I'll spend the game drunk then.In post 198, Titus wrote:ConManMick, the nights I will be drunk will be random. That being said, trying to think exactly like me is hard to do in either state.
It's gonna be a long month... At least the game is 2077
I'll spend the game drunk then.In post 198, Titus wrote:ConManMick, the nights I will be drunk will be random. That being said, trying to think exactly like me is hard to do in either state.
A lot of the arguments here are based on meta, and I haven't played with most of these people, so I'm at a bit of a disadvantage. With that said, opening by claiming a role like that seems really fishy, especially if you've done it in the past as scum. None of mastina's posts since then have sounded at all towny, in fact most have sounded extraordinarily scummy.
The above still stands true and is the reason why I haven't gone too much into it. It's not "playing those cards close to my chest", it's just something I don't think I have to go into yet until he contributes more. I can go into it into more detail though.In post 133, RAS wrote:I dislike Creature's opening posts and find them forced. It's based on fairly flimsy reasoning considering what he's contributed so far, and something I'd rather not go into.
Why? Things can change. She was upset for multiple reasons after, one including feeling like I wasn’t doing anything.In post 206, RAS wrote:Just some quick thoughts regarding this whole Nancy thing.
Nancy's frustration level here don't make any sense for someone who was excited to be in this game; 106/107. Tonally, it's not even remotely natural, and the way she handled Roster's vote just feels forced to me. I'm not valuing the fact that she's replacing out into any of this since it's her initial reaction to the vote that bothers me the most.
I still believe that Creature is scum, but I'm more content placing my vote here because of the above.
VOTE: RX.
In post 122, Titus wrote:VOTE: Rx Strange BrewIn post 112, Rx Strange Brew wrote:I don’t vote without a reason unless it’s to prevent a no lynch, so you’re asking the wrong person.In post 111, rosterfoster wrote:Do you have a better one?
A player refusing to be VCA read. Well it's a good policy lynch.
I think 100 could be read as a lack of comprehension of the discussion to that point, imo. I can see where you're coming from though. I need to re-read re: your comment on 104 thoughRAS wrote:The above still stands true and is the reason why I haven't gone too much into it. It's not "playing those cards close to my chest", it's just something I don't think I have to go into yet until he contributes more. I can go into it into more detail though.In post 133, RAS wrote:I dislike Creature's opening posts and find them forced. It's based on fairly flimsy reasoning considering what he's contributed so far, and something I'd rather not go into.
I think 100 is a poor attempt to throw away what was a legit discussion with the whole Mastina thing. There are a lot of reasons why it was still discussed, and I find it odd why someone would question why it's still being discussed. It basically got the game going, and is still the main topic of discussion.
104 is flat-out false considering how many people brought up in this game that Town!Mastina doesn't do this. It feels like such a lazy read when there were a lot of discussions before this. I don't believe that the only read he got from the previous pages is Town!Mastina.
Sheep me. Mastina has a tendency to tunnel town me.
Piggybacking on this, Nancy’s reaction ONLY makes sense for someone excited for this game.In post 206, RAS wrote:Just some quick thoughts regarding this whole Nancy thing.
Nancy's frustration level here don't make any sense for someone who was excited to be in this game; 106/107. Tonally, it's not even remotely natural, and the way she handled Roster's vote just feels forced to me. I'm not valuing the fact that she's replacing out into any of this since it's her initial reaction to the vote that bothers me the most.
I still believe that Creature is scum, but I'm more content placing my vote here because of the above.
VOTE: RX.
No. If I'm excited about something, I'm not going to throw it away because one unfortunate event happened. A simple vote made her completely snap out of this game, and I don't think that's a natural thought process at all. The wagon wasn't "hard" at all, that's a bit of a stretch.In post 217, Flavor Leaf wrote:Piggybacking on this, Nancy’s reaction ONLY makes sense for someone excited for this game.
She got upset because one, Rosterfoster, two, I hadn’t responded to her in a bit because I was out of town and sorta forgot the pass to Strange Bree, three, she was excited for this game and she got hard wagoner.
That is classic Nancy. How does that not make sense? This seems projecty.
YOU are not going to, sure.In post 218, RAS wrote:No. If I'm excited about something, I'm not going to throw it away because one unfortunate event happened. A simple vote made her completely snap out of this game, and I don't think that's a natural thought process at all. The wagon wasn't "hard" at all, that's a bit of a stretch.In post 217, Flavor Leaf wrote:Piggybacking on this, Nancy’s reaction ONLY makes sense for someone excited for this game.
She got upset because one, Rosterfoster, two, I hadn’t responded to her in a bit because I was out of town and sorta forgot the pass to Strange Bree, three, she was excited for this game and she got hard wagoner.
That is classic Nancy. How does that not make sense? This seems projecty.
It doesn't make sense to me that someone would flip out this much over something so small.
Random tbh. I am equally drunk as town or scum. Alignment does not impact BAC. I frequently play both alignments simultaneously too.In post 203, Nero Cain wrote:but how many times has drunk Titus been scum Titus?
Millers claim post 1. If you change another's role, you must at least hint at it, no matter how obscurely.In post 205, ConManMick wrote:That's very fair. I'm also not really fond of meta reads in general because in the past I've personally deliberately played to avoid having consistent meta myself, so I don't consider it reliable, and people borderline use it for trust tells.
However in this case: were the role replaced with a miller role, wouldn't you think it fair to claim out the gates?