Fennin wrote:
Oh Hi, I'm pussy pussy and not drunk. ROFL ROFL LOL LMAO!!
Just wanted to say, I'm interested to hear more about this. Something just seems weird here.
Nacho wrote:absta earns the honor of being the first caught scum of the game.
What was the last game we played together? I feel that it's been awhile.
In any case, no. This isn't even a decent reaction test.
Nacho wrote:It was pretty damn obvious to anyone with half a brain that my first vote was not a vote to lynch.
Yawn. Whatever his name(absta? Spy is what I'm going with) is right here Nacho. This was a shitty attempt. Don't try to just cover it up with band-aids, please.
Nacho wrote:
And yet, even when I do, scum somehow manage to fail the tests in almost every way imaginable.
I don't remember you being a cocky small fry.
Stop acting like one please.
Nacho wrote:Three people think I'm town.
Mala wrote:Eh, I see a town agenda in your posts Nacho.
MoreMala wrote:Joined : June 06, 2012
Malee wrote:
Nacho, never thought that scum might bus their buddy and then nominate themself the next day to gain some town credits? Even if I admit that it would be a dangerous move for them.
MoreMalee wrote:The Requested User does not exist
Don't flatter yourself. You got fake townreads.
Mala wrote:I think Nacho's push for a wagon on you was to reaction test more than pressure.
Herp derp. Reaction tests are used to increase pressure in a short amount of time with votes.
Yeah this whole Nacho/Absta argument is crap. Nacho thinks he has scum(he doesn't) Not sure what Absta thinks and I'm not sure if Nacho is scum. I'm avoiding the thought to lynch him though, just because today doesn't seem like the best day to do that.
Shotty wrote:Why did you put: "@Malee" on top if you aren't going to ask her anything nor explain anything? To specifically tell her that you are voting for her??
Why does this fucking matter?
Shotty wrote:
Classic Scum behavior well spotted.
Even at early stage, wagon is a wagon.
Oh god. This reeks of buddying h4rd3or3
Shotty wrote:2. Nacho said it was very important that we hit scum today.
Nacho said? Holy shit really?
Yeah. I'm going to definitely place this here for now.
Unvote, Vote: Shotty
Absta wrote:
I think that you're were trying to fake ignorance to make it look like you can't be scum.
I think he was actually just being a tad bit lazy.
This is a bad reaction Nacho.
And it took fucking inte to make it.
What the hell.
Shotty wrote:
Uh-huh. You are SO capable of hammering when someone is not even on L-1.
Oh cool! It's not like he just admitted he couldn't do it--oh wait. He did.
Shotty wrote:Fuck off Absta.
This is a horrible reaction. Could've just said he lied about it(I do this frequently) but decided to add in the little finger nod toward Absta, because....Absta. There's no real reason to do it except for frustration, which I'm seeing as scummy Shotty atm. Note: Not Meta Related.
Shotty wrote:Wow, not checking Wiki was a capital crime.
Yes, because that was the main basis of his case.
Shotty wrote:Now that is faking ignorance.
Except he's actually that bad. I won't say you're trying to shift blame here out of kindness. If it was just about any other player(even YamiChan) then I'd totally get you on the ground for shifting focus here.
Shotty wrote:
I made a case on her, voted and gave reasons.
Correct. You gave 4 reasons for the lynching of Mala on Page 3 or 4?
Isn't that a bit...odd to you?
Maybe you could be wrong because it's just mere coincidence that you had 4 reasons with a noob player? Even if he's trying to be ignorant here, there's something to say about that with the inclusion of the fact that it was horribly played anyway.
Shotty wrote:
^Oh, yet I'm at L-1. Exact occassion to be touchy.
Are you saying you can't be calm and collected at L-1?
No.
Sad to see that Absta backed down.
Make note that I will not make the same mistake as him.
I'll be honest as well as I'm mostly skimming Absta's walls for important points because they're sentence by sentence. Nothing wrong about it but it's dragy.
And done.
That's hammer.
See you all tomorrow.