Open 716: Making Friends and Enemies [Game Over]
-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Hello ladies and gentlemen.
The fun stops now."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
I just finished Page 11, and now have to do some work for a few hours. So I'll loop back to finish catching up later today.
BuJaber is a perfectly fine D1 lynch as of Page 11. So,@BuJaber, you should probably claim since you're at L-1 and I'm okay with you dying."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Alright so I didn't read as in depth the last 5 or so pages, because I got bored.
Why why I'm happy to lynch BuJaber: His vote activity appears motivated to deflect criticisms, and is not supported by good suspicions
Step 1)First real vote of the game is to jump on the easy mislynch of verydark in Post 171. Simply reiterates the reasons already voiced by a bunch of other players. Doesn't actually add anything to the conversation, but it looks good in an ISO because he looks thoughtful and thus justified.
Step 2)Gets called out for broadly throwing shade at a townblock (per GuiltyLion) in Post 246. (Note I don't have an opinion about whether this is actually a townbloc or not because I'm not quite sure who the "meme team" is because I haven't kept track.) There's some back and forth (e.g., BuJaber's Post 257). What gets me though is then BuJaber waits a beat and then revisits his "meme team" post to vote dave (Post 380 and Post 409).
Step 3)After getting some pushback on his dave vote (e.g., S_S's Post 410), and after GuiltyLion questioned his switch from verydark to dave (Post 444), BuJaber then jumps back to the verydark wagon in Post 479.
So, recap: parroted already-voiced reasons to vote verydark; jumped from verydark to dave when called out on not flushing out his "meme team" suspicions (thus appearing to try to defuse the criticism), but with some weak reasoning; and then jumped from dave back to verydark when called out on his dave vote being bad and for leaving the wagon on his #1 suspicion (thus again appearing to try to defuse the criticism towards his play)."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Who has time to enjoy themselves when there are arguments to be had?In post 702, Mathdino wrote:green crayons serious business 2019"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
@Gamma:
Please explain to me the good point you thought was being made here. Pretend that I don't understand anything about the S_S + BuJaber + pops interaction.In post 422, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Oh wow this is a good point. S_S probably town because this would be some wonky SvSIn post 415, popsofctown wrote:
This reads as really bad survivor tell. S_S isn't even voting him. BuJabertown would care about arguing why it is valid to or logically justified to do so, not care about arguing it isn't logic he only employs when he rolls scum... which no one even said...In post 414, BuJaber wrote:
That may be true but I'm pretty sure I've used it myself before as town.In post 413, Something_Smart wrote:Not to mention that "objectively scummy" is often used as a synonym for "I'm scumreading them because of playstyle but don't want to admit it."
VOTE: BuJaber
VOTE: BuJaber"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
I started off scum reading GL and that turned into a town read.In post 710, Mathdino wrote:Kmd and GL are good scum players and while they've done a bunch of pro-town things, I'm uncomfortable putting them under "neverlynch". They haven't exactly completely towntold yet (Kmd lightly did early game).
I started off town reading Kmd and that turned into a scum read.
Guess they're the next two to reread."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
@Gamma:
Please respond:
In post 711, Green Crayons wrote:@Gamma:
Please explain to me the good point you thought was being made here. Pretend that I don't understand anything about the S_S + BuJaber + pops interaction.In post 422, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Oh wow this is a good point. S_S probably town because this would be some wonky SvSIn post 415, popsofctown wrote:
This reads as really bad survivor tell. S_S isn't even voting him. BuJabertown would care about arguing why it is valid to or logically justified to do so, not care about arguing it isn't logic he only employs when he rolls scum... which no one even said...In post 414, BuJaber wrote:
That may be true but I'm pretty sure I've used it myself before as town.In post 413, Something_Smart wrote:Not to mention that "objectively scummy" is often used as a synonym for "I'm scumreading them because of playstyle but don't want to admit it."
VOTE: BuJaber
VOTE: BuJaber"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
This is the next thing I'm doing.In post 712, Green Crayons wrote:
I started off scum reading GL and that turned into a town read.In post 710, Mathdino wrote:Kmd and GL are good scum players and while they've done a bunch of pro-town things, I'm uncomfortable putting them under "neverlynch". They haven't exactly completely towntold yet (Kmd lightly did early game).
