Yes, both halves of the hydra are confirmed. A hydra encompasses one player slot.
This game is confirmed as not being bastard and thus having no alignment-changing roles. I should think that was obvious.
Can you pretend I'm an idiot and explain the logic here?In post 104, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:HOLD YOUR HORSES!
Let's first make a strategic move. I think the best move for town now is for the masons to claim if there are any.
Note thatonly the masons should claimand not any other roles.
Good to see youIn post 79, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hi I finally get to play with you again
I know that. I want to know the logic for why Dredd thinks this is a good idea.In post 110, Generic Hydra wrote: IC can only be in play if there’s 1 or 3 M’s rolled. If it’s 1, we have no masons, if it’s 3 we have two masons + us.
-Kor
Why do you think that the value of doing this so obviously outweighs the cost of outing two Town PRs on D1?In post 134, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:Cutting the road on scum to fake masons later on + gaming the setup for the exact formation of the scum.
I am not certain what to make of Oh Nyea yet. I think I will have a better idea once she answers your question about her mafia experience.In post 135, Generic Hydra wrote:I'd also like us to discuss this quote in general:Is it just me, or does this entire quote seem scummy?In post 127, Ok Nyeo wrote:Yeah I realized it will be useless anyways since you are getting the nightkill.
-Kor
Why did you change your vote to pinturicchio?Ok Nyeo wrote:Hmm...
VOTE: pinturicchio
I am going to a secret spy mission so see you later, everyone!
I agree with this.In post 182, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: myloninjaIn post 181, Myloninja13 wrote:Hey, sorry, homework and going out got in the way.
Generic Hydra lol. This is going to be fun.
For now I'll VOTE: Judge Joseph Dredd because I'm not sure how a masons claim would help town in really any way aside from eliminating a few smaller options in the set-up.
this is scum taking the high road
Honestly, I think there's a decent case for policy lynching you, confirmed or not. This game has only been going on for barely 24 hours and I'm already seriously tempted to replace out.Generic Hydra wrote:In post 155, Generic Hydra wrote: Where's the town motivation in lynching a confirmed town member?
I'll save you the effort, there is none.
Me and n33dl3 both whole-heartedly agreed that is most certainly a scumslip. You said you had 10-ish games, therefore, it's not a noobslip, it's you scumslipped.
Bolded is the reference of what "it" was.@Laser, this post isn’t enough?
Can you explain where you're getting this from?In post 294, Sesq wrote:nyeo's town
Pregame choice of godfather or one-shot bulletproof.In post 324, Gamma Emerald wrote:Doesn't SK have option of one shot bulletproof
I think there is definitely some validity to this reasoning. We had a similar discussion over at my homesite in a recent game (not the same setup, but a roughly comparable situation), and reached a similar conclusion... I think in a semi-open PR-heavy setup like this one, scum does have very little to lose by claiming PR this early in the game. We might end up lynching the scum!PR tomorrow, but it's still better than today if it ends up with a mislynch somewhere down the line, and depending on the claim, they could live even longer. I haven't played enough relevant games on this site to have a good sense of the site meta as far as this sort of claiming is concerned though.In post 334, Hoopla wrote:So, who wants to have a chat about this claim with me? I feel like my opinions about these sort of situations are controversial.
For the most part, towns are pretty ruthless when it comes to following through on lynching D1 VT claims. The problem is, most scum are aware of this idiosyncrasy and tend to favour claiming PR's, which creates the ugly D1 metagame of having PR-claims being disproportionately scum-heavy and VT-claims disproportionately town-heavy. Ultimately, if you want to have the best chance of lynching scum D1, you generally need to take a risk in lynching a PR. Most towns are adverse to this concept, and tend to play it safe and lynch the VT and keep the PR pool hidden -- this is a valid strategy as PR's can win you the game, but you'realmost alwayslynching town D1 because of it.
