Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:05 pm
Whatever you need to justify that read
That seemed likely. It's what I have.In post 242, Scioness Sajj wrote:that's not really elaboration I was looking forIn post 241, wingedcatgirl wrote:Read some ISOs. Got some feels.
What assumption are you referring to?In post 255, Mathdino wrote:No i don't remember
I don't see how that assumption counts as a townslip
You said earlier your early reads of her are always right. So which is it? Insight into how to read her would be valuable because I'm disliking some of her posts but townreading her tone. Then we've got NSG scumreading her and you townreading her so that's just a lot of uncertainty on someone who should be sortable by now given the number of posts.In post 261, Mathdino wrote:Was hard townreading her until you weren't
I don't have a good record on her
1: A prod dodge that she actively admits toIn post 280, wingedcatgirl wrote:That seemed likely. It's what I have.In post 242, Scioness Sajj wrote:that's not really elaboration I was looking forIn post 241, wingedcatgirl wrote:Read some ISOs. Got some feels.
(1)I'm still only half-here, honestly, so right now I'm mainly trying to make sure I don't fall out of the game entirely.
Anyway, with the last few pages in account I'm gonna UNVOTE:(2)VOTE: ArcAngel9. I dislike 244 in particular.
Talking to the mod pregame.In post 256, northsidegal wrote:@mutant, when did you realize that the game didn't take place exclusively in the PTs?
If I was scum, I would 100% be scum with a heavy pre game strategiser since I'd be scum with at least myself.In post 259, Mathdino wrote:I would accept that as a reason he's not scum with a heavy pre game strategiser
In post 287, Invisibility wrote:what is that question even supposed to accomplish
I feel like she is trying to paint my misunderstanding of the setup as a town slip and asked me the question hoping my answer would back up said claim.In post 288, Invisibility wrote:the one that NSG asked
That's a reach. I don't mean "I'm trying not to get replaced for inactivity", I mean "I'm trying not to lose track of the game, which I have noticed happens much more often when I lurk without posting".In post 283, UnrealSeal wrote:1: A prod dodge that she actively admits toIn post 280, wingedcatgirl wrote:That seemed likely. It's what I have.In post 242, Scioness Sajj wrote:that's not really elaboration I was looking forIn post 241, wingedcatgirl wrote:Read some ISOs. Got some feels.
(1)I'm still only half-here, honestly, so right now I'm mainly trying to make sure I don't fall out of the game entirely.
Anyway, with the last few pages in account I'm gonna UNVOTE:(2)VOTE: ArcAngel9. I dislike 244 in particular.
2: a weak ass opportunistic vote with little reasoning.
in a game with no PR's
VOTE: wingedcatgirl
So you admit to lurking? I also checked and your not in any other games. So you mean to imply that you consciously choosing to lurk?In post 292, wingedcatgirl wrote:That's a reach. I don't mean "I'm trying not to get replaced for inactivity", I mean "I'm trying not to lose track of the game, which I have noticed happens much more often when I lurk without posting".In post 283, UnrealSeal wrote:1: A prod dodge that she actively admits toIn post 280, wingedcatgirl wrote:That seemed likely. It's what I have.In post 242, Scioness Sajj wrote:that's not really elaboration I was looking forIn post 241, wingedcatgirl wrote:Read some ISOs. Got some feels.
(1)I'm still only half-here, honestly, so right now I'm mainly trying to make sure I don't fall out of the game entirely.
Anyway, with the last few pages in account I'm gonna UNVOTE:(2)VOTE: ArcAngel9. I dislike 244 in particular.
2: a weak ass opportunistic vote with little reasoning.
in a game with no PR's
VOTE: wingedcatgirl