so much this.In post 184, MagnaofIllusion wrote:This only works if the players in question want to improve and actively seek to do so.In post 181, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is what post game discussion is really for(at least I think so): constructive criticism. Automatically voting them is bad.
I can point to a number of newer players who are happy with what they bring to the game and don't see it as bad or detrimental to their teammates and thus ignore anything said on improving their play.
I view it as a natural outgrowth of the type of thinking that made Blink popular. people love their gut reads, but any valid gut read can actually be explained in a way that isn't just "lol gut". I've found that there are a lot of players who value things that have nothing to do with mafia and are more about validating their worldview (ie. building townblocs) or when they think that a certain "way" of playing is inherently town/scum. you can't give people constructive criticism when their paradigm is so radically different than yours.