Grand Idea GPick [Game Over]

TrueSoulEnergy · Post Post #850 (ISO) » Thu May 28, 2020 7:37 pm

In post 849, Two Girls One Vote wrote:
In post 848, Iconeum wrote:interesting timing to start doing stuff after just being called out for not doing anything all game despite there being 2 of you
You'd prefer we went back to lurking? Also, thats rich coming from someone with a post count even lower than ours.

I take back what i said about TSE being scum. being a scummy person is different. As a scummy person myself, I would like to express sincere regret for scumreading you. We believe and stand with TSE!

do we want to waste a hoctac investigation on quick's VT fake-claim?

-the money

Great is your vote on Farside?
Because I’d prefer that to be the lynch today.

Iconeum · Post Post #851 (ISO) » Thu May 28, 2020 7:39 pm

big difference between number of posts and content, girls

ManateeDude · Post Post #852 (ISO) » Thu May 28, 2020 8:24 pm

In post 841, Chateau Lobby wrote:@Manateedude

How many successful wagons on scum have you started? Can you please point to examples.

I havent played in a very long time as I've said and before that my wim was slowly dropping. Possibly zero but you gotta start somewhere

Iconeum · Post Post #853 (ISO) » Thu May 28, 2020 8:38 pm

In post 849, Two Girls One Vote wrote:
In post 848, Iconeum wrote:interesting timing to start doing stuff after just being called out for not doing anything all game despite there being 2 of you
You'd prefer we went back to lurking? Also, thats rich coming from someone with a post count even lower than ours.

I take back what i said about TSE being scum. being a scummy person is different. As a scummy person myself, I would like to express sincere regret for scumreading you. We believe and stand with TSE!

do we want to waste a hoctac investigation on quick's VT fake-claim?

-the money

holy shit this is such a dishonest take on just about everything i said

-calling me out for having fewer posts, but not mentioning that you only surpassed my number of posts AFTER I called you out and you started spamming?

-threatening to go back to lurking = admitting you were actually lurking, which in my book = claiming scum (or in this game, at the very least Not Town). Any reason you were lurking?

-you change your mind about TSE with information that was always available. why did you choose to backtrack? too much heat?

-MORE VOTES ON THIS PLEASE - CHOOOOCHOOO

Chateau Lobby · Post Post #854 (ISO) » Thu May 28, 2020 9:38 pm

In post 852, ManateeDude wrote:
In post 841, Chateau Lobby wrote:@Manateedude

How many successful wagons on scum have you started? Can you please point to examples.
I havent played in a very long time as I've said and before that my wim was slowly dropping. Possibly zero but you gotta start somewhere

I think and I mean no disrespect, but confbias seems to be fueling your read on me.

Iconeum · Post Post #855 (ISO) » Thu May 28, 2020 11:27 pm

weekend vla - extended to include Monday because holidy

ISO · Post Post #856 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 3:24 am

In post 849, Two Girls One Vote wrote:
In post 848, Iconeum wrote:interesting timing to start doing stuff after just being called out for not doing anything all game despite there being 2 of you
You'd prefer we went back to lurking? Also, thats rich coming from someone with a post count even lower than ours.

I take back what i said about TSE being scum. being a scummy person is different. As a scummy person myself, I would like to express sincere regret for scumreading you. We believe and stand with TSE!

do we want to waste a hoctac investigation on quick's VT fake-claim?

-the money

More votes on Two Votes please.

---
TrueSoulEnergy is probably town based on his claim and interactions involving that claim, but his reads this game aren't very good.

Chateau Lobby · Post Post #857 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 4:11 am

VOTE: Two Girls One Vote

TrueSoulEnergy · Post Post #858 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 4:26 am

In post 856, Ircher wrote:
In post 849, Two Girls One Vote wrote:
In post 848, Iconeum wrote:interesting timing to start doing stuff after just being called out for not doing anything all game despite there being 2 of you
You'd prefer we went back to lurking? Also, thats rich coming from someone with a post count even lower than ours.

I take back what i said about TSE being scum. being a scummy person is different. As a scummy person myself, I would like to express sincere regret for scumreading you. We believe and stand with TSE!

do we want to waste a hoctac investigation on quick's VT fake-claim?

-the money

More votes on Two Votes please.

---
TrueSoulEnergy is probably town based on his claim and interactions involving that claim, but his reads this game aren't very good.

Farside is Scum.

ISO · Post Post #859 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 4:39 am

I don't think so. Even if they are, I think Two Girls is a much better vote; we can always save farside for tomorrow.

TrueSoulEnergy · Post Post #860 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 4:52 am

In post 859, Ircher wrote:I don't think so. Even if they are, I think Two Girls is a much better vote; we can always save farside for tomorrow.

You said that last game and we lost.

Quick · Post Post #861 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 4:58 am

In post 859, Ircher wrote:I don't think so. Even if they are, I think Two Girls is a much better vote; we can always save farside for tomorrow.

Still? Why? I thought they were Scum for lurking? Now they are Still Scum after posting?

ISO · Post Post #862 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 5:20 am

In post 860, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:
In post 859, Ircher wrote:I don't think so. Even if they are, I think Two Girls is a much better vote; we can always save farside for tomorrow.
You said that last game and we lost.

