Open 684: Stacking the Deck (Game Over!)

XnadrojX · Post Post #200 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 12:38 pm

And sorry, I'm just gonna tunnel Lowell at this point. I tend to only have a single scumread to push in the early game. Feel free to look town so i can townpile you though

Xayzeck · Post Post #201 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:03 pm

In post 184, Hawk wrote:Also Xay is your avatar Akiyama from Liar Game?? It looks like it I just didn't pay attention till now.

Yep, if I recall right yours was from the second revival game?

Xayzeck · Post Post #202 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:05 pm

In post 185, Pyra wrote:Trolling like FECampbell did doesn't really take that much effort and isn't really indicative of alignment, either.

Previously you said he was probably town or bad scum. If you say here his trolling is NAI, how did you get those reads on him

Xayzeck · Post Post #203 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:11 pm

In post 187, Lowell wrote:Xay aubrey, and gamma are town.

some combination of pyra, hawk, thenewearth are scum. as I said prob not hawk and pyra together though.

Why is gamma town?

Why is Pyra scum?

Xayzeck · Post Post #204 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:11 pm

In post 188, Lowell wrote:xandro and comm tbd. shin is town. whoever is left tbd.

Why is shin town?

Xayzeck · Post Post #205 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:17 pm

In post 190, Aubrey wrote:Pyra's action though is interesting. If Fred was town, and Pyra scum,...why not just join the easy wagon? Why be against it? That doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I'd imagin scum either voting it, or just ignoring it all together. Maybe making some small WTF comment. However, with a Pyra town scenario... He hasn't voted, and finally sees someone who has a possibility of being scum. So why not vote for it? Nothing to lose, so I don't understand that really either. What I'm curious about is Pyra being scum, and maybe thinking Fred(Gamma) possibly being an un-recruited mafia. He gives a reason for why the slot is acting up, and insists for people to look elsewhere. All the while he keeps the ability to vote him by noting scum potential later on.

Towncred? In a Pyrascum Fredtown scenario, knowing Fred will flip town and being an easy wagon, you know that post flip people are going to be on the wagon. Considering you already have loud pushers you could potentially push as scum, his posturing makes sense.

Xayzeck · Post Post #206 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:19 pm

And also, mafia don't know who the traitor is.

Xayzeck · Post Post #207 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 1:23 pm

I'll get back to this game later, got some work to do

Shinobi · Post Post #208 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 3:36 pm

Catching up in a bit.

MMM · Post Post #209 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 5:09 pm

@thenewearth
Why have you been pushing Fred as scum yet never voted him?

MMM · Post Post #210 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 5:10 pm

@CommKnight
What are your thoughts on Hawk and Aubrey so far?

Lowell · Post Post #211 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 5:40 pm

In post 200, XnadrojX wrote:And sorry, I'm just gonna tunnel Lowell at this point. I tend to only have a single scumread to push in the early game. Feel free to look town so i can townpile you though

Nah. We can 1v1 though if you want. Over your boy pyra's honor.

Lowell · Post Post #212 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 5:42 pm

209 and 210 are questions into the ether so that MMM can look like he's trying. This is a classic bit. Insert innocuous 3rd-party questions into a discussion about something else.

Once I'm done 1v1ing pyra, xna, and hawk, I'm coming for you.

MMM · Post Post #213 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 5:46 pm

In post 212, Lowell wrote:209 and 210 are questions into the ether so that MMM can look like he's trying. This is a classic bit. Insert innocuous 3rd-party questions into a discussion about something else.

Once I'm done 1v1ing pyra, xna, and hawk, I'm coming for you.

212 is a remarkable attempt at throwing shade so Lowell can look like he's finding scum.
See, I can do this too, doesn't make me townier.

Shinobi · Post Post #214 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 6:17 pm

In post 176, thenewearth wrote:
In post 174, Hawk wrote:
In post 171, Gamma Emerald wrote:IMO this is the best lead rn for me
VOTE: thenewearth
? Reasoning.

UNVOTE:
i'm pretty sure its because "I'm picking on the easiest target which makes me scum"

There's little here that indicates whether or not he's picking an easy target or he's scumhunting - you have decided that he did the former based off of a rather small amount of things.

In post 177, thenewearth wrote:
In post 170, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hello Xnadroj
TBH, I have NO READS.

