Open 422: Polygamist Mafia (Game Over)
-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
This argument has become highly confused.
Arugula's original vote on TAM was nothing to get upset about. TAM was being impatient, and had silly reasoning for voting people; so they wouldn't dodge questions. But he had no reason to anticipate a dodge. Arugula's vote was just as silly as TAM's vote.
Malee how is that "extreme" in any sense? Also please explain how putting two votes on someone is scummy.
@TAM I agree with GIce that those post seem odd. It seems in #43 and #45 you were not completely serious about your "ANSWER NOW" votes. But now it seems like you are standing by them firmly.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 115, Malee wrote:In post 114, Nyalite wrote:Malee how is that "extreme" in any sense? Also please explain how putting two votes on someone is scummy.
It's extreme to vote someone because that person is impatient and eager to play, yes. And I never said that putting two votes on someone is scummy, but joining a bandwagon without any valid reason (not even "pressuring" someone), is!
Only as extreme as voting two people on one page so they didn't "ignore your question." TAM had no reason to suspect they would ignore his question. If they had posted after he asked and ignored it, voting them to force an answer might be warrented. But you don't just vote someone just because you want to ask a question.
Also this doesn't show eagerness play.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 117, Malee wrote:In post 116, Nyalite wrote:Also this doesn't show eagerness play.
Really?
In post 45, The Acting Method wrote:tbh I'm bored, and I can't think of any thing I can use to boost activity and get reactions to get reads from. I'm pretty much "Ask questions as I need to, get answers" I mean I could ask the "What Timezone are you in?" question so I have a basic idea of when people will be posting so I'm not as bored but I'm not really one for Reaction fishing or the like.
It's maybe a poor display, but it's one nonetheless.
Why did you ignore the majority of my post?
I maybe should have said it doesn't necessarily show eagerness to play. The "I'm bored" defense seems weak, as the thread wasn't moving along to badly, and if he really wanted to talk there were plenty of people to post to. Instead he went after people who weren't posting much which would be silly if he really was just bored and wanted to play.
@Charter How is Arugula giving you strong town vibes?-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 133, GreyICE wrote:Fuck Malee is shit town isn't she
That's what I'm getting. Nothing she has done is in any way scummy.
In post 131, charter wrote:In post 129, Nyalite wrote:@Charter How is Arugula giving you strong town vibes?
I agree with his case on Malee, and dislike how he is being attacked for a solid case.
His case is in no way solid. But even if it was, how does that make him town? Scum can come up with a good case against town players, and they will be attacked over it especially in this setup.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 134, The Acting Method wrote:Actually Grey, I didn't call him out because someone had already...
Though frankly, even I find that suspicious...
VOTE: Charter
I'm sorry, but that seems too scummy to try and save one of the top two scum people...
What exactly is your accusation here?
That is the weakest reasoning yet for a vote.
VOTE: TAM
Please explain your vote on Charter.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 137, The Acting Method wrote:To add onto what Nyal was saying to Charter...
I've already gotten into why his case is bad...
It's built around the principle that getting lynched d1 is a worthy sacrifice for town...
He never said anything like that. Unless I just totally am missing it. Can you post where that is?
Charter/Argula/?/? scum team? I can buy that. Possibly Slandaar as the third.
Why are you saying this as if someone else is suggesting that? No one put arug and charter together but you, just now..
Okay, I'm voting for him A: Because of his reasoning for voting Malee... Argula's case on Malee, I've already explained why it's bad. (Also, Argula's reaction to my pressuring was TERRIBLE FYI) Also the things that GreyIce pointed out.
Arug reaction was not terrible. I had the same reaction when I read it. Although his case on Malee is weak. But more importantly the things that GreyIce pointed out paint you as scummy along with Charter.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 143, The Acting Method wrote:Your first line: I'm adding on to your point about Argula's case not being solid.
My first line was asking you to say where arugula claimed getting lynched is a worthy sacrifice. Because he never said that. In fact has anyone even made a case around that principle? Please quote anyone who said that in this game.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 147, Slandaar wrote:TAM/Malee need to claim lovers/not lovers imo.
