Is it Ethical to Replace into Your Alt?
- Firebringer
-
Firebringer Trail Blazer
- Firebringer
- Trail Blazer
- Trail Blazer
- Posts: 52591
- Joined: June 28, 2015
- Location: woofbringer
- Contact:
if you replace into another account in order to take advantage of peoples notion of meta of u. I think its unethical.Show"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown- Cabd
-
Cabd QT Sniper
- Cabd
- QT Sniper
- QT Sniper
- Posts: 15501
- Joined: February 3, 2013
As a mod, I take the stance that this is moderator influence/out of game influence, and you're forced to stick with the account you signed up to play as. Slips be damned.
Technically speaking an alt could be claiming a different main they actually are, but by allowing the replacement to occur ITT I have now as a moderator confirmed such is true, on a level that is mechanical.
Better to risk no grey areas by banning the practice outright.ShowHave retired for good; Life is too busy to have time or energy for mafia. It was fun~
And then, a Miracle, a Dance Game and a flight of fancy struck, one more game into the abyss
- Ythan
-
Ythan SheWelcome to the Haystack
- Ythan
She- Welcome to the Haystack
- Welcome to the Haystack
- Posts: 15149
- Joined: August 11, 2009
- Pronoun: She
Slip posts kinda do the same thing I think without moderator interaction.In post 26, Cabd wrote:As a mod, I take the stance that this is moderator influence/out of game influence, and you're forced to stick with the account you signed up to play as. Slips be damned.
Technically speaking an alt could be claiming a different main they actually are, but by allowing the replacement to occur ITT I have now as a moderator confirmed such is true, on a level that is mechanical.
Better to risk no grey areas by banning the practice outright.- Taly
-
Taly he/him, she/herSurvivor
- Taly
he/him, she/her- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10219
- Joined: July 26, 2014
- Pronoun: he/him, she/her
I don't think slips are very avoidable at points.
Is it unethical to play an alt but then not want it outed? Even if you don't use any meta to your advantage?"Taly is going to be a hot mess all game and I am entertained" ~ Gammagooey
"The human race is bad at reading Taly." ~the worst
"Taly I knew your slot was scum and I still struggled to find arguments to SR your play lol" ~Infinity 324
"Taly wins for the most fence-sitty reads in a game ever" ~Battle Mage- Ydrasse
-
Ydrasse She*twirls hair*
- Ydrasse
She- *twirls hair*
- *twirls hair*
- Posts: 14081
- Joined: May 1, 2020
- Pronoun: She
people might find it annoying especially if you do end up using meta but it’s not unethical to not wanted it outed; if anything if you repeatedly play on it an establish it as a thing on its own any small “advantage” you’d get from anonymity wanes. being read in a vacuum for lack of any tells to rely on goes either way wrt being town/scumread.- Sleepless Assassin
-
Sleepless Assassin Mafia Scum
- Sleepless Assassin
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: October 13, 2009
Any strategic replacing is unethical. I know this is up to interpretation, but I've always assumed anyone who replaces out is considered to have lost that game regardless of which fiction wins. So if you're one for statistics, is it really worth taking a loss on one alt to benefit another? Either way, yes, unethical. Play the game as it was started or don't play. Replacements should be for emergencies only.3-2 as scum and 5-8 as town
Www.escapeintothemixradio.com/EMRchatroom.html come say hi- Nancy Drew 39
-
Nancy Drew 39 She/HerNot that Inno Scent
- Nancy Drew 39
She/Her- Not that Inno Scent
- Not that Inno Scent
- Posts: 14979
- Joined: January 14, 2018
- Pronoun: She/Her
- Location: HYDRAs 4EVA!!!
- Contact:
I don’t believe I have done this because I would be essentially outing my alt by doing that, The only reason I think I’d seriously consider it is if I really didn’t want to play ob that account for whatever reasons. Hectic did this a number of times in me v Titus but everyone knew they were both Hectic. However, I play alts differently than Tally, my playstyle is really only marginally affected by playing on an alt.
