Open 216 - Generic Reality Television Mafia! Day 2!

ksen · Post Post #10 (isolation #0) » Mon Apr 26, 2010 3:08 am

vote chronopie

He needs more time to devote to the other game we are in together.

ksen · Post Post #20 (isolation #1) » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:27 am

imaginality wrote:@everyone: has anyone played with anyone else on the list here? I'm pretty sure I haven't played with any of you yet.

I'm currently in a game with chronopie and DoItRiley, although DoItRiley just exited that game.

ksen · Post Post #38 (isolation #2) » Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:03 pm

I don't mind trying the hypocop idea.

Any other takers?

ksen · Post Post #51 (isolation #3) » Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:06 pm

imaginality wrote:@ksen: why are you in favour of hypocop?

Because I read the link about it that was posted and it got generally good reviews.

ksen · Post Post #53 (isolation #4) » Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:21 pm

Shattered Viewpoint wrote:
ksen wrote:
imaginality wrote:@ksen: why are you in favour of hypocop?
Because I read the link about it that was posted and it got generally good reviews.
So, what do you think about the arguments in this thread that basically counter that?

FTR, I think it's not such a hot idea in this particular setup.

I think people have laid out some valid concerns with hypocopping in a game where scum have this tailor ability. tbh I didn't even think of the Tailor aspect of the game.

I think if we do it we should follow Imaginality's suggestion.

However, for today it is a bit of a distraction and we ought to concentrate on hunting scum.

ksen · Post Post #54 (isolation #5) » Wed Apr 28, 2010 4:23 pm

nopointinactingup wrote:- Cops investigation, in my opinion, will play a vital part in scum-hunting. In fact, I think we should consider no-lynch day.

@nopointinactingup - Please explain how no-lynching on Day 1 helps town.

ksen · Post Post #61 (isolation #6) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:55 am

chnorek wrote:is this what you calling hunting scum?

Asking questions is how you look for scum, yes?

ksen · Post Post #62 (isolation #7) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:56 am

chnorek wrote:is this what you calling hunting scum?

Asking questions is how you look for scum, yes?

ksen · Post Post #63 (isolation #8) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:57 am

Whoops, sorry for the double post.

ksen · Post Post #65 (isolation #9) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:11 am

chnorek wrote:
ksen wrote:
chnorek wrote:is this what you calling hunting scum?
Asking questions is how you look for scum, yes?
not when excacly same question has been already asked 1 page ago (post 35). in that case it looks opposite...

And at this point nopoint has yet to answer. So please explain how pushing someone to answer a question they've not yet answered is scummy.

ksen · Post Post #66 (isolation #10) » Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:12 am

XScorpion wrote:
Ksen wrote:Because I read the link about it that was posted and it got generally good reviews.
Unfortunately, at the bottom of the link,

Khelvaster wrote:
Adel wrote:and if a paerson posts that they got a guilty on a person the mafia knows is not scum, that person is not the cop. If a person posts that they got an innocent on a mafia player, that person is not the cop. Hypocop greatly assists the scum's process-of-elimination (and I don't mean by nk's) in determining who the cop is.
I see.

I guess this is just doomed to failure then.

Oh, thanks for pointing that out. I only read the first few posts and saw the tone was generally positive.

ksen · Post Post #109 (isolation #11) » Sat May 01, 2010 1:31 am

VLA until 5/3

Noted.

ksen · Post Post #193 (isolation #12) » Mon May 03, 2010 9:12 am

mavsfan41 wrote:The town has two plans right now, hypocoping and imaginality's random plan. Personally I like imaginality's plan better. Although it will be hard to figure out who the cops are, and it seems this plan will involve a lot of WIFOM, it seems to be a better plan than hypocoping. I want to ask a the town a question in general, I fear the worst case scenario today with lynch of the cop, and I don't really have a specific scum target, I am down with a no lynch today, and during day 2 will go about with imaginality's plan. Since I don't really have a strong scum read on anyone yet, I will probably not be voting unless something really materializes. What's everyone else's plan on ending today? To lynch or not to lynch, that is the question...

I'll be voting to lynch. I absolutely do not like ending a day without a lynch.

Actually town has 3 plans: 1) hypocop_A, 2) hypocop_B, and 3) just play the game without the hypocopping.

unvote

vote mavsfan41

I didn't like any of this post.

1) actually advancing the notion of no lynching day 1,
2) pretending to worry about hitting a cop on day 1.

ksen · Post Post #209 (isolation #13) » Mon May 03, 2010 5:59 pm

XScorpion wrote:
chronek wrote:ksen case is still here but he did hide behind VLA for now. no point keeping vote, but worth to push when he comes back.
Ok, ksen is back. Now what are you gonna do?

He's gonna do nothing because he knows his "case" against me was weak . . . at best.

ksen · Post Post #212 (isolation #14) » Mon May 03, 2010 6:22 pm

chnorek wrote:
XScorpion wrote:Ok, ksen is back. Now what are you gonna do?
for sure not remove the vote out of you. why you care so much what am i going to do?

This is mafia, everyone cares what everyone else is going to do. Seems like an odd statement to ask why he cares what you are going to do.

ksen · Post Post #220 (isolation #15) » Wed May 05, 2010 3:59 am

kunkstar7 wrote:
nopointinactingup wrote:Scum do have a tendency to procrastinate.
I find this a completely baseless accusation.

@ksen: what do you make of Xscorpions's "jester" style of play and the following wagon that built up around it? Any suspects so far?

tbh I didn't read too much of it. I think that was around the time of my VLA and when I got back a lot of posts had been made.

I can go back and give it a read though.