Why? How would that help?
Seems unnecessary to me.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 158, DoubleJD wrote:
@Nyalite: How would tam/malee claiming NOT help? What is the hazard in doing so? No, the entire village should not claim. Theres too many lurkers and people not under pressure for that. But TAM and malee have been in the spot light for awhile and have had tons of pressure on them.
I just don't see the value in it. When I think through what would happen if they claim this way or that, it doesn't add to our knowledge base in a way that would help determine if they are scum or not.
I also think it is brutally obvious. But if others want a claim I have nothing against it as I don't see any harm.
More importantly I think TAM and Malee are(were) just really bad town. TAM's last vote further adds to that read.
--
TAM why the hell are you suddenly worried about lurkers when you have all this pressure on you. People are calling you scummy and your response is, "Hey I'll get around to claiming later, but in the mean time, I THINK YOU'RE RIGHT JD LETS TALK ABOUT LURKERS INSTEAD."
And further Snake and charter are both equal lurker status except charter came in to randomly tell us he likes arug because, stuff. And your vote was on Charter why change it?
Did you decide Charter wasn't scummy?-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 173, GreyICE wrote:In post 167, Nyalite wrote:More importantly I think TAM and Malee are(were) just really bad town. TAM's last vote further adds to that read.
Being an idiot isn't actually a town tell youse
No, being an idiot isn't. But he hasn't done anything scummy. So at this point my read is Idiot. Scum/town unknown.
However I feel like people are mistaking badness for scummy.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 180, DoubleJD wrote:In post 171, Jal wrote:Sorry - looking back I was confused about one thing. Yellowbounder, why doyouwant replacements to look at their past selves at all?
Have you fully caught up yet then?
Wait, you acknowledge this?
So you voted for someone without reading all their latest post?
Also I've never heard of the amish tell, but the way arug describes it's because you criticized the person you replaced. Yellow didn't ask you to do that.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 183, DoubleJD wrote:I did. Im on my phone and focused on her wall instead of the hidden line inside a post directed to someone else. It's certainly similar to not reading a post directly above a wall don't you think? Why aren't u criticising jal as well then? That's odd. Also odd that u continue to vote for TAM when you have nothing on him. Tell me then, who do u think is scum and why are u voting TAM instead?
My reasoning for voting TAM was very clear in the post that I voted for him. He suddenly switched his vote over to charter with almost no explanation. I said as much, voted him and asked him to explain.
Not sure how that is unclear.
I'm not sure about who scum is because this thread has been very distracted by the Malee/arug argument, and Malee and Fennin being replaced. Also TAM being all over the place.
Also I don't care what Jai did nor is it relevant. You didn't bother to read the rest of the thread before voting/attacking someone.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 186, DoubleJD wrote:Post 167 and 175. That's why I'm attacking u for having a lingering vote on TAM...someone u think is town.
There is no where better to put my vote. Also TAM is still being bad, which is why I voted for him. Not scummy, just bad.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 188, DoubleJD wrote:Really? Am I in the right game? We have a maximum of two lynches, and u want to use one on a person u don't think is scum. Good plan, im sure its easier to lynch correctly on day2.
Woah. Calm down. No need for all the sarcasm. I don't want to lynch TAM, I want to him to explain himself, his last couple votes have been really bad. The last two he just suddenly followed other players and voted for people without explaining why. He needs to explain his charter vote and why he suddenly switched to snake after you said we should go after lurkers.
However having my vote on him seems to be stirring you up, so it has apparently been very useful.-
-
Nyalite
-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 194, DoubleJD wrote:Nyal: because I hate your reasoning for voting someone u think is town.
I voted for him because of his post on charter in #134. He never explained his reasoning. I voted for him and asked him to explain himself. He never really adequately explained it in my opinion.
Then he changed his vote to snake, because snake was lurking? Even though charter is also lurking and TAM thought he did something worthy of a vote. But changes it before charter even replies.
