For not paying attention to what game this is
![Eek :eek:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Pepsi if I have to. Stopped drinking pop a month or so ago.Beefster wrote:1. Pepsi or Coke?
I don't really have a favorite setup, long as it's not a bastard game I'll probably play. I do like games that are more about the scum hunting and less about the power roles though.Beefster wrote:2. Favorite Setup?
I question and prod a lot, so I'd say I have a pressure style of play.Beefster wrote:3. How would you describe your meta?
Actually have no idea, played way too many games. I am trying to update my wiki but it is taking forever. I will say I have been winning more games than losing recently. But I don't have exact stats.Beefster wrote:4. Win/loss record?
Five is probably the max, but I am trying to keep it to around 2-3 now.Beefster wrote:5. Maximum number of games you'll play in at one time?
It was partly that, but also I didn't like his response to Paltry's question, in that I don't believe he did it as a "test". Since then he has also gone on to make a joke vote (or at least it feels some what jokey to me) in post 49 which doesn't seem to back up his earlier "RVS unvote".StrangerCoug wrote:Sotty7 said that Shattered Viewpoint "unvoted" solely because the RVS is over. I think what's running through his mind is that, if SV thinks that, he should at the very least chip in about what's going on, and preferably vote someone he thinks is scummy. SV didn't explicitly mention the RVS, but I think he's the last person that could have ended it.PaltryExcuse wrote:@SC: Why me over Sotty7?
Please explain why not answering those RQS is scummy.Shattered Viewpoint Post 69 wrote:This -- is totally, completely scummy. YOU ARE NOT ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS FOR BEEFSTER. You are answering them FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL OF US.silverbullet999 wrote:Fineee I'll answer... I was looking and couldn't find the game... though I could have sworn I played with beefster before... Maybe I'm losing my mind as beef didn't show any love to me in his posts.
Thus, you are trying tokeep information to yourself.Scum.
My vote remains, and now with extra bonus Good Reason.
What do you think about the people who are "paying attention"?Shattered Viewpoint Post 69 wrote:And to the rest of you: I have a unique playstyle. You don't like it, too damned bad.
I unvoted for precisely the reason I stated: To see if you people were PAYING ATTENTION. Some are, some are NOT.
I knew where my vote was (or wasn't, in this specific case). Ialwaysknow where my vote is, and I never post without knowing that.
I engage, from time to time, in "tests" and "traps" designed to see what people are thinking. If you can't handle Advanced Scumhunting 101, you're on the wrong site.
Good day, sirs.
Pretty sure that isn't an answer.Beefster Post 70 wrote:Why not?Col.Cathart wrote:Why did you answer for him?
Mod kill fishing?StrangerCoug Post 76 wrote:Modkill fishing FTL.Beefster wrote:Besides, there are four scum. You should have asked who his scum palswere.FoS: Beefster.
Yeah I get that part, I just don't understand how Beef was trying to do that in your opinion.StrangerCoug Post 78 wrote:Trying to get another player modkilled.Sotty7 wrote:Mod kill fishing?StrangerCoug Post 76 wrote:Modkill fishing FTL.Beefster wrote:Besides, there are four scum. You should have asked who his scum palswere.FoS: Beefster.
No, the general advice was good. I just used it as a reason for my not so random, random vote.Zorblag Post 118 wrote:@Sotty7, if you don't think I'm paying attention to the type of game this is do you disagree with any of my rules of thumb for what we want to do here? I claim that I'm pretty sure I know both the setup and the player mix we're dealing with and I made that post because I thought it was important to get that stuff out there.
Do you with hold your vote or not?Enigma Post 166 wrote:I'mpretty sureI withhold my vote in many games regardless of my alignment.
Why?Shattered Viewpoint Post 189 wrote:unvote
I must say, SmashBro is doing a FINE JOB OF LURKING. We'll get to him tomorrow.
For now,
Vote: enigma
Who is your biggest suspect out of the “active” players?Zorblag Post 197 wrote:UNVOTE: KageLord
VOTE: tumescence
Major AtE here and a over generalization. You aren't being found suspicious by these players simply because your posting, it isConfidAnon Post 207 wrote:I don't get it.PaltryExcuse wrote:Oh. And AGar, Confid's recent reaction to Enigma has gotten me thinking you may be right. I still feel Enigma is more likely scum though.
