Open 534 - Killing at the Frat (Day 5)
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
I'm afraid you are going to have to explain this one
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
hang on.In post 47, bubbajack8 wrote:
Would it appear I'm jumping on Notscience's.In post 41, BoroPhil wrote:I'm afraid you are going to have to explain this one
you expressed disappointment at the lack of a counter-wagon
yet one was available to you
if you were so disappointed, why didn't you jump on it?-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
right. so you are quite defensive of not, even at this early stage. interesting.In post 71, bubbajack8 wrote:
I see where confusion came, and I'll answer this postIn post 62, Sakura Hana wrote:I'm more concerned about bubba wanting a nacho counter wagon, then he not jumping on ns to create a counter wagon himself, so i decided to try a counter wagon on him instead.
In hopes to answer you.In post 70, BoroPhil wrote:
hang on.In post 47, bubbajack8 wrote:
Would it appear I'm jumping on Notscience's.In post 41, BoroPhil wrote:I'm afraid you are going to have to explain this one
you expressed disappointment at the lack of a counter-wagon
yet one was available to you
if you were so disappointed, why didn't you jump on it?
My counter-wagon was startsfromthehearts, the first person to vote Nacho. I see now that notscience was the 2nd on, sakura 3rd, Mario4 4th.
THEN I voted startsfromthehearts.
That's 4 on Nacho, 2 on not. So sure not was there, but Not was asking what an either-or fallacy was, so I wasn't going to vote him when he's asking me to explain my vote in RVS. And I honestly don't like startsfromthehearts continued badly drawn reasons for voting Nacho (granted it is RVS, but instead of helping he's just posting memes.)-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
yes, but defending someone else for no real reason at this stage is quite interestingIn post 80, Marcrell wrote:I can't really say that being defensive is a hard scum tell, but it can be. Last game I got in trouble for being overly defensive but I wasn't scum. But considering the mafia needs to make sure people think they're town, it can be an indicator as well.-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
More interesting reactions...In post 85, bubbajack8 wrote:
I'm sorry but I don't feel like I'm "defending him" I just said I'm not jumping on his "wagon" and gave reasons as to why I was not jumping on his wagon. I did not give reasons to get off his wagon, nor did I try to convince people not to vote him. I gave my reasons for not voting him at this current time, and you can take it as you will.In post 79, BoroPhil wrote: right. so you are quite defensive of not, even at this early stage. interesting.
Finally something actually contributing. (sort of) None the less, you haven't been aggressive, or defensive, so why point out they are neutral?In post 81, Wake1 wrote:Alright, time to start playing.
Defensiveness, as you know, is not always indicative of guilt my friend.
In fact, aggression, like defensiveness, are neutral behaviors.
The eternal ordeal is discovering the intentions behind them.
In post 84, BoroPhil wrote:
yes, but defending someone else for no real reason at this stage is quite interestingIn post 80, Marcrell wrote:I can't really say that being defensive is a hard scum tell, but it can be. Last game I got in trouble for being overly defensive but I wasn't scum. But considering the mafia needs to make sure people think they're town, it can be an indicator as well.
I'm sorry is this not a real reason? Really you'd make a better argument to say I'm defending Nacho.In post 71, bubbajack8 wrote:Not was asking what an either-or fallacy was, so I wasn't going to vote him when he's asking me to explain my vote in RVS.-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
It all seems a bit fake. You bemoan the lack of a counterwagon, despite one being there, then when one is pointed out to you, you come up with some anti-reasons. now you bring out a barrage of smileys.In post 100, bubbajack8 wrote:In post 92, Nachomamma8 wrote:oh i dunno mostly cuz i forgot i was voting the guy i'm votingIn post 94, notscience wrote: You're voting Wake and he has a scum role pm and needs to die
Just went to check. MM is correct. Which would explain how Nacho "forgot who he was voting". the question is why is notscience pushing Wake? And saying that Nacho is voting him when he's not.In post 98, Ms Marangal wrote:Nacho isn't even voting anyone.
@Boro: You want to give reasons besides just saying it's "interesting?" -_-
not convinced at all.-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
if you are implying that is my case, you are obviously forgetting our earlier interactions. or not forgetting them as the case may be.In post 222, bubbajack8 wrote:
I like to hear it!In post 198, Marcrell wrote:
I am a relatively new player who has played two games on the site before and may be a bit overconfident in how much I think I know about the game. I'm not sure.In post 189, bubbajack8 wrote:Welcome ETL! Who is Marcrell?
