Newbie 1958: Random Mafia (END)
-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Hello everyone.
I hate RVS, so i'm going to entirely skip that phase. Allow me to introduce myself:
I am Farkran, this is my second game in this site, but i have been playing FMs a long time ago elsewhere. Last game i was a mason.
Misc info:
- i am from italy, native language italian, i'm active most of the day but i will be sleeping during CEST nighttime.
- my meta is to talk a lot and getting others to talk. I attention-whore the game hard and usually die very early. I do this both as town and scum.
- i have a hunch that i may know who to target for today's lynch, but i need to confirm it first.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
1. I did not, check again.In post 10, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
So why are you skipping RVS this game? Because it looked like you participated in it last time. Also, how do you possibly have a Lynch target four posts in?In post 9, Farkran wrote:Hello everyone.
I hate RVS, so i'm going to entirely skip that phase. Allow me to introduce myself:
I am Farkran, this is my second game in this site, but i have been playing FMs a long time ago elsewhere. Last game i was a mason.
Misc info:
- i am from italy, native language italian, i'm active most of the day but i will be sleeping during CEST nighttime.
- my meta is to talk a lot and getting others to talk. I attention-whore the game hard and usually die very early. I do this both as town and scum.
- i have a hunch that i may know who to target for today's lynch, but i need to confirm it first.
And if you do, why aren't you voting it? Also, if you die early as town is it due to mis-lynching or being NK'd?
VOTE: Farkran
2. I need to confirm something first, then i will be happy to do so.
3. Both, actually. Last time i was n1ked for being active and unpredictable. In my past games (role names may vary) i have been n1ked by a vigilante as a jester, n1ked by mafia as a mason (that time they did NOT know i was a mason, though) and mislynched d1 or d2 fairly often - including that one time when i was targeted by the mafia Framer and investigated by the town Cop - guess what, i drew attention from both sides. In my past scum games, i managed to stay alive a bit longer because i was safe from nks and i consider myself a fairly good PR sniper.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I will tell you as soon as i know. Currently, i don't have the necessary elements to confirm my theory, and it would be detrimental to speak about it beforehand. Most likely tomorrow (almost sleeptime here).In post 16, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
I can't wait to see what you are talking about in 2. I also can't possibly imagine what you would need confirmed. When do you plan on being able to let us know whether you got the confirmation you need.In post 12, Farkran wrote:
1. I did not, check again.
2. I need to confirm something first, then i will be happy to do so.
3. Both, actually. Last time i was n1ked for being active and unpredictable. In my past games (role names may vary) i have been n1ked by a vigilante as a jester, n1ked by mafia as a mason (that time they did NOT know i was a mason, though) and mislynched d1 or d2 fairly often - including that one time when i was targeted by the mafia Framer and investigated by the town Cop - guess what, i drew attention from both sides. In my past scum games, i managed to stay alive a bit longer because i was safe from nks and i consider myself a fairly good PR sniper.
Also, why did you communicate to us that you die early often?
Pedit: I'm a lawyer, so I may be a psychopath. I haven't taken the Hare yet.
And knowing she has a towngame on site means I can go check it to see if her play in general lines up with how she played that game. Not saying it's perfect, but it's better than acting like previous games don't matter.
As for my grand meta-ish introduction, last game i learned the hard way that metareading is a strong thing in this site. I used to play anon, but it's not a custom here, so i had to adapt even though i don't like to meta-analyze.
Counter-question: i have my reasons to hold back on my hunch, but what are yours for not providing your thoughts about me?
(out of game: i have a female avatar but i'm actually a guy, see the "he" in my Pronoun slot)-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Good morning everyone. Pretty much everyone has chimed in in some way, time to talk now.
My whole introductory post was actually a (pretty obvious) reaction test to everyone, to get out from RVS asap. Last game i got out of it by following an impossible claim of conf!scum from another player, this time i decided to try it myself. Turned out it worked here too.
Updated readings based on it:
- Billy: fairly solid townread. Questioning, analysis and tone were good. Almost too much, but i can see that coming from hyped town.
- randbo: townlean. Did quite the same thing as billy on me, but tone is slightly worse - i could see it as hastily looking for lynchbait rather than actually questioning. Didn't vote though, given the current situation i'd say that is a very small towncred (could've jumped on the wagon instead). That, plus emotion and activity make it a townlean.
- ofrhz: townlean/null. 29 and 30 look good, doesn't seem as committed as the others though.
- Micc: null/scumlean. My reaction test should have been kinda obvious to a SE player. However, i didn't lead off the game at all, i got us out of the RVS and i'm kinda proud of that. You should too, yet your tone didn't look like that. I do agree about billy though - do you have any read on anyone else?
- Pine: Slight scumlean. Greeting post (this is NAI to me), then he disappeared completely (this is SL). Readings please.
- Kerset: stronger scumlean. He learned about our discussion as early as post 14, yet he answered with some irrelevant question instead. Then disappeared.
- lilliaire & Evenstar: didn't react at all, as if they didn't read the whole first page. However, this couple of players currently give me the vibe of "we're two friends who decided to play fm, please don't harass lilliaire as this is her very first time", which could be NAI at the moment. However, evenstar says he's not a new player AND claims VT. Explain?
VOTE: Kerset i do want to hear more from you.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Not an entirely bad answer. But why did you even post at all, then? Also, what did you get from analyzing the interesting wagon on me?Kerset wrote:I decided to remain silent because I saw very interesting wagon on you(Farkan). I did not agree that your actions were suspicious so i wanted to see if anyone is going to join this. Anyone who would join such opportunistic wagon would be my main scum lead.
As opposed to what? Not doing anything to get the game moving? Why don't you give your reads too instead, so we can read what you think about the game status, and actually move the game along? If your analysis of my read is that i just wrote a post count, i'd say you're currently the only active player that hasn't provided his own content besides SLing me for... moving past the RVS stage?In post 33, Micc wrote:I appreciate Farkran’s urgency for getting out of RVS as that’s something I also feel is important from a theory standpoint. Usually you have to be willing to push a pretty shallow case on page 1 to make it happen. Throwing out shallow reads on the whole playerlist is kind of excessive.Feels like he cares more about getting Town credit for moving the game along than actually moving the game along.Stripping his read list down to the bare bones is basically the activity overview sorted from most to least posts...which I don’t find to be especially alignment indicative.