1) Your reads were not on-point there.
2) I have very little control over who other people vote, and I can't stop quickhammering scum.
3) This isn't a valid counterpoint anyway.

In post 861, Quick wrote:
In post 859, Ircher wrote:I don't think so. Even if they are, I think Two Girls is a much better vote; we can always save farside for tomorrow.
Still? Why? I thought they were Scum for lurking? Now they are Still Scum after posting?

Since when has farside22 been lurking????????????

TrueSoulEnergy · Post Post #863 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 5:40 am

In post 862, Ircher wrote:
In post 860, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:
In post 859, Ircher wrote:I don't think so. Even if they are, I think Two Girls is a much better vote; we can always save farside for tomorrow.
You said that last game and we lost.
1) Your reads were not on-point there.
2) I have very little control over who other people vote, and I can't stop quickhammering scum.
3) This isn't a valid counterpoint anyway.
In post 861, Quick wrote:
In post 859, Ircher wrote:I don't think so. Even if they are, I think Two Girls is a much better vote; we can always save farside for tomorrow.
Still? Why? I thought they were Scum for lurking? Now they are Still Scum after posting?
Since when has farside22 been lurking????????????

2/4 of my scum reads were accurate.

Titus · Post Post #864 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 5:41 am

VOTE: Two Girls One Vote

TrueSoulEnergy · Post Post #865 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 5:49 am

I think Titus and Farside are scum.

Quick · Post Post #866 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 5:53 am

In post 864, Titus wrote:VOTE: Two Girls One Vote

For what reason? Do tell Titus.

ISO · Post Post #867 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 5:54 am

Why are you defending Two Girlsrn Quick?

Quick · Post Post #868 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 5:57 am

In post 867, Ircher wrote:Why are you defending Two Girlsrn Quick?

Because the reasons for thinking they are Scum have evaporated yet people still want to lynch there? It's not smart play.

Titus · Post Post #869 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 5:59 am

In post 866, Quick wrote:
In post 864, Titus wrote:VOTE: Two Girls One Vote
For what reason? Do tell Titus.

Two Girls only seems to be here when pressured. I don't find anything they say memorable.
The people defending Two Girls I have as suspects for being a third party or scum themselves.
I townread the people pushing Two Girls.

TrueSoulEnergy · Post Post #870 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 6:08 am

In post 868, Quick wrote:
In post 867, Ircher wrote:Why are you defending Two Girlsrn Quick?
Because the reasons for thinking they are Scum have evaporated yet people still want to lynch there? It's not smart play.

That’s where scum want to take the “Safe Lynch” and vote there too.

*Cough* Titus *Cough*

Quick · Post Post #871 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 6:17 am

In post 869, Titus wrote:
In post 866, Quick wrote:
In post 864, Titus wrote:VOTE: Two Girls One Vote
For what reason? Do tell Titus.
Two Girls only seems to be here when pressured. I don't find anything they say memorable.
The people defending Two Girls I have as suspects for being a third party or scum themselves.
I townread the people pushing Two Girls.

Okay, that doesn't mean Two Girls is actually Scum though. Guilty by association? You can do better than that.

Titus · Post Post #872 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 6:42 am

In post 871, Quick wrote:
In post 869, Titus wrote:
In post 866, Quick wrote:
In post 864, Titus wrote:VOTE: Two Girls One Vote
For what reason? Do tell Titus.
Two Girls only seems to be here when pressured. I don't find anything they say memorable.
The people defending Two Girls I have as suspects for being a third party or scum themselves.
I townread the people pushing Two Girls.
Okay, that doesn't mean Two Girls is actually Scum though. Guilty by association? You can do better than that.

The first two comments are not "guilt by association". Being present only when pressured and lacking memorable content are not associative indicators.

I am willing to take a backseat when a) I don't have the energy to drive, b) the wagons I want most are vetoed and c) the lynch being pushed isn't bad.

Just don't claim things that aren't true about my play and say I can do better.

Quick · Post Post #873 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 6:47 am

In post 872, Titus wrote:
In post 871, Quick wrote:
In post 869, Titus wrote:
In post 866, Quick wrote:
In post 864, Titus wrote:VOTE: Two Girls One Vote
For what reason? Do tell Titus.
Two Girls only seems to be here when pressured. I don't find anything they say memorable.
The people defending Two Girls I have as suspects for being a third party or scum themselves.
I townread the people pushing Two Girls.
Okay, that doesn't mean Two Girls is actually Scum though. Guilty by association? You can do better than that.
The first two comments are not "guilt by association". Being present only when pressured and lacking memorable content are not associative indicators.

I am willing to take a backseat when a) I don't have the energy to drive, b) the wagons I want most are vetoed and c) the lynch being pushed isn't bad.

Just don't claim things that aren't true about my play and say I can do better.

Points 2 and 3 are very much similar in nature and are a guilty by association read. Plus, you saying you have no incentive to play when things are going your way is lazy and not what I expect from your Town game.

Titus · Post Post #874 (ISO) » Fri May 29, 2020 7:02 am

I admitted 2 and 3 are association reads. Alone, they wouldn't be sufficient. It's those combined with point 1. All of them are reasons to vote Two Girls.

Also, I am clearly still playing this game. At no point do I say I am not playing this game. Taking a backseat =/= no incentive to play. I don't have as much energy to actually push through a lynch on BM or you.