His name looks the most like Drekava.
Open 279 - Rusty Guillotine Mafia - Game Over!
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I don't really know what Concission is going for here, but at this point I think she's only half-joking. This seems like a desparate attempt to be comical, either that or it's poor logic. Either way, Concission is trying too hard.Concission 39 wrote:Randomly selecting someone and asking him a generic question and you're done for the day is what I deduce to be your "reasoning".
Unvote;vote: Concission
---
SD 47 wrote:I'm agogly waiting...
Was this supposed to be eagerly? How do you mispell a word that badly?
I mean, I guess this isn't game related, it's just... wow...
---
I'm sorry; I'm lost. What "randomly generated lynch mechanic"? The only mechanic is the guillotine.crypto 49 wrote:1. The randomly generated lynch mechanic. I've been in a few games with rushed lynches and even, IIRC, no-lynches due to lapses in either activity or decisiveness. It's maddeningly bad enough in games with standard lynch mechanics. If it happens here then I will be furious.
---
Oh, please. If I was scum facing townFate you and I both know I'd just immediately surrender.Fate 66 wrote:Scum:
Antitown
Percy
RedCoyote
---
It happens. I'm still unsure what you mean by the "randomly generated lynch mechanic" though.crypto 70 wrote:God fucking damn it. I was under the impression from the wiki that the player on the guillotine could vote but not post but looking back at Hitorogoshi's activity rule it looks like he can post, too.
---
This is a good point. I hadn't even considered this. I agree 100%.Ythill 82 wrote:The vig should shoot the first person we put on guillotine. Since we cannot no-lynch, it is important to get that kill through so that we have an odd number of players. Best chance to do that is to shoot while the scum have the largest number of potential RB targets. Also, early information FTW.
I absolutely agree. The scum have a Role Cop, so we might as well claim fairly early. If we don't, chances are that the scum will find them soon enough anyways.Ythill 82 wrote:We will probably want the vig and the redeemed soul to claim early. Not today, obv, but maybe tomorrow. If either gets CCed, we've gained a coinflip. If neither do, we have the beginnings of a sweet little voting bloc and will force the scum to kill them off, thus protecting our tracker.
Agreed. They should be more vocal in either case. That would be the most townie thing they could do at that point, regardless of their role.Ythill 82 wrote:We might consider requiring the person on guillotine to take on a leadership role in selecting the next lynch. Thus we will seed the thread with information to be exploited after the inevitable cardflip.
---
Could you be more specific? Which one of Ythill's points are unhelpful to the town?Simenon 83 wrote:Also don't like Ythill's call to discuss something other than the previous four pages and something unlikely to aid in scumhunting
---
*25, but I don't think so.LL 101 wrote:by the way, is there a way to view more than 20 posts a page?
---
This is the second time you've made this point without backing it up. That's too much.Simenon 104 wrote:(which I didn't find illuminating anyway)
Unvote;vote: Simenon
---
You just wait until he pulls out his PbPA on me.crypto 119 wrote:Did you seriously just claim to have been reading isos. on page 5?-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Oh, wow. So it is. I owe you an apology, SD. I looked it up as agogly and got nothing, but when I looked up agog I found it.
Normally I wouldn't have even commented on it, but I'm in kind of a pissy mood today. Still, sorry about that SD. You know more than me (which isn't saying much, mind you).
Also, I'm not really getting the VPB hate so far. Does someone want to enlighten me here? Ythill, for some reason, neglected to mention his reasoning. The only thing I've really gotten is AGM telling us he didn't like how he approached Concission, but I don't know about that. I guess I just completely disagree.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I'm feeling a little bleh right now. I like zora's entry though, and I'm glad Simenon is feeling a little more pressure for being our worst offender thus far. I need to take a good hard look at LL (nothing caught my eye in a very, very quick skim through his posts) as well as reconsider my position on VPB in light of Ythill's exchange with him. I want to respond to Concission and get her to talk a little more, and I want to poke Fate to get him to rattle some cages. I think, still relatively fresh off of calling scumFate in DEFCON 2.0, I have more confidence in my ability to assess his alignment as the game rolls on. This is something I can hopefully use to my advantage in finding scum, be it through him or connected to him. He's got one of those big personalities that draws a lot of reactions.
That's sort of my mental D1 checklist, heh. Call me out if I don't live up to these promises.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
AT, why are you posting the way you are? I forgot to ask this, but VPB is right. You really are being obtuse. I just read your iso. I don't like it. Show me something or I might be forced to sheep Fate.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I'm not sold on his LL vote being genuine. I'm still waiting to hear back about the so-called "randomly generated lynch mechanic", which seemed completely out of the blue.
As much as I've had to say about you, I only have one real issue with you, and I'm not prepared to lynch you for it. Then again, I wouldn't want a crypto lynch either, preferably. The difference between you two is marginal if my scumscale didn't carry that across clear enough.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Everyone gets a turn except for Sim? Is that how it works? Do you guys just not like me or what? I want to know what this sucka did to get all of your to give him a pass, that's what I want to know.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
It's just very agreeable. I guess that's how I'd put it. Almost passive, but with a little more heat to it. Anyways, hey, look, I honestly don't want to see you get the chop. I wish I could turn my charm on and off at will, but sometimes it works for me and sometimes it doesn't. I'll admit it'd probably have a greater effect if I were here a bit more and if Fate, VPB, and Ythill weren't all trying to one-up one another, but that's just the way it is.Luck 314 wrote:I also think you guys might make me cry if you call me fake again.
Anyways, now you're making me look at you like a victim, damnit. Stop it.
---
I love your metaphor.crypto 317 wrote:The Batman, of course, is a metaphor for players who don't fall under the aforementioned category.
We'll start with Alamanatee.
Unvote. Vote: AlmasterGM.
I can support this. This is a decent compromise; this is a decent case.
Unvote;vote: AlmasterGM
You're welcome, Ythill.
I do want to say that I still think Sim is a more agreeable lynch candidate here. Better than Luck and better than AGM. AT is probably someone I'd be willing to vote now. My reluctance in voting AT as opposed to AGM is only due to the fact that I know AGM knows he's ducking this thread. AT might actually be more unfamiliar with the game and, therefore, possibly more deserving of a pass.
---
That's fine; I understand. The actual aggressiveness isn't as much the issue as it is that I didn't like how you hadn't really given LL anything to defend himself against. You did soon after, which I noted as well.Ythill 318 wrote:Did you miss the part where I explained what I meant by that statement or do you think I was lying? I was using bombast to say "Luck is getting even scummier." Even if you don't believe me, note the part where I have been known to be impatient as town.
Yeah, I skimmed this; I get what you're saying here now. It's not even so much that I disagree with your conclusion there at the end (I saw the LL/AT buddy comment earlier as well, it's at the beginning of my big post), but I didn't like the phrasing of the comment all that much.Ythill 318 wrote:You should pay more attention to the parts you didn't emphasize. Context is key here because "I don't think doing A is wise but if you insist then let's at least find a more helpful way of doing A," is not a contradiction.
You know you like it.Ythill 318 wrote:"Big man" has my hackles up a little but that's beside the point.
---
For the sake of what? For it's own sake?Jarti 320 wrote:also of note: RC's responses to AGM in his little catch-up post don't seem genuine, could be scum interacting with buddy for the sake of
I thought it was adequate. I think he's more than capable of committing more.
I agree. This is what I thought. I'm willing to give AGM the benefit of the doubt (insomuch as he may have actually just wanted to genuinely pop in to acknowledge the game and make a promise), but I can't honestly say I'm not slightly more interested in this wagon now.Jarti 325 wrote:but you are following closely enough to pop in when some minimal heat comes your way I see
---
That was me, player. What are you going to do about it?Fate 328 wrote:Whoever had zoraster as a #1 town read (above me even!?) was smokin something last page.
He's the only one with enough smarts to call out both Sim and SD. Oh, and he did it on his first post. What's your excuse?
