There can only be 1 neko!
In post 6, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:Why the need to kid in your first post?
Well aren't most 1st post during RVS are jokes?
In post 6, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:Why the need to kid in your first post?
In post 15, CityElectric wrote:In post 13, CityElectric wrote:In post 12, Lincolm wrote:By the way, scooby are in VLA until Saturday. Just telling.
Wait, you mean until the end of today?(Also, who is scooby?)
Ahem, should learn to read the playerlist properly... Sorry scooby!
In post 20, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:CityElectric is scum. Discuss.
In post 35, bv310 wrote:request replacement for Scooby
Waiting on him will get us no where. Replace him orlynch himso we can move on.
In post 46, bv310 wrote:In post 39, Nekoko wrote:In post 35, bv310 wrote:request replacement for Scooby
Waiting on him will get us no where. Replace him orlynch himso we can move on.
lolwat?
The game is stalling because people appear to be looking for him. He is a hindrance to the town, and needs to be dealt with. We can either have him replaced (ideal option), or we lynch him and move on to actual useful game time.
In post 58, bv310 wrote:So you're willing to accept a lurker because he might have a PR? Especially since, in this setup, one of the two PRs is ENTIRELY useless?
In post 71, dividizzle wrote:I agree with Nekoko that a policy lynch would be a bad idea but we also can't set a precedent that someone can just sit back and watch an entire day go by.
I'm having trouble focusing on anything else because so much of our conversation has revolved around scooby and opinions of his actions/what they could mean.
In post 67, bv310 wrote:If you are willing to excuse an active lurker because of the potential that he is the 1/9 people in this game with a pro-town power, then we have nothing to talk about and should move to a better line of questioning. If, on the other hand, the chance of losing the one PR is worth pressuring every player to contribute, then let's push it.
In post 75, CityElectric wrote:@Nekoko, what's up with the random line breaks?
In post 76, dividizzle wrote:I just reread through the interaction between Lincolm and F16 and I think Lincolm's actions look pretty suspicious. He has an inconsistent approach to lurkers based on his determination of what their level of activity should be. it seemed like a convenient way to throw some pressure out there without any substance.
In post 67, bv310 wrote:If you are willing to excuse an active lurker because of the potential that he is the1/9people in this game with a pro-town power, then we have nothing to talk about and should move to a better line of questioning. If, on the other hand, the chance of losing the one PR is worth pressuring every player to contribute, then let's push it.
In post 163, bv310 wrote:That said, I would like to point at Nekoko for likely scum. If you look through his posting history, all he's talked about so far is that there might be a seer in the game. His reasoning for excusing Scooby before was that he might be a PR. He's basically refused to look at me because he saw a joke and thought I was softclaiming Seer (this actually seems likely that if he's scum, the scum is Mafia, not WW).
In post 165, bv310 wrote:Because speculating on whether a power role is player A or B is fluff that appears game-related. It's used by scum to try and figure out who the PR is on reactions.
In post 150, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:Nekoko also offers to hammer Dividizzle. Again, the 107 seemed somewhat unnecessary.
In post 180, CityElectric wrote:Two of Nekoko's points in Post 158 about bv310 are pretty flawed, if you think about it. Her first point is flawed, because the assumption of him not being scum needs to come from somewhere and she doesn't explain that in her post and her second point is flawed in that bv310 has expressed to not consider the seer a PR if there is mafia.
In post 180, CityElectric wrote:Okay, so first we point out two flaws in the post and then we unvote? What?
In post 180, CityElectric wrote:Disregard my weak town read on Nekoko, I think bv-Nekoko has a strong chance of being the scum team. On the other hand, why would scum try to bus during LyLo?
In post 180, CityElectric wrote:Great thought. How about you posted that when discussing F-16's post was still relevant? Now it just seems like you're trying to derail the discussion about your bv-town read.
In post 186, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:@ Nekoko, why no BV vote? If you are town, it should be obvious to you that he is scum, shouldn't it? If me and Div were scum together, we would have hammered you a long while ago.
In post 191, CityElectric wrote:What? You didn't mention hammering divid in that post, nor was hammering divid a topic at that point. Try again.
In post 88, bv310 wrote:We need to figure out what we're doing. Short deadlines means we have to have concrete action. I willl hammer Divi when we get to deadlineif need be, though I'd preferno one hammer until the last dayso we get the most to work with.
In post 90, bv310 wrote:@F16, I find his last two posts to besomewhatscummy, andI'd rather have a lynch than a no-lynch. We need all the information we can get with this setup.
In post 201, bv310 wrote:In post 199, CityElectric wrote:I'm sorry, Godot. Due to the lack of activity, I didn't realize that I hadn't done anything for 3 days...
My main problem with Nekoko is still her logic behind bv310 being a seer. Her first and second point both make as much, if not more, sense if you replace PR with scum.
It's because she's not looking for scum when she made that post. She's looking for PRs because she's scum.
lol you were great. Those flavor text made me lolIn post 235, ProsecutorGodot wrote:This game was an interesting experience for me to mod and, though the slow pace worried me, I had hope it would balance out at some point. After a bit, I figured I could back off a little with the speed of the game. This was my first time moderating a game, so you are welcome to drop comments on how I served you in that manner, what I did right and what I could do better next time.