Open 486: Game Over

Kmd4390 · Post Post #22 (isolation #0) » Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:56 pm

vote bojo

Opportunism.

Not a joke.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #24 (isolation #1) » Tue Mar 26, 2013 6:06 pm

Kmd4390 · Post Post #26 (isolation #2) » Tue Mar 26, 2013 6:25 pm

Zach's post was a clear joke that, if said seriously, would confirm him as scum. Whiskers voted him for it and called it serious. Bojo jumped right on that and used Whiskers' implied reasons as if Bojo came up with them on their own. It's too fake.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #31 (isolation #3) » Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:42 am

Whiskers, yours looks more like a "let's get this game started" post where Bojo's came off as "zach just claimed scum let's get him".

Johnny, I was wondering that myself. Probably one of those Whiskersisms.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #33 (isolation #4) » Wed Mar 27, 2013 4:37 am

In post 32, Bojo wrote:Well, if it came off as that, there's really nothing I can do to change your mind.

Why do you say that? You think on Page 2, I am 100% sure you are scum based on that vote?

Kmd4390 · Post Post #36 (isolation #5) » Wed Mar 27, 2013 5:04 am

Bojo, can you elaborate on your vote then? Do you think zach is scum?

Johnny, I don't have much of a read on you.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #40 (isolation #6) » Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:10 am

Bojo, that's fair.

Johnny, too obvious...

Kmd4390 · Post Post #84 (isolation #7) » Wed Mar 27, 2013 11:15 pm

Siv, can you link the game you played with this setup? Actually, anyone with links to this setup, can you post them? That's probably the best way to test zach's theory. Also, i'd be less worried about scum intentionally picking the same number and more worried about it happening because someone wasn't paying attention to the QT or something. It's definitely a good theory, but it would be even better if it proves to be true in past games as well.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #103 (isolation #8) » Thu Mar 28, 2013 1:21 pm

In post 102, fuzzybutternut wrote:Well, in that case, I think I know Whiskers alignment at least, so that helps.

How?

Kmd4390 · Post Post #110 (isolation #9) » Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:18 pm

In post 104, fuzzybutternut wrote:We both had the same number, I know what role I chose, I didn't get that role.

Someone above you did...

Kmd4390 · Post Post #182 (isolation #10) » Sun Mar 31, 2013 1:57 am

Haven't posted in a while. Got bored of all the setup talk. I'll read over it when it's not Easter.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #193 (isolation #11) » Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:30 am

In post 190, Whiskers wrote:
Vote: Syryana

unvote, vote syryana

Kmd4390 · Post Post #195 (isolation #12) » Tue Apr 02, 2013 3:11 am

OMGBUDDYING

TURBOLYNCH GOGOGOGO

Kmd4390 · Post Post #255 (isolation #13) » Fri Apr 05, 2013 1:59 pm

unvote

I really should get caught up...

Kmd4390 · Post Post #263 (isolation #14) » Sat Apr 06, 2013 1:31 am

Fuzzy, working my new shift as a manager. Getting used to the hours. Good news is that today is my last day on my second job.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #333 (isolation #15) » Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:54 pm

Vote Demon

Didn't like bojo early on.

I apologize for my Day 1 activity so far. I'll get better.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #417 (isolation #16) » Thu Apr 11, 2013 5:34 am

Vote Elyse

Kmd4390 · Post Post #427 (isolation #17) » Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:38 am

unvote

Forgot about the numbers.

Last scum is probably remembering Sunday or salamance.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #460 (isolation #18) » Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:25 am

Salamence, you voted late enough that demon was going down anyway. Your vote doesn't clear you even if we definitely think both scum wouldn't bus. There was nowhere near enough time for a counter wagon to pop up and no one was really entertaining the idea. At that point it was just push a lynch through before deadline. At the time you voted, you would have been worried you'd take too much heat for NOT hammering had you lurked it out or voted elsewhere.

This is awkward. Johnny is town and so are his scum reads.

vote salamence

Elyse's vote on johnny looks opportunistic by the way. Is it possible that scum said "hey if two of us pick one, we won't look like buddies"?

Kmd4390 · Post Post #463 (isolation #19) » Thu Apr 11, 2013 11:29 am

When did I say I had no reason for voting you?

Kmd4390 · Post Post #476 (isolation #20) » Thu Apr 11, 2013 4:49 pm

In post 464, Elyse wrote:When did you provide a reason?

Oh wait you didn't. You just said Vote: Elyse

This doesn't answer my question.

Whiskers, why are you against a salamence lynch?