I started off town reading Kmd and that turned into a scum read.
Guess they're the next two to reread."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Bad dino.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
I keep having connection problems with this website when I actually have time to read this game. Anyone have any suggestions?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
The problem is being unable to establish a connection with the server. It happens on my laptop, on my iphone, from work, and from home. And it happens intermittently, obviously, since I'm posting now."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
I had some problems this morning (~8 EST) when I tried to start my reread. And then some time earlier this afternoon when I tried again.
I can't do much about kop."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
ANd lol my connection has been out since literally posting this. Now I have phone only connection. Which let me tell you, is not conducive to rereadig.In post 821, Green Crayons wrote:I had some problems this morning (~8 EST) when I tried to start my reread. And then some time earlier this afternoon when I tried again.
I can't do much about kop."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Glad to see my whinging was toxic to the thread.
@anyone:whoever read northsidegal as town, can you please justify that read?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
@Dino:
1.
Did you ever do this?In post 154, Mathdino wrote:Sando: A bucketload of NAI things. Need to metadive.
2.Why the BuJaber vote in Post 360?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
@Kmd:
1.How often do you see people referring to you as, simply, "Md"?
2.What are your thoughts on dave?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
@S_S:
1. Tell me all of your thoughts that you think are worth sharing about the verydark wagon.
2. I don't understand your Post 618 or Post 620. Can you please explain?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
@dave:
1.
Why?In post 500, davesaz wrote:LUV looks town.
2.In post 572, davesaz wrote:LUV can you link a couple replace-ins for both alignments?
What about now?In post 585, davesaz wrote:Thanks LUV, you're remarkably consistent when you replace in."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
^^ Those are my questions after rereading D1. I'll vote after some follow up.
Only skimmed D2, but:
I didn't pick up a game after not playing for a year or whatever just to not be engaged. This isn't alignment indicative, it's shitty internet.In post 801, brassherald wrote:I'm not seeing real scumhunting or analysis, just promises to do so, which is what I've seen some scum do in games where they are not engaged."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Please do.In post 829, Mathdino wrote:I also have a spreadsheet documenting her meta trends in her town vs scumgames. I can run her posts through that and let you know what it comes up with if you like."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Dino.In post 830, Mathdino wrote:
MD is MathdinoIn post 825, Green Crayons wrote:@Kmd:
1.How often do you see people referring to you as, simply, "Md"?
2.What are your thoughts on dave?
Dino.
Please."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Where did that read come from, when you made that vote?In post 829, Mathdino wrote:2. I'd been waffling on verydark in my mind (and my heart wanted to policy his ass). He requested space, and I trust GL's reads in general, so I swapped to Bujaber,my second highest scumread."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Why do I need to come out with a case before I hear why people have been townreading the slot?In post 835, Gamma Emerald wrote:
You gonna tell us why you read the slot as scum as well or just shade it?In post 823, Green Crayons wrote:Glad to see my whinging was toxic to the thread.
@anyone:whoever read northsidegal as town, can you please justify that read?
If I want people to vote for LUV I’ll make it explicit."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
I have feelings. Just want to know others’ first before I share with the class."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
@S_S:
Hm. Fair. I wrote that question when your slot was occupied by Sando.In post 842, Something_Smart wrote:
It was a meme wagon on town that developed into a real wagon for dumb reasons.In post 826, Green Crayons wrote:@S_S:
1. Tell me all of your thoughts that you think are worth sharing about the verydark wagon.
How about this: with the Bu flip, is there anything about the verydark wagon that you think is worth pursuing today?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
I'm uncomfortable with this explanation in light of your Post 161, listing GL, Sando, or Bujaber as POE scumbuddies, but then shouting down Sando in Post 348 for having the audacity to think your 161 was suggesting you'd be happy with a Sando lynch. By implication, you weren't advocating for either of the other two POE scumbuddies' lynches either.In post 834, Mathdino wrote:i'm pretty into PoE. everyone else in my D1 lynchpool had done townier things so my general goal is to not vote town and pray for the best
i didn't really expect him to flip scum but i figured it was a decent lynch nonetheless especially with him going inactive up to the deadline
So: I agreed with your Post 348 stating that your 161's POE scumbuddy list (GL, Sando, BuJaber) was not advocating a lynch out of the POE trio. But then in 360 you switch to a vote out of the POE trio to give verydark some breathing room. And your vote just happens to land on a scum who had only mild pressure (GL vote). And then your vote just sort of lingered on BuJaber, sort of like a buddy who didn't know when to unvote.
