Personally, I think yes, players should have clear expectations of when a hammer will occur ahead of time, without having to wait for mod confirmation.
50% should be the standard, it's impossible for an elimination to occur if half the players are against it, having 50%+1 is unnecessary and simply doesn't make sense
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
50% should be standard - after all, if there are 50% of people voting No Elim, the day should end in No Elim because with the current votes an elim will not happen.
50%+1 makes sense in plurality - though 50% should be standard for any elim decision in a plurality vote game
considering the alternative is a deadlock, having No Elim be called at 50% in evens is an anti-frustration feature
If half of the alive players are voting No Elim, an elim is not going to happen 90% of the time. The other 10% can be accounted for by making it standard to call No Elim at 50%, because the alternative is very unfun - if it is standardized No Elim can get the proper E-1 warning to avoid quickhammer.
Definitely. I had a game I ran be impacted by running it as 50%+1 without knowing 50% was more usual, and it quite likely impacted the outcome of the game. I would have much preferred being told "no, it should be 50%" at the review stage
4 players, 3 v sk who had up to that point played a strong game. Requiring 3 for no elim instead of 2 definitely lead the direction for the next day.
I don't mind that it did because those are the rules I played with and it was a normal game so it got checked - I'll be changing them in future games. But it bothered me that the first time I found out that was a weird rule was people mentioning it in the dead thread.
Yeah, better than sitting there and waiting it out if the no-lim voters are determined to no-lim so you can't convince them otherwise and nobody else wants to hammer the NL.
When i open this game, and starting read, i immediatly close it because i starting strongly consider self last townie alive and others are just jesters.
I think No elim should be hammered the moment a elim cannot be obtained regardless of normal or theme.
Anytime an elimination cannot be done then the day should immediately end barring a theme mechanic that has to play out.
ScumBlade's eloquent performance left me utterly disoriented, debased, depraved and sent me spiraling into a horrific murky abyss with emotional turmoil and immense despair as my only companions until slowly I suffocate in my own gloom, surrounded by failure. I will never recover. -- Zachstralkita about Mini 1841 GTKAS -- MathBlade
Could you rephrase your question? I don't understand how my theoretical had to do with town, unless you meant that the players realize that Player X is town, in which case.. the players still wouldn't vote them..
In post 12, Jake The Wolfie wrote:What if the players would, with the day not ending, realize that player X is scum, and would thus cause player X to be executed?
What hypothetical situation are you responding to here?
In post 12, Jake The Wolfie wrote:What if the players would, with the day not ending, realize that player X is scum, and would thus cause player X to be executed?
What if after a town aligned player Y is hammered, the other players realise that player X is scum and would thus eliminate player X instead?
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
In post 12, Jake The Wolfie wrote:What if the players would, with the day not ending, realize that player X is scum, and would thus cause player X to be executed?
What if after a town aligned player Y is hammered, the other players realise that player X is scum and would thus eliminate player X instead?
Then they execute player x tomorrow. They don't get to un-execute player y just because it was bad.
In post 12, Jake The Wolfie wrote:What if the players would, with the day not ending, realize that player X is scum, and would thus cause player X to be executed?
What hypothetical situation are you responding to here?
The situation in which the players have voted for, with a majority, to no-execute.
In post 12, Jake The Wolfie wrote:What if the players would, with the day not ending, realize that player X is scum, and would thus cause player X to be executed?
What hypothetical situation are you responding to here?
The situation in which the players have voted for, with a majority, to no-execute.
We can't be sure whether they're voting no execute because they want the day to end, or because they genuinely want no one to die today, because the alternatives aren't good for them.