my VLA is over? Why would I do that? And also, even though I'm not posting a lot, I'm still more active than some. I haven't disappeared from the game completely.In post 343, Allomancer wrote:I mean we theoretically can, but right now, as I've said before, I don't find TGP particularly scummy and while he's not posting because he is v/la he'll stay that way.
I think unfortunately my V/LA is delaying the game. I'm sorry, and I'm really trying to fix that, but I don't think there's a ton I can do - I think we all agree that sometimes, you need to put your IRL health over your mafia life.In post 342, brassherald wrote:What, we can't move on someone who's VLA now? I know what to do in all my scum games with Allo
In post 345, Robert2424 wrote:This is Painful, if you want something done, do it yourself.
Vote BrassSo this is giving me scummy vibes and really seeming a bit odd. I don't recall either of them expressing suspicion of brass, so barring them being neighbors/masons (daytalk?) and having learned something we don't know, why would they both vote someone they didn't say was scummy before, one after the other, without explanation?
What do you see out of this vote? Allo seems towny to me, but you said he straw-maned RCE? However, you weren't going to vote him because you wanted to vote me, but had second thoughts about putting someone on V/LA at L-1?In post 350, Munchmellow wrote:Yes, there's that.In post 340, Allomancer wrote:Well nothing really's gonna get done with the only wagon being on TGP while TGP is on V/LA, so there's that.
VOTE: AllomancerWhat happened?
This seems to me like another backtrack to me on 324.
In post 358, Lady Angel wrote:Allomancer: 1 (RCEnigma, Munchmellow)
Because I think that you're most likely to be scum, and am not convinced by the current wagons?In post 359, Bambi Jay wrote:Hey Amor, any reason why having your vote still parked on me is a wonderful idea?
Why vote the player with the most posts? If you want activity, doesn't it make sense to vote the player with the least posts?In post 357, Robert2424 wrote:Nothing has changed, I want activity. Nobody willing to do something, so I vote for the person with the most posts in the game.
This made no sense. brassherald's previous post was asking me about the whole miscommunication about TGP being V/LA.In post 345, Robert2424 wrote:This is Painful, if you want something done, do it yourself.
Vote Brass
He never answered this either.In post 347, Amor wrote:You two have only mentioned having light suspicion of Brass before -- is there something that made you more certain?
After some a response of "No, not really"In post 369, Robert2424 wrote:Allot fails to realize what I want. I want a activity. I want people to post. Is it working? I would guess so compared to earlier.
As I've stated before, besides Bambi, I think Munch and Brass are the most suspicious. Everyone else seems like town overthinking things. I would question why you're so focused on activity when the deadline is tomorrow.In post 363, Robert2424 wrote:@Amor, then what are your thoughts on everyone else, including me.
And, I just realized it is not a timer.In post 372, brassherald wrote:@mod your timer is wrong.
I thought we had nearly 3 days since I was reading the timer
Does it bother you at all that, as you pointed out, the deadline is tomorrow and a mislynch is statistically better than a no lynch day 1 yet you remain on a vanity wagon?In post 371, Amor wrote:As I've stated before, besides Bambi, I think Munch and Brass are the most suspicious. Everyone else seems like town overthinking things. I would question why you're so focused on activity when the deadline is tomorrow.In post 363, Robert2424 wrote:@Amor, then what are your thoughts on everyone else, including me.
As for the case on Allo, I'm not sure I buy it. It seems like scum would have tried to jump on at least one of those wagons.