Open 436: Lovers Mafia - Love is a Poison! (Ended)

[Nachomamma8]

Vote: Drchrist

You seem like a pretty big advocate of love to me.

[Nachomamma8]

Unvote, Vote: Pressed Bunson

[Nachomamma8]

Unvote, Vote: VoidedMafia

bababaaaa
ba baaaa

[Nachomamma8]

Ya i dont like his L-1 vote either. Its not like the wagon had any real justification

VOTE: nacho

Funny, this wagon didn't exactly have any justification to it either. Hikari never gave any reasoning but you somehow applied more to it and sheeped justification that was never given >.>

A vote looking forced isnt exactly a beacon of scummieness. No one talking --> wagon to get reactions.

Whyd you move off nacho?

And why exactly is it scummy to bring that wagon to get reactions to L-1?

[Nachomamma8]

Who are you sheeping and why? If not, why are you voting me?

I was voting you because I didn't like you starting to defend Bunsen's RVS. Why exactly did you think I was sheeping someone?

[Nachomamma8]

As for his RVS, i'm defending it because I feel like Drchrist is trying to make it out to be scummier than it actually is (or rather, trying to make it scummy when it's actually not), and because of the seeming implication that there needs to be something in an RVS vote specifically to go off of to get out of RVS when there's plenty of other things that can be used.

why didn't you vote at the time, though?

@Voided: Hypocrisy how? Theres a RVS L-1 wagon, and then theres a L-1 wagon thats no longer in rvs. I dont like his vote.

@triangle: look. all we had p1 was bunsen's "apparently its rvs time, ill throw in a rv and you can tell because im typign out this random voting script." Thats odd, and worthy of attacking for reactions with nothing else to go on. Also, fake votes arent scummy till we're out of rvs for obvious reasons.

what the hell is any of this >.>
the first page was pb's random vote and the wagon in response to it. how were we out of rvs at that point especially since there was apparently NOTHING ELSE TO GO ON

VOTE: DoubleJD is my best guess right now, I don't like him putting nacho at L-1 and declining to point it out. I don't really see anything scummy about nacho's voting patterns and I like his post 32.

[Nachomamma8]

I see you Hikari
and I might be with you in a moment

[Nachomamma8]

yes hikari

Unvote, Vote: Drchrist

[Nachomamma8]

Dr, we aren't going to get anywhere if you don't defend yourself.
So do that, please and thank you.

[Nachomamma8]

I forgot

UNVOTE: nacho. Ill buy his reaction test excuse for now. It seems more believable at a second look

>.>
and now you have no opinions whatsoever

[Nachomamma8]

There's at least one scum on this wagon:

this is completely true
but also completely useless

Voided's refusal to hammer Drchrist while calling him scummy (but not scum with JDJD) and still sitting on JDJD seems pretty scummy now. His reaction to the hammer (none) was sort of strange considering who the hammerer was and how he felt about the whole thing.

I would rather lynch someone that's not Hikari because his partner will probably be easier to read than him if he is scum.

JDJD unvoting me and saying he's not suspicious anymore and then starting to suspect me in the very next post seems like a contradiction scum would be a tiny bit more careful of, so he's probably town.

I don't like Triangle's hop off JDJD and onto DC. It didn't seem like he found JDJD town at all, it just felt like he saw that DC was probably a more viable lynch.

So, right now I'm leaning towards lynching one of Voided/triangle, probably voided moreso than triangle. If Hikari is scum, then he probably wouldn't set himself up to push triangle while leaving a random townie out of the equation for some reason.

[Nachomamma8]

Vote: triangle123

[Nachomamma8]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zvCzCf9ZBc