Obviously Fire Mafia.
My timezone is UTC+1 / GMT+1.
Ok then.DTMaster
@Mindgamer
I had the pleasure to mod pwnman. He is very anti-town newbie, but gut instinct says I need more time to get a better read. You should also look at join dates.
Text in red is joking. The rest is serious. This is important because...Eh... yeah... I don't really see much to do, sorry. :/
My joke could be interpreted as a scumslip. I don't like how Crazy refuses to understand that.
Unvote. Vote: Crazy
Bandwagon go!
/goes back to lurking
Hmm hmm. First, it's not a joke. It's just me sucking and not really paying attention to what's going on. Second, why is it OBVIOUSLY a joke. Explain what's so funny.DarkLightA
This is obviously a joke from Mindgamer's side.
FoS: SaintKerrigan
Try to avoid jumping on EVERY joke you see, will you?
Nope, I did not learn this lesson. Quite the contrary. The joke boosted some interesting discussion and we already have people taking some serious stances about the attackers and defenders of the joke. That's great, isn't it? Progress AND humour. Now that's my idea of an awesome mafia game!ICEninja
Didn't we learn from the first time that saying blatantly stupid things, assuming people will take them as jokes, is a bad idea?
Interesting. Bandwagoning is pro-town imo, so I don't see what's your point here. Lurking is... sucky. I agree. But is that enough to rise 'very high' in one's scumlist? Why don't the other lurkers rise very high in your scumlist then? To me it seems like you are just picking on a bad poster. Scumpoints for you.ICEninja
You then vote for the sake of bandwagon, then /going back to lurking. You have risen very high in my scum suspect list.
Force is bad?ICEninja
Crazy is caught in a mild contradiction for the piggy backing thing, but doesn't seem too bad for me. Lots of content and good explanation, but I really don't like how much force he puts in to his arguments.
Most people would call that active lurking, but apparently you have a reason to be positive about DarkLightA. Which is...?ICEninja
Darklight isa little content shy, but seems OK.
This is relevant because?DTMaster
Actually,the fact that pwnman took so long to answer, then rehashed my answer should be proof that pwnman is being scummy about his reasoning.
Fixed.SaintKerrigan
This. Is. SPARTA!!!
The funny thing is that although Scott Brosius has made a number of posts, he has not posted any content at all. All his posts are about game philosophy or unimportant facts like quote tags. Involvement in the game? Scumhunting? Nothing.Crazy
Also, it seems to me Scott had posted more content than Sanhora, XScorpion, and probably pwnman. [and even you, before that last post.] Deer, too, is relatively low on post content. Why did you choose Scott in particular?
I'm pushing a lynch now? It's just a simple vote.Nachomamma8
Oooh, and Mingamer? As a lurker, never push a lurker lynch. Hypocrisy is a strong scumtell.
Parrot.Deer
Well, I find it very hypocritical
This whole post is one big OMGUS. I accuse you of lurking, so you accuse me of lurking. Is that all you have to say? I'm certainly not happy with you, Scott Brosius.Scott Brosius wrote:ISO Mindgamer
9- Likes RVS
48- Basically parrots my post about pwn being VI
79- Finds the pwn BW "interesting"
115- Votes for Crazy for the reason on "bandwagon go!"
147- Perhaps some content?!
So I fail to see how you can attempt to call me out for lack of participation when you have barely done so yourself. Your 2 non-RVS votes have lacked reason.
Pretty hypocritical since apparently I'm worthy of a vote yet you say lurking is not enough to rise someone to very high on one's scumlist.Mindgamer wrote:
Interesting. Bandwagoning is pro-town imo, so I don't see what's your point here. Lurking is... sucky. I agree. But is that enough to rise 'very high' in one's scumlist? Why don't the other lurkers rise very high in your scumlist then? To me it seems like you are just picking on a bad poster. Scumpoints for you.
Quite an early conclusion. We have 13 days left to decide.DTMaster
Iceninja is definaltly not the lynch for today.