---
As I implied before, please don't look at me. Please, I'll vote whoever you guys tell me to. Please just don't wagon me, please.Sim 338 wrote:As I said before, he's flown under the radar. crypto's points are strong
Let me try to process this. Ythill is scummy for making a post about getting the town's strategy in order. You refuse to respond to it after being asked to, instead choosing to blanketly label it as scummy on two separate occasions. Then Ythill asks you for your top scum picks and AGM and Concession beat out Ythill? I can understand LL, because you've touched on him over the course of the game, but why the other two?Sim 338 wrote:Top three:
LL
Almaster
Concession
you've moved up there, mostly for your compromise bullshit and your weird behavior over the RC wagon.
I do see your last sentence, so I'm guessing Ythill is actually at, like, four with you, but you seem really reluctant to actually take him on straight up. You just throw little sprinkles of suspicion out there as though you don't want to be the center of attention.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
But I'm interested, and so should every other town-aligned player. You understand that, don't you?Ythill 346 wrote:I'm not really interested in defenses at this juncture. One of the reasons I'm so effective at finding the scumz after replacing in is that I get to weigh behavioral tells without arguing about them. I'd rather not lose to a convincing liar.
---
SD's post 353 is good. He calls out a number of people and is trying to start some good conversations. If SD follows up on this, he'll have earned some serious points from me.
---
zora 365 wrote:I never said claim, did I?
This sounds like doubletalk. I don't like your string of posts here at all, zora. I mean, they really, really leave a sour taste in my mouth. I didn't have much trouble with you pressuring AGM, but I feel like you're really squirming after VPB and crypto pressured you a bit. I mean, I get what you're saying. You're looking for reactions. The only reason I'm not prepared to just buy that at face value is that AGM is lurking. So, it's not like we're gauging how AGM is reacting to getting an increasing number of votes. Whether he logs on to see L-1 or logs on to see L-1 and a casual zora hammer threat makes little difference as far as I'm concerned.
---
Same to you.Fate 379 wrote:JAgm doesn't need to claim, kjust post
---
It matters a lot. It means that (as this whole thing got started) I don't know for certain if you are joking about his attitude or not. The RVS is typically reserved for a lot of silliness. Frankly, Concission, I think it's you who is being insincere.Concission 399 wrote:Somewhat. But why does it matter when my main point is his insincere attitude?
---
Your voting and reads are all completely based on how what you think will make you look the most townie rather than actual scumreads coming from a town-aligned player. Everything you say feels completely manufactured.Sim 400 wrote:I don't know what to make of this. It's a nonsensical interpretation of my post. How does "x flew under the radar" become "please don't look at me"?
Well, seeing as how I'm the one who's most hard up for you to respond, you'd think you'd call my attention to this.Sim 400 wrote:As I said, I erred with Ythill (context which you have conveniently ignored)
---
I'm using Sepia and I see no issue with the VCs. Lucky me, I guess.Mod 404 wrote:Are you perhaps on mafSepia?
---
SD 408 wrote:I cannot find any response of yours to Baltar adressing that. And if I'm not mistaken your attack on Ythill was not about his tone.This. I looked as well, and I couldn't easily find it.
---
AGM, in your post 411, could you explain your issue with LL, especially in regards to what he had to say about D1? I don't quite understand the disconnect, but it feels like this is an important point you're making.
Why's your vote still on VPB after all that?AGM 412 wrote:I will now take your questions, criticisms, and praises.
---
Generally the town doesn't want to give away the little information they have over the scum until they absolutely have to. However, this game provies somewhat of an exception to the rule in that the scum have a Role Cop. This significantly increases their odds of finding the PRs before they get a chance to claim.LL 419 wrote:I don't game mainly on mafiascum. I've played with different groups. Claiming when you are a confirmable roleas late as possibleis the standard. Why?
---
Unvote;vote: Antitown
I think this man is bad news. I think LL and SD have both done a little more to make them seem more townie. Fate and crypto are both probably town, and they think this is a good lynch. All in all, Sim is probably the only one worse than Antitown at this point, so I'd be satisfied with this lynch.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
How wonderful. Because Antitown didn't realize several days ago that he'd never bother to give this game an honest try, right? I'm going to really tear into the next person I see do the whole "I'll post later... I'll post later... I'll post later... eh, can't keep up, replacing out" shit. It seems like the longer I play on MS the more agitated I get with flaking. This isn't even a particularly post heavy game. I guess the posts are a bit longer than average, but still.
Ugh. I echo what Fate says. I really don't want to have to read through an entirely new player and have to hear him respond to the hundred different little issues in this game. Then again, I guess at least Antitown was mostly a blank slate.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I can go with this. This mostly falls in line with my reads, you know. I think you give zora, Jarti, and LL too much credit, but I'm sure you'll clarify as the game moves on.Glados 452 wrote:Which happily leaves seven players I can vote in good spirits. But they are far more difficult to sort. I have typed up three separate votes now, but I keep deleting them when I reread the player to make sure I like my vote. (The order has been: Simenon, Concission, and then Percy, for the record). I am unhappy without my vote on anybody right now, but I need rest; I clearly will need to read the game again before deciding where my vote will go.
The biggest thing is his most recent threat on AGM. Does this strike you as acceptable?Glados 455 wrote:I feel like he has been scumhunting; his posts read very genuinely to me so far. Can't really explain it beyond this.
---
In what way? He knows how to bring his guard up when he thinks needs to. Big deal.VPB 461 wrote:I do like that you seem to be getting a little more fire in your belly now that my vote is on you.
---
You're welcome to explain how I'm being subtle here. I've been pretty vocal about my likes and dislikes, if I do say so myself. Frankly, I'm ready for a lynch.Glados 462 wrote:I caught him on very subtle posts pushing a Cult agenda (such as subtly directing opposing scum teams into killing the claimed Mason group who he could not recruit, and trying to gauge the Town's reaction to a Townie claim while I had correctly deduced that the Cult could only recruit Townies).
---
I voted him for the first fourteen pages. I asked others multiple times to join me on the wagon. I mean, for crying out loud. This is pretty silly, because, you know, on the one hand I have Ythill breathing down my neck about how I'm being stubborn about my vote, and when I take a step back because I recognize no one is following me on Sim, crypto here is criticizing me because I wasn't forceful enough in the first place.crypto 470 wrote:I feel likeCoyoputs way more effort into exposing Simenon-scum than actually pushing for Simenon's lynch. Considering he's so fiercely anti-Simenon, I'm surprised he doesn't push harder for Simenon's lynch. Something to mull over.
*shrug*
I mean, it's fine with me; I'll lead a wagon. I'm not scared of trying to out shout you guys. I haven't seen any improvement from Sim, and I'll vote him right now.
Unvote;vote: Simenon
I'm not really convinced there's anything here besides playstyle and language issues, really. He's too focused on himself, I agree, but, then again, people are constantly wanting to talk about him.crypto 470 wrote:Take away his scummy buddy-buddy style andLuckayLuckdoesn't look too bad. Some of the things he says, and the timing of some of his observations and stances, indicate a town thought process. He's been forced to spend a lot of energy defending himself. I'd kill to see less of that and more analysis of other players; I think that's the key to deciphering his motives.
---
I had to read this several times until I understand what the hell you were trying to say. Did someone accuse you of not reading your role PM? I missed it completely.zora 479 wrote:Well, I promise I didn't catch up and only then read my role PM. I'm here to play the game, and not reading a role pm is antithetical to that. Mafia relies on honesty to work (meta-honesty that is... obviously not in game honesty) If I'm scum, I might try to write my posts forgetting that I'm scum, but I would never not read my role pm.
Well, I already found scum in Sim and Concission. Perhaps Jarti too, but the third is probably someone who I think is town and is playing me well. Probably a Ythill or a Percy. Maybe even you.zora 479 wrote:I know his style often involves more point-by-point than I ever like to do, but his seem less designed to find scum and more to seem like he's inspecting.
---
What do you mean when you say it looks like a fruitful wagon? That sounds like a buzzword to round off the sentence.Sim 491 wrote:For my previous reasons and because she hasn't posted in a while and this seems like a fruitful wagon.
