In post 1348, Purrfect Panda wrote:It was the only time I had ever seen a VT fake claim a PR
wait what
In post 1348, Purrfect Panda wrote:It was the only time I had ever seen a VT fake claim a PR
In post 1454, AurorusVox wrote:Also before lock can I just say
Vig + JK makes sense as a combo
Since JK adds to the chances that a vigs kills will be nullified.
In post 601, absta101 wrote:My vote on Nat is just sheeping BK. My vote on Panda is way more productive.
Vote: Panda
@Panda- All my previous points still stand. Add the fact that you and Brandi mentioned JK before anyone else and you're looking more scummy than ever.
In post 662, BK201 wrote:Panda is town. I don't think Nat is some genius scum who said this knowing she would die Day 1.In post 341, Natalie wrote:
And Slandaar's plan is pretty foolproof. Why would you still want Elmo to be lynched after looking at it? Unless you can find a major flaw in it, I don't see the town motivation in you wanting Panda dead.
In post 1491, DeasVail wrote:I'll probably reread stuff and decide what I think at some point today. I'm pretty lost at the moment.
In post 1158, BK201 wrote:One more for the town pile -- Sawyer. After looking carefully at some things both Nat and Sawyer have said, I find it hard to believe they would be scum together.
In post 1119, BK201 wrote:1. Absta, Starbuck, DVIn post 1115, Purrfect Panda wrote:
1. Who is your top scumspects?
2. Who will you be willing to lynch before deadline if your scumspect does not have the votes ?
3. Who will you absolutely NOT lynch?
2. Sawyer
3. Brandi, Panda, Shamrock
In post 492, Slandaar wrote:I am being cautious when I say this; DV is probably town.
I always found the Monty wagon an overexaggerated wagon that gained traction quickly based on nearly nothing.
Scum could easily be Natalie/Absta/Kyle
Need to think. I have way too many scumreads.
In post 495, Slandaar wrote:absta what do you think about my scumteam in 492?
In post 496, absta101 wrote:1. I know you're wrong.
2. I know that the idea of that scum team is new and that you have little confidence in it.
In post 1470, Sawyer wrote:In post 1466, AurorusVox wrote:Don't bail on me now brah you're my only hope for the town
That kinda seemed liked a way to incriminate Reck in the event of a absta town flip. So if Vox is scum, Panda will be next.
- I have never, ever hung out with Starbuck in real life, so that line is just blatant bullshit. And I can read Starbuck, I had a gut town-read on her, it remained a town-read, and I hammered partly out of frustration and partly out of drunkenness.
You say I've done nothing while you've done a ton, right? Let's see... it was I who tried to stop the Starbuck wagon, it was you who was pushing it through. It was I who was screaming for absta's blood for over two days, and it was you who did everything in your power NOT to lynch absta. It was also you who tunneled on the goddamned innocent child the entire game. Exactly what is it that you've done that is so great for town? By my book, I'm two for two, and you're zero for three.
That's the biggest scum overreaction I've ever seen, and since this is so goddamned out of character for you, yes, I believe you're faking it.
In post 1564, xRECKONERx wrote:That's a lot to read and the only thing I can process right now is that you say I called Starbuck scum but that's a blatant misrep because I never said that.
In post 1568, xRECKONERx wrote:Me asking a question to Starbuck does not constitute me having a scum read on her. Calling one of her actions scummy (which is what I did) is not me starting to have a scum read on her. Your insistence to the contrary is laughable.