Trying to get lynched is against your win condition no matter your allignment. You're not playing to win. Stop this idiocy and pick the next 'behaviour' on your list.I don't have a meta. Trust me.
I'm completely unpredictable. So don't even bother Very Happy
I never play two games the same way.
I'm now going to OMGUS vote in an attempt to draw more attention and get myself lynched because that's what I do.
Interesting. What makes you think this?Nachomamma8 wrote:Mindgamer-pwnman = 1 Mafia Scumteam...
I thought I explained this clearly enough. Sanhora has just not posted. Scott Brosius has posted, but his posts are empty. I'm not sure what's your problem with DarkLightA. He isn't super active but I can live with what he has said up til now. And the RayFrost/DTMaster is quite active. It's noted how both Scott Brosius and you keep defending Scott Brosius with 'but others are doing it too!!!'Nachomamma8 wrote:Mindgamer, why Scott Brosius? Sanhora hasn't said anything with her posting, Ray hasn't said anything with his posting, Darklight hasn't said anything with his posting... Scott's actually taken positions on things, which is a hell of a lot more than you've done so far.
Nachomamma8-Scott Brosius = 1 Mafia Scumteam...Nachomamma8 wrote:Scott, a comment on anything that wasn't an attack on you?
ICEninja
If you insist on Mindgamer, tell us what specifically he has done that makes you feel he merits a vote.
This is not an answer to the question.DarkLightA
Sorry, I realized that might be unclear. It's not a ladder scale, but a category scale. I'm reciding a bit on XScorpion.
I'm not talking about your list. I'm talking about this:Nachomamma8
It's noted that you haven't been reading the game as closely as you should be. That list was a response to XScorpion's plea for a list of lurkers...
Nachomamma8
Mindgamer, why Scott Brosius? Sanhora hasn't said anything with her posting, Ray hasn't said anything with his posting, Darklight hasn't said anything with his posting...
Does this include yourself?Pwnman
Right now I actually think the people not lurking are mafia so they can mislynch and/or use the lurking to their advantage
Yeah, I take that as a defense since I had already explained what made Scott Brosius stand out.Nachomamma8
Wait, you took that as me defending Scott Brosius? Erm, what? Again, I was just asking what made Scott special.
You asked DarkLightA why he voted for me. Not relatively to the other players, you just asked why.ICEninja
Actually it was. You did not understand the nature of my question. I was asking DarkLight if, because 2 people were lower on the list than you, if he found them more scummy than you. If he did, then why was he voting you?
What words?DarkLightA wrote:Ahaha, you little smarty-pants. Putting words in people's mouthes now?Mindgamer wrote:ICEninja
If you insist on Mindgamer, tell us what specifically he has done that makes you feel he merits a vote.This is not an answer to the question.DarkLightA
Sorry, I realized that might be unclear. It's not a ladder scale, but a category scale. I'm reciding a bit on XScorpion.
DarkLightA
Also, useNo."Name" wrote:[/ quote] Instead of [ quote]Name[/ quote]
Que? Who has said they don't like it? Scott Brosius. And Deer merely asked you a question. Is that enough for you to think 'well apparently the town doesn't like this soooooo'?DarkLightA
Okay, that vote was meant for me to be a base in scum hunting, but as you guys seem to not like it:
Unvote
Rolling Eyes Now where do we start
You do realize there are four scum in this game right? Thinking independently is the key to victory. Don't let your judgment be clouded by what others say.
Time on site =/= Quality of posts.DTMaster
You started in Augest 09, this is March 10. I expected better posts then this.
Ok, you're keeping track of SaintKerrigan's games. That's good. So you also know that when he replaced out of this game, he replaced out of all his other games as well right? (barring Chess Mafia where he will just take a break)DTMaster
Unvote
Vote: SaintKerrigan
He is actively lurking in this game.
Use this:
http://www.msutils.net/search.php
Searched SaintKerrigan
He posted in other games, and he analyzed in other games.