If I don't say anything, I'm not contributing.
If I do say something, I'm suspicious.
What is there that I can do without getting voted? (Honest question.)
Troll listed Chronopie, Enigma, silverbullet999, tumescence, Zajnet, all of who I would list as lurkers. Silver has been posting but not a lot of content at all. I know a little of Troll's early game is about pushing the lurkers regardless of alignment, I just want him to commit a clear opinion on people that are posting, because lynch all lurkers is a good way to hide directly in thread. I suppose a better question would have been, why Silver?AGar Post 223 wrote:Sotty, your 218 strikes me as ironic. In your 209, you quote a post from Troll and ask who his biggest suspect of the active players is. In the same post you quoted, no more than two lines down, Troll outlines a list of people he'd be happy with lynching (generally means suspecting that person), one of whom has maintained a decent activity level throughout the game.
Okay, but that wasn't the question. Who is your number one suspect right now?silverbullet999 Post 227 wrote:Hrm? I don't believe I've said lynch X now! I've always been for waiting til deadline gets near...Silver, would rather get closer to a lynch or vote and pressure the scummiest player in your eyes? Keep in mind we have about a week left in the deadline.
Umm... yes he does.ConfidAnon Post 229 wrote:Also, why Zorblag? You didn't even mention him in your post.
I think you're reaching. But how about you look for the scum?tumescence Post 232 wrote:In my books, silverbullet is 95% town from now on. What do other people think?
Yeah, I have never played with Confidscum before. It's more of a weak gut feeling about his play style, not enough to derail his wagon, but enough to make me not want to join it. Plus I really think Zajnet's ISO is a lot scummier.AGar wrote:Sotty - you've seen the behavior before you say. I'm assuming you mean with Confid as Town. Have you seen Confid play as scum before? Is his behavior different, the same? Radically changing?
The unvote test weak and pretty pointless. Tries to claim it was a gambit, but I think it was more likely he wasn't paying enough attention to the thread. A weaker point, but still pings my scumdar.silverbullet999 Post 340 wrote:-Sotty
Why the vote on shattered?
Backs away from his stronger stance on you not answering the questions and tries to apply it to your future play. Umm... What?Shattered Viewpoint Post 82 wrote:I will grant you that thisSotty7 wrote:Please explain why not answering those RQS is scummy.specificinstance of not answeringthose particularquestions is not, in and of itself, scummy, it does point to a larger meta on SB for tending to withhold information (which is scummy).
This is a very strange thing to say considering that you were one of the ones in line for a mod kill. Were you just waiting to make only one post today? I'm not liking this post at all.Zorblag Post 441 wrote:@sotty7, actually, I'm not convinced that the mod kills that would happen at this point would be a bad thing (especially when the kill rate for the game is taken into account.) I was planning on giving this till tomorrow morning and then coming to point that out and make sure we got a lynch. Given my stance on lurkers I couldn't particularly come in and not complain about them but the BaM ruleset is convenient for this particular use. You also didn't list them all but there's no one that's not posted today that I particularly want around tomorrow.
Plus, I'm pretty sure it is a lynch already.smashbro_of_the_SSS wrote:I mean, so far nothing has led me to believe curiouskarma was scum,but I'm not quite sure why a cop would claim after only one night of investigations, when there are 4 scum running around.
What did you mean by this?Equinox wrote:drmyshottyizsik is a null read, and I'm too emotionally affected to try to remedy that.
Fair enough. For you to be so annoyed I figured there had to be some kind of contact with Shotty other than this game. I share your rage.Equinox wrote:As for being "emotionally affected," I was angry with drmyshottyizsik at the time. I think I still am. His behavior has been totally off-the-wall, he's made no effort to contribute, and add the fact that I've seen him /in and volunteer to replace into even more games... and you get a rather pissed Equinox. I'm probably feeding when the sign clearly says not to, but ARGHDAMMITOMFG. Those little tidbits you saw me address to him were a product of that.