VOTE: micc, we may be getting somewhere.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I genuinely hate RVS. It's a waste of time, i never vote with an insignificant motive in mind (aka random, or "i don't like your avatar"). I literally don't enjoy it, so you may see me doing it as scum in future games. My point is that to get out of RVS you need to do *something*. I triggered people's thoughts, and offered my own. Surely you (and everyone else) have been thinking something about the discussion so far, yet you're refraining from outing them, instead complaining about the one who did and accusing him of "not actually moving the game along".Micc wrote:I have one read, and I gave it. Having eight reads at this stage is unnatural and it’s clear that you’ve contrived them from something that I don’t believe to be a good indicator of alignment - activity in the first 12 hours of day 1. You’re doing this either because you want to move from RVS quickly (Town motivated) or because you want to appear motivated to move from RVS quickly (scum motivated). It looks more like the second one to me right now, but hey it’s page two, my read is shallow too so maybe it moves by the time we get to page three.
I don’t really appreciate you misrepresenting my play by saying my only content is pushing you. I’ve pretty clearly put out questions aimed at interacting with both Evenstar and Kerset. What’s your angle on that?
Surely the lurkers will have to speak too, but currently this is my highest scumguess. Your interaction with Evenstar and Kerset looks as shallow as you're accusing my readings of.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
No, he has not.In post 37, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
We're not even 12 hours into day 1. This game has a 10 day deadline. Before you shade Pine for not posting after the greeting do you know that he was posting in other games?
Also this is one of the things i'm most struggling with in this site - people always seem to be lurking way more than what i am used to. My past games had a day deadline of 48h, ofc everyone was so much more active than here. I still have an hard time shaking off the scum vibes that i get from lurkers, but i will be giving them a chance to speak. Your post comes off as defending him for no reason though. What's your read on him?-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Questioning is not the same as shading. Reads are not strong at this point, but i start getting vibes from other players. You (billy) look townsided so far - the read is consistent, even though you "defended" pine which amounts to a minor scumcred at this point of the game, it's something i take note of, not something i accuse you of.Billy Pilgrim wrote: He had one post which was the first in game. So I have no read at all on him.
Saying I'm defending him seems a bit strong, Im just skeptical of the amount of shade you've been throwing around in your early posts. In that reads list, you were even shading your townreads and leans. I get that the game is in an early state so the reads will be fluid, but you had about three townleans/reads and three scumleans/reads. You shaded each of your townleans/reads.
Given that you were pretty non-committal with respect to your reads, what's the point in throwing them out there?
I have been prodding kerset and i got a semi-decent answer. I still scumlean him, but now it's on the null side.
Micc on the other hand is coming off not so much pro-town to me, his tone wasn't as good.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
This is also interesting. You are jumping on my wagon on the account of me mistyping an S in your personal pronoun, you claim thst RVS is useful when it obviously is not - RVS is a complete waste of time and its only purpose is to get out of it and start triggering actual interactions between people instead of trololol votes.In post 42, Evenstar wrote: For someone who claims to be doing reaction tests, you seem startlingly unobservant. My avatar, gender marker, and the fact that I said my name wasEvangelinereally ought to have tipped you off to the fact I'm a girl.
And no, I didn't read the whole first page. Because you're obviously trying to force RVS to an abrupt end, and that's dangerous. RVS is useful, because it's where the scum have to confront their own TMI square in the face and try their best to pretend they know nothing.
As for my claim, I did it because:
1: Fuck the rules.
2: It's an obvious falseclaim and therefore provides no actual information.
3: But it sure is going to get people reacting to it.
I mislike your reaction to it: you seem to be using it to attack my stated experience level, compared to Micc, who simply says "That ain't site meta, why are you doin that?"
I think right now I'll drop my vote onto you.
VOTE: Farkran
If you hate RVS, post a survey next time.
Last but not least, your VT claim was fake? What the hell? What were you trying to accomplish?-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I have this sense of deja-vu from when i have called out for using backward logic in my last game. Let's take a step back and go through our exchange again:In post 45, Evenstar wrote:
Allow me to clarify: Vanilla Town is an obvious falseclaim fromanyone, because scum don't want to claim power roles that could be CC'd, and power roles don't want to claim them and be shot. As such, stating that I'm Vanilla Town gives zero information, because everyone in the game ought to be playing as if they're Vanilla Town.
I'm not saying my claim is fake. I'm saying nobody has any reason to believe it, and therefore I might as well not have said anything.
Also,you'rethe one who says I'm scumreading you based on you getting my gender wrong. Nice job understating my case.
You're scummy because:
1: You're forcing RVS to die too early. Scum's tone is most likely to be off in RVS, before they can sheep others' reads and town consensus has not yet formed.
2: You're failing to actually observe after claiming you're doing a reaction test.
3: Your immediate reaction was "Is Evenstar lying about her experience level?", throwing shade.
4: At this point, you're taking my claim as an excuse to try and rolefish me.
5: You're not engaging with my argument and trying to change my mind; you're saying I'm obviously wrong rather than considering my case for why RVS is useful.
6: You're immediately shading Micc after I said they reacted better than you - trying to get me to reconsider a good read?
7: And, as Billy has said, your reads are pretty meh. Why bother when you had this other whole gambit going?
1. I strongly disagree with your opinion. During RVS scum is free to waste town time by not providing actual content. Scum want to stay in RVS as long as possible because it's a safe place where you don't generate interactions between players and you are not forced to explain your thoughts to other people - you can just say "hey, it's RVS fun baby, i do not need to explain myself".
2. Sorry, but player genders are not my main subject of observation. I corrected billy because he has been calling me a she in several posts, and i explicitly premised it was anout of game notewhich is entirely NAI. I missed an S in my single post regarding you, do you really think this is relevant?
3. Er, no. I wasn't judging your experience level or throwing shade at you - you made a weird play and in my first readings i asked you why, because it did not make any sense to me. Then you said it was fake, which makes even less sense, except for the fact that you tried to justify it as "reaction testing". For what purpose? Did you want to move past the RVS too?
4. Again, no. You should not have claimed, is all. Do not claim unless necessary.
5. See point 1 and 3. Getting out of RVS is a good thing. Having a >0 amount of info is a good thing.
6. I said i was scumleaning Micc before you even answered me. Check again.
7. What are your reads then?
Conclusion: this looks like TvT. Your reasoning is misplaced, but your tone and emotion look genuinely townish. Your vote is on the aggressive side given the current size of the wagon and that does look a bit scummy. Again, this is me taking notes, not "casting shade" on you. Currently you are a null/townlean.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Please explain how Micc is town enough to you to give him an actual reading as opposed to "having nothing reliable on anyone else"?In post 47, Pine wrote:Skimming the thread, Micc strikes me as Town, soft Town on Billy, nothing reliable on anyone else. Farkran’s on some sort of designer uppers, but I don’t know if that’s alignment indicative.
