Mini 2243: Chromatic Ascension || Game Over!
- Knight Daffodil
-
Knight Daffodil Goon
- Knight Daffodil
- Knight Daffodil
-
Knight Daffodil Goon
- Knight Daffodil
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: October 1, 2021
- Knight Indigo
-
Knight Indigo Goon
- Knight Indigo
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 235
- Joined: October 1, 2021
Can you tell me why? That’s why I’m concerned about Daffodil/Rainbow leaving because I know that not all three of Daffodil/Rainbow/Rose can be town anymore.In post 1020, Knight Crimson wrote:I honestly don't townread Rose at all.
If I can be convinced we’re not the T - T couple, I’ll be more than happy to leave.AKNIGHT.COOL- Knight Daffodil
-
Knight Daffodil Goon
- Knight Daffodil
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: October 1, 2021
- Knight Indigo
-
Knight Indigo Goon
- Knight Indigo
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 235
- Joined: October 1, 2021
We’re not.In post 1023, Knight Crimson wrote:That's definitely viable although I think personally I'd pair up with my scumbuddy since having three scum alive is still really good for scum
Rose is like not towny at all but I've said that about Magenta and original Indigo
I can tell you that I believe Lav is townier than Rose though. From the sounds of it there aren't PT contributions by Rose to change my mind on that, either.
Lav's behaviour in my PT is an extremely strong indictator the team isn't Rose/Lav. Daff/Rainbow S/S would be a really impressive showing of distancing by the both of you. Also I don't really know why you two would want to pair up to each other just to suspect each other anyway.
God I just want an easy way to know Indigo/Rose isn't S/SAKNIGHT.COOL- Knight Daffodil
-
Knight Daffodil Goon
- Knight Daffodil
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: October 1, 2021
- Knight Indigo
-
Knight Indigo Goon
- Knight Indigo
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 235
- Joined: October 1, 2021
Can we not rush this? I will leave if I can be convinced. Promise.
AKNIGHT.COOL- Knight Daffodil
-
Knight Daffodil Goon
- Knight Daffodil
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: October 1, 2021
- Knight Indigo
-
Knight Indigo Goon
- Knight Indigo
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 235
- Joined: October 1, 2021
You think, Beige, Rose and Lav?In post 1030, Knight Daffodil wrote:Oh well in that case pack it up we solved it
Well I have trouble seeing why either scum!you and/or scum!Rainbow wanted to lim Beige over Lavender for the SvS thing, so that’s the main thing that concerned me about Rose.
Anyway, if Rose is the consensus, then please let me leave. I still don’t understand why Crimson trs Lavender but it’s possible if one of you/Rainbow is scum, then it’s them.
I think that scum wouldn’t push for Beige over Lavender and there are strong Beige/Lavender associatives, wich is why I think Crimson could be wrong. It’s also possible that Beige pocketed Lavender but fmpov, pushing Beige is pro-town, so I think you’re the T-T couple most likely.
I think that the both Lavender and Rose wanted the other one limmed over Beige yesterday which deprived us of info about Beige/Chartreuse and the SvS theory. Well so did Chartreuse but it’s completely understandable from her end.
I’m still more confident on Lavender than Rose, so I think it’s safer but I’m willing to hear why Rose is a better lim today?AKNIGHT.COOL- Knight Indigo
-
Knight Indigo Goon
- Knight Indigo
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 235
- Joined: October 1, 2021
How about if Rose is the consensus, I leave before hammer then? I would just really prefer to leave.In post 1032, Knight Daffodil wrote:Sure. UNVOTE:
I would rather resolve it with votes than leaving, though. I want to make scum cast votes for me to read them on.AKNIGHT.COOL- Knight Daffodil
-
Knight Daffodil Goon
- Knight Daffodil
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 111
- Joined: October 1, 2021
- Knight Crimson
-
Knight Crimson Goon
- Knight Crimson
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 187
- Joined: October 1, 2021
What if youIn post 1035, Knight Daffodil wrote:It's fine I guess. I wish we'd just done the whole game via votes to force players to commit to reads, but the ship has sailed I suppose.
Wanted to play a game of mafia
But Knight Azure saidAKNIGHT.WARM- Knight Indigo
-
Knight Indigo Goon
- Knight Indigo
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 235
- Joined: October 1, 2021
Especially with Azure/Burgundy.In post 1035, Knight Daffodil wrote:It's fine I guess. I wish we'd just done the whole game via votes to force players to commit to reads, but the ship has sailed I suppose.AKNIGHT.COOL- Knight Crimson
-
Knight Crimson Goon
- Knight Crimson
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 187
- Joined: October 1, 2021
@Indigo
Lavender had a meltdown in my PT about how we were doomed to lose because I trusted your pair over her and generally gave off a sense I was writing her off as town.