A weak vote with a confused explanation for it. Sudden change in vote from someone you accuse of being scum to a "lurker" even though the person you switched from is also lurking.
That warrants a vote in my book.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 196, The Acting Method wrote:Um, Nyal... read through the game... Pretty sure I explained... Or have I not yet because I left for awhile... (in fact in my next post after you asked for an explanation. I believed it happened.)
I believe I explained the charter vote, and I thought I had explained the snake vote.
Frankly (on the latter one) I agreed with JD's comment that the lurkers need to be posting more and decided to focus on the one who hadn't posted recently.
I thought about leaving it on charter, but frankly I decided not to.
You don't sound to sure of yourself.
You tried to explain your charter vote but it was not a very good explanation at best.
More importantly, Charter is almost lurking as much as snake is, except (this is the important bit)And he has been lurking ever since you voted for him.You voted on Charter as a scum.
???
How can you vote for Snake for being a lurker, when charter lurked away your vote on him.
@Mod Can we get a prod on Snake? The only things he has posted is one RVS vote and a prod dodge.
That is how you deal with lurkers. Not votes.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 198, DeltaWave wrote:In post 197, Nyalite wrote:@Mod Can we get a prod on Snake? The only things he has posted is one RVS vote and a prod dodge.
His last post was yesterday, well within the 72 hour grace period for a prod. However his next prod will be his second, and three prods = replace
Fair enough.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 205, The Acting Method wrote:
Mainly trying to boost activity from the ones I haven't really gotten reads on.
I prefer votes to prods for players who are most likely viewing the thread.
If you think your vote is such a good tool for getting people to reply, why did you take it off Charter (Who you had a scum read on)? Charter did not post in the thread at all while you had your vote on him. He completly dodged your question/pressure/vote/tickle/whatever which you claimed annoyed you in the begining of the game.
Also what makes you think Snake is viewing the thread and not replying?
And Prods are a much better way, look at brun/greyice we traded a lurker for an active player.
@Jal It's very hard to decide who scum is when so many people are not really in the game, or have barely posted.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 212, DoubleJD wrote:I disagree that prods are effective btw. Active players get the most attention, and active players are the ones that get lynched. Prod all you want, no one will forget what ive said in the last 2 pages meanwhile i can barely recall everyone's name in this thread.
What? This post makes no sense.
Prod are so people either come play the game or they get replaced. Has nothing to do whether you can remember who we are playing with.
@Arugula How was 3 votes much pressure, and how did he react well, he spewed nonsense and ignored half of the questions put to him.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 215, DoubleJD wrote:I guess i have to clarify.
I disagree that prods are more effective than attempting to spark a player into action. Lurkers have posted and are here. They just feel like they have nothing to add or are content with sitting back while they complete other games or work or something.
I also took for granted that we were ignoring lurkers, and so any scum hiding there arent gonna get lynched. Further, we arent getting any info from them and have no idea where theyre at. So at this rate, its the active players that are on the chopping block.
Im not immediately thinking about organization and what assumptions im making as i type
That all makes sense if its someone who is kinda lurking about posting here and there. Which we have many of.
However snake and charter are not coming back because people are voting them. So the point is moot. Voting Brun did not help. Replacing him did.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 245, Salamence20 wrote:I'm sure Hiraki and jD are town. Charter post made me lol, people are so whiny. Give me more time.
I understand you have a lot to catch up on, but can you please explain these town reads?-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 247, DoubleJD wrote:Wagons suck, time for a change up. I doubt anyone is gonna vote jal or nyal, and im ignoring all of malee's posts now because i cant discern what i can use.
UNVOTE: jal
VOTE: snakeplissken
I want people to post reads, lurkers bad, yatta yatta yatta ive said it before.
@jal: I thought fennin was scummy because........i misread the thread. I completely didnt see this whole cheating thing until way after my little tirade against you and nyal. Your other questions are silly.