I usually have a big introduction post in Newbie games, I might get around to digging it up after work.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Please elaborate about how he is engaged in actual gamesolving. You're going as far as giving a townlean/townread of him, while i assume you are putting me below the null line based on this post (= at least scumlean me) based on our posts, yet what he has been doing so far is basically just pushing me for getting out of the RVS (same as Evenstar, but more on that later). I do find that a scummy move. I am aware of his questioning to Kestar, but it's not like scum doesn't do that, especially when you're looking at a possible SE!scum. His tone is not town, more like "hey, i'm doing something useful, but i am not providing any content to support it".In post 50, Pine wrote: Micc is engaged in actual gamesolving, making an effort to sort people on reliable information rather than the kneejerk surface-level stuff you’re doing.
Saying nothing in a lot of words is still saying nothing.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
See? Now we got some content that looks genuine. Even though i strongly disagree with your strategy and your readings of Pine and Randbo, your tone does not seem coming from scum, rather from town taking my attacks on a personal level instead of applying them to the game context. You're getting emotional, which amounts to town points to me. It happened in my last game too, turned out that the guy was town, i'm inclined to believe this is the same situation.In post 53, Evenstar wrote:
1: I disagree; in my experience, good scum tend to push to get out of RVS fast, trying to seize control of the town's agenda and manufacture consensus about reads, so as to generate early MLs.
2: I think it's worth noting that you're maybe not making as detailed of examinations as you say (or think) you are.
3: You specifically mentioned my experience level in that context. Why was it relevant?
4: Then why are you calling my claim fake and continuing to push me on it? Why is my role so important to you, especially if you think I'm Town?
5: I agree that getting out of RVS is a good thing long-term, but you tried to force it in the second post of the game. That speaks to trying to grab hold of the Town's agenda, which is scummy.
6: Fair enough.
8: Now you're calling this a TvT fight, despite saying my reasoning is bad. If you think I'm town, why aren't you arguing your case rather than trying to disengage?
This reads to me like a pocket attempt. I'm going to stay here.
As for 7:
Ofrhz: Towny entrance, but then goes on to explicitly say his first townread in a stilted and questionable manner. Also asks others to generate content rather than making it himself. Scum? Don't think I want to lynch them today given that they're an SE and know what they're doing, but I definitely expect to see more from them later.
Billy: Looking very towny based on tone and degree of content. Good aggressive questioning of others. Not lynching today, that's for sure.
Farkran: Scummy for all the reasons I've given above.
Randbo: Extremely hostile & toxic player, might be worth lynching just for gamestate reasons. Pressures Farkran but does not vote. Looks scummy, but this could be town anger. Overall though, I see little reason not to lynch them.
Kerset: Seems to be ESL. An observational/analytical player. I like their tone and content so far; I need time and more posts to form a stronger read here.
Micc: I'm getting experienced-player vibes here. Hasn't responded to my response to them yet; my read's largely contingent on their reactions there. I feel that they've done both scummy and towny things so far, and I need a better sense of how they play in order to parse what's playstyle and what's AI.
Lilliare: Shy as always. Really hoping to see more content and not just have her lurk through the game.
Pine: Good Town tone. I like their reads on Farkran, but I'm also getting experienced-player vibes and therefore I'm not trusting that read just yet. Not aligned with Farkran, which makes me more inclined to a Fark lynch; not really feeling like Pine ought to be the one dunked out of that pair.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Ok, so far you have been complaning about:In post 59, Micc wrote: No one’s lurking here. Our deadline is 10 days not 48 hours. It’s that long specifically so people can go 24 hours between posts and still keep up. If that’s not the style of game you want to play, then I’m sorry but this site doesn’t host the games you’re looking for very often.
I can afford to have a drawn out interaction with Evenstar or Kerset that starts off shallow and eventually gets meaningful. There’s time for forming a real read such that I don’t need to force myself to put something down for the sake of having something.
1. Getting out of RVS quickly
2. Providing actual content (i.e. my read list) while not offering your own, claiming that "it's too early and it looks forcefully made up"
3. Trying to get people to post more by pulling inactive players out of their comfort zone
I'd like to hear actual content about how you can have a scumread of me while at the same time refusing to give reads on anyone else. It is indeed early d1, but the more i read, the more it looks like you are not paying attention to your surroundings. Feel free to build a case against me, i'd like to hear your reasoning.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I can agree with the first sentence, but i can't shake off the feeling that you picked me as your target whereas you could push behaviors scummier than mine (albeit shallow) such as what Kerset initially did, or Pine. Why did you pick me out of all players, despite having "similar opinions"? Why are you going against Kerset now of all times?In post 70, Micc wrote:
If I told you I jumped on the first thing I could justify pushing (you) specifically for the purpose of moving the game from RVS, would accept that as an answer? Would you then be willing to admit that at least half the reads you made in that first list were complete BS...but nonetheless BS made for the same purpose as my scum read on you?In post 64, Farkran wrote:Feel free to build a case against me, i'd like to hear your reasoning.
Like, you seem to have very similar opinions about theory as I do, but I think your execution kinda sucks. Yeah, pushing shallow reads early is good for Town as it moves the game from RSV, but you still gotta be pushing something that is at least somewhat reasonable, and I think most of your page 2 reads are unreasonable. I don’t know what it means for your alignment yet, but I’ll get there eventually, and when I do I’ll be sure to let you know.
I would definitely not say my readings were complete BS. I triggered reactions, and i outed my thought processes about said reactions. If you check again, i said that the onlyfairly solidtown read was Billy, which a lot of people agreed with - including you. All my other reads were shallow leans, which are evolving into something more concrete and solid. I will update them regularly - something everyone should do, rather than keeping to themselves.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Currently null. My original scumlean of him has been somewhat cleared by his 32. I'm wary of him and i am not against pushing him today, but i'd rather stay on my current vote, who coincidentally joined a wagon against him. I shall see where it leads.In post 69, Evenstar wrote:@Farkran:
What's your opinion on Kerset?
@Kerset:
What's your opinion on Farkran?
pedit: was writing before micc unvoted.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I do agree.In post 79, Evenstar wrote:
Care to elaborate on why you think Farkran's scum?This list seems a bit sheepy of me, tbqh.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Fear not, i'll provide updated readings before going to sleep.In post 93, Micc wrote: I guess, I'll hold you to everything in the second paragraph? I don't have a problem with any of it from a theory standpoint, but I highly doubt any of it is outside your scum range, so I'm interested to see where your reads develop to.