When I used to keep track of Mini Normal stats, I used to record things like VT claims on D1 to check how often town/scum claimed that role respectively. IIRC, scum claimed VT 5 times compared to about ~50 truthful VT claims. In analysing the handful of times that scum claimed VT, it was generally done by newbish scum who didn't really seem to get site meta of claiming a PR to try and survive deeper into the game. Granted, I haven't updated any of these stats for more than 18 months, but I doubt the metagame has shifted significantly.
This is where I'll get Gamma to weigh in. Do you think Kop is a switched on enough player to realise that claiming VT as scum in this situation is suboptimal? Would you expect a PR claim from him in this spot as scum?
Also, unvoting while I do my some research.
UNVOTE:
hoopla's tone is extremely townie. This specific discussion regarding the VT claim I also feel is very unlikely to come from scum. Scum has little to gain by attempting to push the lynch off of a true VT. OTOH, there is very little to be gained from scum!hoopla trying to save a buddy at L-1 in this manner. If the lynch goes through anyway or if Kop flips scum later, then he'll be under a lot of suspicion.In post 354, Ok Nyeo wrote:Can you explain your TR on hoopla?In post 339, LaserGuy wrote:Also, Hoopla is Town.
What's wrong with this post? Why are you voting for JDD?In post 267, UglyDuck wrote:If I wasn't already voting you, I would because of this post.In post 237, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:That moment when you open the activity overview to do some ISOs and you see that the mod has the 2nd highest post count.
OK, why is there a wagon on Gamma? I think he's town
The two people voting me are both scummy, but not because they're voting me. It's because neither has done anything else other than voting me.
I have good feelings about Laser Guy, UnaBombaH & Kop.
@Una: you didn't start the wagon on Gamma. Hoopla did, then you then Sesq
VOTE: Myloninja13
Again, not because he's voting me but because he did nothing else and also because 3 of the 4 I TR aside from the IC are voting there
Why aren't you answering the questions directed at you? E.g. here.In post 354, Ok Nyeo wrote:I would vote for Kop, but their wagon gained votes too easily. I doubt they are mafia right now.
What do you mean by the last line here? If you think he's going to flip Town, what value do you think there is in lynching him?In post 343, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:I'm of 2 minds
I think lynching the VT claim is the safe choice as we don't want to out the PRs
But since my call for the Masons to claim was met by general objection I can see this one too to be viewed as advocating a mislynch on purpose
fwiw I buy the claim from Kop and I think if lynched he will flip a villager just like he said, but I don't know if lynching him is good or bad so I'm staying put
Kop or hoopla? I had hoopla in my "looking pretty good" pile earlier (roughly Town lean).In post 364, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think hoopla is town regardless of Kop alignmentIn post 358, LaserGuy wrote:hoopla's tone is extremely townie. This specific discussion regarding the VT claim I also feel is very unlikely to come from scum. Scum has little to gain by attempting to push the lynch off of a true VT. OTOH, there is very little to be gained from scum!hoopla trying to save a buddy at L-1 in this manner. If the lynch goes through anyway or if Kop flips scum later, then he'll be under a lot of suspicion.In post 354, Ok Nyeo wrote:Can you explain your TR on hoopla?In post 339, LaserGuy wrote:Also, Hoopla is Town.
UNVOTE: Kop
Not a fan of you switching tune on how you're reading him
I had her as null up till 341, which I didn't care for. I liked most of the people on the wagon (I don't care for Ok Nyeo, but wasn't scumreading anyone else on there) so I was mostly trusting my townreads.In post 479, Hoopla wrote:LaserGuy- I've got a town vibe from some of his posts like 320 -- covers a lot of topics and reads in a pretty lucid manner and is clearly thinking about the game. But I'm also suspicious that he talks about Sesq earlier on D1 like this and then later in the day claims intent to hammer without reason:
In post 320, LaserGuy wrote: Sesq's posting style is consistent with the last game I played with her where she was Town. IIRC she's pretty abraisive as either alignment, so I don't think that I can read much into her tone at the moment.If you believe her play was consistent with her town game (or at best neutral), what was your reasoning to intend to hammer?