Basically I'm paranoid that you're scum with two relatively inactive buddies."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
One of them being dead already my man. BuJaber complained about people disliking his level of activity, and specifically called out Dino's prolific posting abilities."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
@Gamma:
How did you interpret it to be too self-conscious?In post 788, Gamma Emerald wrote:It was mainly me thinking BuJaber responding to a question never asked was scummy due to it speaking to me as too self-conscious.
Promise I'm not trying to be pedantic. I've interpreted BuJaber's Post 414 "That may be true but I'm pretty sure I've used it myself before as town" response two different ways since I first read it, and I've seen three different interpretations.
Since this was your motivating reason to vote for BuJaber-scum, I'd like some further explanation."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
This is me explaining why I don't think I'm wasting our time, not suggesting that you have been holding out or anything.In post 857, Green Crayons wrote:Since this was your motivating reason to vote for BuJaber-scum, I'd like some further explanation."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
After yesterday's reread, I came away thinking he looked more protown than I thought he would and the impression I last had of him.In post 807, verydark wrote:Any additional thought about kmd?
But reading D2, I see that GL-town is hard reading him scum in light of the flip, which means more work."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Yeah. It doesn't make sense to me for anyone to refer to you as Md either. Which is why this interaction caught my eye:In post 863, Kmd4390 wrote:Green Crayons, I've used this name on multiple sites over the course of about 18 years and I don't recall ever being referred to as "md", although someone has been calling me just "k" lately which is new.
Spoiler:
It looks like you were overly conscious of what BuJaber was posting to the point of thinking he was referring to you. In response, he went along with it, but then realized he hadn't actually referred to you and corrected himself. It's just weird."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Are you serious with this post?In post 875, davesaz wrote:I have been thinking of BuJaber picking me as the token mislynch attempt as a very indirect chainsaw since I was weakly pushing Myloninja (in the same way as KMD but have not looked at what BuJaber did on that).
I still think Myloninja is scum for the same reason as before, but I'm more interested in finding another since if it's a red flip we get next to no help on 3rd scum."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
One spicy order, coming up:In post 901, Mathdino wrote:hey GC hit me up with some spicy thoughts on that lynch order
I'm not sold on kmd. Still need to dive his ISO because GL told the thread to do so.In post 884, Mathdino wrote:Optimal play if we're going by votes (and taking into account locktownies) is something like:
Kmd --> Gamma --> brass --> verydark --> GC --> GL --> davesaz
Not feeling Gamma after reread. Before D1 ended I read pops and Gamma with the idea that one of them had to be scum. I think I found only one thing wrong with Gamma and it was meh. Not too keen on his very terse responses to my questions; I still left unsatisfied but I don't really know how to probe further without literally everyone ignoring it regardless of whatever nugget I might mine.
Hard no on brass. I'm reading him town. That's his input + prior occupant of the slot. THOUGH I WILL SAY his read on me is bad because, obviously.
I could do verydark but man I feel that that's a throat-clearing exercise of just getting rid of a poorly playing town. Your dual D1 scum wagon theory is sexy and plausible enough for me to sleep okay at night. But man this really just feels like a lazy lynch.
lol GL. Am I so far removed from site meta that he isn't lock town for everyone?
unclear why dave isn't at/near the front based on D2 posts."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Let me pull out the full player list, then.
Current game state, I'd say I'm at:
Willing to lynch: davesaz, verydark, kmd4390, Myloninja13,
Meh: Lil Uzi Vert ← northsidegal, Gamma Emerald, Something_Smart ← Sando,
Not interested in lynching today: brassherald ← Agent Sparkles, Mathdino, GuiltyLion, Green Crayons ← Kop"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Well I'm convinced.In post 903, Mathdino wrote:Gamma - I'm unconvinced on your unconvincedness. I don't see much TOWNISH about him.
