25 pages isn't hard work.In post 599, Game Replacement wrote:No, that's hard work.
Give me the TLDR and I'll town lock you for today.
It's not a policy lynch. There is a distinct scum motivation behind what Flubber is doing.In post 574, havingfitz wrote:The other two...Flubber and Steel have a few spots where they feel town but a general lack of posting/content makes developing a scum read more advanced than 'let's policy lynch the lurkers' difficult to come to.
Maybe not. But osuka was the ONLY player who would have tried to save Paul's skin if he got wagoned.In post 594, Jules and Vincent wrote:I do understand the points of keeping someone in who town reads you because it helps your survival in the game. But one person can't save your skin if a handful scum read you.
Could you elaborate? Or link to where this was explained?In post 601, iiSq5024 wrote:There is a distinct scum motivation behind what Flubber is doing.
That sounds like LaL. How is he any different from the others not providing content?In post 603, iiSq5024 wrote:You can't see the scum motivation behind not posting any content?
Here's my town reads.
Why must it be? It's possible to have legitimate analysis of low-content posters by looking at the content they do have, but your analysis of Steel was basically "his thoughts are genuine". Which thoughts were genuine and why would you think scum wouldn't have them?In post 609, Flubbernugget wrote:How is a comment on a low activity poster going to be anything but weak?
Is this you telling me to to hammer Flubber?
This is an awesome expression but I'm not sure if you linked the right post? That's a Creature post and Creature's not lurking.In post 615, Flubbernugget wrote:hand in hand with foot in mouth.
