![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Means you know too much.
1) Since 9th Feb 2010, as per my join DateBeefster wrote:1. How long have you been playing Mafia? (inside and outside MS)
2. How would you describe your meta?
3. What's your win/loss record?
4. Favorite setup?
5. What do you think is the biggest scum tell?
6. How do you make your decisions?
Confidanon gave very little reason for placing inhim at L-3, only stating that he disliked inhim's use of word choice as a vote reason. I don't really see why there's much more to say.There's too much debate around easjo and not enough votes on inHim.
sounds like BS reasoning to justify what was, essentially, little better than a random vote. The vote on Beefster appears to be largely unprovoked.I did not jump on ODDin because he placed a "serious vote." I voted ODDin because he claimed his vote was better than a random vote. I would have been OK with "more than a random vote" or "finally, something besides a random vote" but "better"? No, that's dishonest.
You be in my head, posting my ideas.Mr. Chaos wrote:Just noticed some flawed reasoning. Active Lurking is an anti town action. I don't really see how lack of evidence = less scummy. If anything, it should make him look even more scummy.Beefster wrote:Scott really only has active lurking and confusing posts against him. If I had more time to actually take a look at him before, I probably wouldn't have put him on my scumlist. There isn't enough evidence against him.
The rest of the slot are empty?OP wrote:Players
XScorpion
Chronopie
Scott Brosius
ElscoutaKarma
Toon FighterConfidAnon
ODDin
Mr.Sandman
easjo682
Mr. Chaos
Well I've quite forgotten who I suspected (If I even did, I recall being pretty disengaged), so some leniency from me.XScorpion wrote:Did you read the whole thread? Do you have any views besides Karma being suspicious? Content would be nice.
That goes for all replacements.
@People who aren't replacements: do you agree with Taz that I should cut equinox slack, despite my previous suspicions of Karma? Are you going to vote for the same people you are voting for, even if they were replaced? Opinions, please.
Hello!Tazaro wrote:@Chronopie: Chronopie!! Contribute soon. What's your flavor? Equinox or drymyshotty?
Just because there's a 2/3 chance of any player being scum.Equinox wrote:Mass claiming isn't going to help, Chronopie. We're all going to end up claiming vanilla townie, especially with that botched doctor claim (*grr*). You're probably scum, anyhow, so... yeah, definitely a "no."
uhhh... Look for four. Or at the very least, a pair.Equinox wrote:I'm going to go reread and pick my scum target of the day.
It's more that I expected to see a fair bit of Night interaction, instead we had aScott Brosius wrote:Why play then? Do you always just give up and provide nothing when you are VT? Obviously it's more entertaining to have night decisions but that's not fair to everyone else in the game.
It's one thing to be new to the game and obviously act scummy because you don't know any better. This doesn't seem to be true in your case.