Note: I even forgot who Tet & Looker were. I remember these were alts of players I know well, but WHO??
![Face, Meet Palm :facepalm:](./images/smilies/icon_facepalm.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
I'll read and see if I buy the caseIn post 250, Battle Mage wrote:Not enough people voting for Hiraki here... Would be great if people could explain why, making reference to my watertight case against him!
In post 27, Aloratom wrote:Hello.
In post 28, Aloratom wrote:Hello again.
OK. Who is Eminem??
In post 348, DkKoba wrote:did you end up reading?In post 252, Almost50 wrote:I'll read and see if I buy the caseIn post 250, Battle Mage wrote:Not enough people voting for Hiraki here... Would be great if people could explain why, making reference to my watertight case against him!
Now tell who's not reading (or rather is notIn post 345, Almost50 wrote:Note: This does NOT mean I SR Hiraki.
First part is true. Second part is questionable at best.In post 359, Iconeum wrote:you know perfectly well who I am and how I play
Let me be honest: I would not fault anyone who disliked DkK at the moment. Let me pass on this one. Hiraki I think is more likely Town though.In post 365, Iconeum wrote:also read his first case on dkkoba and tell me your thoughts on that?
OK. Can you please provide a read list in one post? I don't really care if you have too many nulls. I just want something to check back on when we do have flips. Thanks in advance.In post 375, Madoka wrote:I'm not really up for discussing it. You can read my completed game / ask Looker/Hiraki for meta.
I didn't realize I had to.In post 509, Looker wrote:MONKEY! At what point will you cast a vote of your own?
He's @4 votes (L-3) as of your quoted postIn post 524, Hiraki wrote:Btw - I can join orange if it is actually L-2. I don't want to count atm and I don't want to accidentally hammer.
@Mod: Votecount please?![]()
As I said I'm just chilling right now, but that doesn't mean I don;t have thoughts. Put another way:In post 550, Looker wrote:p-edit: Because you never mentioned it. All your stuff is about meeting old friends
This whole strategy looks like bullocks to me. I was first pinged by the suggestion a player should pick Vig over Tracker. Tracker is an informative and will be a safeguard for us in case the Hider did get NK'd. Tracker will tell us if the Hider's death was due to visiting scum or hiding behind the original NK. Furthermore, picking Tracker reduces the chances of the Hider dying due to their target by 25%. It also makes the Detective/Psychologist results more reliable.In post 57, happyorange wrote:People should stop talking about roles, it doesn't benefit village and gives the werewolves more information than they deserve about who is or isn't what role. If you feel the need to discuss the setup, do so in a way that doesn't spew you as not X role. Hider outing is a terrible idea, optimal play for hider is to hide behind their strongest townread each night unless that player is vulnerable to a nightkill and if hider outs then it becomes very simple to narrow down who they are going to visit at night. Vigilante is also a lot more power for town than tracker, and the vigilante should be shooting the counterwagon each night, so as long as the vigilante is doing their job there should never be any real risk of the vigilante inadvertently hitting the hider. Detective/psychologist is going to have false positives with a vigilante around but that should never be a serious issue when claims happen, as long as they are sensible and don't out on day 2 or day 3 if they happen to get an early result.
This funny not just because the Role PMs are posted on the frontpage (I'll assume he didn't bother checking them) but because he was of the opinion "If you feel the need to discuss the setup, do so in a way that doesn't spew you as not X role". This post alone tells me he's not the Hider.In post 106, happyorange wrote:?
If that's true then hiders work differently here, because I've never encountered a hider role that can be tracked.
That was almost mid-day (i.e. with 7 real days left in the DAY). I don't see a point in declaring I will vote X towards the end and not doing it at that time. Do you?In post 223, happyorange wrote:at this rate I'll probably end up voting hiraki at the end of the day,
That is why I intended to chill and let my original vote be w/o discussing any further. Now you're making it sound like "damned it you do, damned if you don't" kind of thing. I have my vote where I think is best and that is that. And if/when orange flips red I'm coming after you.In post 569, Madoka wrote:I'm certain Almost is scum. I don't think Orange fits with the team. Almost made it known he was trying to chill D1 but made the case above on Orange after me and 72 have been putting pressure on him, and I feel like he's trying to solidify the Orange lynch. Like what was the point reiterating everything that's already been discussed about 57
Well, I'm not Ejji so can't claim IIn post 600, Madoka wrote:544 is newbie scum calling someone out for something they think is scummy and then doing the very thing in the same post.