Kmd4390 · Post Post #478 (isolation #21) » Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:28 am

unvote, vote Elyse

Kmd4390 · Post Post #541 (isolation #22) » Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:24 pm

Massclaim is stupid. Scum won't fakeclaim.

Assuming Elyse can't be scum because Demon had the same number is stupid too. Maybe they weren't active pregame and never discussed numbers. Maybe they picked the same number intentionally. We don't know that they wouldn't pick the same number.

However, I'm wondering if Remembering Sunday is a better lynch than Elyse. May have beetlejuiced shortly after my last post. I've found that tell to be pretty reliable. The only thing is I'm not sure if that was a true beetlejuice or not.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #549 (isolation #23) » Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:57 pm

In post 548, Whiskers wrote:Actually, zach, I
am
special, which is why I was calling for it in the first place.

Now:
Is there some benefit we get by waiting until Day 3 to massclaim?

Another night for whoever scum decides to kill after massclaim. Possibly confirmed townies tomorrow that we don't have today and a chance to just lynch down a list for the win with that chance increasing even more if we wait until Day 4 if we haven't won yet.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #561 (isolation #24) » Sat Apr 13, 2013 10:12 am

Yeah there is no role that would be confirmed town. That's just dumb.

Let's just lynch Elyse or Remembering Sunday and call it a day.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #569 (isolation #25) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 1:50 am

Elyse, it's a few things:
- you were off the demon wagon. I prefer to look there.
- a wagon popped up on johnny and with your fourth vote on the wagon, you suddenly had a case like your vote was original. No acknowledgement of the other votes or anything. I found it to be a very interesting first mention of a player. Especially when your first few posts of the day came off as getting a feel for how the day will go rather than expressing opinions on who looked scummy at the start of the day, which you saved for that post.
-the timing of your unvote was off regardless of your reasoning for it.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #571 (isolation #26) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 3:54 am

In post 570, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:
In post 562, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Your wrong is wrong. Nothing is conf-town.

I'm fairly sure whiskers doesn't have the role I'm thinking of. But he might.

Anyway, can everyone claim a result of innocent on a player? If you do have an result (JK, tracker, cop) that confirms someone is innocent, claim that, otherwise just claim innocent on any player.

Salamence

Kmd4390 · Post Post #572 (isolation #27) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 3:55 am

Shit why'd I read that as we are hypo claiming guilties?

If I have an innocent, it's whiskers.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #584 (isolation #28) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 9:38 am

vote remembering sunday

Everyone has him on their list and he's one of my two so I'm good with that. I think johnny is town.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #597 (isolation #29) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 11:37 am

Yeah that's a beetlejuice if I ever saw one.

Lynch it.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #598 (isolation #30) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 11:38 am

Remembering Sunday, if you are a vanilla townie, what role did you try to get? I don't care about a claim aside from that unless you have info.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #601 (isolation #31) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 11:44 am

He's a VT who wanted to be a jailkeeper.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #602 (isolation #32) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 11:45 am

Or a goon. Either way.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #617 (isolation #33) » Sun Apr 14, 2013 2:37 pm

I have my reasons.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #624 (isolation #34) » Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:50 am

I'll get into it when the time is right.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #626 (isolation #35) » Mon Apr 15, 2013 4:49 am

Most Mods use random.org or something to generate alignments. Not sure if that's true for this game or not but that's my best guess.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #631 (isolation #36) » Mon Apr 15, 2013 5:28 am

Zach, that's usually how it works.

Siv, gut. Early Day 1 interactions. The vibe I get when he expresses his opinions. That kind of stuff.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #639 (isolation #37) » Mon Apr 15, 2013 7:12 am

Zach, you asked why johnny is town. I said it was probably generated randomly. Pretty straightforward.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #647 (isolation #38) » Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:26 am

Zach, open setup bro. One more scum alive.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #656 (isolation #39) » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:28 pm

Zach, I have yet to see a case that outweighs my gut town read on him.

Human, you don't see that as distancing because his scumbuddy did something scummy and he felt obligated to vote him?

Syrana, I appreciate the kind words.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #659 (isolation #40) » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:51 pm

What the fuck?

Kmd4390 · Post Post #682 (isolation #41) » Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:56 pm

The reason I wanted to know what role Remembering Sunday tried for was the fact that we could narrow the scum down to two suspects if no one claimed JK or tracker. Granted it's a small chance that someone in the top two of the draft tries fakeclaiming or claiming vanilla, but it was a possibility and worth trying for. But then people asked about it so I started a nonsense conversation with zach to make everyone forget about it. Didn't need the scum realizing the tracker was in the top two if the top two were both town.

Good game overall. Mostly happy with my reads other than on Elyse.