You've never seen a cop get a guilty result or had to evaluate a claim before? You said you had played 10+ games on another site. How has this never come up for you?In post 560, Ok Nyeo wrote:I did not know the optimal play for a cop. Lynching fred then lynching JJD if fred flips town made more sense after that. But after JJD explained his reasons, I thought about it and came as very townie motivated reasons.
Una, what do you think about mylo? And are you good at scum?
What's your read on Mylo? Why do you think he's scum?In post 564, Ok Nyeo wrote:Una, if Fred flips scum would you be OK with lynching Mylo tomorrow?
In post 582, LaserGuy wrote:You've never seen a cop get a guilty result or had to evaluate a claim before? You said you had played 10+ games on another site. How has this never come up for you?
Why did you answer the second question and not the first? I have to assume you are deliberately refusing to acknowledge questions about your previous experience at this point.Ok Nyeo wrote:His only vote seems opportunistic, he has been lurking and PoE.In post 583, LaserGuy wrote:What's your read on Mylo? Why do you think he's scum?In post 564, Ok Nyeo wrote:Una, if Fred flips scum would you be OK with lynching Mylo tomorrow?
@Fredif JJD is lying and is scum, then who is their partner?
I think there's a good chance this is a scumslip.In post 579, UglyDuck wrote:In post 519, Ok Nyeo wrote:Why would scum kill JDD when he was wrong? Would not fred being town make JDD a scum?In post 512, UglyDuck wrote:Town!Fred - We go to night, Skum kills JDD
Fred is probably trying not to give information. L-2 would be always safer just in case.
Sorry, good catch. it should read that if JDD is wrong we lynch him the next day. Again - late on a plane write up
Why are you scumreading Una here?In post 487, Kop wrote:Suspicious of JJD, Mylo, Una, Fred.
Also @Kop, why did you never answer this?In post 505, Myloninja13 wrote:Not sure why Kop is suspicious of both JJD and Fred, did he think he was lying but still killing a scum member?
I find it very interesting that this pinged you. In retrospect, I see exactly why you might have found the wording "odd" (JDD was lying but not scum), but that you felt this phrasing was unusual in D2 is quite remarkable. Not necessarily in a good way.In post 587, Kop wrote:I don't know if it's my brain not functioning as well as it should be, but that is a bit of a odd question to ask, I don't know whether it's down to how it's worded, or just in general, odd.In post 584, Ok Nyeo wrote:His only vote seems opportunistic, he has been lurking and PoE.In post 583, LaserGuy wrote:What's your read on Mylo? Why do you think he's scum?In post 564, Ok Nyeo wrote:Una, if Fred flips scum would you be OK with lynching Mylo tomorrow?
@Fredif JJD is lying and is scum, then who is their partner?
Post-reread, I think Una and Kop are probably both mafia. Unsure about the third... was thinking it was Duck before the claim.
This is an odd oversight on your part. If we are in a TT setup, then that guarantees that there is a mafia godfather. We need to be very careful trusting any innocent results even if we believe Duck's claim.In post 675, Hoopla wrote:we can now potentially work out the game from a PoE perspective.
PoE and some associatives. Nyeo's play doesn't make sense as mafia, but I couldn't put her as Town until everyone had claimed since I thought she had a good chance of being SK (who either had bad luck with blocks/crosskills or just decided not to shoot). With SK largely ruled out, Nyeo is probably Town. Mylo is lynchbait. He's a useless lurker slot for sure, but I don't think he's even had a null read by anybody this whole game. Unless his buddies basically decided to throw him under the bus D1 and never interact with him or defend him in any way... I don't see it. I actually also agree with him here that having three people immediately jump out of the gates and say that he should be the lynch today is extremely suspicious.In post 694, UnaBombaH wrote:Interested in hearing what landed you here!In post 684, LaserGuy wrote:Post-reread, I think Una and Kop are probably both mafia.
What interests me even further though, is your implementation of UglyDuck into this.
1. Why do you think me/Kop/UglyDuck would work as a team?
I'd rather wait until after he claims his results to discuss this.2. If you honestly thought he was a likely part of a scum-trio, why would him claiming PR in assumed LyLo mean anything?
