No, they didn't. They literally just won the game for town *regardless of whether Rider is scum or not*In post 2524, Servant Alter Ego wrote:I don't see how refusing to vote someone I think is town is anti-town. I refuse to blow another elimination like this. It's just Beast and his posting now makes it obvious he needs to get this through to win.Assassin fucked up.
In post 2233, Servant Assassin wrote:I have a 1-shot announcing fruit vender ability that I haven't used only because doing so would make it obvious which servant I was if anyone did a little lore digging, and I couldn't figure out a good use for this, but I'll use it tonight for kicks I guess.
VOTE: RiderIn post 2537, Servant Rider wrote:Cool, now that it's supposedly auto-win, can I die now?
Okay. I'll revise the plan to account for the possibility of a redirector.In post 2538, Servant Beast wrote:I’m surprised assassin wouldn’t mention this earlier in terms with the solve. It’s a real shame that shielder began the game by mentioning that there was probably redirector and none of the scum flipped redirector.
How. Lmao. How could you overlook this?In post 2545, Servant Assassin wrote:Wow. that's actually brilliant.
I'm embarrassed I didn't think of that.
In post 2543, Servant Beast wrote:Uh, wouldn’t it make more sense to do the opposite? Where they don’t send a fruit out if I am in the pt, and they do if I’m not? Can redirectir redirect to themselves?
I didn't want it to be fruit/no fruit binary in the event of a roleblock. My thoughts went to that instead of a redirect. If we flipped it and went with fruit if you're there, no fruit if you're not, that might be better?In post 2544, Servant Beast wrote:Do they have to target the player that sends the fruit or do they have to guess who the player is they redirected to?