Discuss
He stopped playing those games.DTMaster
@Nacho
^^ Need I say more.SK has been active in other games, but claims to be busy in this game. SK also flaked out on another ice/fire mafia game (though he turned out to be town. Read mod errored open 201).
The timing of his replacement with my accusation= very bad against SK.
@Dana
Sup
He doesn't say he understood the sarcasm. Nice Straw Man.DarkLightA
SK wrote:
I agree that my case on Mindgamer was weak. It was an attempt to make something happen to jolt out the RVS (although at the time I agreed with my reasoning).
Wait, wait, wait... Now he's saying that he UNDERSTOOD the Mindgamer sarcasm and pointed it out just to get the game out of RVS????
O really? I'd say this is my best contribution to the game so far. A townie who can't think independently is worthless. It's a shame DarkLightA ignores me and follows the trend again: DTMaster attacks SaintKerrigan and DarkLightA makes a case on SaintKerrigan.ICEninja
Mindgamer wrote:
You do realize there are four scum in this game right? Thinking independently is the key to victory. Don't let your judgment be clouded by what others say.
Maybe I'm missing your point here, but this statement seemed to be completely irrelevant to the rest of your post, and just thrown in there.
No.DarkLightA
So you're saying that I have to vote someone who isn't being voted on, otherwise I'll be scum?
Don't forget this one:DTMaster
Ok, now why did you attack me for this when:
a. SK's last post I analyzed was Tue Mar 09 2010 06:19:00
b. I posted at Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:57 pm
c. The replacements began Tue Mar 09 2010 21:49:00
Your point is?DTMaster
Said he had midterms on the 9th so he didn't post his catchup but had time to post on the 8th with the last analysis being on Mon Mar 08 2010 17:26:0.
You never had evidence. Everything you said has been proven wrong. SaintKerrigan was busy and he replaced out, he wasn't active lurking.DTMaster
No I had evidence that he was actively lurking in this game, not that he was scum who gave up. That is far more supperior to what you call my case is.
Better find a new core then.DTMaster
before you do that again you had better attack the whole active lurking bit which is the core of my original vote on SK.
I don't see ICEninja pushing a SaintKerrigan lynch. lol.DTMaster
Oh hay IceNinja agrees with me too, but you don't attack him. You attack the guy who put the first vote when he had evidence to push a case on SK. lol.
So much roflcopter stuff in this part of your post. It's interesting how you're already making plans for the future. SaintKerrigan isn't even close to being lynched, but you're already talking about his flip, and the day afterwards. Why would a townie plan so much?DTMaster
Mindgamer's defence on SK is noted since he is chainsawing heavily on me. If SK/Replacement flips scum, it is likely Mindgamer is scum with SK because he ignored my initial vote, and only attacked my side comment (aka he ignored my full case).
Not this shit again. Pwnman didn't think logical. Now he's gone, so we don't need to think about that any longer.DarkLightA
Guys, read the beginning of pwnman's iso. (First 6 posts). It's clear that HE DID NOT ADAPT the theory, rather he stated it himself, and later said "and SK's is the same" not realizing that it wasn't.
I'm keeping an eye on ICEninja for the exact same reason.Locke Lamora
-ICEninja also concerns me a bit, mainly because of an air of caution. This could just be playstyle based but I've learnt to be wary of anyone who says they don't put their vote around until they've carefully considered all the information.
At least that means more awesome replacement fluff, right?Nikanor
Bio Hazard has been prodded.
Now searching for a replacement for Crazy.
Activity is a town tell?Deer wrote:I think both of them defended themselves fairly well. Mindgamer more than Crazy, just because he's posted more.LL wrote: Vote: Deer
What happened to your suspicions of Crazy and Mindgamer?
Will it help? Only one way to find out. But I see you're not interested in participating in initatives that could help town.ICEninja
I'm not sure if this is a strange way to rolefish, or if it could actually help at all.
Links to games where this was the case, please.DarkLightA
I tend to be the D1 lynch, so I try for the town's sake to avoid that now....
