In post 3067, Enchant wrote:Wait how you tied me and Toog
In post 3068, Enchant wrote:What you smok
This is their reaction to me calling them partnered... I THINK I FINALLY GOT IT RIGHT!!!!!In post 3073, Toogeloo wrote:Ooo... Interesting solve.In post 3060, Andante wrote:however, unless we wanna ego vote out VP (or whatever it's called) the team is simply Toog and Enchant
i don't think enchant's seriously been a wagon, and that was not the impetus for us trying to get u to vote dwlee, it was the factt aht dwlee starting posting and looks scummy and i think you're a viable partnerIn post 3066, VP Baltar wrote:When enchant came up seriously as a wagon was when yall started badgering me incessantly to vote dwlee. When andante votes there, you pop up trying to nudge her away from her vote. So yeah, you seem to have an interestIn post 3062, Fun and Games wrote:i don't think that that 'very concerned' matches the vibe of that post or really my entire trajectory todayIn post 3058, VP Baltar wrote:You seem very concerned with enchant not getting run up. Why's that?In post 3055, Fun and Games wrote:andante you change your mind a lot lol
i think dueling vp and dwlee wagons would be great
~ skitter
~ skitter
i don't know what prompted pooky to go after you just then, but i also don't know if there's a massive difference between 'pushing you passively' and 'pushing you actively' that you're diffrentiatingIn post 3074, Dwlee99 wrote:But this isn't even a response to what I'm saying. The point is that pooky might have been suggesting we were scum, but when I'm around before then he doesn't interact with me, only linking me to VP to push VP. Then when I vote enchant he THEN starts going head-to-head with me, which is the point of the interaction I'm highlighting. Calling me scum indirectly ("dwlee is VP's partner") is not the same as directly attacking me (which is the interaction after I voted Enchant) which is why I think it's a chainsaw specifically and not just an extension of already saying I'm scum
Do you OMGUS a lot, or is your natural inclination to assume someone attacking you is scum?In post 3082, Fun and Games wrote:i mean at least for me it wasn't in response to your enchant vote, but rather your vote on us ...
and yeah if it wasn't clear i am explcilty saying i think you're scum
~ skitter
Its functionally omgus and imo incredibly reachy, as i think our push on ico doesnt look anything like a busIn post 3084, Dwlee99 wrote:What about my reasoning for voting you do you think is scummy
Saying I'm buddying andante is also funny
- p sure dwlee's vote on us was a reaction to pooky calling them scumIn post 3085, VP Baltar wrote:Do you OMGUS a lot, or is your natural inclination to assume someone attacking you is scum?In post 3082, Fun and Games wrote:i mean at least for me it wasn't in response to your enchant vote, but rather your vote on us ...
and yeah if it wasn't clear i am explcilty saying i think you're scum
~ skitter
Eh fine. You're right, I'm not being very generous.In post 3086, Fun and Games wrote:- p sure dwlee's vote on us was a reaction to pooky calling them scum
- why do u reaf everything wr do in the worst possible light
- to actually answer the question: no
I can look through the interactions with ico but they're not any part of my read on you so idk why it's relevantIn post 3086, Fun and Games wrote:Its functionally omgus and imo incredibly reachy, as i think our push on ico doesnt look anything like a bus
I'm townreading andante cause <reason> and she's so chaotic and unagenda'd it's obviousYou're townreading andante for p meh reasons with what i believe to be the goal of getting her to stop pushing you which seems to have worked since she's fairly chaotic and has already moved on
Independantly scummy first, and incidentally they might be partnered with uIn post 3087, VP Baltar wrote:Eh fine. You're right, I'm not being very generous.In post 3086, Fun and Games wrote:- p sure dwlee's vote on us was a reaction to pooky calling them scum
- why do u reaf everything wr do in the worst possible light
- to actually answer the question: no
Feel like your slot has made several bad faith arguments, and that's put things in a bad light for me.
Let me rephrase this, do you see dwlee as independently scummy or scummy because you think he is my buddy?
So why exactlu are u scumreading us thenIn post 3088, Dwlee99 wrote:I can look through the interactions with ico but they're not any part of my read on you so idk why it's relevantIn post 3086, Fun and Games wrote:Its functionally omgus and imo incredibly reachy, as i think our push on ico doesnt look anything like a busI'm townreading andante cause <reason> and she's so chaotic and unagenda'd it's obviousYou're townreading andante for p meh reasons with what i believe to be the goal of getting her to stop pushing you which seems to have worked since she's fairly chaotic and has already moved on
Uh explain why we're pushing our partner from p2 and were one of the biggest advocates for flipping him?In post 3089, Dwlee99 wrote:Also like again you can't just call it reachy and make it so
WHY is it reachy
Yes it is some OMGUS but that also is completely valid in this scenario cause of the way you've pushed me not that you scumread me at all
Toog overenchant but vp over bothIn post 3090, Andante wrote:I mean, yall are both town, so we want Enchant today or Toogeloo today?