Although, my posts have not been fluff, and youre echoing a lot of what im trying to get people to say. So :p
Why are voting for someone who isn't even here. We have proved that votes on "lurkers" don't work, TAM already has his vote on snake. If that was going to do anything, it would have nor will one more vote change it.
More importantly though, your reaction to Jal's attack on you is awful. First your OMGUS Jal saying she is just finding an excuse to vote you. Then you try to ignore it, or make up non-sense. Now you are just saying. Oh it was an accident. Please ignore it.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: JJD-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 251, DoubleJD wrote:I attacked jal first in my wall post when i replaced in. You too iirc. She omgus'd me and ive thought jal was scum ever since...as well as you.
Its about time you voted me btw, its been obvious since page seven that you thought i was scum. Maybe we can get a wagon going and draw some party lines!
No. I don't care about what Jal did. You keep bringing him up as a defense for your own actions which is really bad.
I did not think you were scum, I don't know why you are putting words in my mouth. You have been making awful post and I pointed that out.
But now you are reacting horribly, but more importantly you moved your vote from someone you think is scummy to someone who is lurking. This is exactly what TAM did and I voted him for it.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 251, DoubleJD wrote:Also re snake: Your argument is too broad. 1 vote isnt going to do anything in any situation. If lots of people vote snake, however, his buddy will be forced to defend him. If hes scum, his other buddies will also be forced to defend him. You can gauge a lot of things by the speed at which such a bandwagon might take off as well. Ive tried saying this multiple times and you keep ignoring it, i dont understand why
This argument is terrible. Snake has posted 3 times. None of them had any content. Someone is voting for him and it didn't make him come back.
Your vote against him will not do anything. But you gave up voting for someone who you thought was scum?
This is not about the value of analyzing a wagon this is about distracting from scum hunting. Focus on the people that are here, not the ones that will be replaced.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 257, DoubleJD wrote:Are...you real? You argue this
In post 249, Nyalite wrote:First your OMGUS Jal saying she is just finding an excuse to vote you.
I assert that the opposite is true. And now you attack me for bringing it up? REALSSSS?
Im putting words in your mouth because i had a page long back and forth with you. Yes, you thought i was scum then ldo
And no, the voting scenarios are not the same. I called you out for tam becasue you SAID he was town...and yet you still had a vote on him! Im voting for snake becasue he has 3 posts and i have no clue what he is.
OMGUS is when you vote for someone who voted for you. Not when you vote for someone who attacked you.
I did not think you were scum. Period. If you can't read our ISO's and see that, I will spell it out for you. Do not presume to tell me what I did or did not think.
And you did not comprehend what I was saying. I am saying my votes are for the same reason. Let me make it simple:
The Tale of TAM
1) TAM votes charter saying he is scummy
2) Nyalite votes for TAM
3) Charter does not post anything
4)TAM abruptly changes his vote to Snake for "lurking"
5) Nyalite leaves vote on TAM*
WWJJD?
1) JJD attacks Jal
2) Jal spots scum tell, votes JJD
3) OMGUS! JJD votes Jal
4)JJD abruptly changes his vote to Snake for "lurking"
5) Nyalite votes JJD*
*These votes brought to you by: why are you switching your votes off your scum read to an inactive player?
In post 258, DoubleJD wrote:In post 256, Nyalite wrote:
This argument is terrible. Snake has posted 3 times. None of them had any content. Someone is voting for him and it didn't make him come back.
Are you real again? You honestly expect anything to come out of a single vote when it takes 7 to lynch? "OH SHIT, I GOT VOTED, BETTER OUT AS A PR!!!". That is hilariously untrue, no one gives a fuck when they get voted once, and i dont expect teammates to care either
And ya, switching my vote so that it isnt wasted is a good move. No one has any interest in lynching jal, and the town needs 7/8 players on a scum wagon to succeed. Jal isnt gonna get lynched today, so im lynching someone else that might.
I am real. I think you need to take a couple breaths before you post next time.
