I'll read through the game now and probably post a couple of updates along the way.
UNVOTE: in case Celebloki was voting anyone
I think this makes quite a bit of sense, so long as you mean non-investigative PRs would also hypoclaim a target rather than their actual target. Otherwise scum might deduce who's doctor for example based on the choice of target.In post 59, Gamma Emerald wrote: Eh I think hypo might be viable if claiming target but not role/result
This seemed a bit too quick to dismiss a reason for townreading people compared to asking for more specifics about why (as Thomith did in the very next post).In post 81, Puffalicious wrote:Are you town reading them because of the setup talk? Those type of stuff are nai.In post 80, Celebloki wrote: I have a really hard time reading setup speculation without my eye's glazing over, but I think I ultimately followed it. I do think I generally get a town read on ssbm because of it though. Maybe also Mizuki.
UNVOTE:
- A
I agree with this gamestate as +town for Elements but don't see it as +town for Puff.In post 178, Thomith wrote: it seems like it was over half the playerlist in the entire game that was questioning the slot (Me, Gamma Emerald, Cobblerfone, Elements, Mizuki, Kyouko) either directly on post 30, or on other things after it became clear that the Puff slot had gained a lot of attention. That definitely gives me vibes that Puff could very feasibly just be Town, and there was at least one Mafia jumping on that seemingly easy train of thought/suspicion.
Again this also makes me more tempted to read Elements as Town currently, as it did look like they were trying to avoid this happening, at least to me.
In post 218, Cobblerfone wrote: Mizuki, I think of in terms of her tunnel on me. My gut gives me a slight town read becauseI have a history of attracting misguided town tunnels.
The first bolded sentence makes it sound like currently relevant as a justification for townreading Mizuki for scumreading you. The second bolded quote makes it sound like distant past. Which is it?In post 276, Cobblerfone wrote:Honestly it's been long enoughIn post 224, Thomith wrote: -SNIP-
Could you expand a little on why you think you attract misguided town tunnels?I don't really remember. Even at the time I wasn't sure.
Elements is being scummy too. But there is the whole alt thing so idk.
Similar vibe to Puff (that the first post was scummy overexplainy) or similar to "town would just be like 'sup' and leave"?In post 269, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like I got a similar vibe from shaddowez’s first postIn post 257, Puffalicious wrote:Over explainy first post. "Sleep now." "Post tomorrow"In post 253, Thomith wrote:What's scummy about what is essentially an ego post?In post 252, Puffalicious wrote: Anyone else think shaddowez is scum here? just based off the first post.
Elements is being scummy too. But there is the whole alt thing so idk.
What do you think @kyouko
Scum feels the need to over explain, especially in a scenario where they legit gotta go. Town would just be like "sup" and leave.
Only would be a chain mislim if Cobb (or you) are scum otherwise it fails as soon as one flips town. So are you saying you're sure Cobb is scum?In post 285, Puffalicious wrote: I did not like imaginality's catch up. The wallpost looked like the kind of post scum would make to fake a read and it looked like he was pairing Cobb's and me as scum buddies. Pairing 2 players as scum I consider it scum trying to setup chain mislim. The part where imaginality said where I was rewarding a town read made no sense to me.
- A
Wanting to wait to hear Gamma's response to my question about her Shadow comment first.In post 286, Puffalicious wrote:On your wallpost you have talked about Cobbs and me and when I looked at your reads list here I see you put Shadow below me. What is it about Shadow you did not like and why did you not have anything to say about him?In post 283, imaginality wrote: Readslist:
Yay!
Thomith
Elements
Mizuki
Kyouko
Gamma
Puff
Shadow
Cobb
Nay!
- A
And that wouldn't even be a chain mislimIn post 289, imaginality wrote:Only would be a chain mislim if Cobb (or you) are scum otherwise it fails as soon as one flips town. So are you saying you're sure Cobb is scum?In post 285, Puffalicious wrote: I did not like imaginality's catch up. The wallpost looked like the kind of post scum would make to fake a read and it looked like he was pairing Cobb's and me as scum buddies. Pairing 2 players as scum I consider it scum trying to setup chain mislim. The part where imaginality said where I was rewarding a town read made no sense to me.
