Are you semanticing the fuck out of my questions and chainsawing the fuck so he doesn't have to answer or address the concerns?In post 1249, davesaz wrote:I can't speak for Comm but I didn't see Titus's post as a question. Did it look like one to you?
No, it doesn't look like a question to me either.In post 1249, davesaz wrote:I can't speak for Comm but I didn't see Titus's post as a question. Did it look like one to you?
I "interrupted" because your concerns are easily laid to rest by just comparing your two ISO's.In post 1250, Titus wrote:Are you semanticing the fuck out of my questions and chainsawing the fuck so he doesn't have to answer or address the concerns?In post 1249, davesaz wrote:I can't speak for Comm but I didn't see Titus's post as a question. Did it look like one to you?
Alchemist is addressing the concerns at least, but still interrupting.
Waaaay ahead of you dude. Are you even reading this game?In post 1226, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 1223, shannon wrote:What's nasty about it?In post 1221, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 1168, Umlaut wrote:Gamma, who on your wagon do you think is scum?this is nasty
VOTE: Umlaut
Also, who *did* you think was scum on your wagon?Asks about scumreads on my wagon
Leaves my wagon
You can't tell me something isn't up.
Other than him, I don't really have scumreads on people from my wagon.
And actually, why not go back?In post 1189, shannon wrote:In post 961, FireScreamer wrote:Can you look back on the Gamma progression on me and comm and come back on the wagon kthanksIn post 956, shannon wrote:So you saw like 300 posts had happened between Titus voting me and you asking GC the question, and it didn't occur to you to:In post 905, Gamma Emerald wrote:I wasn't disturbed by Titus' irresponsiveness, and I hadn't read past that post so I couldn't tell she didn't answer. I was disturbed by GC's phrasing.
- read a few more pages to see if it had been resolved
- read a few more pages to see whether anyone else had asked what you were going to ask
- ISO any of the involved players to establish same?
Your iso suggests ... that might actually be the case. It shows you responding to posts in order, regardless of what might have happened in between. OK, I believe you.
VOTE: Alchemistinb4 'shannon was bussing gamma and then the wagon got strong and she left it but now she's worried about not being on it so she came back'
I'm trying to figure out what you're trying to do. Posting an observation like that does nothing. You didn't even say you had a concern -- how can it be a chainsaw when you're not making an accusation? For all we can tell, you like it that you have the same reads, or were trying to absolve yourself of responsibility for actually having reads.In post 1250, Titus wrote:Are you semanticing the fuck out of my questions and chainsawing the fuck so he doesn't have to answer or address the concerns?In post 1249, davesaz wrote:I can't speak for Comm but I didn't see Titus's post as a question. Did it look like one to you?
Alchemist is addressing the concerns at least, but still interrupting.
Pardon me, how are you ahead of me?In post 1255, shannon wrote:Waaaay ahead of you dude. Are you even reading this game?In post 1226, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 1223, shannon wrote:What's nasty about it?In post 1221, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 1168, Umlaut wrote:Gamma, who on your wagon do you think is scum?this is nasty
VOTE: Umlaut
Also, who *did* you think was scum on your wagon?Asks about scumreads on my wagon
Leaves my wagon
You can't tell me something isn't up.
Other than him, I don't really have scumreads on people from my wagon.
And actually, why not go back?In post 1189, shannon wrote:In post 961, FireScreamer wrote:Can you look back on the Gamma progression on me and comm and come back on the wagon kthanksIn post 956, shannon wrote:So you saw like 300 posts had happened between Titus voting me and you asking GC the question, and it didn't occur to you to:In post 905, Gamma Emerald wrote:I wasn't disturbed by Titus' irresponsiveness, and I hadn't read past that post so I couldn't tell she didn't answer. I was disturbed by GC's phrasing.
- read a few more pages to see if it had been resolved
- read a few more pages to see whether anyone else had asked what you were going to ask
- ISO any of the involved players to establish same?
Your iso suggests ... that might actually be the case. It shows you responding to posts in order, regardless of what might have happened in between. OK, I believe you.
VOTE: Alchemistinb4 'shannon was bussing gamma and then the wagon got strong and she left it but now she's worried about not being on it so she came back'
VOTE: Gamma
Gamma is L-1
Is this based on her last post or is there more?In post 1259, Firebringer wrote:Shannon is scum this game.
I think it's based on his imagination as much as anything.In post 1261, Gamma Emerald wrote:Is this based on her last post or is there more?In post 1259, Firebringer wrote:Shannon is scum this game.
In post 605, ThinkBig wrote:
In post 640, ThinkBig wrote:
Enough smart people are telling me Comm isn't scum to where they can't all be partners. So assuming Comm town, me town and GC town.In post 983, ThinkBig wrote:
Its based on your actions so far.In post 1264, shannon wrote:I think it's based on his imagination as much as anything.In post 1261, Gamma Emerald wrote:Is this based on her last post or is there more?In post 1259, Firebringer wrote:Shannon is scum this game.
CK was bogus last game and two of the scumteam was being wagoned at the start, so the scum motivation was to change that.In post 792, FireScreamer wrote:Who were bogus?In post 786, Narna wrote:They were bogus. Who can't see that??In post 785, FireScreamer wrote:What was the scum motivation to how they acted last game? I'm happy enough to treat similar behavior as coming from a similar motivation.
Two of who?In post 788, Narna wrote:2 of them were beinng wagonned. Everything they posted had a defensive twing to it.
Are you waiting for BSkies to ask, or can I ask: why?In post 1265, FireScreamer wrote:VOTE: Brian
It's contrary to previous reads lists but clearly it's time for a fresh take.
It's as it seemsIn post 1273, Green Crayons wrote:Are you waiting for BSkies to ask, or can I ask: why?In post 1265, FireScreamer wrote:VOTE: Brian
It's contrary to previous reads lists but clearly it's time for a fresh take.
I have a theory based on the remainder of your post, but not sure if that's what you're actually intending as the basis for your vote.