Ignoring you ranting about why one vote doesn't matter (Which we agree on) I am saying it is a waste of time for us to form a wagon on an inactive player. It won't bring him back, and I hope we aren't stupid enough to actually lynch an inactive player. Scum won't have to defend him if he is scum. The only person who will care is his partner and any town player with half a brain who realizes it is a waste of time.
In post 259, DoubleJD wrote:Nyal, ill ask you again. Who do you think are town, and who do you think are scum? Why is this such a hard question to answer?
You know exactly why its hard, there are so many lurkers and inactive players. But since you and Jal have asked, reads list coming in my next post.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
By popular demand, Nyalite's read list!
Townish:
TAM
GreyIce
Jal
Hiraki
yellow
B&B
More scummy than townie:
Slandaar - Seriously add something more than demanding claims.
Looking scummier with every post:
Arugula - Jumping off JJD because "you liked his reaction" was really scummy. Still awaiting proper explanation of that.
DoubleJD - "r u 4 real?"
If you have a read on these people it's because you know their alignment:
Salamence20 *I did find charter scummy but Sally has been negating this.
SnakePlissken-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 262, DoubleJD wrote:Hrm, ok. I had assumed you brought up the TAM vote because thats why our little back and forth began in the first place. You're using it to justify voting me, saying its why u voted tam. K, fine.
Being literal with terms like omgus is stupid. A counter attack is a counter attack.
Im not explaining my snake vote again. It is not a waste of time, and wagoning does not mean he actually gets lynched.
Thank god your finally gonna post some reads!
In post 263, DoubleJD wrote:I mean, its just so easy!
Salamence20: town
Arugula: town
SnakePlissken: lurker, unknown
Slandaar: lean scum
GreyICE: null
jal: scum
The Acting Method: null since he started sitting back
Nyalite: scum
yellowbounder: town
Hiraki: town
BridgesandBalloons: lurker, unknown-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
Sorry hit the wrong button.
In post 262, DoubleJD wrote:Hrm, ok. I had assumed you brought up the TAM vote because thats why our little back and forth began in the first place. You're using it to justify voting me, saying its why u voted tam. K, fine.
Very gracious of you.
Being literal with terms like omgus is stupid. A counter attack is a counter attack.
While I can agree with you to a point. What you did was actually omgus.
Your initial "attack of Jal" was over a lingering RV. It was really more of a question.
Jal then voted on you for something totally unrelated. Then you immediately voted for Jal.
Im not explaining my snake vote again. It is not a waste of time, and wagoning does not mean he actually gets lynched.
You are proving my point, if he won't actually get lynched why should scum bother defending him? If he is townie maybe some scum would try to go for the mislynch and reveal themselves. But it would be difficult to decide who is scum and who is just dumb.
Bottom line? It's a distraction and a waste of time. There are a lot of players in the game right now who have very low post counts we could poke at anyways.
Also, lets differentiate between Lurking and inactive. Snake is inactive, he hasn't done anything. Where as lurking is someone who is purposefully avoiding posting.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 267, Salamence20 wrote:Please don't call me Sally, just please don't, I'm a guy and I prefer sala, thank you.
I tell you, DJD is VI, not scum, leave him be, I know, VI's like me know how other VI's work, and he is obvVI. Snake is worthless to kill, we should just wait for his replacement.
I'm sorry. It just popped into my head. It is prettier than sala though. But I will call you Sala.
I don't think anyone wants to kill Snake, though I agree we should wait for his replacement.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 299, Hiraki wrote:reticence
bravado
2 out of a 2 liner
sounds like a lot to me
and you can fod plz
Really? Those words are to big? I can't believe someone is actually advocating lowering the level of communication.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 303, Arugula wrote:Scumslip?
VOTE: DoubleJD
My explanation of why I got off DoubleJD:
1. I was expecting him to retract his townread on me once I attacked him. Many new players do this, because they have the mentality of "he's attacking me, so we can't be on the same team." He didn't which I was happy with.
