/quote]In post 1774, Thor665 wrote:Vote Count 1.5
(4): CultOfAthena, Klick, mozamis, MaxousTranscend
(2):Flubbernuggettexcat,Thor665
Beefster(1):RadiantCowbells
mozamis(1): Beefster
(1):texcatFlubbernugget
Not Voting(4):Moneybags, Transcend,HeWhoSwims, Errantparabola
Can you point specifically to where you think I'm being vague or theoretical?In post 1811, mozamis wrote:@ Klick - look at how ready Max is to give out his opinions - even to the extent of saying "i was right", which is very town lol
whereas Cult is so vague and theoretical. It's not Max.
cult plays in a similar way to Hewho - quire reasonable, but DOING and even SAYING very little.
Yes, I do know something – what your towngame looks like and what your scumgame looks like. I found your playstyle scummy in the first game we played together, but now I know that that's just how you play as town.In post 1812, mozamis wrote:and you'll note how Cult is THE ONLY player in the whole game that has always called me town. Does that seem toen to you? Most people find my "erratic" playstyle scummy at some point. She never has, like she, ya know, KNOWS something...lol
I think there's a bit more nuance to it than that.In post 1813, mozamis wrote:also lol at CUlt for attacking EP for not mentioning Tex day 1 and then attacking EP for voting Tex day 2.
clearly just attacking EP for whatevr he does.
My activity hasn't changed at all, and even if itIn post 1814, mozamis wrote: yeah, but look at how much more active you are now, now that you are under pressure?
where have you been all game when town needed you? Nowhere, you have done NOTHING to lynch scum.
you never pushed beef, you never pushed klick. only now, under pressure, do present a case on EP.
No, I would never accept my own lynch. There's no reason to.In post 1818, Errantparabola wrote:Would you be willing to get lynched today if, hypothetically, it guaranteed my lynch tomorrow?In post 1801, CultOfAthena wrote:Reasonably so, and more than the other potential candidates.
How likely is it? Unless you're talking about pure statistical likelihood, is there some specific reason to disbelieve it? All-town wagons happen all the time. My reads independent of the votecount lead me to the conclusion that EP is scum, so I don't see why that conclusion also leading to the conclusion of something being an all-town wagon is cause to reconsider.In post 1827, Thor665 wrote:@CoA - if EP is scum and you and Max are town than it means we got Transcend to 5 votes (RC was on there as well but unvoted shortly before this votecount) with zero scum support for a town wagon.
How likely do you think that is?
Well, first off, you're kind of playing word-snarl there; yes, I'm asking about the statistical liklihood, which you appear to understand but then don't address by tossing out the (unsupported) idea that 'all town wagons happen all the time'.In post 1831, CultOfAthena wrote:How likely is it? Unless you're talking about pure statistical likelihood, is there some specific reason to disbelieve it? All-town wagons happen all the time. My reads independent of the votecount lead me to the conclusion that EP is scum, so I don't see why that conclusion also leading to the conclusion of something being an all-town wagon is cause to reconsider.
In post 1832, CultOfAthena wrote:I mean, I'm willing to consider scum!Maxous given that my EP case doesn't appear to be going anywhere. I'm not really confident in it but I don't think town loses this game either way.
I will offer the counter thought that; she is under reasonably heavy attack, and the only person trying to discuss reads with her is me - so she's actually only avoiding discussing reads with one person, not in general.In post 1837, mozamis wrote:@ Cult - your last few posts sum it up: no scum hunitng, you're not trying to get EP lynched (remember him? your supposed "suspect"?). Just defensive survival mode form you.
"Town you" may have made some of those points, but you would have also said "c'mon, lets lynch EP" or something like that.
Cult's scum. Hammer her.
What follow up questions should she be asking?In post 1844, mozamis wrote:no follow up questions to Ep. Not engaging with Ep. Shes never really around when it counts.
Her case on EP seemed really contrived to me.
I feel i've done my bit tbh. i think she's scum. i really dont want to get into an argument with you about it. You gotta go with who you think i guess.
Max, EP, Klick -need you guys!
In post 1082, texcat wrote:In post 1075, Transcend wrote:Pretty sure one of these forefront votes on Tex is scum
Hey tex can you be a doll and vote hws
HWS has been in my null pile. I doubt if he's scum. Although since I'm sure I'm town, I might do it for self preservation. Of your 3 (or 4 if you include Klick) I'd be more inclined to vote CofA. I still think Money is town. And I was suspicious of Klick for a while, but that seems to have dissipated recently.
not sure what to think here. Handwaves the confirmed town on HWS but brings attention to Athena? would actually suggest they're not buddies.In post 1083, texcat wrote:Have you noticed that CofA was posting a lot before you subbed in, and then it's practically come to a standstill?
In post 1625, TesXX wrote:Official Vote Count 2.8
mozamis(4): Klick, Beefster, RadiantCowbells, Flubbernugget
Errantparabola(3): Maxous, mozamis, CultOfAthena
Klick(1): Errantparabola
Beefster(1): texcat
texcat(1): Thor665
Not Voting(0):None.
With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
Deadline: (expired on 2018-02-08 18:26:35)
In post 1626, RadiantCowbells wrote:I've already been clear I think it's moz beef
i think Errant!scum could of so easily jumped onto Moz here but didn'tIn post 1627, Errantparabola wrote:RC's gonna hate me if he ends up being right, but I'll go here for now, I think I vastly prefer it.
VOTE: texcat