After 12 pages there is no such thing as a 'I don't know.'. You have a town, scum or neutral read. Which is it? If you really don't know, you should read Deer in ISO and form your opinion.DarkLightA
About Deer:
I don't know.. Sure, he's riding on the wave of the others, pointing out the obvious. But scum? I don't know.
This seems like a question for RedCoyote. It looks like ICEninja's opinion on Pwnman makes the difference.XScorpion
Mindgamer: RedCoyote said he did not like Ice's stance against DTM, yet you are the one actually voting for him. Why do you think RedCoyote considers Ice scum and not you then?
It's the reason why that is important.XScorpion
@Mindgamer:I'd investigate StK/danakillsu
Ok, but why would it be a shot in the dark to investigate a lurker? I'd say it's the other way around. It's hard to get a read on players that don't post much (eg lurkers), so investigating them would give you the info you need.Scott Brosius
As for mindgamer's question, I would probably investigate DTMaster, as he has been participating the mostand investigating a talkative player is better than taking a shot in the dark with a lurker.
Meta'ing on ONE game?Nachomamm8
I can't see myself jumping on the Deer wagon; so far, he's playing exactly how he was in Newbie 869. I'd like to see him step it up a little bit though; he's someone I'm going to be watching Day 2.
O really? Please give me Scott Brosius's content up to that point.Bio Hazard
Page 6: Calls SC down for "no content," which is really hypocritical,not to mention untrue.
Posting without producing content.DTMaster
Define to me what you would call active lurking.
Admitted? I really don't like your choice of words here.DTMaster
You even admitted to SK posting elsewhere.
This looks like a retreat of your case. Your case 'was' valid? That's news! Not long ago you said SaintKerrigan's replacement timing actually strenghtened your case.DTMasterI find it fascinating that you dislike my pressure on SK. Yes you showed me that SK replaced out of every game except for his modding duties. Hence I unvoted since this is a sign that SK was busy.However, my case was valid given when I made it, I did it before SK's replacement.
You are scummy.DTMaster
I also find it fascinating that in this entire argument you never once said I was scummy. Here you are arguing against me, voting me, but at no time did you call me scummy
Because it's my duty to hunt scum.DTMaster
Why are you so concerned about my push on SK's wagon given that she wasn't close to a lynch.
Actually, being a good cop is not about investigating suspects. It's about investigating people who are hard to get a read on. Is it bad to talk about people who are hard to get a read on? That would take the discussion take to a new level, which is needed imo. Let's face it: We haven't achieved anything with our current discussions yet.DTMaster
You think I'm scum right? Hence the vote? Why are you so concerned about people's scum list again? This reads as: fishing for people's town list while attacking me. Cop investigation lists = gut scum lists = townie targets for scum.
SaintKerrigan replaced out in post 238. In post 240 you indicated in response to Nachomamm8 that you were still supportive of your 'active lurking' case.DTMaster
Blablabla dropped my case after SK quit blablabla
DTMaster is my first choice, obviously. I will do a reread of the game tonight and present my Top2/Top3 scum list afterwards. However, I won't give a Top3 town list like you are proposing. Easy nightkills.RedCoyoto
You really need to offer up at least two people you are comfortable with lynching today, one or two people you don't feel comfortable lynching... etc.
I said this game wasn't exciting, not that there's not anything to analyze. Strawman much?DTMaster
You are seriously back tracking in our discussions right now . You say there isn't anything substantial to analyze, but at the same time call me out on being scummy.
I'm not attacking you? Explain.DTMaster
Let me ask you this: Why are you complaining about this when you aren't productively scum hunting/attacking me right now?
No, I didn't say that. What the heck?DTMaster
you say there is an issue about people who you can't get reads on.
You're right, I should stop asking questions. /sarcasmDTMaster
Your question = laziness.
Repeat: In your first post after the replacement you still supported your case.DTMaster
I've unvoted to allow Dana to speak up and SK demonstrated that he replaced out in all his games. Hence my: oh, halo of replacement I take back my original case.