Interesting take. Say me and kerset are a scum team, would that match with your current reading of other people? Specifically, i'd like to hear your opinion of Lilliaire, Pine and Micc.
-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
So, updated readings:
- Billy: can't say we agree on everything but he's still my highest townread so far. Tone and content are good, although possibly misplaced.
- Evenstar: after our exchange i'd say her content and tone got better. Townlean.
- Kerset: this guy has made the most posts i can agree with, but... his tone is actually dodge-y. Introduction was bad, exchange with micc was good. Him defending me feels weird. I'd say above null, less than townlean.
- randbo: i profiled him as paranoid town, but on the dangerous side - still above - of null. Overly aggressive with words but not with votes (often town-indicative), kinda disagree on reasoning.
- ofrhz: almost no content at all. I don't like this, but i have no reason to say less than null. I do want to hear more of what he thinks about the current game status.
- Pine: little and not so very good content. Still below null to me, didn't like his page 2 posts, didn't like his interactions.
- Micc: scumlean. I do not agree with his motives for pushing me, tone rings hollow and LAMIST-originated. I don't know why people would think of that as towncred, but can't be in team with more than 1 scum, so i might want to review my thoughts from town!micc pov first. I've learned my lesson about universally townread SEs after playing against scum!skitter...
- lilliaire: stronger scumlean. That post 75 was... bad. In so many ways.
Now, i know for a fact that i must be wrong on at least 1 of my SL/SRs. For the time being, i can see lilliaire as newb!scum more than i can currently see Pine or Micc as SE!scum.
VOTE: lilliaire
@everyone: i get that a lot of you are SLing me for having a readlist early. I don't care much about the individual votes against me (not enough to start VCA), rather i'm curious of why you all are so reluctant to post readlists. I know it's early. So what? They are not set in stone, you're free to change your mind at any time, assuming you have reasons to do so and/or back them up with actions. This is called progression. Progression is something we use in a mafia game to create interactions and discussions to talk about. Why would you NOT do that as early as possible, even if you're just outing your first impressions?
I'm going to bed for today, g'night everyone.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I agree with pretty much half of this, which is... a weird place to put you in my eyes. I still think you are on the town side of null, but i'm taking note of the possibility of you being scum trying to be town, but having an hard time to PoE your scumguesses. I think it is time to test your reasoning.In post 114, Kerset wrote:I got some sleep and I ready to give my readings.
Farkran - He really wants to get some content out of people. It might look provocative but his intentions seems to be genuine.
Evenstar - Her thoughts seems to be very independent. She tries to make opinions, which are not based on other people reads. I wish, I could see other games to state, whenever this is her behavior or dedicated playstyle. Null for now.
I don't understand this "T/T, T/W, W/T, W/W". I can't even find this in wiki.In post 72, Evenstar wrote:@Micc: What's your opinion re: Farkran's trying to brush me off with "this fight is T/T, you're getting overly emotional"? Is this T/T, T/W, W/T, or W/W in your opinon? Rank these in order of likelihood, please.
Billy - He likes to call out people for shading, even that most of his posts are shadings itself. He has some reasoning but never use it to pull back. Slight scum lean
Micc - He seems to be misguided town. Even that i disagree with this reads, i feel that he is trying to contribute to town with his work.
Pine - He creates no content. All of his posts are just nodding to other people. I am looking forward for his explanations (#89)
VOTE: Pine
Randbo - Lack of content, his read about Pine feels random. The rest of my though is in #99
ofrhz, lilliaire - null
Please elaborate more in detail:
1. Why would you read Evenstar as null? Independent thought is almost always a strong towntell. I didn't notice it at first, i just had gut feeling about tone and content from her, but you're right, she... does not seem to care about other people's views, which is town indicative. I think i am confident enough to place her in my current town bloc alongside Billy.
2. Speaking of null reads, i find it VERY weird that you would put Lilliaire in the same spot as Evenstar. The difference in content quantity is huge, but so is the difference in content quality. Lilli's readlist is sheeping, opportunistic, and you just don't see a newb!town joining a wagon so aggressively.
I do agree with you about Pine, and i am also reconsidering Micc. SEs are just... kinda harder to sort out, even just because they're confident in their scum mafia experience. It's like they can fool around with us freely - not necessarily in a bad OR scummy sense - but that's what happens in newbie games.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I disagree with this post. While it is true that asking specific questions or posting specific analysis is better than nothing, a readlist helps both 1. the writer, recapping his town/scum structure of the game, 2. the readers, who do not have to look through pages of posts to learn what is your current read of a specific player. Sure, they could ask you, but it's way easier to save/take note of your latest readlist. OR they can do both and then make a comparison of your reads (aka progression analysis).In post 123, ofrhz wrote:This may just because this game is still taking off, but I've noticed that there's a lot of posting readslists so far.
That isn't very common on this site. Posting readslists usually happens if
1) someone is replacing in or catching up after having been away from the game for a while, or
2) someone is under pressure
If you want to know someone's read on aspecificperson or people, then you can and should ask them.
If you have a read on someone you'd like to share, then by all means post it. Especially if your read on someone has changed.
There are a few benefits to doing it this way -
1) it lets everyone else see what specific reads you're personally interested in and what reads you think are important enough to share
2) more directly engaging and distills info
3) reading long readslists is pretty boring imo and this is probably why we don't do it on this site all that often
I think the only valid reason for not using the readlist system is being lazy - but i don't find this to be necessarily SCUMMY. Just sub-optimal. It may be boring and time consuming, but in most cases it would be sufficient to format it like this:
Player A - townread
Player B - townlean
Player C, D, E - null
Player F - scumlean
So, after i read that, i can ask you to elaborate on specific entries such as "why do you scumlean player F"?-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
What bad claim are you talking about?In post 133, Randbo wrote:Aight
Pine have been posting very safely.
>Read town (Micc and BP) the most active people at that time
>Gives little to no explanation behind his reads and vote.
Just cursing under the radar at this point.
Null: Lilliaire and ofrhz
Kerset (lean town) & Farkan(nullish)
Farkran made a bad claim in his post. Farkran reads are ass pull. What people went after him for are fair and reasonable. I do like how Kerset gave an alternative view point of what is being narrated at that time. Kerset could just have sit back and let the pressure build on Farkran continue, or even let it build up if Kerset is a scum.
Also now this is like the 3rd time you're shading me but not taking -ANY- action at all. Can you elaborate a bit more on your reasoning and actually do something or are you just going to fence-sit the whole game?-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
You've never literally called me scummy, but you have been throwing shade towards me - a lot - and if post 95 is not a SR of me and Kerset, i don't know what it is. Did you reconsider that? Why?In post 135, Randbo wrote:Fence-sit? When did i ever said that i find you scummy?-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Hello again, lilliaire.lilliaire wrote:
I'm not too clear on the rules about talking about other games that are currently being hosted on mafiascum.