---
Join the club. I feel like a lot of people are calling me out on trivial little issues. Doesn't coaching imply that you have the be the same alignment as me, by the way? That's how I always interpreted it.SD 493 wrote:Buddying? Coaching? Like play a certain way to please me? I don't know, but posts like this make me wary.
---
You know what? I just defended you a little bit, but now I kind of feel like retracting it. This postLL 496 wrote:I consider it important to get everyone's views on important events, this is one of them - so I will state now: I am opposed to lynching Concission at this moment in time.
I like the people voting Concission. I think most are townies. I get that Concission has at best been a lurker, and at worst had some scumminess. That's fine. I myself have not found anything particularly townie-ish about Concission.
Concission seems like a "compromise" lynch. It's a lynch everyone can get behind because I don't think anyone can actually defend Concission. That's why I would vote for him, at least...because it's "okay."
I am not okay with an okay lynch at the moment. Feel like we can do better.sucks. Your push for Jarti is going nowhere. How do you expect a lynch to go through? It's going to be a compromise between a majority of people. It's not going to be a person everyone has listed as their number one scumread; I can guarantee you that much. You just want it on record that you do not support this lynch, and this post reeks of that. I don't know if you are sided with Concission or if you know Concission is a bad lynch, but this post screams lame to me.
---
No, Ythill's third point.Percy 497 wrote:So the right general place is a case on VP, right?
VPB was addressing you and your allegations, but he still had Antitown as his vote, if I recall correctly. I'd really have to dig back into my mindset when making that comment though, because it was a long post after a long night.Percy 497 wrote:Say whaaaat? Where does this even come from?
This is a good catch. Just another layer of suspicion in one of the more awkward moments of this game.Percy 497 wrote:Then there are some claim shenanigans and you're now saying he's town. zor's play here smells a lot like opportunism.
I'm still completely unsatisfied with her original, fraudulent push on VPB. Afterwards, when she asked me why I thought she may have been kidding, she gets fairly defensive and dodges the issue. It doesn't feel right at all, and I'm content with getting something going this game. Apparently you, and others, feel like we need more discussion. LL feels like this lynch is too much of a "compromise" for his taste. God only knows what he expects of a D1 lynch with so many strong personalities in this game.Percy 504 wrote:Could someone summarize the Concission case for me?
---
Speak for yourself. This "You're a little townie... you're a lot townie!" crap is for the birds. Not everyone here is townie, Glados.Glados 506 wrote:This is a strange game because I do not think people look scummy so much as I think players seem slightly less Town than others.
---
Well, I voted you 9 hours after Sim, so there's no need to blow things out of proportion. If you were holding out hope that I'd scold the wagon on you after our dialogue so far in this game, then you were sorely mistaken.Concission 507 wrote:WTF. I accidentally hit the Submit button for the Preview button, continued to read and suddenly everyone was on me with ten thousand times the speed of light.
I like them both. Happy?Concission 507 wrote:You don't put someone at L-1 saying you like the WAGON and not the LYNCH.
---
Glados 509 wrote:I am certainly more able to follow his logic, and I now more appreciate his concise commentary.
"He makes shorter posts, so he's more likely to be town."
---
I have a question. What's WoT?Ythill 511 wrote:I'm adding my voice to the anti-WoT choir. Please be brief. If people have questions, they can ask.
Sentence by sentence:Ythill 512 wrote:An exercise in critical thinking for you. Take the five largest bandwagons. Cross off any player who has been on three or more because that player is wagoning shamelessly. Cross off any player who has been on only one because no comparison data is available. Identify those players who have been on exactly two and look for similarities.
1.) Okay.
2.) An arbitrary number.
3.) Why? What difference does that make?
4.) How can you compare wagons with no flips? What are you attributing it to, then? Your reads?
5.) Another completely arbitrary number. Suggests that you are framing a set group of people to please your own interpretation.
Coming from someone that generally supports wagon analysis (after flips, mind you), this entire post is futile at best and manipulative at worst. I'm not merely suggesting this because you set the data up in such a way that I'd come back scum, but because this entire system is rigged so that only certain people are being analyzed. I also noticed how conveniently you left out the wagon on me (don't let the facts get in the way of your results, right?).
Okay, here's come more critical thinking.
Take the people who are voting AGM at his peak, cross out all the people who stay there for longer than one VC (because they are more likely to be purposeful votes). Cross off anyone not related to this vote.
AlmasterGM:crypto, Jarti, Simenon, Fate, RedCoyote, Ythill,Shadow Dancer(L-1)
Hmmm, Ythill, points in the scum column for you.
The fact that you'd call Concission a lurker wagon and not Antitown is so obviously motivated that I've just about lost my patience, I think. Ythill, the man replaced out, for goodness sakes. There's no honesty in this post whatsoever.Ythill 512 wrote:RC has been on both of the lurker wagons but not on those of the people around to defend themselves. Points in the scum column for sure.
---
Do you need a warning, Glados? Is there someone else you think that does?Glados 513 wrote:RedCoyote has moved further down my Town list for putting Concission at L-1 without warning.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I've only been blowing the Concission is suspicious horn since, let me see... my first fucking post? I don't get to check the thread 24/7, you know, so sometimes I'm not on the wagon at the "most advantageous" time. Why should that deter me? I'm not going to sit here and plan out my actions to make me look good; I'm going to try to lynch scum. Period.AGM 540 wrote:Another fail-vote.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Because I'm not the hammer.Concission 543 wrote:@RC: If you like both then why don't you ask for a claim?
Concission, do you think a majority of D1 lynches will have scum on them?Concission 543 wrote:Look, if you people seriously believe 9 votes over 30 posts is a scum wagon, especially with questionable characters like RC, Sim and VPB in there then I don't know what to say.
You and LL are kind of in the same boat here. Of course you're just trying to save your skin, and I get that. Probability tells us that any given majority of players (i.e. those voting to lynch a player) will have a scum in the grouping. That's why wagon analysis can be extremely effective (when analyzed fairly).
Still, rarely will the town get the "perfect" D1 lynch. A lynch where the target is scum, all the players voting them are town, and the case is solid in every town player's eyes. Anyways, my point here is that, regardless of your alignment and the players forming your wagon, it's extremely unlikely that all three scum are on your wagon. It's unlikely any posts prior to your wagon had nothing to do with other players' willingness to vote you.
---
Then why bring it up at all? You completely lost me. If this game is nothing like the game you mentioned, then what difference does it make whether I act like a Cult Leader or not?Glados 545 wrote:So asking me to explain how you are being subtle this game makes no sense.
Cute.Glados 545 wrote:And yet most of the players in the game are Town.
Of course, I would certainly prefer to have scum reads -- that gives me purpose and direction. But I don't always get what I want. It is very magnanimous of you to volunteer, though.
I was just making an observation more than anything. Luckily I don't have the same problems you do. I see clear cut cases of scummy behavior that I want put down, and, until you brought up that you don't think people look scummy so much, you could've fooled me. I thought you had some clear scum reads since your first post.
In any case, it looked completely artificial and unlike anything you had said prior in this game.
A) If I've had to clarify this once, I've had to clarify this a hundred times. My reads are not in any way static. They are fluid and they are constantly evolving. It's short-sighted to assume otherwise, frankly. This goes for Concission, this goes for AGM, and everyone else in this game. I'm on record of propping up SD, Jarti, LL, and you on various occasions since I made that post. The same cannot be said for Concission (who has only gotten consistently worse).Glados 545 wrote:~a.)In Post 301, your List of Suspicion had Concission as the sixth scummiest player. Notably, AlmasterGM was on the Town side of your radar.
~b.)Nevertheless, the next real-time day you voted for AlmasterGM in Post 345. Not only does this not much up with your previous post, but it was the fifth vote on AlmasterGM. (And by the way, I also do not like your "[stop] making me look at you like a victim, damnit" line directed at LuckayLuck. It strikes me as fake.)
~c.)After three other players unvote AlmasterGM, you switch to the newly forming Antitown wagon in Post 429.