It was you who came up with the idea of tracking SaintKerigan because you saw he was active in other games. Despite taking the effort to follow him when he was active in this game, you stopped this when he replaced out? Why didn't you check his other games then? I shouldn't have needed to point that out.DTMaster
Yes until you pointed out SK replaced out of all his games where I shortly unvoted . Hello, earth to mindgamer, am I still pushing for an SK/Dana lynch right now?
Nope, let's base our votes on 100% gut. Epic.ICEninja
ONE POST gave me a town read. Everything else makes me feel like he's scum. That one post gives me pause to see him lynched, but other than that I feel like Mindgamer is probably one of the best lynches for today.I don't need to point out anything, because I've mentioned more than once that I find him scummy, and I've also called him the second best lynch for today. This is not fence sitting, this is not backtracking. This is just questioning my previous (and current) read on him because he posted something that made me feel somewhat better about him. One post isn't enough to reverse the case against him, however, so my scum read on him stands.
Which points exactly?ICEninja
OK so I did a re-read of deer in ISO, and I see a lot of the points against him.
To my knowledge I have been attacking DTMaster and he has defended himself, not the other way around. What's up?ICEninja
I currently stand at DarkLight and Mindgamer roughly equal, mostly because of things I've already said about DarkLight and becauseI really like the points DT brought up about Mindgamer. XScorpion and deer follow for doing similar things.
This is a town statement imo. A townie is more interested in scumhunting than their own reputation. But Locke Lamora follows it up with this:DarkLightA
In my games I tend to not really care about the other players' opinions about me. I'm more focussed on using different ways to find scum
This is about the exact opposite of what DarkLightA has said. It feels like you're trying to get DarkLightA to say something.Locke Lamora
Are you more worried about being another D1 lynch than you are about catching scum?
I think he's more concerned with what people think of his scumhunting than he has confidence in his own scumhunting abilities.Locke Lamora
If you genuinely think that DLA is more concerned with scumhunting than what people think of his votes,
Dude, I said you were offering decent content. Stop this extreme strawmanning...DTMaster
Also, what a weak way to jump off your DTM vote in the end. I haven't produced content? If anything you should be getting strong reads off me in our exchange. I've definitely had strong stances throughout this game. You can sum this up quite nicely as:
I noticed this too. Danakillsu is pretty detailed about his opinion. Let's see:Nachomamma8 wrote:@All on DLA's Wagon:
Post made at 10:37 AM.danakillsu wrote:I don't understand why everyone's saying I need to post NOW or anything, but I certainly think it's time tounvote. I'll have to iso DarklightA to see whether I find him scummy enough to lynch even near a deadline.Post made at 10:42 AM.danakillsu wrote:He's definitely worth lyching. His vote jumps around a lot with no apparent reasoning behind it at all, he gets off topic a lot, and he tries to lynch someone he doesn't find scummy at all, and in fact finds pro-town simply because it's near the deadline. I'llvote: DarkLightA
Look at how long it took Dana to make his grand decision... THIS is the type of company you're sharing on your stupid, meaningless, mislynch wagon.
...DarkLightA wrote:Yeah, I was so into the whole thing of fire+water cancel that I forgot completely about that. Well, I guess the night will tell then...
Although I like attacks on Scott Brosius, this defense could also come from a townie who wants to share his knowledge on Danakillsu's behaviour.Nachomamma8
I think it's also worthy to note that he outright defended Dana in ISO 15: "I have played in a few games (Mafia 103, another game I can't remember) where danakillsu replaced in with a similar playstyle. He/she has always proved to be relatively useless, was town both times. So I don't think lynching him/her would be helpful or give us any information. I am fine with my vote where it is.".
After 20 pages you step forward with a 'connection' vote? Don't you think we have much more information to go on?Kthxbye
Vote: Nachomann
I don't like DLA's 'read' on him. It's a connection vote more than anything.