Long story short: you can talk freely about games that have ended, but you are forbidden to say anything about game that haven't.
Detailed rules for ongoing games discussion: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=30909
Full forum rules: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6470-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I don't care about rudeness - i am usually aggressive myself, i know it can feel bad but as long as you don't actually insult me, i'm ok with that. I know i am an attention whore and i'm fine with that.In post 141, Randbo wrote: @Frakan You hoard so much attention so early and for a long time. Of course many people are reacted to u, and consequently people are reacting to how other reacted about u. I cant talk about Kerset with u when Kerset post was about u.
What do you mean you can't talk about Kerset with me? Talk about Kerset with anyone else. I'll read anyways.
@lilliaire: take your time but provide some content please. I'm waiting for you to elaborate on your post 75. It feels sheepy. And opportunistic. And it's missing your reads of 4 other people.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Spoiler: Micc and Kerset
This exchange does not look very good on either side. Content produced is not useful, looks like they are both trying to "teach" the other how to play, pointlessly stating the obvious to increase their post count. I'd say no more than 1 scum in {Micc, Kerset} is plausible. However, it also reminds me -a lot- of my exchange with teacher in my last game which was entirely TvT. I am having issues because of this.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
My other issues are that i am currently having a readlist consisting in at least 3 scumleans.
Lilliaire is refusing to produce ANY content.
IF there is a scum in {Micc, Kerset}, i think it's probably Micc. Kerset's reasoning looks misplaced rather than scummy.
Randbo's progression is NOT good, as ofrhz points out in 175. 1 scum in {randbo, ofrhz} is also plausible but i strongly lean on randbo here.
Pine's game development is NOT good, refusing to produce content besides some sheepy, opportunistic posts.
I think my best chances are here at this point
VOTE: Pine
Let's get a L-1 going on. I'm wary about both Micc and Kerset being on it, but i'd say there's a solid chance they are TvT (>50%), this wagon is all town.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Looking forward to it.In post 196, Pine wrote:
Nonsense. I’m not stalling the game, this nonsense rush to judgment and refusal to consider other options is stalling it out.In post 195, Micc wrote:You’re staling the game out pine. Either catch up or claim in your next post.
Seriously, Micc, how often have you ever seen what is effectively a D1 lurker lynch go through on scum? This is gleefully going after the dangerous experienced player while they’re distracted. I’m not positive who the scum is on this wagon, but I have time this morning to find out.
I could read this post as "leave me alone and look elsewhere for no reason, please".-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Also i've been re-reading the thread from every POV i could, especially Micc.
I think i can buy a pine/randbo solve given their progression - pine wouldn't allow himself to be caught with bad progression but randbo certainly did - see posts 98 vs 133 and 136 when literally nothing happened between the two.
@Pine, what's your read on randbo?
@Micc, what's your read on randbo?-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Poke.In post 142, Farkran wrote:
I don't care about rudeness - i am usually aggressive myself, i know it can feel bad but as long as you don't actually insult me, i'm ok with that. I know i am an attention whore and i'm fine with that.In post 141, Randbo wrote: @Frakan You hoard so much attention so early and for a long time. Of course many people are reacted to u, and consequently people are reacting to how other reacted about u. I cant talk about Kerset with u when Kerset post was about u.
What do you mean you can't talk about Kerset with me? Talk about Kerset with anyone else. I'll read anyways.
@lilliaire: take your time but provide some content please. I'm waiting for you to elaborate on your post 75. It feels sheepy. And opportunistic. And it's missing your reads of 4 other people.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Let's see if i can talk your language.In post 199, Micc wrote:I’d say at least two times for every nine tries.
If you’re here to play, then prove it I guess? I have Evenstar and Billy in my town group, Farkran and Kerset in my not wanting to lynch today group with ofrhz skirting on the outside. That leaves the lurky part of the game left to sort, and we’re starting with you.
Predit: yeah pretty much. With some “my experience is valuable, trust me” thrown in.
With respect to randbo, I don’t feel like I have one.
I too have Evenstar and Billy in my town group, Kerset and ofrhz in my not wanting to lynch today group (ofrhz's content is small but looks *solid* so far) and a pending reconsideration of you. Everyone else i am currently scumleaning or worse and i am willing to lynch any, with preference given to pine and randbo.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
This post is... worrying me, in the same way i said i was worried about Kerset (i'm on mobile, forgive me for not quoting directly). I agree with half of it, the other half is weird.In post 209, Evenstar wrote:
Spicy. Unlikely that Micc and Pine are both wolves given this kind of pressure on an L-1 Pine. Makes me further interested in Pine's flip.In post 195, Micc wrote:You’re staling the game out pine. Either catch up or claim in your next post.
Pine's response is not reassuring: the fact that they're calling all the votes on them badexcept Micc'sspeaks volumes; to me that sounds like a scum SE trying to bully their way out of being lynched.
@Pine: If my reasons for voting you are bad, please share with the classwhythey're bad. This is proof by blatant assertion.
Billy's vote on Randbo also smells good to me. I think they're town.
Knowing Lilliaire, I would call their current reclusiveness NAI, not scummy: if anything it makes me lean them town, because if they knew who scum were they wouldn't have to stress about being wrong, and that would help them post.
Reads update:
Kerset slightly weird but likely town.
Micc null. Skillful enough, and unusual in their play enough, that I don't have a strong read yet. Hoping to get more from this interaction with Pine.
Farkran I'm feeling much better about, but I'm not locking them town yet.
Ohrfhz isn't someone I'm willing to lynch today, but IMO still has >rand chance to be scum.
Billy is town, not reconsidering till like D3/4.
Lily slight townlean, but could be bias 'cause I wanna be on her team. Never lynching her today, if only to try and help her find her feet.
Randbo: I don't know. TWTBAW? It's hard to tell what's scum and what's just being BaM. Either way I'm still cool with a lynch, since it's likely +EV to town even if he's ours. He's never being shot in the night and he needs solving.
Pine: Their (lack of) defense so far just makes themlook worse to me. I'm cool with a lynch here today as well.
I agree on the Micc vs Pine part, if one is scum, the other is not. I also agree that Billy's vote on randbo is valuably placed.
1. Why would you scumlean ofrhz? I assume that >rand chance to be scum means a scumlean. However, if randbo is scum, ofrhz is almost never scum. Scum rarely start bussing wagons, they are either forced onto them, or they try a desperate defense of their partner.