~d.)And when Antitown is replaced, you complain about it (and not subtly, I might add) in Post 451. This whole post is strange -- you take the soapbox for almost no reason, and despite saying that "Antitown was mostly a blank slate" your post certainly suggests that everybody should have a sour and bitter aftertaste of Antitown.
~e.)But when it turns out I am not lynchbait, you immediately switch your vote to Concession, putting her at L-1 in Post 500. Without warning. And now you claim to be "ready for a lynch."
B) This goes for your second point as well. I clearly told crypto, in that post, that I liked his points and was willing to vote AGM on the back of them. AGM needed the pressure, my Sim vote, as Ythill pointed out, was not having any real effect, and there was no reason for me not to switch my vote. There's really no way to address this point outside of telling you that you have no basis with which to assume my reads over the course of the game would remain the same as they are in post 301.
C) That's correct. I gave Antitown enough time, I thought. At that point he was worth pressuring, and AGM had since posted. I was on record of disliking Antitown and liking Fate and crypto. There was no reason to ignore this wagon.
D) Were you pleased with Antitown's performance, then? I wasn't. I noted it post 303 and post 310. As to me bitching, well, unlike GLaDOS (the character), I am human. I dislike replacing. Replacing out of a game is inconsiderate and shows a lack of respect to the players you're playing with, especially if you don't even bother to find a decent replacement for yourself.
E) Of course you leave out that I had voted Concission earlier in this game (though, granted, I switched in the same post, but that was how strongly I felt about my initial Concission read). Of course you leave out that I was keeping up an argument with Concission that got steadily worse (post 206, post 301, post 429). Of course you ignore the fact that I had Concission on the scum side of my scale in post 301 (though, unsurprisingly, you try to use the position relative to other players against me). So, yes, I was ready for a lynch. I'm still ready for a lynch. I will not apologize for being ready for a lynch. On Sim, or Concission, or LL, or Jarti, or possibly even Ythill or zora.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Yeah, I keep forgetting about vote tags. I've been wanting to start using them, but I type up my posts in notepad and copy and paste them onto the website (old habit from posting on forums when IE would regularly devour my posts whenever it felt like it in the late 90's and early 00's. Anyways, another post incoming.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I don't expect you to read my walls unless you have an issue with me. This is mostly defense oriented anyways.
Spoiler: There will be cake if you click here :right:
To sum up, I liked Jarti's recent post. I have been feeling better about Glados. Fate needs to be taken down a notch for his lack of performance in this game (Fate is more likely to be resigned, I think, when he's scum). We need to hear more from Percy and SD.
[Town]-----VPB---crypto-Glados--AGM-Percy-Jarti-SD[∙]-Fate-zora-LL-Ythill---Concission-----Sim---[Scum]-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
That's a moot point. I'm clearly trying to say that it's been an issue I've had with this game for years. It's not indicative of my alignment.
Here's a more recent outburst.
Maybe instead of dodging the actual point I'm making and sticking your fingers in your ears, you'll take a breath, read over Antitown's abysmal posts, and come to your senses.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
It's just frustrating. It's pure confirmation bias. Whatever I say is "Why is scumRC saying this?" as opposed to "Why is RC saying this?"
How in the hell did you ever see me as town then, Glados?-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
This is a stark contrast, especially for a game that has moved as quickly as this one has. I wouldn't have even thought these two were the same person.LL 614 wrote:We'll beginBEFOREthe game begins (metagame). Antitown has one data point of a previous game on these forums in which he is a town. This is admittedly not a lot of data, BUT his style is seen to be drastically different. His posts in that other game include: , . In this game, he does none of the above.
Agreed. His interactions with both Fate and VPB was complete crap. You hardly have to sell me on this though. When put all together like this, I feel a little embarrassed that I was so hesitant to join the Antitown wagon earlier today.LL 614 wrote:Antitown called out, of all people, Fate - for . I doubt a townie can come to this conclusion because Fate was quite active and stirring up the pot during the early game. This is a sort of lazy accusation that tends to come from scum.
Antitown with no good reasoning and pushes him to wagon #1 (alongside yours truly, LuckayLuck) - of note is that Antitown was wagon #2.
I think you're blowing this a little out of proportion, but I take your point nonetheless. I'm not particularly swayed by anything else you have here in these two posts, but your next post was quite interesting. I hadn't even realized that the two players had been effectively ignoring each other the entire game, despite Antitown being a leading wagon at one point and Jarti being a controversial figure throughout the game.LL 615 wrote:Jarti begins early day one with an interesting phrase:
This question is sheer madness, and how a townie can be thinking of a scenario with 2 scum dead early in game one is outrageous.Jarti wrote:@mod: since town wins with 2 scum dead & one on the guillotine; that means if we lynch 2 scum and have a 3rd scum on guillotine the game will immediately end without us having to play out that next day while the 3rd scum is already gonna die, right?
LL, why do you think Glados is focusing on your supposed contradiction as opposed to explaining why it is she has ignored Jarti this game?
Jarti, do you have anything to say in regards to any of this? About Antitown/Glados or LL as it relates to their alignments?-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I only meant to convey my thoughts as I was reading through the "mental exercise" line by line. There was nothing sinister or snide intended by saying "Okay", I just meant like, "Okay, you're fine so far". There were other significant bandwagons though, notably the original one on me. Of course, had Ythill bothered to include that, he may have had to push his sweet spot up from 2 to 3... but then that would disqualify me from suspicion, I guess. I hope you got that implication that he was cherrypicking, because I fully intended forJarti 674 wrote:#1 without re-reviewing Ythill's post looks like an "Okay, but you're wrong" when everything is behind it. When looking at his post, you're really just saying "okay, I'm reading this sentence". Completely unnecessary & devoid of substance. It's just a tacked-on qualifier. #2 is your 'an arbitrary number'; but really at that point there hadn't been any other significant bandwagons than what ythill's number got us anyway. When you add it to the list though, it frames the mindset that ythill was cherrypicking wagons. #3/#4 are legitimate questions that could have been asked directly in paragraph form without #1/#2 setting them up on a list. #5 is falling back on the arbitrary number cop-out; and the list all boils down to your point that is basically 'ythill is framing things'. In reality him showing his 'mental exercise' just showed me how he was thinking about things & shows forces him to make a stance on some players' voting habits, even if his stance is 'null' or 'no info', it can be called out if it looks like he's purposely avoiding taking a stance on someone who he should of. That is why I don't like this.thatpoint to come across. What difference does it make if he says "null" or "no info" if the entire thing is based off of whatever he feels like it should be? I mean, changing your vote 3 times is too excessive and, therefore, should be ignored? Huh? The lack of context is one thing, I mean, that's the idea behind VC analysis anyways. It's the omissions and the randomness that make it not only artificial but actually suspect.
---
Still, I'm having doubts about Jarti as scum here. I absolutely hate how Concission jumps at the chance to follow LL when, prior to his case against Jarti/Glados, this is the only thing I can find that she has really had to say about him as a player in this game.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
This mild distancing attempt from Sim was tragically ignored by a majority of the players. Many of them paid lip service to the suggestion that Sim was scummy (most forcefully by me, I'd argue, but also by zora, VPB, Percy, and Concission at times) but never acted on it. It's a shame Percy was already voting Sim, because I think anyone who reads over the game the way you've started to do would notice this out of place, disagreeable for the sake of being disagreeable type of post.VV 709 wrote:Simenon can join VP's ranks in my scum reads after this, especially since his only other post was an excessively weak vote (that he's kept despite all this useful information he seems to be saying we had) and this post just looks like mudslinging.
Glados attempted to make a big deal over my documented, progressively increasing level of distaste for Antitown, but this sort of half-justification, half-paying attention, half-assed attempt at promoting the Antitown wagon by Sim was also largely ignored. He's basically saying here that Fate is probably right, so, whatever, Antitown is a good a vote as any. It sounds too much like he's undercutting his own position should he need to back away from it, which I also pointed out at the time.VV 709 wrote:Unnecessary meta post here from Simenon.
