Sorry- by align I meant 'not mutually exclusive'In post 97, Old Dogs wrote:pedit: our wincons dont align at all (survivor's is to just live) but that doesnt mean we should kill them
~AramisIn post 99, The Three Musketeers wrote:Indeed, also those other slots can flip town too, why that's not a concern to you at all?
ramcius you've played mafia before LMAOIn post 99, The Three Musketeers wrote:Indeed, also those other slots can flip town too, why that's not a concern to you at all?
See, that's the difference between you and me - you want to try lynch scum, I want to eliminate as much lose conditions as I canIn post 102, Old Dogs wrote:ramcius you've played mafia before LMAOIn post 99, The Three Musketeers wrote:Indeed, also those other slots can flip town too, why that's not a concern to you at all?
yes, ofc they can flip town, thats why i said i'd rather take a >0% chance of a scumflip over a 0% chance of a scumflip.
im glad we came full circle
we can vote out the survivor when it's almost lylo and thus an actual lose condition, for now let's take advantage of the extra vote, aight?In post 103, The Three Musketeers wrote:See, that's the difference between you and me - you want to try lynch scum, I want to eliminate as much lose conditions as I can
Considering we have no clue on scum numbers and 3p numbers it's hard to predict, when it will be this "almost LYLO"In post 105, Old Dogs wrote:we can vote out the survivor when it's almost lylo and thus an actual lose condition, for now let's take advantage of the extra vote, aight?In post 103, The Three Musketeers wrote:See, that's the difference between you and me - you want to try lynch scum, I want to eliminate as much lose conditions as I can
18 player game so we should start talking about it after 2 mislynches, and it's happened before in past large games so it can happen here. let's just play the game and let the setup speak for itselfIn post 106, The Three Musketeers wrote:Considering we have no clue on scum numbers and 3p numbers it's hard to predict, when it will be this "almost LYLO"
Also, what chances we have to find all scum before this "almost LYLO" happens in your opinion?
why townhunt when we can scumhuntVorkuta wrote:Can we stop clogging the thread with hypotheticals?
We'll cross that bridge when we get there.
In the meanwhile, let's townhunt instead of discussing when and how best to lynch the survivor (*smh*)
Very bad post.
Very good post.In post 13, YAYVIDEOGAMES wrote:Hi.
I'm a town fakeclaimer.
I win if I get everyone in the game to believe my fakeclaim.
Btw I'm a VT.
Why would you say this?
Old Dogs get my first solid town points.In post 47, Old Dogs wrote:i mean fair but u said you didnt like a post so im equating that to you feeling he's scum - im not really sure why scum specifically is going to go like "I STAN 3rd PARTY ROLES BTW" in bold on a pagetopIn post 38, ElevenThirty wrote:I dont like thr post at the top of this page either, the one addressed to 3ps
is it a not-very-good-post? ya maybe... but like, it just seems like a bad post and not a scummy post to me
Vorkuta wrote:Even if I were "insert party here", I wouldn't actually understand any of the mechanics involved so I'd beIn post 44, ElevenThirty wrote:faking his interestgenuinelyinterested anyway
This is basically where I stand.In post 64, The Three Musketeers wrote:If you're not with us, you're against usIn post 56, Chickadead wrote:We're hard-claiming Survivor.
We've an active ability to help keep us alive. We won't be sharing what that is now.
We've no killing action, and we're not in any PT.
We're not going to out any scum-reads unless scum ever try killing us.
Neutral.
