open 759: house party (compleded)

[Fuscosco]

Actually, I TR PP preemptively.

[Titus]

I'll try to give this game more attention later.

[Michael Scott]

poooke

Welcome to the party! Check out my awesome dance moves:





Good sir, are you aligned with Toby aka SCUM, or are you one of the good guys? And you better answer honestly pal because Dwight is a human lie detector! Nothing gets past him.

FACT

: According to Dwight, if Fus responds in the next 2.67 minutes he is 56.733345% more likely to be town.

- Date Mike

[Michael Scott]

@Fus, Dwight strongly suspects that you are in cahoots with Toby. He tells me that your answers to the following questions will prove where your loyalties lie:

What kind of bear is best?

Are vampires more dangerous than werewolves?

How many acres is Schrute Farms?

If you could only choose one, which would you choose between Battlestar Galactica and Second Life?

Are you able to raise and lower your cholesterol at will through concentration?

- Date Mike

[Michael Scott]

ill try and read u

first q: are u town or scum

According to Dwight, asking this question makes you 2.357777% more likely to be town because it exhibits a deep towny thought process to try and determine RC's alignment. Just thought you should know that.










- Date Mike

[Fuscosco]

[Uncle Bob]

Don't like Uncle Bob in post 80... why does my plan being unhelpful even mean I get voted? I don't like the reasoning, or lack of connections between voting for scum and voting because you disagree (it seems scummy)

So explain why you think having a small group there with the option of switching things around later so that group outside the party is a good plan?

If we know 5 town right now, we don't need the party mechanic to win anyway - that's a flawed argument. We don't need to win twice as hard, we need to not lose momentum twice as hard by both being wrong on the lynch and thereby being wrong on who is town in the party

Seriously though, if you can name 5 town right now, and everyone agrees, and they're all town.... we win without the party mechanic. Needless to say that's easier said than done

We don't have to nail it down today.

[Uncle Bob]

I think putting active people in the party is a reasonable idea - I'd lean toward active and seeming townie too.

[Uncle Bob]

What makes it scummy is the way he doubled back and called attention to it in 14.

Why's that?

Hello Schiavetto?

[Fuscosco]

Please explain the party mechanics to me in a quick manner. re: its permanence and how scum interact with it. And how many rooms we can form (total and per day) and if death of a member destroys a room.

[Fuscosco]

I think putting active people in the party is a reasonable idea - I'd lean toward active and seeming townie too.

subjective and a common fallacy. eg though, its understandable. id lean towards not making any parties for the early game. but again, its subjective.

[Uncle Bob]

My understanding: There is only one party, we can add members to it, but can't take them out. If scum have to enter to leave the party to make a kill, they are outed by the mod.

[Uncle Bob]

I think putting active people in the party is a reasonable idea - I'd lean toward active and seeming townie too.

subjective and a common fallacy. eg though, its understandable. id lean towards not making any parties for the early game. but again, its subjective.

Which fallacy?

[Uncle Bob]

Edit:

My understanding: There is only one party, we can add members to it, but can't take them out. If scum have to enter or leave the party to make a kill, they are outed by the mod.

[Fuscosco]

activity=alignment

[Fuscosco]

ugh, then why do we want to add all the damn cool kids to the party? havent you guys ever seen scream?

[Uncle Bob]

activity=alignment

That's not what I was getting at, more that it would create a division in the town, between active players - more likely scum targets for a nightkill, and the inactive players, then if an active player is killed, we get confirmation that not all the active player are town, and by keeping the group smaller, we isolate scum more quickly.

[Fuscosco]

I just think that if the hood is permanent then we shouldnt be adding people willy nilly. its eg, and (Im sitting down to read this for the first time now) I think we can do better than that.

[Fuscosco]

i think we should ignore the party mechanic and treat this like a good ol mountainous game

Skygazer [WORDS] . . maybe townie?
HEAL: Mary Saotome
HEAL: Kirari Momobami

I

really

want this slot to be scum, but this post is kind of townish

[Titus]

We should still do the fifty fifty.

We can then have two pools off scum to hunt in.

[Fuscosco]

Parties are re-elected daily right?

Lego my ego.

Lean pink on these, for purely meta reasons.

Ego

You will always be read as 'Aero' to me when I skim.

they can start killing everyone, if I understand the setup correctly...

Im not touching this.

[Fuscosco]

We should still do the fifty fifty.

We can then have two pools off scum to hunt in.

we would have a situation where scum would benefit from killing outside the party. especially if half of them got into it.

[PenguinPower]

Actually, I TR PP preemptively.

[Fuscosco]

essentially exactly the same as her entrance in a past game where she was scum

good

have other spicy reasons

crap

[Fuscosco]

Skygazer and Hellknight are switchable for me

the skygazer hate is premature unless there's some meta reason. its just a case of killing the outspoken.

hellknight pressure is neat tho


mary, pp, and sky are people i think i should iso.

psure pp iso is a void, i thought sky didnt post much but somebody quoted a thing, and mary strikes me as kind of sly, but im sure its a part of the alt personality.