Page 21 of 110

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:50 pm
by Aeronaut
- VoteCount 1.9 -

With 9 players still alive, it's 5 to lynch!


[L-5]
mattblackguy -
[L-5]
GAYreenHamster -
[L-5]
schadd -
[L-4]
Shade -
Raskolnikov

[L-3]
Raskolnikov -
Cassielle, Creature

[L-3]
ThinkBig -
schadd_, gigabyteTroubadour,

[L-5]
gigabyteTroubadour -
[L-5]
Creature -
[L-5]
Cassielle -

Not Voting
-
GAYreenHamster, mattblackguy, Shade, ThinkBig

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2017-01-18 20:00:00)

In post 494, Shade wrote: @Aeronaut Please don't replace me from the game! I will promised try to be more active.
Rakkar didn't respond to his prod, and therefore he was replaced. As long as you respond to a prod within 24 hrs or post at least once every 48 hrs, you won't be replaced!

Also, so I can see it better, try bolding
@Aeronaut
if you gotta ask me a question!

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:53 pm
by cassielle
mod: creature also voted rask

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 2:53 pm
by Creature
You missed ThinkBig's unvote on 495.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:10 pm
by cassielle
putting some thoughts out there while i wait on more content.

schadd_ has convinced me his reads (the main no. 1 reason he pinged as scum to me) are valid and honestly made. i dont agree with most of them but i feel that he and i also have opposed styles of reading people. i make strong judgements and then build on them or leave it null, he seems to build a baseline then adjust with strong judgements -- and with that and the small pool of info to work with in general from certain players this game, im gonna say that its very likely were weak-reading people oppositely but both putting it forward as way stronger than it should be because theres so little to make a strong opinion on to begin with.

last real concern i have with schadd_ is the lack of posting. activity is low, below GAYreen even. low word count high content makes me feel townie on him in general tho -- every post he makes stands out and because theres a small number of posts from him its easy to get polarized (strong conclusions from small sample size, etc.)

i want to go through his reads list because i feel like theres some inconsistency there idk but the time isnt right. still waiting on two people to provide content asap and i really want to drag a longwinded wallpost out of shade at some point too. harder to do that the more i focus on a strong townlean imo, because then im putting the pressure on the wrong folks.

current reads list sans gbT (as stated, waiting on them before i approach that again)

TOWN
creature
gayreen

NULLTOWN
schadd_

NULLSCUM
tb, mbg

SCUM
shade, rask

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:21 pm
by Raskolnikov
hey casserole what would you do if you felt lazy and most of your scumpool was also lurking?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:24 pm
by Raskolnikov
Or just lazy in general, I find people hate it but it's how I feel here.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:24 pm
by Raskolnikov
Maybe if you ask me more questions it'll be interesting.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:25 pm
by ThinkBig
Working on a read list now.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:26 pm
by Raskolnikov
I'd probably sheep you if your reads looked better.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:26 pm
by Creature
I feel better about my recent reads because I've read the posts and didn't just automatically assume activity = town.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:26 pm
by Raskolnikov
Cass, not think. Hi thinkbig!

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:29 pm
by Raskolnikov
If it were one or two things different I'd try to talk about it but if it's like half the playerbase and it'd involve going over every single one multiple times would take so long

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:31 pm
by cassielle
id try to stay active, call them out repeatedly. dont let them off the hook -- if i see them post, jump on it, try and pull something out of them while theyre present. if theyre not posting, keep adding clear reminders that i want them to post whenever i post something.

lurkers gonna lurk, the best you can do is make them look bad for continuing to lurk, imo

which is why im really pressing hard on mbg and tb, i want those two to post like asap, i want them active, engaged and involved so i can get good reads and everyone else can draw better supported conclusions

p-edit: as far as continuing to lean on you, i dont really feel thats a good idea juuuust yet. i want creature to put some pressure on, because ive just eased up. yeah its good cop bad cop of a sort but that works even when youre aware of it happening, so idc really about putting that in the open. also im uncertain my case is as strong as i thought it was now if im being honest but youre still giving strong scumvibes. creature said to beware folks inflating postcount way back and im getting that vibe from you, for instance. among other things, but im gonna keep that back while i work on outlining my case better.

but you sure af could look a lot better by stopping this 20 1liner post bs and focusing on content more imo, this feels like mass fluff and youre not making your case any better looking

p-edit 2: at the very least you could do as schadd_ did and do a post outlining the why of each read, thatd be a great and easy way to prove your reads are good-faith and not shallow

also: hi tb! looking forward to that reads list

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:35 pm
by Raskolnikov
Can't you just agree with people to not use postcount as an indicator of much instead trying to force me to change my posting style? If it's globally acknowledged as "inflated" I don't really see the problem?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:37 pm
by Raskolnikov
I could go over everyone person by person but talking about townreads is pretty boring tbh.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:39 pm
by cassielle
problem is theres no content atm to draw conclusions from? i think thats very fair to say, your past page of posts or thereabouts is fluffy and i cant pull anything out of it. condensing the posts into larger ones would force you to flesh out the thought processes youre following more, thats why im pushing for that.

and yeah talking about townreads is boring but when half of your trs are half of my srs it becomes a whole lot more interesting, dont you think?

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:39 pm
by Aeronaut
Gayreenhamster has requested replacement.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:41 pm
by ThinkBig
First, I would like to apologize for my inactivity. I had many things that came up IRL that has caused me to be not as active as I'd like to be.

I'll respond to the posts sometime tomorrow, but for now, here are my reads.

ThinkBig's Read List 1.0

{T}Raskolnikov
{T}Creature
{T}gigabyteTroubadour


{N} mattblackguy
{N} GAYreenHamster

{NS}Shade


{S}Schadd
{S}Cassielle


Spoiler: Key
Conftown - {CT}

Town - {T}

LeanTown - {LT}

NullTown - {NT}

Null - {N}
NullScum - {NS}

LeanScum - {LS}

Scum - {S}

ConfScum - {CS}


I will expand on this read list tomorrow.

Format and colour shamelessly sheeped from Aeronaut.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:42 pm
by Raskolnikov
I consider you, matt and scadd_ as full newbie clears. I guess there our biggest difference is matt so I could talk about that.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:43 pm
by Raskolnikov
LOL thinkbig did you exhaust all your effort colouring that or something :giggle:

No,
I
did! (in a seperate completed game) - Aero

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:45 pm
by ThinkBig
Lol. Nah, just copied and pasted the BBCode from aeronaut and filled in my own reads. :D

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:46 pm
by cassielle
ok, lets talk about matt. also: TB's list is a real interesting looking one and i cannot wait for his explanation, because it feels ultra shallow. im holding him to that promise of expanding on the list.

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:46 pm
by Raskolnikov
Now presenting, the new
ReadList 2.0


In full colour and detail, sorted for your convenience.

Coming soon to a store near you


p.s. explanations tomorrow

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:49 pm
by Raskolnikov
That's actually just WTF but also the first time I've seen anything like it

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 3:50 pm
by ThinkBig
Aeronaut and other people on the site use the colours for read list. I personally like the colour codes as it is easy to see visually where you put people.