In post 1632, Alonzo wrote:Forget HWS, you'l be dealing with me today pudding.
Yeh ok, let's focus more on you than HWS now. You are pretty scummy.In post 1724, Alonzo wrote:HWS was TOWNY AF
Has anyone played with Alonzo before btw?
In post 1632, Alonzo wrote:Forget HWS, you'l be dealing with me today pudding.
Yeh ok, let's focus more on you than HWS now. You are pretty scummy.In post 1724, Alonzo wrote:HWS was TOWNY AF
Well it’s more if is this erratic behaviour is normal for him.In post 1751, Creature wrote:Yes I did
that's not why i arrived at that list, you're right. i'm noting that people i don't townread are on that wagon. that doesn't mean i townread gamma, but rather am kinda skeptical of the wagon that is on him. the gamestate is loosely pointing to town!gamma, yes, but that doesn't mean i townread him; those aren't the same thing to meIn post 1747, BuJaber wrote:I know you didn't claim to arrive at that pool because we're voting for gamma, so that's what makes it strange. If it were for that reason it'd be natural to get the playerlist divide that you ended up with. But you seemed to end up with it completely independently and I guess I found it a weird coincidence and I don't trust coincidences in a game of reads, human intrraction, and deception.
If I trust my townread on you then the logical conclusion is that you are being fooled by one or more of your townreads.Or I am wrong about you and this is a result of you unable to keep up with your lies and fake reads to keep them aligned/consistent. I'd rather play with the assumption that I'm right since it's easier and better for my ego.
uh i can't talk about one of those for *reasons*In post 1753, Alonzo wrote:@Skitter
We just played together for a month or more... why cant you sort me correctly here?
It refers to my pov. Because I don't think scum!tw and scum!alonzo would both be voting for gamma if he's town nor do I think his buddy would bus him this early in the day if he's scum.In post 1757, skitter30 wrote:i think we view this very differently; i'm still not really following the bolded; to me a logical conclusion is that i'm scumreading town, not that i'm townreading scum? i don't get why that follows from the above discussion
I don't think replacing after being told to replace or die is town-indicativeIn post 1752, Creature wrote:Though I'm more that HWS wouldn't replace out as scum.
He was VLA until Thursday, so I’ll give him about 20 hours to post.
lmao
Congratulations, you figured out we had a death miller.
Damn, you caught meIn post 1763, ruru wrote:anyone not naked voting alonzo with me can be scum with alonzo.
what are you trying to get at with this?In post 1763, ruru wrote:okay, so
the worst is not happening because skitter is waffling
let's try this
anyone not naked voting alonzo with me can be scum with alonzo.