Your case is great.In post 200, BoroPhil wrote:I swear I posted something earlier. not and bubba are still scum.
When we are positing actual reasons on everybody else, gut suffices?
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
In post 324, startfromtheheart wrote:Boro's last three posts I don't like, I finally skimmed the game once
First one asks us to end the day ASAP (paraphrase) by lynching bubba
Second is a vote ns, third asks us if we agree that those who make the most noise d1 are town
I'll be here around the clock Mon. to Wed. Nights if anyone would like to talk
Love, Bert
Vote: Borophil
Kaboom. Oh and low hanging fruit wagons don't smell good ATM with ns and ETL wagons being such
/phone post
oh, what a cliched, lazy vote. are you trying to rise to the top of my scum list?-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
what exactly needs rebutting? what was contradictory about what I said?In post 333, Marcrell wrote:I noticed you didn't try to rebute it. Do you not have an answer to the points?
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
posturing really.In post 462, Dry-fit wrote:Alright I finished my reread. I didn't come to any earth-shattering conclusions and I still like my vote so I'll just give some thoughts on the players.
Nacho: I still like him for town based on the early wagon on him. His play here feels very different from how he's been before, but every time I play with Nacho he feels like a different player. For the most part his reads lists look solid. Don't agree about Sakura though.
Startfromtheheart: He's playing a very loosey goosey game and that's making him hard to read. His recent Boro vote is solid though I think. He's someone to watch but not a high priority at the moment.
REGINA+: 51 is still the scummiest post in the game to me.
This is REGINA's current vote, or at least it would be if it counted. I don't know what kind of town mindset votes for people because they like the idea of them being scum. Also based on this I think REGINA and Sound of Silence aren't partners.REGINA+ wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Wake
I like thinking of him as scum. It makes sense. The argument is less confusing, at least.
notscience/Sound of Silence: My view on these slots is muddied by the long argument between notsience/ETL. It usually takes a few rereads and possibly a couple of flips for me to get a handle on fights like that. Neither is a priority right now though. Wake's posts felt slightly scummy, but some of ETL's early defense felt like town. Notscience I think is overestimating his cases, and it's a conveniently simplistic view of the game to have townreads on everyone but the lurkers.
marcrell: To be honest I'm not getting much out of this guy. Mostly of the things he talks about are pretty irrelevant. He seems allergic to taking any kind of stance, which can be a bad sign. He's still on his RVS vote.
mario4: Not much here at all. A vote without explanation (303) I think is scummy. I'm usually more tempted to make a vote like that as scum. Need more info.
bubbajack8: Even though he's one of the more active posters, nothing much from him stands out either way. One thing:
Normally I'd call complicated "conspiracy theories" like this town, but this one feels off. While reading notscience's post I imagined this exact argument as one scum could use against him.bubbajack8 wrote:Another reason for no pressure on lurkers. Doesn't want newbie flail. I think that NS doesn't want to pressure the lurkers because his scum buddy is a lurker. I'd also like to say I think it's a new person. As he's worried about newbie flail. It's one thing to be worried about mislynching someone, but to just worry about newbie flail is sad.
Ms. Marangal: One the players almost entirely focused on Nacho. Maybe even worse that Sakura in that respect. At least the pressure she's giving doesn't seem to be as flimsy as Sakura's. Reads on some others please.
Borophil: His early "counterwagon" case on Bubba is bad and can of hard to believe. He's made several posts that are just bizarre. 244, 301, and 328 fall into that category. He also failed to answer the question I asked him in 259.
Neonizer: Still seems town. His posts are short, but he's looking beyond the surface level. His concern of others' townread on him is town. Scum are more likely to just roll with those townreads rather than worry about the motivation behind them.
Sakura Hana: Very fake vote on Nacho as I've pointed out. She declares Nacho scum for not voting, but then sheeps him as soon as he gives a gut vote, one no one should find compelling enough to sheep. How serious are we supposed to take her vote on Nacho? I don't really have anything new to say about Sakura, but it's worth repeating.
Top three scumreads: REGINA, Sakura, Boro.-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
you can lynch me for being lazy if you like, but I'd hardly be the only one you could accuse of that, and that's all you would be doing.
I'm pretty happy with my earlier reads on notscience/bubba and think we should probably lynch one of them. Other than that, anyone targetting me is looking for an easy lynch.