2. He made a good point in saying that it was only page 8 and reads aren't THAT solid. Mine weren't either, but it is true he did not substantiate his reads. I probably shouldn't have let up so easily, but oh well.
But you gave up the vote on him like two post latter? That's all the reaction you needed somehow?
You had solid reasons to vote for him.
Part of the reaction was he didn't make a newbie mistake... Why is that good enough to retract your vote?
You are basically assuming he is really newbish and bad. So he gets let off easy.
But then!
A wild scum slip appears! Let's take a look at the post (#279) He is trying to respond to Slaandar's horrible attack on his "new" playstyle. And he is pre-responding to a potential accusation. I have no idea why he is, but that's what it is and it's not a scumslip in and of itself. It's a really newbish and bad way to argue.But wait, JJD is a newbie right? We have to give him the benefit of the doubt! /sarcasmoff
UNVOTE:-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 277, Slandaar wrote:So, this was pretty serious and everyone ignored, I see.
Well for those who don't understand;
JD has played one game on site, a scumgame.
JD says he is trying a more aggressive style than the last one
This is a slip because if he were town he would be playing a different/more aggressive because he is town, that is the logical reasoning from a townie, not because he wants to try something different.
He can only be trying a different style compared to his last game if hes scum here. He can not be trying a different style as town because the two are not compatible, there is no reason to change your style to see how it works unless you have something to compare it to. He does not have any town games to compare ergo why change style to try something different? its because hes scum trying a different style.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: JD
This is horrible logic.
There is nothing that says you can't change your play style independent of your alignment. The premises you provide to try to prove this just don't hold up.
Youcancompare it against your previous game even if you're a different alignment, obviously it won't be as easy to understand the difference if you are scum in one and town in the other. But then again there will always been different factors. Like who is in the game, and their alignment. The setup. Newbie vs Open. The size of the game. Ect.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
Also this kinda slipped under the radar with the Malee drama. But what the hell is this?
In post 121, Slandaar wrote:Everyone vote snake. There is a 4/10 chance hes scum without reads, this is the best vote ever considering everyone is just derping about right now.
Ah yes, I also read the wiki about random lynching being a good strategy. But then again, it also warned you can't truly get a random lynch.
Slandaar wrote:Plus the added bonus I am town so you know there is 2 town who are not snake, basically 4/8 50/50 chance of town win simply by lynching Snake.
Plus Plus the final bonus, noone else has shown interest in wagoning him; scum are not jumping on what looks like an easy lurker wagon.
Oh yes, this will alleviate my fears that this isn't a scum-driven "random" vote. Your word that you are town is all it took.
Slandaar wrote:I understand the case isn't amazing but there simply isn't a good case right now on anyone, get on snake.
Really four days in? There's nothing better so lets just do this. I'm losing faith in this again.
Slandaar wrote:the wiki is not to be followed religiously.
Um.... Okay then why are you doing exactly what it said?-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 314, SnakePlissken wrote:Sorry everyone I should note Im pretty much V/LA every weekend. Now where we at?
I would love to have 7 day weekends. Where can I sign up?
@Tamy Seriously get your vote off Snake. How many ways can we say its worthless.
@JJD I am not totally sure why you are voting me. The only thing you did like was me voting TAM, but I voted you for the same reason. You then said it what I did made sense and unvoted snake. So wouldn't you then feel like it was justified for me to vote tammy for that reason?-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 331, Hiraki wrote:I'm not stopping communication. The reason you'd even say this is annoying.
I didn't say that though? I said you are suggesting we lower the level of communication.
There are reasons to use words like reticence or bravado. They allow you to express your views in a succinct way. That is exactly what this thread needs. Not huge rambling paragraphs that could have been said in a sentence.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 333, Hiraki wrote:I'm going to go with this assumption that you're new from your join date.
And just say that smaller words are better in almost every way because people are dumb and brevity is the soul of wit etc. etc.
Paragraph walls aren't horrible either. If you tend to avoid reading, you should probably stay away now. Reading is the soul of this game. Especially finding motives.
