Open 524: Donner Party (Game Over)

qwertyuiop · Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:38 am

VOTE: Goodmorning

qwertyuiop · Post Post #21 (isolation #1) » Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:07 am

UNVOTE:
VOTE: BK201
All aboard the wagon.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #34 (isolation #2) » Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:29 am

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Banakai
AFRAID OF THE WAGON ARE WE?

qwertyuiop · Post Post #36 (isolation #3) » Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:35 am

And there are also 3 scum in the game who don't want the pressure associated with putting someone at L-1.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #113 (isolation #4) » Fri Aug 30, 2013 8:09 am

In post 100, Wisdom wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: BK

Banakai = stupid town, moving on

Scum cannot fake being dumb?

qwertyuiop · Post Post #117 (isolation #5) » Fri Aug 30, 2013 9:05 am

In post 114, Wisdom wrote:Do you scumread Banakai?

Do you townread him for anything other than his dumbness?

qwertyuiop · Post Post #340 (isolation #6) » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:34 am

@Wisdom
Do you have any evidence against me besides just my lack of activity?

qwertyuiop · Post Post #343 (isolation #7) » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:08 am

You didn't give a reason why you voted me, so I had to guess.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #345 (isolation #8) » Sat Aug 31, 2013 10:05 am

All I see is the vote.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #369 (isolation #9) » Sun Sep 01, 2013 8:48 am

VOTE: Wisdom

qwertyuiop · Post Post #474 (isolation #10) » Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:43 pm

I voted wisdom because after 343 and 345 he still didn't explain his vote for me, I would have assumed that that was obvious.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #476 (isolation #11) » Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:50 pm

Why didn't you point me to that when I first attacked you for not giving a reason?

And how is being wagon-happy in RVS a scum-tell?

qwertyuiop · Post Post #479 (isolation #12) » Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:00 pm

Pages 1 and 2? Yes they were. Especially given my reasoning was in all caps and very short.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #481 (isolation #13) » Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:27 pm

I can have more than one RVS votes if I want.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #482 (isolation #14) » Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:27 pm

I can have more than one RVS votes if I want.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #521 (isolation #15) » Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:20 pm

In post 483, Mitillos wrote:So, you weren't jumping wagons? You arbitrarily happened to vote the same people others were voting? Because, if your votes were part of the RVS, that's what you're saying.

Random votes=Not serious and early
My wagon hopping=Not serious and early
Thus, my wagon hopping=random votes.

Also, my vote on Banakai was not influenced by the "wagon" of one vote on him so yes in his case.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #536 (isolation #16) » Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:41 pm

@Mit
My only other game is still ongoing so I can't talk about that, but after this game I'll have evidence to show the next group to question it. In regards to Wisdom then I thought he was scum because I didn't see his reason, I now rescind that thought.

And about the four-legs argument, that's different. If (But not only if) an animal is a dog it has 4 legs. If and only if a vote is early and non-serious then it is a random vote.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #554 (isolation #17) » Sat Sep 07, 2013 4:35 am

In post 547, Mitillos wrote: @qwerty: Except that you're asserting something that I can not accept. That your votes were not serious, despite being on wagons. Votes on wagons are generally for pressure or lynching. Neither can be considered random. So, saying that your votes were not serious and therefore RVS doesn't make sense. I'd be more inclined to accept it if you hadn't been on so many wagons. Also, any comments on your completed game that Evil linked? You are far less fluffy there and said you had no other games except an ongoing one.

520 is done? I thought it was still ongoing, sorry. Now I can comment on it. There I had 12 posts in 2 days. Day 1 I had 4 posts, most of which were arguing about whether or not town would care about being lynched, day 2 I voted the target of a claimed roleblocker and never did anything else, then I died overnight BGing the roleblocker. I'm more fluffy here because I'm being attacked here and I wasn't as much there.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #556 (isolation #18) » Sat Sep 07, 2013 5:34 am

I have two modes: Fluff and lurk. Being attacked means no lurk means more fluff. Make sense?

qwertyuiop · Post Post #557 (isolation #19) » Sat Sep 07, 2013 5:35 am

And I just realized I was still voting Wisdom. UNVOTE:

qwertyuiop · Post Post #567 (isolation #20) » Sat Sep 07, 2013 8:44 am

In post 558, BoroPhil wrote:sounds like we might as well get rid of you now then?

Yes, lynch the VI rather than scum go ahead.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #569 (isolation #21) » Sat Sep 07, 2013 11:02 am

And scum can also push for the lynch of VIs.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #576 (isolation #22) » Sat Sep 07, 2013 6:19 pm

@Mod
I unvoted Wisdom.

In post 557, qwertyuiop wrote:And I just realized I was still voting Wisdom. UNVOTE:

qwertyuiop · Post Post #653 (isolation #23) » Tue Sep 10, 2013 7:33 pm

I think that goodmorning is town, did I miss the reasoning behind the wagon or was it not presented?

BK, why Borophil?

qwertyuiop · Post Post #692 (isolation #24) » Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:03 pm

Borophil's wagon has good reasoning on it and is the best out of all the viable wagons.
VOTE: Borophil

qwertyuiop · Post Post #723 (isolation #25) » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:59 am

In this setup no lynching is even worse than in a normal setup since then we won't even have a flip.

BoroPhil, if you're there then vote yourself, unless you're scum.

BC, why are you not voting BoroPhil?

qwertyuiop · Post Post #863 (isolation #26) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 2:02 pm

Un-CCed PR means nothing in this setup, SK can just kill vig and then claim vig. The RB claim makes it legit though, unless they're both scum.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #895 (isolation #27) » Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:22 pm

In post 892, BK201 wrote:Prod dodge I guess. I think we pretty much know who is scum but I'd like to hear more from them.

We don't know who is scum, we have no idea still.

qwertyuiop · Post Post #925 (isolation #28) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 5:14 pm

Sorry for my recent inactivity, I forgot this site existed for a while.

Why the recent flood of votes for me?

qwertyuiop · Post Post #940 (isolation #29) » Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:49 am

In post 934, goodmorning wrote:
In post 930, Evil Regals wrote:I hate, hate, hate how goodmorning hasn't posted her case.
Fun fact: the longest I managed to delay on a case was about a month.
Something more pressing came up, but the case is about two-thirds done at this point.

Why not just post it as you make it? If it is 2/3 done, post the 2/3 and then post the 1/3 later.