In post 171, Gamma Emerald wrote:IMO this is the best lead rn for me
VOTE: thenewearth
I mean

Like he's casually making a bandwagon against me hoping for some skid marks to appear

I'm not even 100% on what this is. Is wagoning someone a bad thing now?

Shinobi · Post Post #215 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 6:20 pm

And before anyone asks, I thought Fred was a dope and pretty much ignored every single thing out of his mouth since his first roleclaim.
How people have concrete scumreads on someone acting like a troll is beyond me.

Shinobi · Post Post #216 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 6:36 pm

Also I just checked on Hawk's scumslip bit and I don't think it's all that solid, though I'm not going to hold that against him.

So I think I'm caught up for the most part aside from something I wanted to follow up with wrt MMM but I can't quite remember what it was.

XnadrojX · Post Post #217 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 9:57 pm

In post 212, Lowell wrote:209 and 210 are questions into the ether so that MMM can look like he's trying. This is a classic bit. Insert innocuous 3rd-party questions into a discussion about something else.

Once I'm done 1v1ing pyra, xna, and hawk, I'm coming for you.

1v1 against 3 people. Seems legit.

I'd honestly prefer you on me, right here and now while the rest of the people discuss your other fabricated reads. I don't need your attention to be diverted from anyone other than me.

Since I'm the one who pushed the read on you originally, I'm gonna be the aggressor here. My case on you is split in several posts, although most lie in pages 4-5 and 7-8.
Good luck pulling shit of sufficient quality to defend yourself

XnadrojX · Post Post #218 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 9:59 pm

In post 212, Lowell wrote:209 and 210 are questions into the ether so that MMM can look like he's trying. This is a classic bit. Insert innocuous 3rd-party questions into a discussion about something else.

Once I'm done 1v1ing pyra, xna, and hawk, I'm coming for you.

Make this one more piece of evidence to my case.

MMM's questions generate far more content than your shade throwing ever will. The questions are valid and most certainly not into the ether. You ain't leading a lynch on anyone here with this game if yours.

XnadrojX · Post Post #219 (ISO) » Wed Apr 26, 2017 10:00 pm

In post 217, XnadrojX wrote:
In post 212, Lowell wrote:209 and 210 are questions into the ether so that MMM can look like he's trying. This is a classic bit. Insert innocuous 3rd-party questions into a discussion about something else.

Once I'm done 1v1ing pyra, xna, and hawk, I'm coming for you.

1v1 against 3 people. Seems legit.

I'd honestly prefer you on me, right here and now while the rest of the people discuss your other fabricated reads. I don't need your attention to be diverted from anyone other than me.

Since I'm the one who pushed the read on you originally, I'm gonna be the aggressor here. My case on you is split in several posts, although most lie in pages 4-5 and 7-8.
Good luck pulling shit of sufficient quality to defend yourself

Your turn, I await your defence

Hawk · Post Post #220 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:03 am

In post 206, Xayzeck wrote:And also, mafia don't know who the traitor is.

Huh?? How do you know this??

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #221 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:15 am

In post 220, Hawk wrote:
In post 206, Xayzeck wrote:And also, mafia don't know who the traitor is.
Huh?? How do you know this??

It's setup info

Hawk · Post Post #222 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:21 am

In post 221, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 220, Hawk wrote:
In post 206, Xayzeck wrote:And also, mafia don't know who the traitor is.
Huh?? How do you know this??
It's setup info

:eyeroll: I know that Gamma. But he said it like he knows that mafia didn't pick recruit option. It's technically not setup info because town doesn't know if their is a traitor or if he was recruited right?

Xayzeck · Post Post #223 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:48 am

In post 203, Xayzeck wrote:
In post 187, Lowell wrote:Xay aubrey, and gamma are town.

some combination of pyra, hawk, thenewearth are scum. as I said prob not hawk and pyra together though.
Why is gamma town?

Why is Pyra scum?

answer me ya fuq

Xayzeck · Post Post #224 (ISO) » Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:49 am

In post 212, Lowell wrote:209 and 210 are questions into the ether so that MMM can look like he's trying. This is a classic bit. Insert innocuous 3rd-party questions into a discussion about something else.

Once I'm done 1v1ing pyra, xna, and hawk, I'm coming for you.

U know, are you even trying to find scum or are you just really stubborn