I love the 90's Cartoon Mafia - replacement / spectate

MattP · Post Post #129 (isolation #0) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:14 am

Say a player break the rule and post too many times in one day? Will they be modkilled?

MattP · Post Post #131 (isolation #1) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:42 am

I think it's so fair and I will be keeping out a special eye for you.

/in

MattP · Post Post #133 (isolation #2) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:51 am

Eh, I'm hoping by that point I won't have to worry about the 30 post rule anyway hehe

MattP · Post Post #136 (isolation #3) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:04 am

When did he state he did it because of you? If you don't like the rule there are other games you can join.

MattP · Post Post #144 (isolation #4) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:15 am

I propose that you:

a) draft up an amendment to the Constitution that has been proposed and go through ~2 years of judicial processing to see whether it merits amending

b) accept the rule

c) replace

?

MattP · Post Post #150 (isolation #5) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:26 am

Your reasoning relies on people thinking they will have to be checking how many posts they've made a day and that being a hassle, when the host understands that part of making a rule where you have to only make 30 posts you, in turn, have to check that you make 30 posts.

That's like saying that a 30mph speed limit is bad because you have to look at your speedometer to make sure you're going 30mph.

Additionally, if you think you can't do 30 posts a day then condense your posts. If you think that's impossible, then the majority of the forum disagrees with you, and therefore the rule should stay.

In response to you telling me what I said makes no sense, here is my response: Please reread my post more slowly and really let it marinate.

MattP · Post Post #177 (isolation #6) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:22 am

Baby more than anyone else gets attacked for her correct views , it's been proven.

MattP · Post Post #191 (isolation #7) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:46 am

Unless far says she outright did this because of you baby that's incredibly rude of you to assume and you are being hypocritical by bullying on her for a mod decision in the same way you say everyone bullies on you. So cut out that argument.

MattP · Post Post #208 (isolation #8) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:18 am

In post 206, BabyBlue wrote:No. Because this is cruel and wrong. I've been struggling to be accepted, and then a host with a grudge makes a rule like this. I CAN'T play the game like this. Posting is a crucial part of the game. How am I supposed to play without being able to voice my opinion or defend myself? This rule is offensive, ruins the game, and it takes all the fun out of it for me.

The mod will not change the rule.

You won't drop out because you "don't want to be bullied out"

You refuse to play a game with this restriction

So what do you expect to happen next?

MattP · Post Post #211 (isolation #9) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:21 am

Baby, question please answer ASAP: will you play this game with this restriction?

MattP · Post Post #213 (isolation #10) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:22 am

PLEASE ANSWER MY QUESTION

MattP · Post Post #217 (isolation #11) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:26 am

Far, baby is unwilling to say she will abide by the restriction and play your game. Please take that as you will but tierce is ready to replace and unless baby says she will agree to your mod decision well.

MattP · Post Post #246 (isolation #12) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:47 am

I have an idea. We just stop responding since BB has selective hearing and will NEVER respond the way anyone can agree to.

Then we let Farside decide the best course of action.

Ok?

MattP · Post Post #250 (isolation #13) » Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:51 am

Ok NO RESPONSES FROM THIS POINT ONWARD OTHER THAN BABYBLUE AND FARSIE, OR /INS FOR REPLACEMENT.

_____________

STARTING NOW