More seriously, weren't you arguing at one point that his lack of affirmative, early town play was somehow in line with Gamma's town play?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Even as someone whose radar goes a bit wonky on dave, I think most of his D1 play was very dave-neutral and his late D1-play and D2 play has been pretty good indicators of potential dave-scum.In post 903, Mathdino wrote:davesaz - Strong meta-based townread, although I guess I can do a onceover and check? Obviously a lot of his posts are bad but that's literally why he's lynchbait in a bunch of games."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
There was a lot of pops/Gamma back and forth and I got it into my head after my initial read through that one of y'all were scum. Not sure if that was an original thought or something I picked up from someone else.In post 909, Gamma Emerald wrote:
explain this lineIn post 902, Green Crayons wrote:I read pops and Gamma with the idea that one of them had to be scum."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
You'll notice I'm not pushing for Gamma's lynch."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
VOTE: dave
i'm drunk and lazy but he's scum."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
dave's mylo suspicions are lazy and inconsistently justified. It's not just an easy vote for scum to make, but dave's way of getting to that vote is suspicious.
1.His initial mylo vote in Post 266, back in Day 1, was because mylo didn't have opinions.
Reasoning confirmed via dave's explanation in Post 376:
Spoiler: dave's Post 376
Yawn, but whatever. That vote carries dave through D1 (per Post 720).
2.D2 starts. Once mylo states that he's going to start posting (and in fact does post some thoughts on the gamestate) dave invites commentary on discrediting mylo's input (including, incidentally, raising dave suspicions) in Post 805:
Spoiler: dave's Post 805
So, after having spent vast majority of D1 voting mylo for simply not having any opinions, dave is now inviting folks to discredit the opinions that mylo is forming.
3.After getting Dino to confirm to the thread that nobody should take mylo's opinions seriously (see Post 805, Post 806), dave reverts to his claim that mylo "is scum for the same reason as before" in Post 875:
Spoiler: dave's Post 875
There are several things wrong with this post:
- dave thinks mylo is scum "for the same reason as before" (having no opinions), but mylo has since tried to provide input and has been shut downby dave. These are suspicions of dave's own creation.
- dave's scum-friendly desire to lynch for information > lynch for scum.
- the "indirect chainsaw" theory that does not actually have any work justifying it.
4.dave again votes for mylo in Post 948:
Spoiler: dave's post 948
Guess what the reasoning is! Because mylo is complaining about being a policy lynch.
dave faults mylo for complaining about being a policy lynch and tells him that he should "give us your thoughts so we can nail the scum." Never mind the 796/805 interaction where dave was soft encouraging mylo not to contribute. Since then mylo articulated support for a kmd lynch (Post 882) and interacted with Dino about his own meta (Post 887). Certainly not winning any contribution awards, but far from a player who claims "to have no opinions at all" (Post 376)--which was the whole point of dave's mylo-suspicions.
The framing of dave's 948 also just strikes me as wrong. It's like he's not convinced that mylo's play is alignment indicative--it could come from town or scum--but dave's still willing to lynch it. The encouragement to contribute is good posturing if mylo flips town, but does not actually appear motivated to get anything useful out of mylo (no specific questions, just a broad "help us find scum" statement that doesn't do anything to illicit thoughts from a player not already engaged).
5.In Post 952 dave confirms in no uncertain terms that "Mylo is scum." and dave "thought it before and still do." This doesn't really make sense. dave's suspicions about mylo have been static, but mylo's play hasn't tracked that same one-note. And when mylo has tried to contribute more, dave has discouraged or ignored that deviation from his basis to vote mylo."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Basically this is dave pushing a bad vote based on bad suspicions that appear to be formed to justify the predetermined need to vote mylo. That's why I'm seeing dave-scum."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
In post 981, davesaz wrote:
They act like they think I'm there for giggles.Myloninja13 wrote: Also, did you really have to add "I'm not kidding". Did people think you were just on me for the giggles or something?
They act like they don't think I believe the read.My Post 900 was not asking if you were making a joke.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
For lack of anything else to comment on atm, I'd be interested to hear from the non-voters
Lil Uzi Vert, Something_Smart"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Oh, nm on Lil Uzi Vert. Outdated VC naming conventions.