Really? You bring up brevity in an argument between using smaller words and using fewer correct words?
Do you understand what that saying means? Or what being succinct means?
The issue here is you have trouble with your reading comprehension. I never said I avoided reading. I love reading people's post.
What I am saying is that certain users post entire paragraphs to explain their thoughts/feelings/case when they could have used a few choice words(being succinct.)-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 334, Jal wrote:I don't see how all of this accounts for your unvote of DJD.
He moved his vote from snake which is why I voted for him in the first place. Add on the fact there is a horrible wagon formed on him. Arug, Sland and Mr. brevity put JJD at L-1 if I counted correctly. I have raised issue with two of those votes, and the third gave zero reason for his vote.
Why wouldn't I take it off?-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
Can you explain why you voted me, and why you unvoted me?-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 340, Hiraki wrote:Even if I didn't, I could easily look it up on Google.
Considering that you were against my point about it and for yellow's, I assumed by succinct you meant using bigger words to covey bigger meanings in a smaller amount of time. No?
No. Maybe you should look it up on google. It's about being clear and to the point. If that means using "bigger" words, sure. But the important part is that it's "Short and sweet."
In post 340, Hiraki wrote:Don't insult me. I'm done talking about this now.
I am not trying to insult you just for the sake of it. But in the last couple post you have misrepresented what I said many times. Also it wasn't like your post are insult free.
And if you want to stop talking about it, don't ask me a question about it.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
This whole VI argument is stupid. Being an idiot/badplayer does not give you a pass or make you scummy. Arugula is right about that. If your read is that JJD is VI fine. But you need to prove the V part of VI or stop bringing it up.
Arug I would like a response to the issue I raised in post #337
Also you have been taking what he said out of context in these post.
In post 305, Arugula wrote:You said, "You can argue I'm being[...]bad scum." That is a slip.
In post 310, Arugula wrote:Why not? You said you are being needlessly tricky and bad scum. It is pretty cut and dry. I don't see what doesn't make sense.
Here is what he said.
In post 279, DoubleJD wrote:I have no experience on this site as town, and wanted to see how people react to such a style. At face value its obviously a town style. U can argue I'm being needlessly tricky and being bad scum....but that's a bit of a stretch considering I saw 4-5 players that people were happy letting sit on the sidelines.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 232, BridgesAndBaloons wrote:Hey everyone,
I've become aware that I haven't been contributing much to this game other than a hidden case on TAM and some theory stuff. So I'm going to try to get some more of my stances out publically soon.
I eagerly await this.
Also, can you explain this post for me?
In post 219, BridgesAndBaloons wrote:In post 208, GreyICE wrote:I get it.
This is a secret variant on conspiracy
Where the goal of the game
Is to convince them it's not a conspiracy if it is, or make them think it's a conspiracy when it's not
And all y'all's win condition is to make me think you're scum.
MY GOD IS ANYONE IN HERE TOWN
EXCEPT MY MOTHERFUCKING MASON BUDDY
lol l I was thinking the same thing.
and thus greyIce gets townie points...
except wait there's this
MY GOD IS ANYONE IN HERE TOWN
EXCEPT MY MOTHERFUCKING MASON BUDDY
HIRAKI GET YOUR BUTT IN HERE
. . . are we supposed to take this as you claiming?
How is the fact you were thinking the same thing = townie points? And then why were they taken away just because you think that was a claim? Does that mean you also think the other two claiming lovers are something other than town?-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 349, Salamence20 wrote:ok, Nyalite, I'll try...
yeah, this is impossible...
Does my townread and my claim that we are partners work?
I'm not really asking you to prove it. Just saying, if that's going to be your defense of him, you have to prove the village part.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 351, Salamence20 wrote:FUCK IT. I can't stand defending this moron.
I'm scum, I want to die. Kill me.
Fuck you DJD.
Sorry Hiraki, I wanted to play a better game, but I can't stand him. Kill me, end my misery.