At this point it feels to me like everyone is just kind of waiting around to see what your results are, so if you aren't going to produce those, I think you need to give some alternative course of action that you'd like to pursue before that happens.In post 734, UglyDuck wrote:I just want to make it clear - I have no problem revealing results. I simply want to be sure it is thought to be the best line of action before I do so, since once I do, I cannot undo it. And since I have claimed the only role I highly doubt I will get the chance to divulge any more info tomorrow on potential gains from this night. So this is kind of the end of my contribution today, I just want to make sure it is used to its fullest.
It's not only this. We can confirm both of them from the setup (as long as we manage to lynch correctly, of course). TT setup (Duck is cop) is Goon/Roleblocker/Godfather. TTTT setup (Duck is scum) is Goon/Goon/Roleblocker. If we lynch a Godfather, then hoopla is confirmed scum. If we lynch Goon/Goon or Goon/RB, then hoopla is confirmed Town and Duck is confirmed scum.In post 754, Myloninja13 wrote:Actually, I agree with you Laser. We should leave Hoopla/Duck to test Duck's cop abilities. If we get mafia tonight, we'll see if he dies or not.
If he dies (and flips cop), Hoopla is conf!Mafia, as we hopefully didn't get two idiot power roles in this game.
If he doesn't die, he'll have another result, regardless if its real or fake, it'll add more information.
....Um.... This phrasing is disturbing.In post 757, Hoopla wrote:- Scum needs one townie to misvote to win. A cop claim can't be disproved from a setup spec angle.All we need to do is convince one townie and we win without having to worry about surviving a day of analysis.
Let me be more specific then. Why did you think claiming at this point in time might not be the correct play?In post 734, UglyDuck wrote:Furthermore - I am quite tired of the "claim immediately bit". These are 14 day game phases - it is not like we are pressed for time. Once I claim, I cannot unclaim. So I want to be sure it is the correct play to extent that I do it when it happens.
What details of your claim did you think might be worth hiding?In post 730, UglyDuck wrote:OK well clearly this isn't going to move forward until I claim up - so just to be clear - do we want a whole claim now or just like the relevant parts? Is there any value in hiding the details from skum?
If you think that hoopla and Kop are both scum, it would be better to vote for Kop. See my argument in #756.In post 778, Ok Nyeo wrote:Hoopla has no push on someone (that's not what experienced town players do) only game theory (for town credit, she already painted most people's eyes with that) and voting sesq instead of kop. Reading the day 1 makes me sure of Hoopla and Kop are scum team.
I am considering to vote Hoopla soon.
I think you are missing the key point of the argument as to why we should not be lynching from you/hoopla today. By D6, assuming we lynch correctly, we are 100% guaranteed to have verified your result, one way or the other. There is absolutely no chance we can lynch wrong D6 if the choice is between you and hoopla. If we lynch from the two of you first, we need to lynch correctly three times in a row; if we follow my approach, we only need to lynch correctly twice in a row and the third one is free.In post 799, UglyDuck wrote:Everyone's opinions are welcome - but the response I am looking for is from Laser, and no one should answer until they do. You were the one to promote the "not Ugly/Hoopla" lynch. Why? You said it works for Town, but no that is not accurate. It in fact statistically works out to the same thing, but while giving all the upper hand to the Skum. What was your exact reasoning behind promoting it?
Duck has no reason to pretend he was faking claiming if he were scum that just won. There aren't really any teams that can fit here that result in a loss that don't include either you or Duck. I think we're good.In post 877, Myloninja13 wrote:I'm here and not immediately lynching.
But are you telling me that two PR's decided to fake cop results in the same game?
I don't see any reason not to lynch Una tomorrow. Town!Duck is confirmed by scum!hoopla's flip, which means his result on scum!Una is also confirmed.In post 882, Myloninja13 wrote:I think Una is a safe bet for tomorrow lynch still, but is there any chance of the final scum not being Kop? I'm certainly not going to believe it's you LaserGuy.