wording error of mine, i mean that there was an opportunity to help create one and you just voted the person who wanted to
In post 235, numberQ wrote:What do you mean that I'm oblivious to the mechanics/scum gameplan? The former, okay sure, I asked about strategies and had forgotten about the insta-lose thing. But at best that's null imo, scum could easily fake lack of knowledge, and even more easily probe for town strats. As for the latter, how would you know whether or not I'm oblivious to the scum gameplan? Not sure what was meant by that statement.
well, i might be projecting a bit when making these awesome logical leaps
as scum i never try to fake townslips because it always feels more fulfilling to get townread for other reasons
in fact i think it's kinda scummy
are you that kind of person, numberq?
i think the use of the word "oblivious" is also wrong, unaware seems better
because oblivious, to me, seems like it would imply that there's a world that you're with XXX scumteam who talked about mechanics and you didn't bother to absorb any of it
but i heavily doubt that one's the case. i may not have answered your question here so get back to me
In post 235, numberQ wrote:Felt like you were building a case on me there, is the "townslipping would be too ballsy" logic really strong enough to start probing elsewhere?
yeah it was a case but voting you would mean that i'd have to ignore both slips you did, your earlier logs and assume that the rest of the scumteam is the people that haven't talked about mechanics here
i don't know you, but why wouldn't it be? i think mafia isn't above using really easy ways to get townread (would assume at least one mafia in the mechanics spammers for ex) but townslipping isn't really one i expect to be that reliable, and so i dont imagine scum doing it in the first place