So is there are reason that Ythill and Glados/Antitown never felt it prudent to pressure Sim really at all over the course of the game thus far? I don't know, but I don't like it. Not for as vocal as these two have been. Sure, for good measure, they've both mentioned his name once or twice in passing, but Ythill actively tried to talk me out of voting Sim and Glados (Antitown never mentioned him) thinks his "concise commentary and open logic" is to be lauded (yeah, I didn't get it either).-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I'm content. Sim has been my top suspect for a long while, and I think this flip will help me tremendously in casting judgment on a few other players.
I'm also interested in what Concission has to say after her newfound commitment to LL.
zora was on the money about AGM though. AGM is absolutely phoning this game in.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
No one was expecting you to make it to lylo, Glados, but that doesn't mean you should've claimed at the first actual opportunity (second day, but you get my point). A Tracker death changes the situation entirely. Now what little PR power we have is best used as a statistical advantage (even moreso, I think, than if the Tracker was still alive).
I mean, wow. That's not playing the odds. I mostly agree with your numbers (the Roleblocker shouldn't factor in, mafia wouldn't know if that's successful or not), but just take it a day further. Let's suppose the scum hadn't found you last night (which is highly probable), and Sim is town (for the sake of argument). Day three we have two dead townies, a dead Tracker, and one person on the guillotine. I think you could've sweet talked your way into surviving another day. During D3 it would've been ten people alive, three as scum, and likely two PRs. I mean, that would've just been better odds at hitting scum because that's effectively a 3 in 8 shot as opposed to a 3 in 10 shot that you just gave us.
Well, whatever. What's done is done. LL, how does the claim change your predictions on the game?
I still feel pretty comfortable with Sim getting decapitated (although the Mod's flavor left me feeling pretty crappy, heh). The fact of the matter is, I think Sim was playing some WIFOM trick with his claim, and I can't wait for the opportunity to rub it in Glados' face, frankly.
Right now I'll tenativelyvote: Fate. Glados is right about one thing. Someone had to have been either really lucky or really good at reading for PRs. Fate makes a big show about how he doesn't read anything thoroughly and works heavily on his intuition, but I know for a fact that this cat is clever. I think he saw the very thing Glados mentioned about Ythill. There are a couple of other people I think may have picked up on it as well, but I think they're much more townie sounding than Fate has been.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Agreed. At least hold out for one more day.Concission 831 wrote:At this moment, I don't think we should have our redemned soul claim.
---
Is this link broken? What am I supposed to be seeing here?VV 843 wrote:If Simenon doesn't flip scum, hats will be eaten.
You tell me. This is your catchup post. Is it?VV 843 wrote:Useful?
---
Really? No foolin'? I'll take a slice.Glados 853 wrote:I have also brought some humble cake for those interested.
---
This is a good point. crypto, is this the angle you're coming at VPB with? I hadn't really considered this, although I did seriously have a problem with VPB backing off of Sim at the time.Jarti 855 wrote:that is correct, I don't see you backing off of bussing a scumbuddy like that upon a vanilla townie claim
---
Fate 858 wrote:NO THIS IS NOT OMGUS. IF HE HAD VOTED ME FOR ANY DECENT FRICKIN REASON AKA:
1. Fate isnt raging, lolmeta
2. Fate isnt contributing, flying lowlowlow
3. Fate killed Ythill cuz he likes to lead townz.>implying these aren't all true
---
No way, I'm too clueless to pick up on something like that.AGM 862 wrote:This conclusion doesn't really make sense. It's like, "Fate is good at mafia, so he must have picked up on it." It could have just as easily been zoraster, VPB, or yourself.
Do you think zoraster and VPB are town? Why are they more town than Fate?Translation: I guess I can't be scum after all.
No, but, like all of my other moves in this game, there's been a documented progression in my dislike towards Fate's lackluster play this game. For some reason people have trouble seeing this and start getting their panties in a wad over the fact that I might vote someone who isn't Sim.
If you're asking me about zora and VPB, well, I've only had one real issue with zora the whole game. He could be ducking the game a bit, but we'll see how that turns out. VPB, similarly, has been a fairly solid town read for me other than one really odd moment (yesterday's Sim wagon).
To answer you question though, I wouldn't be very upset to see VPB or zora in the restraints over this logic (Ythill's kill), but in comparison to Fate? I'll take Fate any time.
---
Oh, absolutely. Without reservation. In light of the Sim and Ythill flips, I was clearly going in the wrong direction with my suspicions. Fate has been skating by without anyone so much as giving him a second look, and VPB, kind of like Sim, has been getting people to talk of him as scum without anyone actually showing the balls to move a vote or two on him.Jarti 864 wrote:rc same question-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
No, I was just teasing you. What do you want to know now? You really are scum for those reasons. Do you really think I voted you out of the blue? I think you know you had it coming. I haven't liked you as town since Antitown was still here, and now with Glados' claim, I'm about ready to put my money where my mouth is.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
So don't let Fate twist the context around here, there's a clear progression of dislike. I've said that Fate is townie sounding, I don't deny that. That was before Antitown was replaced though. Do I really need to tell everyone that since Glados has been here Fate has absolutely shutdown? Throwing his votes around whenever he thought he could get a lynch to go through (regardless of who it was) and placing self-limitations on the number of sentences he can make? So when Fate says he isn't raging, that much is obvious (until now, but even still I touched on that in my post 593), when he says he isn't contributing, say hello to my post 429, and when he says Fate killed Ythill, that was the entire damn theory behind making the move to vote him! So everything Fate said in his little summary:
I've touched on all of those things before, as I've just proven to you.Fate 858 wrote:NO THIS IS NOT OMGUS. IF HE HAD VOTED ME FOR ANY DECENT FRICKIN REASON AKA:
1. Fate isnt raging, lolmeta
2. Fate isnt contributing, flying lowlowlow
3. Fate killed Ythill cuz he likes to lead town
Fate is trying to twist it around and show a bunch of early posts I made where I said that I had town vibes from Fate. That's all true. I had good vibes of him when he was out to get Antitown, and I think most of us did. I do not have those same town vibes now, and I haven't for some time. Fate's entire post 887 is moot because I acknowledged before hand that I hadn't liked Fate as townsince Antitown left the game.
So Fate is stepping up a little bit, it's just a shame that he's doing so dishonestly and manipulatively to try and frame me rather than show the honest truth. Look, don't take my word for it or Fate's word for it. Go back through my posts for yourself. Set aside a couple of minutes and look at where I've addressed Fate. They're all relatively short (because he hasn't said anything of importance since Antitown left), and it's easy to see how my attitude has changed over the course of the game. Ythill and Sim's flips coupled with Glados' claim have just precipitated my need to make a stronger move.
Don't let Fate bully his way through this game. He needs to be held accountable for his actions.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I'm actually starting to sympathize with Concission a little bit. Jarti's last vote for instance (Mod, I think your last vote count is off in this regard), where the hell did that come from? Jarti, what happened to calling out VPB? Frankly, I'm starting to really warm up to that idea. VPB has been riding Concission for sometime, and you're on record of putting VPB on notice for this. I mean, are you giving up on VPB or do you think there's some sort of collusion between him and Concission?
SD and VV need to pick it up. There's a lurking scum between them for sure. SD isn't lurking so much as he is playing under the radar, I guess. VV's catchup post was okay but he's since disappeared.
I'm having trouble pinning down town reads in this game now (with the exception of Glados). Everyone is kind of dropping the ball in different ways. AGM and zora have been going at each other basically since zora got here, so that's nothing new. I lean toward AGM as having the weaker position in general; he's way too self-focused. This entire game he's had this defensive streak in him it seems like. Everytime someone votes him he gets flustered and ramps up the activity, but otherwise I can't tell what he's going to do next.
I'm really disappointed at the disinterest in either a VPB or Fate wagon, it seemed like there was a lot of excitement about that yesterday (real time, not D1), but here we are and Concission is the only real vote getter.
If I had to pick my favorite townie reads right now, it'd probably be crypto, Jarti, and zora, and all three of them are voting different people.
I also just realized we're in a unique position here. There were five people who weren't on Sim's wagon yesterday, one of them is dead and another is Glados.
@Everyone: Who is scum between VPB, AGM, and SD?