While I can understand your wish to stay neutral, it's not beneficial to us at all and I won't shed a tear, if you get lynched
~Aramis
Our approach will differ based on how this player list approaches us. While we won't be outing reads directly, we will be conversing and giving our thoughts about players when we see fit. It's important to realize that our goal isn't to cause chaos, but more so to ensure that none of our posts brings us closer to being a potential night-kill target. It's possible that our approach changes in the near-future, but this is how we're going to be approaching the game for now. We're not actively playing against town's win condition. We won't be outing any "fake thoughts/reads" about players for the sake of helping our win condition, and we won't be jumping on the popular wagon if we disagree with it.In post 112, Chickadee wrote:@chickadead - if you don't plan on sharing reads, but do plan on being useful, how exactly are you going to go about that? Who do you decide to press for info? How do you go about it without ensuing chaos? Pointing out scummy things and pressing people is just another degree of sharing reads. I get that you're trying to play to your wincon, but I'm unsure about the logistics of not sharing any reads and still playing the game. Sorry if this has been discussed. I did legitimately read the first few pages, and then when it just devolved into wordy posts about the survivor role, I glossed over.
You've uuhh read the description of this game yes?In post 111, Old Dogs wrote:single, hardclaimed survivor is not multiball
hooh, what happened to staying our of it?In post 112, Chickadee wrote:Very bad post.Very good post.In post 13, YAYVIDEOGAMES wrote:Hi.
I'm a town fakeclaimer.
I win if I get everyone in the game to believe my fakeclaim.
Btw I'm a VT.Why would you say this?Old Dogs get my first solid town points.In post 47, Old Dogs wrote:i mean fair but u said you didnt like a post so im equating that to you feeling he's scum - im not really sure why scum specifically is going to go like "I STAN 3rd PARTY ROLES BTW" in bold on a pagetopIn post 38, ElevenThirty wrote:I dont like thr post at the top of this page either, the one addressed to 3ps
is it a not-very-good-post? ya maybe... but like, it just seems like a bad post and not a scummy post to me
Vorkuta wrote:Even if I were "insert party here", I wouldn't actually understand any of the mechanics involved so I'd beIn post 44, ElevenThirty wrote:faking his interestgenuinelyinterested anywayThis is basically where I stand.In post 64, The Three Musketeers wrote:If you're not with us, you're against usIn post 56, Chickadead wrote:We're hard-claiming Survivor.
We've an active ability to help keep us alive. We won't be sharing what that is now.
We've no killing action, and we're not in any PT.
We're not going to out any scum-reads unless scum ever try killing us.
Neutral.
While I can understand your wish to stay neutral, it's not beneficial to us at all and I won't shed a tear, if you get lynched
~Aramis
@chickadead - if you don't plan on sharing reads, but do plan on being useful, how exactly are you going to go about that? Who do you decide to press for info? How do you go about it without ensuing chaos? Pointing out scummy things and pressing people is just another degree of sharing reads. I get that you're trying to play to your wincon, but I'm unsure about the logistics of not sharing any reads and still playing the game. Sorry if this has been discussed. I did legitimately read the first few pages, and then when it just devolved into wordy posts about the survivor role, I glossed over.
Also @everyone - Without claiming anything, does anyone have any sort of information about potentially activating the muted players?
How about also ensuring that none of your posts brings you closer to being a potential lynch too?In post 115, Chickadead wrote:Our approach will differ based on how this player list approaches us. While we won't be outing reads directly, we will be conversing and giving our thoughts about players when we see fit. It's important to realize that our goal isn't to cause chaos, but more so toIn post 112, Chickadee wrote:@chickadead - if you don't plan on sharing reads, but do plan on being useful, how exactly are you going to go about that? Who do you decide to press for info? How do you go about it without ensuing chaos? Pointing out scummy things and pressing people is just another degree of sharing reads. I get that you're trying to play to your wincon, but I'm unsure about the logistics of not sharing any reads and still playing the game. Sorry if this has been discussed. I did legitimately read the first few pages, and then when it just devolved into wordy posts about the survivor role, I glossed over.ensure that none of our posts brings us closer to being a potential night-kill target. It's possible that our approach changes in the near-future, but this is how we're going to be approaching the game for now. We're not actively playing against town's win condition. We won't be outing any "fake thoughts/reads" about players for the sake of helping our win condition, and we won't be jumping on the popular wagon if we disagree with it.