No.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 372, BridgesAndBaloons wrote:Hey Slandaar,
I don't see this as a slip. Playing passive is a style you can do as scum or as town. It's worth comparing playstyles as both alignments because both alignments share some things in common (want to be able to construct cases on people that are convincing, want to avoid getting suspicion, want to get reads on other players).
So, exactly what I said in post #328.
Want to try again?-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 377, BridgesAndBaloons wrote:Ah, I think there's a misinterpretation here. It wasn't taken away, I was asking if this was a claim since he said "Except my motherfucking mason buddy hirake get your butt in here." That seemed like a claim and Iwas asking about it.
Okay, your wording made it like you were saying I'm getting a town readexcept...
In post 377, BridgesAndBaloons wrote:Thinking the same thing as me when I'm town is the most powerful town-tell I have. I'm not talking about thinking the same ways as in who is suspicious, but more abstract meta-levels sentiments akin to the ones grey-ice expressed. Therefore I've got a decently strong town read on greyIce.
Really though? I think both scum and town can agree there are lots of face palming moments in this game. So if that's the best you've got pretty weak there.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
The reasoning for the lynch was horrible.
But lets play a game.
Lets take Sally at his word that he hates JJD and wants to ruin the game for him. And that they are scum, and he is throwing it. (Many of you have already done this.)
Why then can we not believe that Sally hates JJD and wants to ruin the game for him. And that their alignment has nothing to do with it.
If you wanted to be lynched claiming scum will get that done.
Sally is a confirmed asshole now. So why do believe he isn't jerking us all around. And if so, why give scum a free mislynch.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 385, BridgesAndBaloons wrote:@Nyalite, yeah looking back at your post it looks like we agree. Why should I "try again"?
also @Nyalite again: I don't need you to believe me. I know how to town-hunt, probably better than I know how to scum-hunt. I'm stating clearly in the thread that I think G-i is town. It's a personal reasons based on what I was thinking, and I can't expect anyone other than my lover to believe me when I say what I was thinking. I can't expect anyone to get the same town-read form him since they didn't think the same thing in the same way. Makes sense? Probs not. going to bed now
Try again to add something useful to the thread instead of lurking it up.
Your "read" is that someone else felt the same way as you. And that feeling is that everyone in this game is being scummy. I'm sure lots of people noticed this.
I'm sorry to disappoint you but you were not the first to notice the sky is blue, the sun is bright or half the people in this game look really scummy. And you didn't find some special bond in GreyIce.("He thinks just like me!!")-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 398, DeltaWave wrote:DAY 1 FINAL VOTE COUNT
DoubleJD (7): Jal, Slandaar, Arugula, The Acting Method, GreyICE, BridgesAndBaloons, Hiraki (HOLYFUCKINGSHITA LYNCH)
Not Voting: Nyalite, Salamence20, yellowbounder, SnakePlissken
[
Scum are all on the JDJ wagon.
So GreyICE I know is town. So removing him.
Arugula, Slandaar, and Jal were all voting for him before the fake claim. Aka scummy.
Which means TAM, B&B and Hiraki all switched over ONLY because of the fake claim. This is also supported by the fact they voted for Sally first before Jal told them to vote for JJD. So a null tell.-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 415, Arugula wrote:
How the hell are we supposed to keep a claimed scum alive?
It sounds like you are trying to say "I told you so, now I'm town" and start another mislynch.
VOTE: Nyalite
You didn't vote for JJD because he was a "claimed scum." Your vote was on him before Sally fake claimed.
I called you out for that vote in post 327. But you chose to ignore it.
So explain again why you had a vote on him?-
-
Nyalite Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 163
- Joined: June 29, 2012
In post 416, Slandaar wrote:
The thing with Nyal is she is basically gone from white knight to high horse all the scum voted JD! which is obviously lol when there is no basis for it.
Pedit: aru said it.
Please respond to my post showing how horrible your vote on JJD was.
post 328
Also your horrible attempt to get a quick lynch on snake.
post 329
-