Relevant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0EMSd6v ... re=related (Spoilers for
Oh yes, and
And yet you don't want to go along with Furcolow's suggestion. So, how do you propose we move things out of the RVS stage?JesseSheffield wrote:I never random vote. I do dislike the random voting stage but there's nothing I can really do about that except to try to lead discussion out of it as quickly as possible.
Zipper, he should speak for himself, and you shouldn't play with chainsaws because you might hurt yourself.zipperflesh wrote:I don't see where Dry-fit has done anything that needs defending. I'm attacking you for saying you have a valid reason to be voting for him, which you have failed to provide.
I don't know that "adamant" is the word you're looking for. I thought he was scummy, and then when Furcolow claimed, I voted for him because I thought was scum. I didn't anticipate he would be dead before discussion continued, and as I didn't come back before night fell, but I would have liked more discussion about both claims before anyone was hammered.zipperflesh wrote:Confirm Vote: Furcolow
@Sevei: Why are you so adamant that Dry-Fit is scum.
JesseSheffield wrote:Why did you not weigh in more when you actually DID post in between the claim and the hammer? I thought it was pretty obvious that Dry-Fit was telling the truth simply because he seemed to be a lot less scummy to me than furcolow.Sevei wrote:Why did Mafuyu and Jesse not question the claims more, and why the quickhammer? Not everyone (ahem, ME) got to weigh in on the matter before the hammer fell.
JesseSheffield wrote:So basically what you did then was made a rash decision after a claim to vote for somebody with absolutely no reason. And on top of that voted for somebody who you admittedly did not find very scummy. So based on that track record what would you have had to contribute after the counterclaim?Sevei wrote:Um, no I didn't. I unvoted after Furcolow claimed. I didn't get to weigh in after Dry-Fit claimed. I would have at least like to have talked about it; I thought Furcolow was scummier than Dry-Fit, and only unvoted because he claimed. I never got the chance to comment after the CC.
I'm not so much trying to downplay the importance of your opinion but it's VERY clear that you're either a) not giving your 100% all the time in this game anyway or b) playing a scummy game. So why are you complaining?
What part of "Dry-Fit is also scum" makes you think I did not find him very scummy? I unvoted the claimed PR, voted for the next scum on my list, and logged out. I did NOT make a rash decision. Are you READING the thread? I would have unvoted after the CC, then brought up the point I made a few posts back. The ONLY people who benefited from ending the day early were the werewolves. There was NO reason to cut it short; we could have tried to draw out the other two mafia partners or even the werewolves using the dual claims.Sevei wrote:Hm. Furcolow is very pro-town and a very aggressive scumhunter. Just ask him to tell you. He will. A lot. I think he tells us rather than shows us, though. It's easy to go after less active people, especially in the beginning.
Vote: Furcolow
P.S. Dry-Fit is also scum.
We COULD have had this discussion BEFORE the hammer, you know.Dry-fit wrote:CES, why are you voting for Furc?
<snip>
I'm most suspicious of Furc, but don't feel ready to put him at L-2 just yet.
Because if you READ my ISO you can clearly see I did NO such thing.JesseSheffield wrote:Why did you not weigh in more when you actually DID post in between the claim and the hammer?
I had said in my post where I voted Furc that I thought he was scummy.JesseSheffield wrote:And on top of that voted for somebody who you admittedly did not find very scummy.
That is pretty much where you called me stupid.JesseSheffield wrote:So can we all agree from now on that voting without reasoning is a) scummy and b) incredibly stupid?
My reason was because he questioned CES about why he thought Furc was scum, then at the end of his post said he also thought he was scum but wouldn't put him at L-2, which looked like he was trying to avoid BW. I don't know where in the hell you're getting that I am making stuff up or what "extra information" I got from his flip other than the fact that I was wrong and he wasn't scum.JesseSheffield wrote:Really? You're going to claim that your reasoning AFTER the lynch was your reasoning before when you didn't have all this extra information? That's bullcrap. You can make up literally whatever you want after the fact and attempt to pass it off as fact but that's just not right.