2. I feel your opinion of lilliaire is either biased (because you're friends) or purposefully lenient of her opportunistic vote as 3rd slot on wagon (right after the previous 3rd left, which would make her almost 4th slot). This is not a null move to me, nor it is townleaning. I'd like her to explain, but she refuses to do so. A prod is likely due soon.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Reasons, you say. Ok, i'll prod you later about this, for the time being i'm fine with not lynching either you or ofrhz.
About lily, i think that in order of likeliness it's D>=A>C>>>B. She is still far below null, and i took temporarily off the hook only because of randbo's bad progression on Pine.
I'm curious as of why you'd think C is less likely than B.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Er... not really, especially when (assuming ofrhz/randbo as solve) there are PLENTY of TvT mislynches available right from the get go, including me, kerset, pine and lily.In post 213, Evenstar wrote:That said, re 1:
Experienced scumabsolutelystart bussing wagons on weak partners, which I think Randbo qualifies as. When scum commit to a bus, they want to bus hard and get credit for it.
I have personally bussed multiple of my scummates into the ground from nothing. Itdoeshappen.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I kinda don't agree with that - in this setup, i'd take a 5v2 with a bad partner a thousand times before i take a clean 6v1 alone if i were scum. Unless the bus move is forced up into your back (it happened in my latest game here), you just don't do it - the odds are heavily against you. If Pine has done anything good here, it's his wiki about bussing.In post 216, Evenstar wrote: You bus the bad partner because they're generating terrible associatives that will drag you down with them, not because you can't find anyone else to lynch.
Note: I'm not saying that's necessarily the case here; we could have a Ohrfz/Pine solve, for instance.
I've bussed my fair share of scumpartners in the past, but i was an undetectable godfather in a 2 maf vs 6 town setup, resulting in a 5v1 after nk. Not quite the same thing.
Pine/ofrhz is... unlikely, but it is true that they didn't interact at all. Well, both of them haven't interacted much with anyone, to be honest. Neither did lily. Nor randbo. However, out of these 4, ofrhz has the most solid content, which is why i was curious of you scumleaning him instead of the others.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I admit you look active enough for this to be true. I don't know about your irl relationship but if it is one of mutual friendship and trust, you'd be in the perfect position to repcoach her in the scum pt. Point taken.In post 217, Evenstar wrote:
Because I know that I'd be coaching the fuck out of Lily if I was in scumchat with her, and that I have the range to produce a distinct voice for "her" in "her" posts that would actually be my posts I sent her. So her lack of posting, from a third party perspective, is evidence against us being scum together.In post 214, Farkran wrote:Reasons, you say. Ok, i'll prod you later about this, for the time being i'm fine with not lynching either you or ofrhz.
About lily, i think that in order of likeliness it's D>=A>C>>>B. She is still far below null, and i took temporarily off the hook only because of randbo's bad progression on Pine.
I'm curious as of why you'd think C is less likely than B.
This makes me even more curious about why you're not at least nullscum her. Would you like to tell us some of her meta?-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Lily fits perfectly into the new-to-the-game insecureness profile. I would probably have been ok with her IF she didn't post that half-assed readlist with a most opportunistic 3rd slot sheep vote on the fotd target. Having a deep relationship is ok, but if my wife was town in a game of mafia and i was scum i'd troll her so hard she wouldn't talk to me for a week at least. So, really @even, i suggest you be wary of that. Also, please kick her out of her comfort place and get the girl here posting.In post 228, Kerset wrote:
You stop joke claiming. It's very annoying, confusing and unnecessary.In post 227, Evenstar wrote:
Stop rolefishing.In post 223, Kerset wrote:Masons? Did you mean ingame role?
Aside of that, Farkran if you suspect that there is Eva and Lilli conspiration. I suggest that you turn off presumption that lilli is shy and Eva wish to change it. She is the one, who on the begining directly wanted us to think this way.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I thought you were referring to ongoing games when you said "reasons". If you are allowed to talk, please do it.
-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Yes. Not my definition of perfect and fun game. I believe some prods are due?In post 225, ofrhz wrote:It feels like there’s only a few people playing this game-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
The more i read from {Kerset, Micc}, the more it looks like the two aren't on the same team, yet they are both on the wagon against Pine as 1st (kerset) and 2nd (micc) slot. I am starting to find this a little disturbing. I thought it was TvT, but their reads are opposites. Kerset reasoning is gaining some ground on me, especially after the recent posts from Billy which i admit can be seen as flailing, while Micc is still WKing Billy hard. I myself am still thinking of Billy as town, but his recent posts aren't really that pristine. I was thinking of this even before Kerset pointed it out. You should at least notice that as a town player - you should never be100% sureof your reads unless TMI.
I did a 1v1 ISO of you guys and while Kerset STRONGLY leans as town now, Micc progression has always been kinda meh. By the time we joined Pine's wagon, Micc's reads were similar to mine, so i tried to reconsider him, but besides common reads i'd say there's nothing worth redeeming in his ISO.
Spoiler: highlighting bad progression posts, but please ISO him as well
If you read the whole ISO you may notice none of his votes were cast on his own scumcases. Also, in his 199 he basically says he isn't willing to lynch any of the active players, but gives absolutely no read of the lurkers (whom i assume he's willing to lynch, given what he said in 148).
Micc, can you clarify this and elaborate your scumcase of Pine again?
Billy and Kerset, you too?-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
@Micc: I am wondering why your vote is here, and what happened between post 59 "No one is lurking here, our deadline is in 10 days" + post 93 "i have nothing to push against Pine on page 1" and post 157 "vote Pine for being a lurker, i'm ok with lynching him today". As of post 33 you accused me of having a readlist based on sortable post counts and nothing else. At the moment, not only you are having pretty much the same readlist, but it is also based on that very motive (sortable post count), since you do not have a read of the other two heavy lurkers, randbo and lilliaire.
I find both of them to be scummy, not for the lurking part, but because randbo's progression on Pine is lousy and lilliaire's vote and readlist are the epitome of sheeping and opportunism. Either could be paired with Pine, but also with you.
pedit: why lilliaire over randbo?-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
@Micc: I am wondering why your vote is here, and what happened between post 59 "No one is lurking here, our deadline is in 10 days" + post 93 "i have nothing to push against Pine on page 1" and post 157 "vote Pine for being a lurker, i'm ok with lynching him today". As of post 33 you accused me of having a readlist based on sortable post counts and nothing else. At the moment, not only you are having pretty much the same readlist, but it is also based on that very motive (sortable post count), since you do not have a read of the other two heavy lurkers, randbo and lilliaire.