If your pair contains scum (aka Rose), why does scum!Lavender care that I do not trust her? Lav's behaviour was that of someone who needed me to trust them in order to win. Which is not true of a Lav/Rose team. If Lav had just done absolutely nothing she would have won. But instead she got a on a voice-to-text convo with me that lasted for three pages. It was very heartbreaking for me that I upset her.
It's not Rose/Lav. If it's Rose/Lav then Lavender worked me for absolutely no reason when she was going to win anyway.AKNIGHT.WARM- Knight Crimson
-
Knight Crimson Goon
- Knight Crimson
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 187
- Joined: October 1, 2021
Yeah I can elaborate. Rose has the most barren ISO of any current living player. This is obviously partially because she hasn't quite been around, but it doesn't help.In post 1027, Knight Indigo wrote:
Can you tell me why? That’s why I’m concerned about Daffodil/Rainbow leaving because I know that not all three of Daffodil/Rainbow/Rose can be town anymore.In post 1020, Knight Crimson wrote:I honestly don't townread Rose at all.
If I can be convinced we’re not the T - T couple, I’ll be more than happy to leave.
Her reads seem more or less not founded in much -- she came into today with a "I want the town in Rainbow/Daff to leave!" ... yet, she has no previously stated opinions on that pair really.
Some of her posts are kinda nothing and not important nor hard for scum to fake:
Like TBH I don't think this is that important of a talking pointIn post 838, Knight Rose wrote:I think a big question is what purpose we think Rainbow's role is. The flavor sort of treats Rainbow as town (but tbf everyone is town in flavor). Idk I wonder what y'all think.
Also, I think lack of motivation might be more townie than not. Scum should probably have a lot of energy at this point which is why I'm still sort of lean town on Daffodil. My "secret" day one thought was that it was cool that all the flowers were town. That also makes me not as big of a fan wrt Chart's recent words towards Daffodil.
When she does give opinions it's like this:In post 837, Knight Rose wrote:@Chartreuse
Probably everyone except for maybe Crimson?
Well, we are in a sort of endgame right now. I definitely think that plays a factor into things. Everyone here (except for maybe me/Indigo) was viewed as townie before, but that can't be true now so it makes sense that you are null.In post 835, Knight Beige wrote:I thought I was pretty widely townread yesterday but everyone seems to have me at null or scum. Did I misinterpret or was there a big reads shift?
Do you think anyone is scummy for shifting you down in their reads?In post 841, Knight Rose wrote:Lol I thought Lavender-Rainbow was w-w, but I think they take the reads thing further as scum buddies. idkIn post 945, Knight Rose wrote:Chartreuse
I'm pretty sure Indigo is town at this point because the interactions with Beige look fine, so it's just a question of whether there is a S/S pairing.
No way scum Indigo randomly shows interest towards scum Beige right...
No conclusions. It's just a "I sort of lean this way but I might be wrong" every single time.In post 949, Knight Rose wrote:I think/thought you're probably town, so I would like whoever is town between Daffodil and Rainbow to leave. Umm I also think I might be too impatient rn. We can talk this out.
Also she apparently was okay with eliminating every single player except for me, lol.
I don't think she's genuinely really trying to solve you. She's shown like no concern about your alignment except for when I pointed out a question of my own:In post 948, Knight Rose wrote:
I haven't really done much in the PT tbh. Idk why Indigo thinks I have been super solvely lolIn post 947, Knight Crimson wrote:Rose, out of curiosity, how have your interactions with Indigo been? Is it just the Beige interactions that make you lean town there?
Beige interactions look pretty good on Indigo, but the tone + postcount also seems pretty clean?
Also.. them not bothering to use your PT much is not doing many favours when both my/Lav's PT and Rainbow/Daff's PTs are being huge barriers for all of us to scumread our partners.In post 1012, Knight Rose wrote:That's something I brought up before, and I think that's a valid question for Indigo to answer.
That's probably my working thoughts on Rose.AKNIGHT.WARM- Knight Crimson
-
Knight Crimson Goon
- Knight Crimson
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 187
- Joined: October 1, 2021
- Knight Crimson
-
Knight Crimson Goon
- Knight Crimson
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 187
- Joined: October 1, 2021
This game gives me stress headachesIn post 1028, Knight Daffodil wrote:Usually when games are this hard it means I'm having fun, but this one is honestly just plain stressful. No fault of anyone's.AKNIGHT.WARM- Knight Indigo
-
Knight Indigo Goon
- Knight Indigo
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 235
- Joined: October 1, 2021
This post is anti-associative with Rainbow. Sounds like Beige is annoyed by this.In post 831, Knight Beige wrote:
Why does that matter?In post 828, The Rainbow Knight wrote:How does it make sense to be Rose - Indigo? Rose wasn't even trying to pair with Indigo at the end?AKNIGHT.COOL- Knight Crimson
-
Knight Crimson Goon
- Knight Crimson
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 187
- Joined: October 1, 2021
- Knight Indigo
-
Knight Indigo Goon
- Knight Indigo
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 235
- Joined: October 1, 2021
If the T - T team is Daffodil/Rainbow, then she loses, doesn’t she?In post 1038, Knight Crimson wrote:@Indigo
Lavender had a meltdown in my PT about how we were doomed to lose because I trusted your pair over her and generally gave off a sense I was writing her off as town.
