In post 11, drmyshotgun wrote:i was using drmyshottyizsik's name. it is in all my modded games. ~mod
Who is this joker? Do you normally spell Ponies with double "n"?Fennin wrote:Hi Gunny the Ponny. Be polite with the mod, you can treat players like shit, but respect the mod! We don't ware what your name is, Ponny.
QFTNachomamma8 wrote:It's actually quite important that we hit scum today. Scum probably won't be ballsy enough to nominate themselves if we kill their partner today, meaning that the two nominated tomorrow that we don't lynch are confirmed town.
Nachomamma8 wrote:Shotty earn pretty strong townreads.
Is this for real?Malee wrote:There's no point by voting for someone who is going to get replaced or better, site-banned.
The fuck? L-1 just like that in Lylo?Malakittens wrote:Eh, I see a town agenda in your posts Nacho.
My vote was a joke vote on Shotty.
Unvote: Shottytheawesomegunny
Vote: Absta
Why did you put: "@Malee" on top if you aren't going to ask her anything nor explain anything? To specifically tell her that you are voting for her??absta101 wrote:@Malee
This is vote worthy.Malee wrote:Yes, drmyshotgun, it is for real. Or was that sarcasm?
VOTE: drmyshotgun
Trying to gain town credits for listening to Nacho?
VOTE: Malee
Nachomamma8 wrote:He sees me posting that I was bringing him up to L-1 to bring him up to panic mode, and he responds by pretty much ignoring the wagon on him. I don't like this because it doesn't really fall in line with his other games (see here) where he reacts and questions when he's voted, whereas here he sort of dismisses it and calls my vote on him bad not because of reasoning, but because I told him how I was expecting him to react. On top of that, he puts a poor vote on Malee that seems completely unfounded even though he already has a random vote down. It seemed like he was trying to make it seem like he was just keeping calm and scumhunting and not caring about the wagon on him too much.
1. The idiotic mod didn't post the set-up in this game.absta101 wrote:
@Shotgun
What made you think this in a 7 player game?Shotgun wrote:There are 3 Scums in this game.
----
Okay, I've just realised there's only 7 players. I thought there was 9...
1. Buddying Nacho.Malakittens wrote:I think Nacho's push for a wagon on you was to reaction test more than pressure. As not being a fan of it when it's placed on myself, but I do think it's an effective way to go. I'm going to give a town read on Nacho because I see town purpose behind this.
As of everyone else I'm still undecided on. This goes for you Absta, I'm unable to make a solid connection of whether or not I think you are town or scum. I was hoping that this wagon would connect it, but I still can't determine.
absta101 wrote:@Shotgun
You never act like this as town. My gut is screaming scum.
In post 52, inte wrote:down with hammering
absta101 wrote:Page 3 hammer. That's new. Go ahead.
inte wrote:ok
Spoiler:
.___.absta101 wrote:So you're against a hammer of me?
So that naturally makes you think there's 9 players in this game?absta101 wrote:Every game i've played has been >=9.
absta101 wrote:So you lied then? You said "Huh? The wiki says there's three scums in this game.".
I think that you're were trying to fake ignorance to make it look like you can't be scum.
In post 48, Malakittens wrote:I don't like the tactic when it's used against me because I often tend to fail the reaction tests.
Still making possible excuses and dismissing the effectiveness of this method when used against yourself.Malakittens wrote:The method is unreliable when it's used against me. I react differently to pressure votes or reactions tests depending on my role. I have never been scum before so I honestly wouldn't know how I would react if I was scum when a reaction or pressure vote is applied to me.
Do you rely on meta to determine people's alignments?Malakittens wrote:I have to agree Shotty is acting oddly, but to be honest I haven't read back into his meta to determine whether he's acting like scum or town. I should get to this in a day or so when I'm free.
I'm curious, what would have been your reaction to his "intent to hammer" were I at L-1?
In post 70, drmyshotgun wrote:I lied about seeing a Wiki page. So I deserve a lynch? Fuck off Absta.
I get set-ups wrong so many times I don't remember how many. Check my meta if you think I'm faking ignorance. What a dumb move that is.
Lynch-all-liars? Fuck off. If I was going to lie, I would have not even mentioned that I actually didn't see Wiki-page.
Even so, that doesn't make me Scum, because I DID not know the set-up.
Wow, not checking Wiki was a capital crime.
I gave you reasons why I came to that conclusion of thinking there were 3 Scums in this game already.
On the other side. Look at Malakittens.
Nowthatis faking ignorance.
Why you can't distinguish the difference is totally beyond my comprehension and your inability baffles me.
Oh, she doesn't even know that claiming in this game is pointless.
Why does Mala think there's going to be sudden evaporation of votes with her VT claim, I haven't a clue.
Mala's vote on me is pure OMGUS.
I made a case on her, voted and gave reasons.
She accuses me of throwing her in the "shady light" and "twisting context of part of her posts".
She doesn't go about defending them, but uses them to make it the exact reason on why she votes for me? Does this make sense to you?
I'm curious, what would have been your reaction to his "intent to hammer" were I at L-1?
Why don't you take a wild guess?
And why aren't you commenting anything of my case on Mala?
And why are you not commenting on: Why you thought you were at L-1 and took the tone of resignation when you were the one who should best know what was going on in your wagon?
In post 91, nopointinactingup wrote:Shotgun, you didn't admit to lying until you were forced to. All you did after you lied was this knee-jerk post
In post 30, drmyshotgun wrote:Wait. No. What the fuck.
Fucking Mod didn't post the set-up in this game.
Never mind.
Things like this just don't go past unnoticed
Vote:Shotgun
In post 107, Malakittens wrote:Absta, I'm planning on reviewing inte, Shotty and nacho in about an hour. Inte's one liner posts are bugging me along with him saying so and so is scum without reasoning. Shotty is squirming around like scum on a hot plate. And Nacho's quick, strong town reads in Day 1 is odd and off.
In post 95, Malakittens wrote:Alright. I planned on getting read up today and ended up drinking and now drunk.
I'll be posting before 11:59 am all caught up to date with thinks that give me niggles and all of that good stuff promise!
@Mod: I'm V/LA until teh 15th, but I'll starting post at least once a night. >.>
In post 153, absta101 wrote:I'm saying if scum nominated themselves Inte is the most likely to be scum.
You're voting me. Why am I the best lynch?
In post 159, Hiraki wrote:my scumread on shotty is just about confirmed at this point, especially from the mala flip
In post 210, inte wrote:shotty are u scum
In post 227, absta101 wrote:Mod I guessed right before coming here
I should've pushed Inte instead. Switching over made more enemies and I therefore got no support.