I find both of them to be scummy, not for the lurking part, but because randbo's progression on Pine is lousy and lilliaire's vote and readlist are the epitome of sheeping and opportunism. Either could be paired with Pine, but also with you.
pedit: why lilliaire over randbo?-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I kinda hate you, but at the same time i respect you. I have to agree with Evenstar that you are a pretty good player, and you know how to gather townpoints in your posts. Given the amount of experience, i'm not sure this is AI in either direction, but i'm willing to lynch other people before you today.In post 257, Micc wrote:
Nearly 40 hours and over 100 posts happened between my push on you and my vote on Pine. I formed some reads I was pretty happy with and decided to work on filling in the blanks. I guess the difference between you in me is that it took you 33 posts to reach that point and for me it was 157 posts.In post 250, Farkran wrote:@Micc: I am wondering why your vote is here, and what happened between post 59 "No one is lurking here, our deadline is in 10 days" + post 93 "i have nothing to push against Pine on page 1" and post 157 "vote Pine for being a lurker, i'm ok with lynching him today". As of post 33 you accused me of having a readlist based on sortable post counts and nothing else. At the moment, not only you are having pretty much the same readlist, but it is also based on that very motive (sortable post count), since you do not have a read of the other two heavy lurkers, randbo and lilliaire.
I find both of them to be scummy, not for the lurking part, but because randbo's progression on Pine is lousy and lilliaire's vote and readlist are the epitome of sheeping and opportunism. Either could be paired with Pine, but also with you.
pedit: why lilliaire over randbo?
To be clear, I want to lynch Pine because his reaction to this L-1 wagon was to brush it off and not bother interacting with the people who are pretty clearly just looking to interact with him. I guess you could call it lurking, but I'd classify it more as not reacting to pressure in a way that looks town.
I'd keep Randbo around over lilliaire because I think he's probably more readable, and seems to be more likely to contribute when he's here... If he's here? If he doesn't pick up the prod and gets replaced I'm starting over from zero on his slot.
I am willing to reconsider lilliaire slot if she gets replaced, not sure about randbo though.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Let's see if i got this correct.In post 258, Kerset wrote:1. Back in time Pine posts were not useful at all.
2. He gave lame vote
3. He started to lurk
Lets see we know there has to be other scum. What kind of action did Sc take?In post 253, Farkran wrote:Also @Kerset i'd really like to hear your reasoning on this, why is your vote staying here at the moment? Just wondering, too. You have two null/scumleans on this wagon (Evenstar as 3rd slot, Billy has given intent).
A) Sc decided to shade someone else and gave no opinion about his teammate.
B) Sc decided to suspect his teammate but did not vote him. When Sc saw L-1, he decided that situation is hopeless and claimed desire to vote.
C) Sc decided to join wagon early and hoped that teammate will be replaced. Then Sc would unvote him.
E) Sc decided to lurk as well.
Looking at the fact that there are other lurkers around. I don't think that C is reasonable, it would cause more charm then good to scumteam. I prefer to think that this vote clears Eva rather then it clears Pine.
A is a real possibility. Pine flip might make me rethink my null reads to either SL or TL.
B looks very realistic to me. There is more then one player who could hammer Pine so its inevitable in long term. Sc would secure his reputation for worst case scenario. I see no reason to pull out my vote because of this.
E would be quite troublesome to investigate.
A) would be ofrhz?
B) would be Billy
C) would be Evenstar, i guess? Are you ruling out both Micc and me?
D) is apparently no one, Pine is scum by himself and the mod screwed with us (lol i'm not serious but where's your D?)
E) would be either randbo or lilliaire
Out of these, i think only A and E are plausible. B is reasonable, but not before A and E.
To me, the situation looks like this:
If Pine flips scum it's randbo>lilli>ofrhz. In this scenario Kerset, Micc and Evenstar are never scum. Billy MIGHT be but not before the other 3 guys.
If Pine flips town, i think it's Micc. Pairings yet unknown but it's hardly ever Kerset. Anyone else can fit as his partner.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Out of game note:Welcome aboard! Glad to have you here, thread feels refreshed and i hope this means it will get more enjoyable from now on. I apologize that i don't know any of you, but so far my first impression of both (as persons, not in-game slots) is good!
In game:Now, you replaced two of my scumlean slots, so i'll leave the out of game part where it belongs, and get back on track.
@Neza (previously randbo): Looking forward to those walls of yours. I have a lot of questions for you.
@worst (previously Pine): expecting content from you too, your slot has been less than useful in that regard. Could you elaborate your 283?-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Take your time. I thought you had finished at least your first readthrough, but actually it may be better to hear your first impressions and progress from there.In post 289, the worst wrote:i can summarise what i've written about billy so far, if you'd like. just allow that i haven't read past page 1 yet.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Welcome OnlyIAmMe! Let me say that i am *so* happy about the new replacements so far, i love active people who are trying their best to play, regardless of wincon. This is how a mafia game should be played in my opinion, and the type i most enjoy being in. Of course not everyone can afford to put so much time and effort into a forum game, but i appreciate it when i see they are actually trying and enjoying it as much as myself.
Please forgive me if i repeat this a couple times in my posts but i need to do that to fix your names into my brain and not mess up about who was what. I think that writing things down helps the understanding and memory areas of my brain so i'm just going to do it for a while until i am confident i can remember it properly:
Pine = The Worst
randbo = Nezahualpilli
lilliaire = OnlyIAmMe
Now i'm going to read all your posts.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I have to say these posts are what i would expect from a tryhard town player, except that you have taken everything Kerset said without ever considering his POV while writing, either on purpose or out of bias. You're pointing what in your opinion is bad logic from Kerset, and regardless of whether i agree or not, you seem to overlook the motive behind those posts and the big picture about Kerset's reasoning in this game. I myself had a hard time figuring it out because his posts are... challenging to understand, and almost always in contrast to general consensus, thus they required multiple re-reads - however, in any of his exchanges with the other players he has shown traces of independent thought and, when not enganged in hollow arguments such as wagon or hammer timings, his posts have been useful and his votes placed and defended carefully. You're being pushy, and this is not the first time we've seen this coming from your slot.Spoiler: Neza post 296
and
Spoiler: Neza post 309
Seeing as this followups a hardly salvageable randbo slot i think this is where i'm placing my vote right now. VOTE: Neza
Still looking forward to read your walls about me and Micc.
pedit: TLDR see ofrhz last post, i guess i could have saved some time by writing just that.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
This on the other hand is a big 180° from what Pine has been offering us - i'm not sure how much alignment indicativeness i should put into that given that Pine pretty much ignored this game except for 47, 50/51 and a sheep vote against Kerset in 67. The skill level displayed in this post is clearly higher than average - to the point that it reminds me of scum!skitter in my last game where she also 180'ed on my read as soon as she realized where i was coming from. That attack on billy also rings weird - billy's analysis of my actions was indeed not keen at all, but tone and progression felt genuine and i think that this kind of "bad" reads usually come from town rather than scum in this specific scenario. It was too early to push for a mislynch anyways, and i believe he has been reconsidering me over the course of the game. This is also kinda town indicative of his previous play - if he was willing to stick to it, he wouldn't have dropped it off the way he did.In post 299, the worst wrote:This quote was actually too long to fit in a single post, so please just read post 299.