If your pair contains scum (aka Rose), why does scum!Lavender care that I do not trust her? Lav's behaviour was that of someone who needed me to trust them in order to win. Which is not true of a Lav/Rose team. If Lav had just done absolutely nothing she would have won. But instead she got a on a voice-to-text convo with me that lasted for three pages. It was very heartbreaking for me that I upset her.
It's not Rose/Lav. If it's Rose/Lav then Lavender worked me for absolutely no reason when she was going to win anyway.AKNIGHT.COOL- Knight Crimson
-
Knight Crimson Goon
- Knight Crimson
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 187
- Joined: October 1, 2021
I cannot for the life of me understand the nightkill either.In post 1026, Knight Daffodil wrote:It's so hard to wrap my head around the nightkill from this angle, but what else am I to do. I can't play the whole rest of the game (well, I could if it's only a few minutes) worrying about that or I might as well just leave.
Let's say all this is correct:
-Knight SeafoamKnight Marigold
- Knight LavenderKnight Crimson
Knight Daffodil- The Rainbow Knight
Knight Indigo-Knight Rose
-Knight ChartreuseKnight Beige
What is the benefit from killing Seafoam/Mari over one of our pairs? I cannot figure it out. I'm banking on that I just don't have the information to understand. That or they made a mistake.AKNIGHT.WARM- Knight Crimson
-
Knight Crimson Goon
- Knight Crimson
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 187
- Joined: October 1, 2021
No because I believed that the T-T team was Rose/Indigo. I was fully prepared to end the game on you two being the last aliveIn post 1044, Knight Indigo wrote:
If the T - T team is Daffodil/Rainbow, then she loses, doesn’t she?In post 1038, Knight Crimson wrote:@Indigo
Lavender had a meltdown in my PT about how we were doomed to lose because I trusted your pair over her and generally gave off a sense I was writing her off as town.
If your pair contains scum (aka Rose), why does scum!Lavender care that I do not trust her? Lav's behaviour was that of someone who needed me to trust them in order to win. Which is not true of a Lav/Rose team. If Lav had just done absolutely nothing she would have won. But instead she got a on a voice-to-text convo with me that lasted for three pages. It was very heartbreaking for me that I upset her.
It's not Rose/Lav. If it's Rose/Lav then Lavender worked me for absolutely no reason when she was going to win anyway.In post 851, Knight Crimson wrote:*This* close to saying yolo and having Rose/Indigo endgame.
Nah, just kidding, Azure was a good reminder of why that doesn't work.AKNIGHT.WARM- Knight Indigo
-
Knight Indigo Goon
- Knight Indigo
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 235
- Joined: October 1, 2021
It’s anti-associative for Rainbow because Beige sounds irritated at her question.In post 1043, Knight Crimson wrote:Seems more anti-associative for Rainbow/Lav to me.
How is it anti-associative for Lav?AKNIGHT.COOL- Knight Crimson
-
Knight Crimson Goon
- Knight Crimson
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 187
- Joined: October 1, 2021
- Knight Crimson
-
Knight Crimson Goon
- Knight Crimson
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 187
- Joined: October 1, 2021
Rainbow posed that question to Lav, not Beige. Why would Beige be irritated?In post 1047, Knight Indigo wrote:
It’s anti-associative for Rainbow because Beige sounds irritated at her question.In post 1043, Knight Crimson wrote:Seems more anti-associative for Rainbow/Lav to me.
How is it anti-associative for Lav?AKNIGHT.WARM - Knight Crimson
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Knight Crimson
- Knight Indigo
- Knight Crimson
- Knight Crimson
- Knight Indigo
- Knight Crimson
- Knight Indigo
- Knight Crimson
- Knight Crimson
- Knight Crimson
- Knight Crimson
- Knight Indigo
- Knight Crimson
- Knight Daffodil
- Knight Indigo
- Knight Indigo
- Knight Daffodil
- Knight Indigo
- Knight Daffodil
- Knight Indigo
- Knight Daffodil
- Knight Indigo
- Knight Daffodil