Thank you for pointing out the vote count error. It has been fixed. -modLast edited by hitogoroshi on Wed Mar 02, 2011 8:57 am, edited 1 time in total.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Yo, Fatesy, did you notice the big ol' part here?Fate 945 wrote:There a me sized hole in your post there RC, you ready to get lynched yet?
There's a lot of ways to go here, but with you and VPB, I really want to see a flip from one of you, I think. AGM might be acceptable as well.RC 944 wrote:I'm really disappointed at the disinterest in either a VPB or Fate wagon
---
I was actually considering running with this, but I went back and saw that Jarti has never been a big fan of Concission. Had that not been the case, I probably would've went off on her. I'll give her a chance to explain what she's trying to do.VPB 946 wrote:why do you start your post pointing out the huge discrepancy in thought continuity from Jarti and then call her one of your favorite town reads?
---
This is getting old fast. You called me out once for some so-called buddying and have been riding that wave ever since. It would be nice if, like Glados, you were willing to engage me every once and a while. I have no problem with someone voting me as long as they're willing to stay relevant and up-to-date. Your vote has been lazy and predictable. I mean, you don't even mention anything I've said today. When was the last time you quoted me or asked me something?SD 948 wrote:This waggon definitely needs morevote RC.
I also like how everyone ignored my question. We've most likely got a scum between three people in VPB, AGM, and SD. Which one is it? If I had to vote right this second I'd probably choose VPB, but it would be nice to know if a VPB lynch is feasible or if I'm just wishing on the stars. AGM and SD are both so-so enough that I'd settle for them, I guess. A number of people are readily ignoring the flips though (notably Fate, VPB, and SD). VPB went so far as to imply the flips meant nothing to him and he wants to continue on the same path he's been on since the second page of the game.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Well, you still do (have a confirmation bias), so why would I waste time arguing with you? The prod speaks for itself. You've done little this day outside of your shot. So you're just floating along rather than actually leading the town like you should be. That said, SD isn't much better. Of course if the roles were reversed it would be a completely different story.
Of course we need to focus outside of the Sim wagon. VPB is the only one who thinks the Sim wagon wasn't a good wagon, I think everyone else agrees it was an acceptable lynch (even if not their priority pick). Lynching from a pool of 3 is better than lynching from a pool of 8, unless you're going to sit here and argue that all scum were on the Sim wagon.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Look, you're the one who's popping in to say, effectively, "Meh, keeping the vote I've had since yesterday, nothing has changed". I find it hard to believe that I'm the only person worth commenting on since Sim's flip, but we'll set that aside. I'm not calling you lazy, but I will call you out for taking me out of context. If you want to step up and say that SD has had as much to say about me as you have, then those are your words, not mine. I strongly beg to differ, and can point to numerous examples of you addressing me and SD, well,not.
Without a scumflip, rereading isn't as beneficial as you make it seem. I mean, rereading is always important, everyone should always do it, yadda yadda yadda, but don't go off on some elitist rant because no one is keeping up with your standards of play. I've reread enough (thank you very much) to know where I want to go, and I would hope everyone else is keeping their offense fresh and honest (unlike Fate, VPB, and possibly SD).
There's a difference between this and saying he's a bad lynch, especially on D1. You don't know Sim's alignment until you know it. I recall you being very back and forth on Sim, but I'll go back and see if you were, as you claim, as insistent as VPB was.Glados 980 wrote:First, I said Simenon was Town.
You either think it or you don't. There are no guarantees. There's no reason to continue to ham up your attacks against me. I don't guarantee anyone will flip anything.Glados 980 wrote:I do not think it is in any way guaranteed that one of the scum was off the Simenon lynch.
You're right about Ythill. I was posting too fast. However I made it a point not to include myself when I'm talking about your perspective.Glados 980 wrote:The "pool" of eligible candidates on the Simenon lynch is 7, since Ythill has died. Second, since you were on the wagon, you can remove yourself for the purposes of your own scumhunting, leaving a pool of 6.
What if they're all scum together? What if there are no scum? What if the moon was blue? I'm going with probability here. Probability is more reliable than whatever scumhunting I can do. I know you don't like thinking about odds and chances (in general I don't like relying on it much either, but I come from an inherently more statistical approach to Mafia given that I cut my teeth on EpicMafia), but there's a real advantage to using it as one tool among many in an attempt to locate scum.Glados 980 wrote:Limiting the scope of suspects is not really helpful to Town, especially if this limitation could easily put the Town in an impossible situation. What if all three unconfirmed players off the Simenon wagon are Town?
Oh, interesting. I must've had crypto mixed up with VPB.Glados 981 wrote:And I just realized that my vote count (and hitogoroshi's, which I based mine off of) is completely missing VP Baltar, who should have been listed as voting Concission.
In that case, it is trivial to lynch off of Sim at this point. Let's stay on the Sim wagon then.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I saw what I saw. I saw SD, who, up until that point, had been very precise about his language and his votes (you've basically just admitted to such in the last post here), absolutely throw all that away in a careless "L-1" vote, which was effectively a hammer by anyone taking two looks at the game. Hell, Jarti just did my work for me. You've made all these very careful votes in this game, more than anyone else, putting players at L-1 after supposedly counting over the previous votes and making sure that your vote wouldn't cause harm.
Now some people don't have the presence of mind to look over the game before making a move like that. They might be prone to making more flighty positions and let their emotions carry them a little more than any given person. I do not get that sense from you. I think that vote was purposeful and measured, just like all of your other votes in the past, with an intent on lynching AGM coyly and acting like you didn't know VV had already voted (unproperly, unbeknownst to all of us at the time).
The scumteam is SD, VPB, and Fate. Game over. gg all. First round's on me.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
No.AGM 1060 wrote:I'll hammer. Any objections?
---
Ignoring what? I don't think you ever responded to my allegations. Are you going to claim?SD 1064 wrote:But, yeah, people ignore me for some reason ;..(
---
This is a good point. Are you just piggybacking on our suspicions or do you have something of your own, AGM?VPB 1068 wrote:Here is something I'd like you to answer AGM, why is SD scum? You haven't said really much of anything about him all game, and especially not any kind of scum read lately.
---
How about you actually cast a vote instead of all this IIoA? I mean, I know you are voting Concission, but, it's like, is there anything new here that you are recapping for me? This is all stuff I've read before because, you know, I'm in this game. Where's the analysis? What am I supposed to be seeing here? Concission's wagon deflated because Concission's not such a great lynch anymore.VV 1069 wrote:Okay, I'm actually kind of falling asleep right now. I haven't gotten to anything useful yet as far as votes are concerned....maybe after a nap? If you haven't actually read what's in the spoiler yet, you really don't have to. It turns out I probably could have started around where I left off and not missed anything.
Name names. Don't be scared.VV 1072 wrote:I actually think the SD wagon might be primarily town-driven, just thinking about how it formed, but that just makes the formation of the AGM wagon even more questionable, if half the players on it didn't really care so much about it.
Do you think Jarti was bussing Concission then? It's possible. I mean, I can see it, but that's not what I'd bet on now. Jarti has consistently been unafraid to lay into anyone. He had a rocky start mostly due to his activity and unexplained positions, but he's since been pretty straightforward and on top of things. I'm still not sure exactly what's going on in his head in regards to how he sees the game, but I like his style and I think he's town atm.VV 1074 wrote:Not sure what this points to about Concission, but I would say that anyone with a town read on Jarti should had better have a pretty damned good reason.
He's been erratic and really unfocused ever since Glados came in. I can absolutely tell this is not Fate as town. He's unsure of himself, not necessarily because he is scum (he can handle that), but possibly because one of his partners is causing him stress. Maybe SD, but I don't know about that. It could be someone like an AGM though.VV 1074 wrote:Fate has been completely in his own world the entire day to the extent that I'm not even sure he realizes half the players exist.
I see the scumteams like this right now: SD, Fate, and VPB; SD, Fate, and AGM; SD, VPB, and AGM; or Fate, VPB, and AGM. There's some grouping going on in these four players. If there aren't two scum in that group, I would be mighty surprised, I'll tell you what. I'm a believer in not counting my chickens before they hatch, so I don't think I'm good enough to have the entire scumgroup nailed down, especially without a flip. It's likely the third scum is someone I think is town.
