So TB in
866 offers Titus a chance to engage with him about reads and the game state. She says she hasn't read and has zero reads which is fine and completely NAI considering she just replaced in. What isn't fine is her ending the conversation right there. Rather than asking if there is a person he wanted her to look into or a particular sequence of events he wanted her to look at, she just shuts the door. No attempt to follow up at all with him either in her ISO.
Titus questions (
872,
875) why Dark is being ran up and questions if he's lynch bait. Both seem like very odd questions based on what I know about her. I'd expect her to have made some sort of attempt to read the game by then as well ask if she could do a bit of meta diving on Dark because she thrives off information in order to make the best decisions as town. Every time I read these questions they feel forced and the lack of concern shown by her hopping on the Dark wagon feels very scummy, especially after she just told Fire in
870 she isn't voting until she has a feel for things. How did getting the recap from someone you just said you don't have a read on and asking those questions gave her a realistic feel of the game state?
The biggest thing however is our back and forth based on the Aubrey slot which has sadly been tainted by Severa. I believe she is lying about genuinely reaction testing due to a visible lack of progression. She calls Aubrey town in
956 and then claims the reason she voted for him in
1351 was because she was reaction testing. Why would she feel the need to test the wagons by voting a town read? The only explanation I can see would be that her read on him wasn't as strong or she started scum reading him. I can't see how her read on the slot changed because the only interaction they had during this time was just
1122. There are no other interactions with her and Aubrey during this time. There are also no interactions between her and anyone else about Aubrey during this time so I highly doubt she suddenly started scum reading him. In the post where she calls him town, the tone of it reads assured and confident. It sounded like she had written the slot off as town and had no intention of ever scum reading Aubrey.
I immediately vote for Titus in
1354 and all I'm met with is her trivializing and labeling my vote as being annoyed in
1370. I have made my scum read on her slot known ever when I voted Luca and I've been pushing for her lynch ever since the start Day 2. I've given a series of posts for players to look at is to why I scum read her in hopes people are seeing how scummy she's been but nope I'm just annoyed. Not once has she seriously bothered to engage with me as to why I scum read her.
Shorty after she just starts mindlessly tunneling and discrediting my work by saying my vote was in defense of Aubrey and that I lied about my reasoning (
1382,
1406) for why I voted for her. What's wrong with defending a town read? Why is it lying instead of a misunderstanding? Why do I have to justify myself when everyone knows she replaced Luca and anyone can read Aubrey's ISO and see that he was scum reading Luca? She then argues that because I didn't mention Luca in my ISO that I couldn't have possibly had him as obvious scum. This is an actually lie because I actually voted for him and felt confident his wagon would go through. Why couldn't I just have been spending my time looking and/or trying to lynch his partners?
TL:DR: I think Titus is scum for a lack of drive to game solve, her hop on the Dark wagon, and calling her suspicious flip on the Aubrey slot a reaction test.