Listen you [redacted]: I said I was going to fucking relax and not bloody effort. I only read the ISO of orange (as the person Ejji was voting) and decided I like where the vote is. Your desperate seesawing if orange is telling enough.In post 609, Madoka wrote:Like if Almost didn't make his case for the sake of showmanship, Point one would have simply been something like "I agree with the points that were made on Orange regarding...", but he rehashed it all out for the sake of display.
This was you proposed team "pre catchup", and you put these same 3 names in your "Rotten Eggs" in 469. Then you fucking found a way to remove orange and replace him with Looker. Rule of 3 applies. If orange is scum (and I think he is) then you are definitely a partner of his.In post 432, Madoka wrote:Pre catchup thoughts is that the team isddl, Happy, and Almost.
I'll have a full catchup, reads, etc. within 24 hours.
I think they are manipulative scum. I could be wrong though as the game I linked (Large Theme from TM2020) had gammagooey doing something similar (pushing me for not "playing the game from the get go" and doubled down on it when I did switch to serious mode on D1). gooey was Town though.In post 641, Looker wrote:What are your thoughts on Madoka's spin-out?In post 556, Almost50 wrote:As I said I'm just chilling right now, but that doesn't mean I don;t have thoughts.
Of course it does. People who play with me more frequently know to leave me alone on D1. If I'm not dead on N1 THEN they can start questioning me.In post 641, Looker wrote:Do you feel that rampant misuse of meta handcuffs your enjoyment of the game?In post 582, Almost50 wrote:I'm always confident, even when make mistakes. Read this game for a fresh specimen of my play (this was my last finished game). The one major difference is I didn't troll much in it because it was TEAM MAFIA so I had a responsibility for my team. When I play on my own (i.e. in casual games like this) I do as I please, which normally involves some shitposting, memes and music videos (and especially so on D1)
Let's assume you did think the Hider is totally untargetable. Why would you want the true Hider to out if scum fake claimed still? You said you would rather pick Vig over Tracker, but it really doesn't matter. Either could target the claimed Hider. Vig misses the real Hider but hits a fake claimer, and Tracker would -in your view- get a No Result while Tracker will either get "Went nowhere" or "Visited X".In post 708, happyorange wrote:His read is contingent on him not acknowledging my post 106 for what it is
I don't know whose alt Madoka is, so I can't respond to that. I know someone like Titus would go the distance to save a scum partner on D1.In post 722, Iconeum wrote:Ok, but I don't see why scum!Madoka risks his game on defending his partner this strong. I'm pretty sure they would have agreed to either bus by now, or just drop the defence and push elsewhere.In post 717, Almost50 wrote:This was you proposed team "pre catchup", and you put these same 3 names in your "Rotten Eggs" in 469. Then you fucking found a way to remove orange and replace him with Looker. Rule of 3 applies. If orange is scum (and I think he is) then you are definitely a partner of his
This chainsaw defence is so glaringly Obvious, an orange!scum flip is resulting in a madoka day 2 lynch 150% of the times.
@Icon: The irony. This is someone so full of them selves they think they are above everyone else. Madoka claims they would have defended TOWN!orange, but is calling me Scum for CASING orange instead.In post 723, Madoka wrote:I love stuff like this and it's why it's so easy to win as scum. If I were scum here I'd definitely be defending town!Orange for this very reason. It increases paranoia, making town more likely to lynch them. Then on their town flip I look good.In post 717, Almost50 wrote:Your desperate seesawing if orange is telling enough.
Kind of what ddl was doing earlier.
I already linked you to my last finished town game. It's on me that you decided to ignore it. I can't spoon-feed you (and certainly not with the current coronavirus pandemic)In post 731, Madoka wrote:Do you have any examples of you reacting similarly to pressure as town?
And you don't need to. If Madoka had cared to check the game I linked they would have seen evidence I did more than that. I clashed with gooey, chenn and Ank. In fact, chenn died thinking I was scum still (but what is new? He always finds a way to call me scum).In post 736, Iconeum wrote:i do but i don't think it's up to me to answer that?In post 731, Madoka wrote:Do you have any examples of you reacting similarly to pressure as town?
viewtopic.php?p=11485250#p11485250In post 751, Madoka wrote:I just want to know if there's an instance of you reacting with such frustration after one post of someone casing you.
I hate to be SR'd on D1m and especially so for reasons I deem "insubstantial"In post 752, Madoka wrote:Like I made a tiny case on you and you start throwing chairs. Imagine if Orange reacted in a similar proportion to your much more extensive case.