Just S_S then."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Please explain that more. How is this play pushing agendas?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
I've got no opinion on them. Mainly because they didn't give much of a hook to do so.In post 1037, verydark wrote:
What does this mean?In post 1025, Green Crayons wrote:I nothing the Gamma votes."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Is this information somewhere public?In post 1047, Something_Smart wrote:In addition to that, BuJaber was basically the best candidate for a hard bus. Not only does he have content that is very unlikely to take him to LYLO, but.he was going to have a baby soon and he knew he would be able to commit even less on further days"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
So GL pushing for Bu-scum's lynch gets him a pass for today.In post 1031, Something_Smart wrote:If I had to pick right now, GL.
Who's next on your list?"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
In post 1052, davesaz wrote:You asked if I was serious. How is that not the same thing as asking if it's a joke?
The phrase "are you serious?" does not always mean "is this a literal joke attempt?" It frequently means "I cannot believe I am seeing this."
In the context of mafia, using that phrase and quoting your post was prodding you to explain the problems with 875, which I think are apparent and which kmd and myself have identified."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
I'd like to hear this, from you.In post 1053, davesaz wrote:Having done a quick reread on Gamma Emerald, I can see scum possibilities there."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
In post 1059, davesaz wrote:What do you perceive as being problems with 875?In post 966, Green Crayons wrote:3.After getting Dino to confirm to the thread that nobody should take mylo's opinions seriously (see Post 805, Post 806), dave reverts to his claim that mylo "is scum for the same reason as before" in Post 875:
Spoiler: dave's Post 875
There are several things wrong with this post:
- dave thinks mylo is scum "for the same reason as before" (having no opinions), but mylo has since tried to provide input and has been shut downby dave. These are suspicions of dave's own creation.
- dave's scum-friendly desire to lynch for information > lynch for scum.
- the "indirect chainsaw" theory that does not actually have any work justifying it."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
The scum possibilities that you see.In post 1060, davesaz wrote:
You'd like to hear what exactly?In post 1058, Green Crayons wrote:
I'd like to hear this, from you.In post 1053, davesaz wrote:Having done a quick reread on Gamma Emerald, I can see scum possibilities there."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Is GL in the free and clear forever for hard pushing Bu-scum into his D1 grave? No.In post 1069, Something_Smart wrote:
That's not exactly how it works... why should he get a pass?In post 1051, Green Crayons wrote:
So GL pushing for Bu-scum's lynch gets him a pass for today.In post 1031, Something_Smart wrote:If I had to pick right now, GL.
Who's next on your list?
Are we going to ignore the other potential scum suspects to pursue the theory that GL is scum playing 10th dimensional chess on D2? Also no.
If GL is in LYLO, anyone with him should 100% consider the meta arguments made about his scum-playing abilities, as well as his post-D1 suspicions scorecard. Maybe some people will want to revisit that before LYLO. But doing it on D2 is just redic. It punishes good scumhunting.
Like, am I going to stand over here and just yell that You're Wrong for wanting to vote GL? Not really. What I was/am trying to do is encourage you to maybe share more about your other suspects, because GL suspicions aren't going to gain traction with me or, I suspect, other players."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
For example--you're interacting with GL about your suspicions. Great! I'll read that in a few days if I'm still alive.In post 1071, Green Crayons wrote:Like, am I going to stand over here and just yell that You're Wrong for wanting to vote GL? Not really. What I was/am trying to do is encourage you to maybe share more about your other suspects, because GL suspicions aren't going to gain traction with me or, I suspect, other players.
I would be curious to see who else you suspect, and why."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Yes and no, respectively. Just giving credit to who first articulated a problem with that post.In post 1087, GuiltyLion wrote:
is the kmd bit just referring to 876 or did I miss something else?In post 1054, Green Crayons wrote:In the context of mafia, using that phrase and quoting your post was prodding you to explain the problems with 875, which I think are apparent and which kmd and myself have identified."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
Just fyi work will keep me pretty limited until the weekend."This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!
-
-
Green Crayons Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7612
- Joined: September 21, 2002
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Happy Birthday!