smhinsomnia wrote:I’m not talking with people that can’t read
intentionally avoids answering questions ://///insomnia wrote:This is scum for trying to keep mislynch bait later on in the game, take notesIn post 307, Enigma wrote:1. are you calling me/vizzy scum?In post 306, insomnia wrote:Logic : Get rid of one of the most active players, easily readable, can point out to scum buddies (Fuck yeah)
Get rid of one of the, if not THE one who has the lowest activity, has a lynch pool of 6 people, has 5 posts, votes for a no lynch then hops on suspicious people without giving content (Fuck no fam what are you, crazy?)
2. do you think you are easily readable? or acting townie this game?
3. what does lynching an inactive slot achieve in terms of next day scum hunting?
where did this read come from?insomnia wrote:YM if you vote enigma I'm keeping you alive for today
did you think that they could not be scum together? (this is based off of the idea that you would not kill YM if e voted enigma)In post 363, insomnia wrote:I sure like me some people that defend ObVtOwN like me, skitter’s good to keep around
Lynch pool for today is YM / Enigma.
Enigma, I’m a mechanical player. Your justification makes no sense. Mine does. OwO
are you saying that enigma is scum for intentionally going against the grain to look townie? how do you know that he doesn't actually just feel that way? (i assume you're talking about the thing where he gave 3 reasons to not vote ym)In post 364, insomnia wrote:Enigma looks like he’s trying to get massive town points for defending someone that shouldn’t even be defended
Vig/cop enigma - this is a good use of cop check / vig shot, as opposed to that Ym shit you are pulling off
In post 701, Invisibility wrote:i did some more of the catch up
I'll be honest I haven't felt like what you're doing is...useful.In post 702, Invisibility wrote:or reread or whatever
kjkikjijiljlknjhgfruyhjIn post 706, Elbirn wrote:In post 701, Invisibility wrote:i did some more of the catch upI'll be honest I haven't felt like what you're doing is...useful.In post 702, Invisibility wrote:or reread or whatever
Can you at least do this with Skitter/ofrhz flips in mind?
In post 705, Invisibility wrote:what are the baezu skitter associatives
this doesnt feel partneryIn post 454, insomnia wrote:I’m trusting skitter because she defended me
I have soft spots for people that rub my back
Let me know when you’re online skitter and let’s game solve
what the heckIn post 488, insomnia wrote:If you defend Ym, then yeah, you can get lynched as wellOh you’re gonna love my posting then. Does this make me scum too?
yeh but its so blatantly not partnery that i worryIn post 717, Invisibility wrote:this doesnt feel partneryIn post 454, insomnia wrote:I’m trusting skitter because she defended me
I have soft spots for people that rub my back
Let me know when you’re online skitter and let’s game solve
Maria is really scummy anyway and I scum read her as well btwIn post 719, Invisibility wrote:what the heckIn post 488, insomnia wrote:If you defend Ym, then yeah, you can get lynched as wellOh you’re gonna love my posting then. Does this make me scum too?