Like, how am I supposed to respond to that? How do you refute an argument like yours? Put yourself in my place, and imagine for a second that you (being me) are indeed town here, and then try to respond to the quote yourself.In post 755, Madoka wrote:It makes me feel like the salt is coming from the fact that you can't manipulate me because I'm unaware of you're meta whereas you can manipulate Ico/Looker who are. From scum!you pov you're playing perfectly to your town meta so it's upsetting that you're being called out by someone because they simply don't know your town meta.
Because I think/thought orange was scum too, and I needed that red flip to convince everyone to lynch Madoka next.In post 818, Looker wrote:@Almost50: If you think Madoka is "manipulative scum", why are you still voting for happyorange?
VOTE: 72offsuit
Allo is a good wagon too.In post 1130, Tet wrote:Hiraki is most likely scum on a red Allo flip. 72 is a potential partner based on voting habits which is about all that should be counted on right now. Hiraki can be scum with a third outside of 72 however but It gets fuzzy from there and it would have to be tracker/hider that make up the difference and clear the big picture up.
LIAR!In post 1131, Tet wrote:I don't know any of you.
Are you saying we all died in our dream?In post 1133, Battle Mage wrote:we're all just in limbo because
I already said it was a minor scum slip, so..?In post 1143, Battle Mage wrote:This is a weak and suspicious reason for a vote.In post 1137, Almost50 wrote:VOTE: 72offsuit
This is a minor scumslip in my book. Considering D2 had only started less than 36 hours there's no way one would think of checking how long a player hasn't posted unless they themselves were posting during the night. It's not like I could have posted in a locked thread you know, and it makes no sense to call for a replacement that fast either.FoS: Almost
Some people really need to shut their eyes and sit on their devices to be able toIn post 1144, Battle Mage wrote:if you're town, why are you sheeping, or claiming to sheep another player?In post 1139, Almost50 wrote:I actually was going to sheep Madoka today(It's been a while since I played with newer players and I forgot most appear scummy when they roll PR)since my reads were obviously shit on D1
I was talking to offset.In post 1230, Battle Mage wrote:you had a case on me?
Where exactly am I role fishing?In post 1438, Battle Mage wrote:Secondly, why are you role-fishing about the tracker here?
Of course not. Ever heard of "monkey see monkey do"??In post 1439, Battle Mage wrote:Do you have any of your own opinions?
Oh, I think I got that. We're not used to studying anatomy and are nor known to perform autopsy in the monkey world though.In post 1439, Battle Mage wrote:Or a backbone?
Alright, mighty and strong one. Show us the light. Let's have you present a case on Tet then. You say he is Scum but I don't know why that is. Would you be so kind as to try and convince me?In post 1439, Battle Mage wrote:Weak dude, weak.
I mean, that's how I make my living. He says it, I do it, bystanders clap and throw us some nickles and dimes, he then buys himself a good dinner and buys me some bananas.In post 1440, Battle Mage wrote:what the heck is this? Goodness me. You just do what Tet tells you, eh?In post 1427, Almost50 wrote:On the other hand Hiraki is a safe lynch under the circumstances (we don't want to end up running up the Tracker). Your call.
Check the post I was responding to, maybe?In post 1442, Battle Mage wrote:Why you trying to fish the hider to visit you on Night 1?
Actually, it's not doing anything the whole game. Just get a string TR and sheep to win and call it a day. Impressive, I know.In post 1442, Battle Mage wrote:Apparently his gimmick is he doesn't do anything on the first couple of days
Same way they get away with a lol!hammer, dude.In post 1442, Battle Mage wrote:How do people get away with this?
I'll admit lynching Allo was scummy of me. Go on.In post 1442, Battle Mage wrote:Day 2 - expecting big things from A50, who has done nothing so far. Rather than have any of his own opinions, he just declares he will copy somebody else's votes, with no justification (not that any justification would be good anyway). Scummy.
I can't even begin to decipher this. Let's start with you admitting to being a piece of brown substance that smells bad and come out of a back orifice. Now that we have that done and over with; I don't get what you want to tell me here? Do you want me to quit playing mafia because you don't like my play? Is that it?In post 1442, Battle Mage wrote:Typical A50, getting his panties in a bunch over it. Being shit (self-declared) is not a reason not to try (I speak from experience...) - why play mafia if you aren't going at least give it your best shot? Just weak scum excuses, and defensiveness here.
you damn well know I was confusing you with someone else.In post 1442, Battle Mage wrote:Ah something nice - Almost50 is pretty satisfied I'm town because I hammered Allomancer.
I wish you luck when/if you play against scum me. I am confident you're gonna need it. LOTS of it.In post 1451, Battle Mage wrote:The simplest explanation is often the right one, and people who are too lazy to think for themselves, and their defence is "I'm sheeping this guy", are probably just lazy scum.