Taly have you experienced someone doing to gain a possible advantage in a game that would not have occured otherwise? I have not seen anything like that happen in any game I’ve ever been in.**********We just need to tread carefully because if you slip up around her as scum she notices and will tear your spine out and slap you to death with it. (I'm slightly scared of Nancy)~the worst*******Nancy is pretty heavenly ngl~CheekyTeekyNancy-scum feels like a hot knife slicing through butter. Nancy-town feels like a magnifying glass in the sun glaring down at an insect.~Taly- TemporalLich
-
TemporalLich Grand Scheme
- TemporalLich
- Grand Scheme
- Grand Scheme
- Posts: 5785
- Joined: January 30, 2019
- Location: A Lost Timeline
Replacements areIn post 30, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Any strategic replacing is unethical. I know this is up to interpretation, but I've always assumed anyone who replaces out is considered to have lost that game regardless of which fiction wins. So if you're one for statistics, is it really worth taking a loss on one alt to benefit another? Either way, yes, unethical. Play the game as it was started or don't play. Replacements should be for emergencies only.objectivelynot just for emergencies only.
These are valid reasons to replace out:
Unforeseen scheduling conflicts (something makes you V/LA and you didn't anticipate it before /inning)
You cannot play the game anymore (if a game is actively distressing, or worse, traumatizing, nobody should be forced to play that game. Don't confuse this with "the game is unfun" or "I don't like the game", this is for when a game is actively detrimental to you)
Emergencies (if something needs your immediate attention, paying that attention is more important than Mafia)time will end-
-
Alyssa The Lamb Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2521
- Joined: March 9, 2020
I'm curious what your opinion on this is in the instance I indicated earlier, where a particular playstyle is discovered to not be viable (aka basically not playing). What is the decision that should be made in your eyes for the integrity of the game?In post 30, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Any strategic replacing is unethical. I know this is up to interpretation, but I've always assumed anyone who replaces out is considered to have lost that game regardless of which fiction wins. So if you're one for statistics, is it really worth taking a loss on one alt to benefit another? Either way, yes, unethical. Play the game as it was started or don't play. Replacements should be for emergencies only.
1. Replacing to another account with a more compatible playstyle for that particular game
2. Simply replacing out entirely
3. Flaking out of the game
I remember that being that level of inactive was considered very unethical about a decade ago and distinctly remember seeing and participating in debates about whether it's the moderator's job to replace them with a more active player or the players' jobs to remove that slot entirely.
It's a very multi-faceted problem from this angle because you could realistically argue that slots simply not playing the game at all damages the integrity of the game, but I don't see any solutions for this that doesn't become impacted by this.
As an example for a way this could realistically happen in a game, you join a playerlist with an account that requires the game to progress slowly to function. A player in the game is forced to replace out due to having to go to the hospital and is replaced by a player that makes the game go at a breakneck pace.
This isn't necessarily a callout of your opinion, more a counterpoint that it (as well as most everything) isn't that black and white.- Sleepless Assassin
-
Sleepless Assassin Mafia Scum
- Sleepless Assassin
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: October 13, 2009
Those all sound like emergencies are far as an online game is concerned.In post 32, TemporalLich wrote:
Replacements areIn post 30, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Any strategic replacing is unethical. I know this is up to interpretation, but I've always assumed anyone who replaces out is considered to have lost that game regardless of which fiction wins. So if you're one for statistics, is it really worth taking a loss on one alt to benefit another? Either way, yes, unethical. Play the game as it was started or don't play. Replacements should be for emergencies only.objectivelynot just for emergencies only.
These are valid reasons to replace out:
Unforeseen scheduling conflicts (something makes you V/LA and you didn't anticipate it before /inning)
You cannot play the game anymore (if a game is actively distressing, or worse, traumatizing, nobody should be forced to play that game. Don't confuse this with "the game is unfun" or "I don't like the game", this is for when a game is actively detrimental to you)
Emergencies (if something needs your immediate attention, paying that attention is more important than Mafia)
---------
Alyssa if it's a playstyle thing I'd suggest sticking it out but I don't understand why anyone would intentionally want a quiet playstyle. People townread high activity and scumread low activity despite saying otherwise.
I know it's an unpopular opinions but to me in a perfect world you wouldn't see anyone replaced. If a player goes inactive regularly, people just don't play with that person anymore. I do understand a situation where someone is in the hospital or whatever other RL things can happen and by all means they shouldn't be worrying themselves with a silly game. So yes there are situations where it's acceptable. But I've always thought the replacement rate on mafiascum is just plain ridiculous. To know that any given game will have replacements feels wrong. To be able to guess which players will get replaced before a game even starts is even worse. It just changes the game too much. Everyone has their own opinions and playstyles and people are playing based on those people so for others to come in and replace them and be completely different absolutely impacts which faction wins. I don't like it.3-2 as scum and 5-8 as town
Www.escapeintothemixradio.com/EMRchatroom.html come say hi- TemporalLich
-
TemporalLich Grand Scheme
- TemporalLich
- Grand Scheme
- Grand Scheme
- Posts: 5785
- Joined: January 30, 2019
- Location: A Lost Timeline
yeah that's one way of looking at it actuallyIn post 34, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Those all sound like emergencies are far as an online game is concerned.