- A
Maybe I misunderstood the term but if one of you flipped town it would make me significantly less likely to scumread the other (as it would remove one of the hunches behind the scum read).In post 292, Puffalicious wrote:Chain mislim means when it's a town flip. I don't know what Cobb will flip. I get pinged alot when I see someone pairs 2 people as scum when there hasn't been a scum flip yet.In post 289, imaginality wrote:Only would be a chain mislim if Cobb (or you) are scum otherwise it fails as soon as one flips town. So are you saying you're sure Cobb is scum?In post 285, Puffalicious wrote: I did not like imaginality's catch up. The wallpost looked like the kind of post scum would make to fake a read and it looked like he was pairing Cobb's and me as scum buddies. Pairing 2 players as scum I consider it scum trying to setup chain mislim. The part where imaginality said where I was rewarding a town read made no sense to me.
- A
- A
Thanks for clarifying. That makes three of us.In post 297, Gamma Emerald wrote: Found it, the former
I couldn't see why they would think I'd be able to push to get one of them mislimmed D2 if the other flipped town D1. And so if Puff were town I assumed they were meaning I'd want to tie them to a Cobb scumflip. But I think I misunderstood what they meantIn post 295, Thomith wrote:This attempt at insinuating that Puff has knowledge they shouldn't feels like a stretch to me...In post 289, imaginality wrote:Only would be a chain mislim if Cobb (or you) are scum otherwise it fails as soon as one flips town. So are you saying you're sure Cobb is scum?In post 285, Puffalicious wrote: I did not like imaginality's catch up. The wallpost looked like the kind of post scum would make to fake a read and it looked like he was pairing Cobb's and me as scum buddies. Pairing 2 players as scum I consider it scum trying to setup chain mislim. The part where imaginality said where I was rewarding a town read made no sense to me.
- A
I mean, I literally said "hypoclaim" in the very sentence I claimed my action, so this is ??In post 386, Puffalicious wrote:I wasn't sure if imagi was true claiming or not.If he was claiming I thought he wanted to clear a slot. In my head I was also thinking a town pr who is not getting wagoned shouldn't claim like that because it exposes them to scum and in past games I have seen players would claim town pr for no reason.
- A
Did you misread Celeboki as Cobblerfone?In post 433, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:What I do see here is a potential Follower crumb and since Cobbler claimed Follower, I could see scum thinking there is a follower in the setup and trying to draw a future counterclaim out of them with this plan. It's a common enough expression, but worth noting as a potential crumb I think.In post 80, Celebloki wrote: I have a really hard time reading setup speculation without my eye's glazing over, but I think I ultimately followed it. I do think I generally get a town read on ssbm because of it though. Maybe also Mizuki.
UNVOTE:
I know Cobbler claimed Follower. Your post was talking about a crumb and quoted my predecessor whose name also begins with C. I think it was pretty reasonable of me to ask what you were talking about.In post 449, ssbm_Kyouko wrote: Feels like maybe you missed Cobbler's claim which is maybe a little yikes
It's possible. I have been known to tunnel a bit. I do think the timing of Puff arguing today that I was bussing fits with scum!Puff wanting to attack and weaken the voice the person scumreading them most. But I mean, it's true I (or anyone) could be bussing, though I still would argue it was a bad plan to bus so it's still less likely scum did than if it was clearly advantageous. [For example if they'd had a strong read on who the invesitgative PR is.]In post 436, Thomith wrote:If I'm honest I genuinely think you could be tunelled on Puff, the same way I think Puff is tunelled on you.In post 434, imaginality wrote: @Thomasina I don't see why Cobb feels the need to unvote Puff in 119 if Puff is town. Why not just stay on Puff there? Maybe you can argue it's NAI rather than my take of it pointing to them being aligned but I think it's a stretch to call Puff town because of it.
What did you think of my other points about Puff?
@kyouko you can see in the 'statistical reasons' comment in 101 that Cobb was already preparing to jump ship at a suitable time.
Cobb was on meIn post 480, Puffalicious wrote: On day 1 it looked like Cobb was more likely going to go over and I don't understand how you thought you had a likely chance on going over on day 1 because Kyouko and Mizuki both said they liked your catch up. I remember Thomith said something about you being wary of you and he said he was scum reading Cobb more.
- A
I'm interested to hear what it was anyhow, even if it's no longer as dazzly.In post 485, ssbm_Kyouko wrote: I actually don't think this works, I forgot to consider if scum have a strongman that held their shot last Night
??In post 487, ssbm_Kyouko wrote: Sorry to put you on the spot here Thomith but I need to know, do scum have a strongman that held their shot last night?