In post 62, AP wrote:Now the problem is you guys robbed me off my right to RVS. I wanted to vote Invisibility with the reason being: a shot in the dark. Consider it's been done and treat it as such, please.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
I know pressure on N_M is not going to change the way he plays.
Pressure on Mylo might work.
By the way, this is because I remember mylo playing differently in a game a few months back, a newbie game. He participated, he formed halfway decent reads, etc.
In this world, there's two types of people, my friend. Those with loaded guns, and those who dig. You dig.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).