I random VOTE: Aether because he loves having votes on him
I see my pal ImJadenYuki is here. Hi buddy!
![Wink ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
In post 38, buldermar wrote:Indeed, the incongruities of post 26 and 28 seems quite telling. Luckily, there is a way for these two posts to be compatible; you're scum.In post 32, shos wrote:there you go bulder! let's just quit RVS! let's get on with the game with absolutely no information to play with! how the hell are you expecting the game to go on?
@31: I see no relation at all between those posts you know(26 28).
post 27 was very good imo, each part of it. post 28 was completely unrelated to 26.
VOTE: shos
In post 53, Declan_giggs wrote:Re: 48
Abaddon, I consider Bulder's vote on Shos to have 2 purposes, neither the stated one. He is looking for somewhere else to place a vote that might gain traction, and he found one with someone voting for him. Voting for someone because they are voting for you is OMGUS. Trying to deflect attention is scummy. Because of the OMGUS part of it, I am not yet ready to read Bulder as scum, which is why I haven't moved my vote to him. If you and Bulder would like to convince me that his vote has NO element of OMGUS to it, I will happily vote for Bulder.
Re: 51
I am hardly on the end of the spectrum being absolutely for the RVS. I just don't like your specific tactic of ending it, especially suffering through it more than once, I'm hearing echoes.
Re: 52 Are you unaware you case a second vote on Shos?
In post 99, Radelle wrote:@Declan, do you read these forums on your phone often?
In post 132, RedCoyote wrote:Alright, I'm going to have to stop for now. I could barely get through 2 pages. I'm a little buzzed, and this game is kind of a snorefest. I get bored easily when I'm town. I'll have to read the rest of it tomorrow.
In post 144, Declan_giggs wrote:In post 132, RedCoyote wrote:Alright, I'm going to have to stop for now. I could barely get through 2 pages. I'm a little buzzed, and this game is kind of a snorefest. I get bored easily when I'm town. I'll have to read the rest of it tomorrow.
Real quick, this. Second post in the game, and feels the need to slip in a town claim? Has anyone even cast one vote on him?
Aether very quiet in this game. Rapidcanyon and at least one other need a prod from @mod.
In post 234, CityElectric wrote:In post 233, Furcolow wrote:I am also not unvoting Abaddon until he is lynched or somehow dies in the night
Why not?
In post 240, greygnarl wrote:VOTE: declan
If this is how you play mafia as town on your other site then that's not mafia. You're playing up the awkward transition angle too much.
In post 246, absta101 wrote:Do you mean like this:You're playing up the awkward transition angle too much.
Otherwise, can you explain what you mean.In post 241, greygnarl wrote:L-1 or hammer I don't give a shit.
In post 249, Abaddon wrote:Oh, I get it. By repeatedly referring to me with sarcasm but without context, you hope to float the notion that I don't have credibility without having to argue for said notion.
How lazy.
In post 261, absta101 wrote:Mod can you force replace Declan and/or Furcolow please.
In post 275, shos wrote:get your vote back on furc.
In post 320, Radelle wrote:I see a lot of shos' "flip-flips" as him latching onto the votes and opinions of his town reads, either by sheeping their vote or sheeping what hethinksthey are saying, other than being inherently scummy.
In post 338, Abaddon wrote:Furcolow, being lowbrow, offensive, and lazy does not qualify as a legitimate playstyle.
In post 372, Radelle wrote:@Declan: That is the response I'm looking for. I'm all for changing reads as the game goes, it's just that you haven't been very transparent and it's been looking like you've changing your reads arbitrary on the go. I know whom you're referring to concerning that other game stuff. Concerning shos, do you still think shos' scumminess is in association with Abaddon?
Also, I think shos is town. It's Fur who I think is scum.
In post 68, Abaddon wrote:Shos, I don't know how plainer I can be. The only reasoning you gave for your vote hinged upon your approval of Declan's points against Bulder.
I dislike the pigeonholing of me you're doing there, Declan. Bulder sticking to his guns in an unpopular position is a very Townie action, particularly for someone who is somewhat new and poorly-versed in gameplay. Newscum that are being attacked on a game theory level are apt to equivocate and fold, stepping down from their firm stance. NewTown, however, are more likely to be stubborn and double down.
That said, Bulder thus far has been an idiot. He's completely wrong in his RVS theory. RVS (outside a Micro, where it can be dangerous,) is absolutely necessary. He's defending an overrun position. It is important to note that I am defendingmyinterpretation of Bulder'sactions,not his position. I am not an apologist.
Also, Bulder himself said it was not an OMGUS vote, upon which you promptly labeled it a reasonless vote, which you would have done anyway had he claimed it as an OMGUS vote. You created a double action trap - either way, you were going to attack him for his answer. That speaks to a preconceived position on him, not a genuine investigation.
Shos could just be an idiot. Declan has clear ulterior motives.
Unvote
Vote: Declan