Might want to look deeper into this.VV 1074 wrote:interesting though that he decides to switch off of a wagon on one player he called scummy to a wagon on another player he called scummy that had fewer votes
Well, you're on record as not particularly caring for Jarti, so no harm no foul here I don't think.VV 1074 wrote:ummm...can we just pretend I was high when I made this post and move on?-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Ugh, VPB, I almost uniformly hate it when people do that. Do you really have a problem with seeing SD as scum here? Is there some niggling doubt in the back of your mind that you can give us? I mean, putting your AGM or Concission suspicions aside, do you see SD as a potential buddy of either of them?
I had SD almost in completely neutral territory (sort of townie D1 and sort of scummy D2), but his vote was just so very fake.
I mean, I'm willing to give you that AGM is no prize in my eyes this game. I want to know from you if you think there is a real, serious reason we should forgo an SD lynch this time.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I can't believe someone who posts stuff like this is going to be lynched over SD today. This is good posting. Someone needs to be a hero and get off his wagon for SD. crypto has been getting a ridiculous amount of passes by everyone (myself included) and I want to put a fire under him tomorrow.AGM 1124 wrote:crypto wrote:THE OBSESSION OF YOU PEOPLE WITH REFUSING TO JUST BUCKLE DOWN AND STICK WITH ONE LYNCHEE IS INFURIATING. HAVE SOME FUCKING BALLS, JESUS CHRIST.
AGM is indiscriminately rabid and SD is Go-Go Gadget Lurkatron-to-Night.
Here is what happens.
1. AGM goes back to L-1.
2. Everyone checks in and states a preference (or lack thereof) between AGM and SD.
3. We lynch accordingly.
If you twats continue to sit with your thumbs up your asses and somehow manage to fail to state a preference, then we lynch AGM.crypto wrote:Unvote. Vote: VP Baltar.crypto wrote:Unvote. Vote: Concission.crypto wrote:Unvote. Vote: AlmasterGM.crypto wrote:Unvote. Vote: zoraster.crypto wrote:Unvote. Vote: Shadow Dancer.crypto wrote:Unvote. Vote: AlmasterGM.
The last four are especially hilarious.
---
I wish you weren't scum, Fate. Because, if I didn't know any better, post 1151 is so townie it hurts.
Still waiting on Concission and VV. Glados would, theoretically, be a good person to hear from before we finish this, but his/her reads are so off that it's hard for me to pretend like I'll value them.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
As can been seen over the course of the game, I've been very back and forth with crypto. AGM does bring up a good point though; the man has been extremely opportunistic for better or for worse.
To answer your question more precisely though, I'm thoroughly convinced there are two scum in the group of you, Fate, AGM, and SD. When you add crypto to the mix, that could be a perfect third. AGM isn't really a bad lynch, but SD is so much more clear cut in my eyes. It frustrates me that I can't really get anyone to go with me on that.
Am I whistling dixie? Do you think this is just AGM grasping at straws with his last scummy breath or do you think there's something to the idea? I know you've got, as you admitted, somewhat of a position of bias (as do I as one of the, if not the main, proponent of lynching SD), but, as I asked earlier, do you have any niggling doubts about AGM? Are you prepared to move on?
To preemptively answer a possible retort: I do not have any doubts about my SD position.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Despite what you may say, Glados, lynches based on majorities are decisive and force the scum to take real positions on the game. Do not underestimate the importance of finishing this off.Mod 1185 wrote:Deadline is on March 12th, 2011, at 2:00 PM central time.
A Fate lynch, although preferable to even SD in my eyes, is unattainable in 34 hours, I think. Me, Glados, AGM, and LL, okay, that's four votes, but I don't see where we'd get the remaining three from. SD can be done, and is better than AGM, Glados. I ask that you use your vote toward something productive while Fate flails and HURR DURR's his way to a lynch tomorrow. Your reads, while well intentioned, are not going to be heeded. They're simply too misguided or suffer from being too little too late.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I'm tempted to post a reaction image of my ecstatic face when Concission and Glados turn around and hammer your buddy SD.Fate 1272 wrote:Good thing whoever has the most votes FIRST gets lynched.
BUH BYE AGM-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Well, I wasn't surprised to see Concission vote SD over AGM. She had made it clear that she was likely going to do that. VV's heart seems like it was in the right place when he went after Fate yesterday. He was the decisive vote here, so we'll see what happens. I've got a townread on him that will definitely be dependent to some degree on how SD flips. All in all though, I think they are both townies. The scum had already cast their votes prior to these two, I think.VPB 1289 wrote:RC - you think SD is scum still?
All that doesn't answer your question though. The short answer is yes, I see no reason for me to change my mind on SD.
Vote: Fate
I'd like to see SD's "Sim-like" post as well.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
Wow, can you say last ditch effort?
I guarantee you I didn't just get three honest votes in the last four posts. Fate's partner has just confirmed himself to be Jarti, LL, or VPB.
I've already addressed every point Fate's brought up before, this is all old stuff. I mean, if it's necessary, we'll go wall-to-wall again, but it's clear the scum are now trying for any lynch they think they'll be able to get. I've become, having put myself out there consistently each day in this game, the "easy" mislynch.
If SD doesn't flip scum, then it would be a different makeup... but there's obviously a connection between Fate and one of these players. It's especially weird that LL and Jarti voted me out of the blue, having not really had anything negative to say about me (hell, neither has VPB, really, but it's no secret that VPB and Fate are attached at the hip at this point). This was concocted. I'd stake a pretty penny on that.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
You're one to talk.Fate 1307 wrote:VV, as the only probtownie voting me, may I ask why you're so casually sheeping GlaDoS lol reads?
So... you're voting me because you think I'm scum. But if I'm scum that means it's more likely that you're scum.Fate 1307 wrote:And if you ARE, then you agree that a RC scum flip would be damning for me, so lynch RC with me first.
Because my vote caused a shitstorm D1 for no reason. I was very clear in my dislike of Concission throughout the entire game. Then, out of the blue, people start getting uppity as though I had never mentioned Concission before. I had. Go back and look. I did it multiple times in multiple posts.Fate 1314 wrote:Even his SD vote is scummy as fuck! What townie says "UNLIKE THE WAY I BANDWAGONNED >_> <_<"
SD's vote was completely different. He was trying to pull a quicklynch off, which is completely unlike all of his prior play in this game. As, I believe, Jarti pointed out, SD, prior to this vote, was very careful about his vote and making sure it didn't do anything rash. After his vote on AGM he acted as though he didn't know it was a hammer. That was completely unlike him and how I knew that SD was scum.
Except for the fact that, like what I just said above, one can read me in ISO and pull out multiple things over the course of the game that I've said about Concission. This isn't rocket science. You did this same nonsense yesterday and you're doing it again today. You cherrypick a couple of statements and paint this huge picture around it, fists pounding on the chalkboard, screaming until someone does what you say. This is the Antitown argument all over again. How many times did I rail against Concission before voting for him? Not once, not twice, not thrice, but four times. Oh, and by the way, I have even voted Concission before.Fate 1314 wrote:HERE IT IS! Boy talk about a read that dropped off the face of the Earth.
WOW WHO KNEW ISOING SCUM WOULD NET FINDING... so MANY DAMN SCUMMY THINGS?
Oh, look, and here's AGM making the same argument that Fate just made.
So what does this all mean? It means that I was actually on record disliking Concission before I voted him. Does all this sound familiar to you guys? It should, because it's the same argument I've had with Glados and Fate before twice now since the end of D1. Somehow it keeps gaining traction as though it is something new. The point was either that my Antihero vote came out of nowhere or my Concission vote came out of nowhere. Neither of these are true. I've got to sit here and keep linking the same tired old posts instead of us doing something proactive like lynching Fate.