Contrary to billy though, i would not townlock you based on analytical skills only. Skill or lack thereof is absolutely NAI to me - if anything, it's useful to make yourself harder to read, not townread. I expect more content from you. Specifically, i'd like to ask why would you think Pine played as he did before he repped out.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I have to say i am a bit concerned about what is happening around the Pine/TW and randbo/neza slots. Let me clarify my position more in detail, which at the same time should also answer some of the most recent questions to me:
Pine slot immediately started out as a (very weak) SL to me - this was just me having a first impression following my RVS escape reaction test, definitely *not* a solid read but something worth mentioning for the sake of moving the game forward. I too believe mine was kinda an obvious RT especially in the eyes of an experienced player, and that is why i wasn't particularly fond of Micc and Pine's reactions about it whereas i was more comfortable with Billy's. I thought Billy's post was made with good intent, despite not doing his homework properly about my meta - bad reads/bad logic arguments *usually* come from newb-to-intermediate skill level town in my experience, whereas at the same skill level scum is way more concerned about not slipping it up. Reactions i have got are the following:
Spoiler: Billy
Spoiler: Micc
Spoiler: Pine
Spoiler: randbo
Then the Pine wagon started (post 114) and it almost immediately gained consensus from everyone. I mean, as of 184 he was already at L-1+intent from Billy (he declared intent later, but it is adamant he wanted to vote him as well, which is why i clarified my position in the last paragraph of 261). Even randbo promptly adjusted his reads in 133 and 136, after stating "his actions are reasonable" in 98.Pine did not even post in-between. Everything that happened is that town gathered consensus against him, so he did either:
1. tried to soft-bus his partner as he was going down;
2. tried to push an handy mislynch.
I would have liked to question him more, but he flaked away and i was left with a plausible town wagon on Pine, although i was skeptical about the fact that TRs and SRs merged into it without any particular issue - especially Micc. Then Pine asked for replacement, everyone unvoted, and Neza (formerly randbo) happened.
I already stated i was not a fan of Neza's 296 and 309 and i was expecting a SL/SR on me coming from him, which punctually arrived as of 340 where he basically reinforces his pred's suggestion of a Fark/Kerset solve.
Seeing as TW literally 180°ed from Pine reads (47 vs 283 about billy, 50/51 vs 291/299 about me) i am much more inclined to think this slot has independent thought whereas randbo/neza has not. That newbie slot feels pushy AND looks coached to push mislynches on the fashion-of-the-day baits, which incidentally is also consistent with my scum!Micc theory given his posts 199 to 249 and 257. There also seems to be *way* less general consensus on the randbo wagon started by ofrhz as soon as 122 and ignored by pretty much everyone besides Billy. Posts 310 and 314 reinforce my opinion that Micc would still be ok in lynching the Pine slot but his only argument against Neza is semantics. I wonder how scum would think about this?
@Neza still looking forward to hear your analysis of Micc, i guess it will be fun to read since your FI of him was "i don't feel so great about him" (279) vs agreeing with him in everything you mentioned in your read of me and Kerset, lol.
@Micc i'd suggest you give a in-depth read about the Neza slot, thanks.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I explained it in detail in my 341. Let me recap my reads about them:In post 353, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
@Farkran - why didnt you make the same sort of comment as you did to Neza to the worst who started out scumreading me as pg1 scum then seemed to come around to excluding me from a lynch pool along with three others?In post 341, Farkran wrote: quote snip
@Neza still looking forward to hear your analysis of Micc, i guess it will be fun to read since your FI of him was "i don't feel so great about him" (279) vs agreeing with him in everything you mentioned in your read of me and Kerset, lol.
@Micc i'd suggest you give a in-depth read about the Neza slot, thanks.
Neza:he's being pushy and continued randbo's line of reasoning which does not make any sense to me. His readings of Kerset and myself are filled with misreps and logical fallacies. I can see this coming from coached scum or scum with a VERY hard time to PoE his fake scumreads, especially given the current situation where his slot has been SL/Red and he needs to salvage it quickly.
TW:he started in the same position as Neza, replacing a SL/Red slot, yet he did a full 180 of his pred's reads and produced a very insighful analysis of your case (a pretty much universal townread) which, despite my disagreement, actually looked solid and solvy instead of survivalistic. The skill level displayed makes me wary of the sincerity or usefulness of his post - i'd say it is an overall NAI - but if i look outside of his area of influence, what i can see is a wagon that developed really quickly, starting out as a pressure wagon and ending up with hammer intent, then died just as fast as soon as the slot was replaced. This is pretty much the same thing that happened to me in my last game, so i'm more inclined to think the wagon was against town and therefore at least 1 scum was on it. Micc happens to fall exactly into that description, but honestly i don't have as solid a SR on him as i have on Neza slot right now.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
I'll post my readlist as a recap since i've been just wallposting recently
{Evenstar}
{Billy}
{Kerset, ofrhz, TW}
{Micc, Karnage} (karnage was previously lilliaire)
{Neza}
@karnage welcome! I suggest you form your reads first and then look for explanations/questions. You wouldn't want to have the game narrated by another player, especially in your position.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
Actually @Kerset would you be so kind to tl;dr the thread? We haven't heard much from you recently, except for some emotion display which is usually town AI to me, but i'd like you to produce more than your 381 in the current gamestate. I kinda regret answering to Karnage the way i did because after i read his first post again i could see his introduction as a RT i would do, and he's getting town points from me for that. I was... committed to being polite with my welcome post but that may have been a mistake and i spoiled it. Not really interested to hear from Evenstar (which is probably going to be replaced, sadly) and Billy right now though, but i'd love to hear from Kerset. @Karnage i look forward to hear from you too, your slot has been the least productive so far and i wouldn't like you to UTR your way out of d1 just because it's late.-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy
-
-
Farkran Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: August 16, 2019
- Location: Italy