I'm not sure what the purpose of this post is. With a little imagination, I can translate even the most protown post into scumthoughts. I don't see how this is supporting the RedCoyote case at all, it looks more like an easy way to throw more suspicion on RedCoyote. Scumpoints for you.XScorpion
Suppose RC is scum. Let's break that ISO down line by line.
Translation
Translation
Which is useful because...?TheLoneWolf
Yeah we'll be right back where we started, but we'll have an idea of the scum's personalities, like DTM said, if they both go for the doctor they aren't playing like a vig anymore.
I don't think fire/ice hunting specific isn't useful at all, but it should be a backup, not a main tool for scumhunting.RedCoyote
If you think, as Mindgamer does, that we should just look for scum period, then that's something completely different.
Again, after 21 pages you can do much better than this. And you can't do 'pretty much whatever you want', because you need to help your faction win. Your personal survival =/= your win condition. Start scumhunting.Kthxbye
Vote: Nacho
Before you ask, it's mostly gut based on how I read through the dead scum's postings. Plus, I can do pretty much whatever I want since I'm the Doc and am most likely a talking dead man. Wouldn't it be great if scum didn't kill me tonight though and I got set up as false claiming tomorrow? *laughs evilly* I'm betting they couldn't pull it off even if they tried.
Scott Brosius is my top suspect and he seems to be 'fire' so he's my top fire read.Nachomamma8
@Everyone: Top fire read, top two Ice reads. I've already given mine.
The Lynch All Liars comment was aimed at DarkLightA. You called Nachomamma8 on LAL, I didn't. As he said, he just changed his read. You were actually the only one to call Nachomamma8 a flat out liar. Why do you think I would support your silly claim when I said I thought Nachommam8 was town?XScorpion wrote:Apologies to RedCoyote for thinking that he was fire. No hard feelings?
Well, I did get Wolf's alignment wrong, but at least I called him out as scum (hehe).
Although Fishy does seem like the obvious choice today, I'm looking at Mindgamer and I see some interesting things...
ISO 18:Then yesterday Mindgamer calls Nacho town. Talk about a change in opinion.MindGamer wrote:The opposite of what you said? So it's coming from a scum perspective? Not true.Lynch all liars.
ISO 19:Darklight wrote:This is obviously a joke from Mindgamer's side.
FoS: SaintKerrigan
Try to avoid jumping on EVERY joke you see, will you?Talk about obvious buddying here.Mindgamer wrote:I have a very strong belief a DarkLightA lynch will result in a town flip.
Topped with Mindgamer's attacks on DTM on day 1, I think Mindgamer is more likely than Fishy to be scum.
Vote: Mindgamer
I won't vote for Fishy until I hear what he has to say about "the final scum."
Perhaps I didn't say it explicitly in this game, but real life punched me in the face so I had to replace out of half my games and post only occasonally in the games I continued in. I still post content.XScorpion wrote:I didn't notice Mindgamer until recently because on day 1 Mindgamer seemed pretty town, but then after Darklight died night 1 Mindgamer suddenly became the #1 lurker, which prompted me to read him in ISO. I also find it highly suspicious that Mindgamer's first post today is an OMGUS vote in response to me calling him out. Keep in mind this is his first post in SEVEN DAYS.
Whatever. Point is I didn't call him a liar so obviously LAL doesn't apply.XScorpion wrote:No, DTM called him on it first. Nice try.Mindgamer wrote:As he said, he just changed his read. You were actually the only one to call Nachomamma8 a flat out liar.
That was an ironic reply to Nachomamma8 who called me scum with Pwnman without giving reasoning. 'Mindgamer-pwnman = 1 Mafia Scumteam...'XScorpion wrote:You didn't buddy Nacho because you made a grand total of seven posts on Day 2, and the only one that even mentioned Nacho was your last post before he died, simply saying that you think he's town.This is the only time in the entire game where you say you think he's town; on day 1, your only view of Nacho is:Mindgamer wrote:Nachomamma8-Scott Brosius = 1 Mafia Scumteam... Cool
Yeah, so?Parama wrote:Mindgamer, you realize you are my #2 lynch behind Fishy, right?