Because you started the Antitown wagon that means your town? That makes no sense. Antitown (Glados) flipped town. I resisted the Antitown wagon for sometime. I really preferred Sim; I preferred Sim the entire day. You were the main proponent on Antihero. When Glados joined the game you decided to let off the gas and let the other players argue amongst themselves until you could throw your weight behind a mislynch.Fate 1315 wrote:RC isn't so newbtown sa to think the the one who started the wagon on town is scum, but that the JUMPERS (like RC himself) are the REAL scumbags on town wagons.
You're being a complete hypocrite. If AGM is scum, why did you "derail" his wagon in favor of SD? Why are you not being held accountable for this flip flopping? This argument goes both ways. I'm not the one pretending like I already know what SD will flip. I think SD will flip scum; you claim that you know he won't.Fate 1315 wrote:So he finally gets the lynch derailed on AGM, even though it was derailed by ...oh wait.FUCKING ME
It's a fantasyland to think that Fate would bus a scumpartner?Fate 1315 wrote:WHAT WORLD IN FUCKING HELL IS RC IN? In some fantasy land where SCUMFATE switches from AGM to BUS SD? I'll tell yo uwhere he is, he's in the LADN WHERE HE PIGGY BACKS FATETOWN WHEN IT GETS A LYNCH OFF HIS BUDDY AGM.
Oh, that's a good one, Fatey. Ah, tell me some more later when you're on the guillotine.
Lest we forget, the entire first day of this game you basically sat out. After your plot to get Antitown mislynched fell by the wayside, you basically sat around with your dick in your hand while the rest of us were scumhunting. You waited until you got the opportune mislynch and you voted me! But, wait, it wasn't my time yet... oh, here's another mislynch, Simenon! Awesome.
You were sitting pretty N1 into D2 until Glados pointed out that Ythill was a bit easy to read D1. I wonder who may have picked up on Ythill? VPB? Possibly, but I had a town read on him at the time. AGM? Possibly, but he had to have been playing pretty low under the radar. He genuinely didn't strike me as though he was very much into the game. I feel like I have a pretty good read on him. Fate? Now that's the ticket. You were ready to cruise control through the rest of the game until, uh oh, I called you out by putting two and two together. Good ol' fashioned logical work.
So now, in your position, Me and AGM have to flip scum and SD has to flip town for all of your BS to float. I make no such claims. You're scummy on your own. SD fits, but is not necessary. As you said yourself, you voted him. Your connections are with VPB and possibly LL/Jarti. Hell, this could be a full blown role reversal situation with you and AGM for all I know, but I'm not betting on that one.
You're off your rocker. I said plainly that it wasFate 1315 wrote:was similar to his Vote on Concission D1unlikemy vote entirely. That's the reason I voted him, Fate.
All three scum in a group of five = pretty damn on top of it. All of the scum are in the Fate/VPB/SD/LL/Jarti camp right now.Fate 1322 wrote:"FATES BUDDY IS ONE OF THREE PEOPLE!" Thats weak and bullshit scumhunting.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
I was with you until I read this. This made me cringe a little bit. Yeah, sure, zora hasn't been around, but this completely undercuts everything you just said above it.AGM 1356 wrote:The PROBLEM IS I actually don't like zoraster's play. But I feel pretty strongly about that scum QT above. THINKING.
---
Wow, what a cop out. Get out of my game, crypto.crypto 1374 wrote:I have no idea where I'd put my vote right now barring a CC to zoraster.
---
I don't know, Fate. I've been holding onto two pieces of information for dear life here.Fate 1385 wrote:Scumbuddy theory be damned, his interaction with that AGM wagon was STILL WEIRD AS FUCK.
1) Someone killed Ythill specifically. Someone on the scum team is a very capable player, much better (as town, at least), than I am. This immediately points to you, and this immediately points to VPB. I know both of you are good bets at gauging something like that.
2) Your play is erratic (and not in the normal Fate sense). It's not as simple as the lack of CAPS. Anyone worth anything can use CAPS as scum. You've been a rollercoaster of activity, and it's proportional to Antihero replacing out. There's just this whole scheme that looks like it is beautifully playing out for you.
---
VPB 1408 wrote:wait, the lynched can actually vote?
meh.
anyhow...zoraster point stands
---
Wow, when Jarti actually gives the game his attention we get good stuff out of him like this.Jarti 1417 wrote:This is VPB's 2nd time making a blatant attempt to act like he doesn't know the set-up. First his misinterpretation of how the vig shot would be done. And now his seemingly being unaware that the on-guillotine can post, despite simenon's posting on d2 and sd saying he'd post toDay. I don't buy it, looks like a gimmick to gain town cred by seeming unaware of the surroundings. Calling out ViVi for being 'scums who can't read the thread' when he himself seemingly never saw simenon's post-guillotine posts.
However what I don't get is all the BS you gave us earlier today. It's like, I don't know if you are coming or going. Are you faking it now or were you faking it earlier? Because, it's like this, you can't go, in one post, RC is scum, then the next post, RC, want to join me in a Fate lynch?, then the next post, RC is scum, then the next post, VPB is scum. That doesn't work. What is your game, Jarti?
---
Please. If ever I've heard a scripted post. Save it for The Road to Rome.VPB 1423 wrote:This game is seriously making me pissed because everybody and their brother is so apathetic about the game state.
Town apathy is a terrible thing and pretty much every game I've ever played that has gone this way, I've lost. I know I'm not playing at my best either, so I guess I can't bitch too much, but I do feel like I've been trying to point out relevant things all game (such as wagons that repeatedly stall at L-1) and almost no one is listening to me.
---
You're delusional. The only obvious townies (aside from zora) here are VV and Concission.Fate 1424 wrote:VP is as town as it gets, if here we SCUMPLOTTING VP he'd have all this shit figured out.
---
He's trying to play the town. "All this town apathy is going to lose it for us! I know I'm not the best, but gee whiz, guys!"LL 1429 wrote:I don't consider this game one of town apathy, a lot of players have very strong opinions.
It turns out that a lot of players have very differing strong opinions, hence a difficulty to gain consensus.
I don't know, LL, how you could possibly see me, Fate, and VPB as all part of the same town.
Unvote;vote: VP Baltar-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX
The writing is on the wall, VPB.
You spent the better the better part of D1 tunneling Concission (although, granted, at the time this was more of a problem I had with Concission, but I have since done almost a 180 on what I think of you and him).
You tried to buy creditability at the last minute during the Sim lynch.
Ythill was killed N1 (I don't care how many times people try and dissuade me from this argument; I'm firmly convinced there was more to this kill than sheer dumb luck).
Your relationship with Fate has been unorthodox and untownielike (especially non-VPB townielike if you want to get meta with this argument, but he's the only player I have yet to see you be critical of to any degree despite consistently labeling him as "neutral" and "meh" up until your recent, forced love affair antics).
Your unabashed, ever-present fencesitting in arguably the most critical decision we've had in this game so far.
You essentially forced the RS to claim today with your casual threats (of course this isn't entirely your fault as a lot of people we're on that wagon, including, likely, the scum Rolecop. That doesn't mean you weren't the most fundamental piece however with your vague threat of an impending hammer).
As Jarti just brought up and I now confirmed, this is your second time falling victim to fundamental misunderstandings of a fairly straightforward setup. The first time could easily be written off as an honest mistake, but this second attempt at casting suspicion on VV is completely awkward and wholly convoluted. Even if SD couldn't vote, I still don't understand the implication at all.
Your recent, fake "let's get it together, town!" pep post.
Either you or Fate need to go. It's no longer acceptable to leave you both around. In a perfect world, I'd want you gone now, I'd want SD to flip scum like I predict he will, and I'd want Fate gone the next day. It may not be all three of you, but if it's not two I would be extremely surprised.
---
With the criteria you laid out, I'd say it makes Concission look pretty good. I just looked at his iso though (I don't know if that's cheating or not).crypto 1444 wrote:I have some things I'd like to point out, but I want to see what other people think before I provide any potential point of easy agreement. I want to hear from AGM, Luck, VV, and RC first.-
-
RedCoyote Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8036
- Joined: October 19, 2008
- Location: Houston, TX