youre the one complaining about high posting dumbass. im offering solutions from sites that are in no way better. this site has a generally great atmosphere, but there are still problems like any other site. problems that we are discussing in this thread made to offer ideas and solutions.
have you ever been in a game where someone wants to lynch someone immediately, and another person goes "we must use all of our game days!." people play differently, but some like having the shortened deadlines because it keeps things simple and within their level of time. keeping it 2 weeks bc "i like it!!" is selfish
once again, for like the third time, mods can run games with short deadlines in the currently constructed queues. The fact that they don't suggests either you need to ask for them, or there isn't enough demand.
have you ever been in a game where someone wants to lynch someone immediately, and another person goes "we must use all of our game days!." people play differently, but some like having the shortened deadlines because it keeps things simple and within their level of time. keeping it 2 weeks bc "i like it!!" is selfish
Using time for the sake of time isn't as common as I remember it being.
In post 1056, Ginngie wrote:One day you'll learn that having time is better than not having time.
go tell that to someone successful.
In post 1057, Thestatusquo wrote:once again, for like the third time, mods can run games with short deadlines in the currently constructed queues. The fact that they don't suggests either you need to ask for them, or there isn't enough demand.
oh yeah that sounds good. then just make some shorter games and have certain posting requirements on your longer games. that sounds good to me. making certain posting requirements on long games will create demand for shorter games.
have you ever been in a game where someone wants to lynch someone immediately, and another person goes "we must use all of our game days!." people play differently, but some like having the shortened deadlines because it keeps things simple and within their level of time. keeping it 2 weeks bc "i like it!!" is selfish
Using time for the sake of time isn't as common as I remember it being.
usually when ive seen someone push for an early lynch the time argument is brought up.
At least one player suggested that a legitimate play would be to not read the thread and just try to post, interacting with people in real time.
This is a pro-strat.
A scum player posted something that should have been in the scum PT out into the actual game thread, and requested mod intervention due to it. The mod did not intervene. They were not lynched.
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Mhsmith0
Conq: you, sir, are great at being town.
BATMAN: Only jugg was the only one we didn’t scum read at least not me
Quick: There is little to no chance this slot is Power-Wolfing.
SR: I want to give him a day
Life is simply unfair, don't you think?
In post 1038, Flubbernugget wrote:The player that dropped the game winning hammer attributed at least some of their success to having a small thread to read through.
hey, this was me. i don't want to get into any of these big arguments but in the interest of objectivity the game's incredibly low activity had benefits and detriments. while it may have made the game easier to review there's nothing to say a larger game would have been any harder to solve (more posts to analyze, as it was the scum player probably had less than 20 posts) and i probably found the game less enjoyable than if it were at least slightly more active.