though yeah ideally if you're unable to play the game because of logistical reasons you'd replace out.
replacing into an alt definitely doesn't fall into that category.time will end- northsidegal
-
northsidegal Survivor
- northsidegal
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
i think i agree with what seems to be something of a consensus that if everything is public then it's not really a big deal, but replacing yourself with a secret alt for some kind of advantage or even just to get the benefit of the doubt that a replacement gets / getting to "start over" seems unethical.
i think another interesting question is, how ethical is it to "drop" a secret alt and reveal yourself for some kind of benefit? i remember one game where i was in basically a 1v1 with scum!RC under a secret alt, and given the rest of the playerlist if i had dropped the secret alt and revealed myself i probably would've been able to elim him, but i didn't and so got elimmed myself. i think that that was probably the right thing to do because doing so would've been a bad feeling / possibly unfair in the same way that any unexpected replacement for scum is already sort of unfair, you play a certain way around a certain player and it feels really bad to just unexpectedly have all of your plans ruined and have things turned around by something out of your control.-
-
Alyssa The Lamb
- northsidegal
-
northsidegal Survivor
- northsidegal
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11587
- Joined: August 23, 2017
of course, i suppose the relevant part is just doing it intentionally or not. i wouldn't fault someone if they genuinely slipped and because of that people's opinions about their reads changed. even still, i think that deliberately, like, pulling away your mask and cloak with a dramatic flourish to say "aha! it was actually ME, NSG all along!" to try to get credibility or whatever would probably be wrong. at the very least, it's equally as unfortunate for the scumteam as any random replacement is, but the fact that you would be doing it intentionally makes the difference i think.- Nancy Drew 39
-
Nancy Drew 39 She/HerNot that Inno Scent
- Nancy Drew 39
She/Her- Not that Inno Scent
- Not that Inno Scent
- Posts: 14979
- Joined: January 14, 2018
- Pronoun: She/Her
- Location: HYDRAs 4EVA!!!
- Contact:
I really don’t see any problem with that? If you play under a secret alt and wish to reveal it any time, it’s your call imo. What I do have a problem with and consider rather gross, is involuntarily outing people’s alts without their permission. That I think depending on the intent behind it, can border on the unethical and seriously needs to stop but some game mods adamantly refuse to redact that involuntary outing even post game, which is not at all cool.In post 36, northsidegal wrote:i think i agree with what seems to be something of a consensus that if everything is public then it's not really a big deal, but replacing yourself with a secret alt for some kind of advantage or even just to get the benefit of the doubt that a replacement gets / getting to "start over" seems unethical.
i think another interesting question is, how ethical is it to "drop" a secret alt and reveal yourself for some kind of benefit? i remember one game where i was in basically a 1v1 with scum!RC under a secret alt, and given the rest of the playerlist if i had dropped the secret alt and revealed myself i probably would've been able to elim him, but i didn't and so got elimmed myself. i think that that was probably the right thing to do because doing so would've been a bad feeling / possibly unfair in the same way that any unexpected replacement for scum is already sort of unfair, you play a certain way around a certain player and it feels really bad to just unexpectedly have all of your plans ruined and have things turned around by something out of your control.**********We just need to tread carefully because if you slip up around her as scum she notices and will tear your spine out and slap you to death with it. (I'm slightly scared of Nancy)~the worst*******Nancy is pretty heavenly ngl~CheekyTeekyNancy-scum feels like a hot knife slicing through butter. Nancy-town feels like a magnifying glass in the sun glaring down at an insect.~Taly-
-
Alyssa The Lamb
- PookyTheMagicalBear
-
PookyTheMagicalBear Pooky got your back
- PookyTheMagicalBear
- Pooky got your back
- Pooky got your back
- Posts: 39978
- Joined: August 17, 2003
I think if you play under a secret alt it's kind of unfair to purposefully reveal your main as it introduces new information and a change to the game state that is not really able to be predicted or planned for by your opposition.Show"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
-Norwee - PookyTheMagicalBear
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Nancy Drew 39
- northsidegal
- northsidegal
- TemporalLich
- Sleepless Assassin
- TemporalLich
- Nancy Drew 39
- Sleepless Assassin
- Ydrasse
- Taly
- Ythan
- Cabd
- Firebringer