JesseSheffield wrote:I actually was referring to the seer claim by furcolow not the counterclaim. If I was referring to the counterclaim you would've seen counterclaim. So actually my post is accurate, but you're right in stating that you didn't post between the counterclaim and the hammer.
I found him scummy. When I voted, I didn't anticipate a fucking cc and a quick hammer. I was in a hurry, so I voted and left. By the time I got back online, it was night. I was the only vote on Dry-Fit when I voted; there was no CC; there was no danger of D-F being lynched before I got back; there is no reason to freak out over my vote on him now.JesseSheffield wrote:I don't know what type of mafiascum world you live in, but I think it's generally accurate that accusing someone of being scummy WITHOUT posting reason is pretty much nullpoint. So you throwing out a random line calling Dry-Fit scummy does NOT equate to you actually finding him scummy. If you actually did then you would've posted reason.
It wasn't stupid. And what pity party? I'm just telling you not to call people stupid as a way to argue your point.JesseSheffield wrote:I quite clearly said that voting without reason is stupid so yeah I'm calling what you DID stupid but in no way did I call you stupid. Enough of the pity party.
OMFG. Could you misrep me any more?JesseSheffield wrote:So basically what you're saying is that your vote was a throwaway vote, therefore it shouldn't matter to anybody else what you do with it.
Really? Because it looks like here that you voted me because you agreed with Jesse's attack, not my response to it.zipperflesh wrote:What do you mean? I was suspicious of both of you for baseless accusations, but I choose to switch my vote to Sevei because of his reaction to Jesse's attack. How is that a contradiction?
zipperflesh wrote:Unvote. Vote: Sevei
Jesse is getting at the exact same thing I was.
You're wrong. Your scumdar is either broken or you're lying. You know which one I think.JesseSheffield wrote:don't want to toot my horn or anything but I'm usually pretty confident that I'm right in my decisions.
And as for me not saying much about zipper, I don't see the case on zipper...at all. I don't think it makes all too much sense and I doubt that he's scum at this point.
I think he's scum, and since he hammered a mafia, I am more inclined to believe he is wolf than mafia. I suppose it could have been a bus. Any reason to suggest otherwise (that he is mafia not wolf)?Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Is there any argument for Jesse being a wolf beyond "he voted for Furcolow"? 'Cause that one is terrible.
Sevei wrote:Second
Nightson has contributed ZILCH. Not even a bad argument. He says lurkiness is a habit of his. That may be true, but when he does pop in to say hello, he contributes NADA. ZILCH. NADA. NOTHING.
SEVEI LIKES THE PART ABOUT HOW KATS PRETENDS SHE IS LEADING THE ZIP LYNCH.Katsuki wrote:NIGHTSON LURKING IS A HUGE PROBLEM. HE CAN NOT BE ALLOWED TO LURK TO VICTORY, BUT ZIP HERE SEEMS EAGER TO CUT IN FRONT OF NIGHTSON IN THE LINE TO ROPE.
In WHAT universe is TOWN not in dire shape today?Katsuki-Wolf wrote:Question: Why did no one bother to correct me yesterday when my posts/analysis stated 7 players left? I just noticed now that we have 6 alive today (hence 8 yesterday). In this case, we have 2/1/3, where we're not in as dire shape as I thought yesterday.
Referring to this:Haylen wrote:She gave absolutely no reason for voting him and actually called him pro-town in the same post.
This is me being sarcastic. If I had really believed he was very pro-town and aggressively scumhunting, I wouldn't have voted him. The italicized part in the quote is really where the sarcasm should be apparent.Sevei wrote:Hm. Furcolow is very pro-town and a very aggressive scumhunter.Just ask him to tell you. He will. A lot. I think he tells us rather than shows us, though. It's easy to go after less active people, especially in the beginning.