modify your beliefs about setups based on the setup you're actually playing.
in class so haven't read all of it.
So a couple things. One, Nikk never claimed it was a big scumread on Maki, he wanted an information lynch. I’m not sure if you’re purposely shading him or misread but considering I don’t have much issue with the rest of the post then I’m guessing it’s the latter. Two, the miller claims are too numerous to lynch them all on policy.In post 969, Lady Angel wrote:I don't like the progression of having a "big scumread" on Maki then TRing her four of his posts later.
i can pretend to be lady for a minute if you would likeIn post 974, Chara wrote:Lady forgot to give a read on me. :<
She's not the only one. The whole sequence bothers me.In post 980, Elsa Jay wrote:Bonus points for being the only one to care about Clem denying being my Mason buddy.
Did I not V/LA in this game?In post 980, Elsa Jay wrote:Read all the spoiler tags Lady made and... Wowo. I feel like we hit the goldmine. Bonus points for being the only one to care about Clem denying being my Mason buddy.
It also reminded me that after the events Nikk said "yeah I'm townrrading you for that" and ignored me now. That's still a weird sign in my eyes. The laziest attempt to pocket someone?
"I'm townreading you so I can ignore you now." Kinda thing.
Whoops. I'll blame that on working on that post until absurdly late in the morning.In post 974, Chara wrote:Lady forgot to give a read on me. :<
Millers create a ton of potential wine in lylo/mylo situations. Wouldn't it be better to avoid that? I definitely don't think it's a good idea to lynch them all, since that's five wasted days, but I'm cautious about leading to a situation where we have three people who can't be cleared by investigation near the end of the game.In post 975, Chara wrote:also 100% disagree with every miller dying before endgame. that's a silly rule. atleast3 of the 5 millers are town.
modify your beliefs about setups based on the setup you're actually playing.
in class so haven't read all of it.
the "big scumread" thing was a direct quote, although he did swing back around to Maki with the information lynch idea later... after he voted wisdom for voting Maki then backed off of Wisdom to vote Maki with wisdom.In post 977, Alchemist21 wrote:So a couple things. One, Nikk never claimed it was a big scumread on Maki, he wanted an information lynch. I’m not sure if you’re purposely shading him or misread but considering I don’t have much issue with the rest of the post then I’m guessing it’s the latter. Two, the miller claims are too numerous to lynch them all on policy.In post 969, Lady Angel wrote:I don't like the progression of having a "big scumread" on Maki then TRing her four of his posts later.
Do you keep personal notes on games you play?
What makes you this upset over a null read?In post 972, Firebringer wrote:wow its almost like you give the same shit every game you play with people.In post 969, Lady Angel wrote:His fourth posts is likely a PR softclaim - I don't know why he'd do that early but that + a lack of overall content makes it hard for me to read him at all. Read: True Null
a surprisingly correct joke.In post 979, Firebringer wrote:i can pretend to be lady for a minute if you would likeIn post 974, Chara wrote:Lady forgot to give a read on me. :<
*does best lady impression* "Chara is town because their playstyle is town and I always read into peoples playstyles their alignments".
You have a very odd taste in roles.In post 987, Chara wrote:miller is also one of my favourite roles next to traitor, so i acknowledge i'm biased.
How does that make me scum?In post 969, Lady Angel wrote:The Maki vote was pure bandwagon
How does that make me scum?In post 969, Lady Angel wrote:as was his next vote on Wisdom.
How does that make me scum?In post 969, Lady Angel wrote:Then he defends Maki from Wisdom despite having just voted her.
So? What's your point?In post 969, Lady Angel wrote:and it seemed more brought on by frustration than anything.
How does that make me scum?In post 969, Lady Angel wrote:The wisdom vote also seemed quite random at the end of the iso.
In post 969, Lady Angel wrote:Overall there isn't much to work with here
This is the same reason people were just voting you - it's not a good one, which you said in the same postIn post 969, Lady Angel wrote:and what there is is pinging me enough to suspect him.
Hey look, it's working, they think one of us must be townIn post 975, Chara wrote:at least 3 of the 5 millers are town.
Fair, I retract what I said then.In post 985, Elsa Jay wrote:I didnt see a giant "V/LA" sign on your account, so I forgot you did that,
You think 3 or more millers are scum?In post 995, Creature wrote:Hey look, it's working, they think one of us must be townIn post 975, Chara wrote:at least 3 of the 5 millers are town.
No, it just looks like Captain Obvious considering setup indicates likely three scum (as long Krazy isn't the mod).In post 998, davesaz wrote:You think 3 or more millers are scum?In post 995, Creature wrote:Hey look, it's working, they think one of us must be townIn post 975, Chara wrote:at least 3 of the 5 millers are town.