ETL was town all along. Obvious to anyone.-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
North-east England dialect.In post 543, Sound of Silence wrote:
Who is "they"? Has more than one player made that argument?In post 542, BoroPhil wrote:bubba, I think by distancing they mean that by attacking each other we are scum making it look like we aren't on the same side
Is that why you are voting for me?-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
In post 352, Marcrell wrote:
I mean you didn't say anything about how he analyzed your posts. You just called the vote lazy and stupid. That can technically be counted as rebutting it, but without much besides calling it lazy and stupid it isn't much of one.In post 338, BoroPhil wrote:
what exactly needs rebutting? what was contradictory about what I said?In post 333, Marcrell wrote:I noticed you didn't try to rebute it. Do you not have an answer to the points?
this is what he said:
and that was his reasoning for voting me. are these good reasons to you?
First one asks us to end the day ASAP (paraphrase) by lynching bubba
Second is a vote ns, third asks us if we agree that those who make the most noise d1 are town
lynching bubba? I think that's a good idea. why doesn't he tell me why it isn't if it's bad.
voting notscience. again, I think that's a good idea. why doesn't he tell me why it isn't if it's bad
are those who make most noise d1 town? valid question. if not, why not.
what's not to like about those 3 posts?-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
and what makes you so sure neonizer is town?In post 538, Neonizer wrote:In post 536, BoroPhil wrote:well wtf happened here
Quoting someone who smells werewolfy.
Loads of pages not enouhg substance.
Don't like mara atm which is weird to say
I like ETLs replace out because before that I have sneaky suspicion him and NS were scum.
Now I think Hi two townies.
they don't seem to have done a lot, and the bottom of this is bizarre.
before ETL replaced out, ETL/NS were scum.
now they are both town.
what?-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
You are stating obvious things here or being deliberately obtuse. The hydra thing has already been explained. regina's vote was linked to your smileys, which I know were directed at me, we've discussed it.In post 579, bubbajack8 wrote:
Maybe he was to lazy to see who was making the argument.In post 543, Sound of Silence wrote:
Who is "they"? Has more than one player made that argument?In post 542, BoroPhil wrote:bubba, I think by distancing they mean that by attacking each other we are scum making it look like we aren't on the same side
SoundsofSilence is a hydra between GiF and fferyIn post 551, BoroPhil wrote:who's we? are you speaking for more than one player?
In post 562, BoroPhil wrote:Regina's vote for bubba at #100 was fine. Bubba's response to being questioned was to throw out a few smileys. scumcity.
Actually my smileys were directed toward you, and your lack of questions.In post 100, bubbajack8 wrote: @Boro: You want to give reasons besides just saying it's "interesting?" -_-
GiF's played with me ALOT.In post 566, Sound of Silence wrote:
I read every page in a frenzy of catch-up last night. I could mostly follow bubba's reasoning. GiF has played with bubba and has a light town meta read to go along with our impressions from this game.In post 564, BoroPhil wrote:and as for bubba, did you manage to read the first few pages?
(continues Death tunnel)In post 568, notscience wrote:Why is SoS town Nacho
I really really really really really think they're scum-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
this vote is surely linked to your smileys?In post 130, REGINA+ wrote:
I don't quite like this post at allIn post 100, bubbajack8 wrote:In post 92, Nachomamma8 wrote:oh i dunno mostly cuz i forgot i was voting the guy i'm votingIn post 94, notscience wrote: You're voting Wake and he has a scum role pm and needs to die
Just went to check. MM is correct. Which would explain how Nacho "forgot who he was voting". the question is why is notscience pushing Wake? And saying that Nacho is voting him when he's not.In post 98, Ms Marangal wrote:Nacho isn't even voting anyone.
@Boro: You want to give reasons besides just saying it's "interesting?" -_-
UNVOTE:
VOTE: bubbajack8
having said that, I quite like your last post.-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
tbqh there was a bit of humour behind my omgus. Surely stating it was an omgus at that stage makes that apparent?
I've been disinterested for most of this day, I'm not alone in that. It's been very quiet, I was also amazed that the deadline was now.
Your vote on me was basically based on 3 random statements with zero analysis.
I wanted bubba lynched. so why not a quick one?
notscience was acting anti-town. so why not scum, why not a lynch?
and the third one was a genuine question - why would you have a problem with that exactly?
you are basically just trying to sound town-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
SOS's reads earler on D1 for reference.In post 519, Sound of Silence wrote:Town
Marcrell
Dry-Fit
startfromtheheart
Nachomamma8
notscience
Neonizer
Lean Town
Sakura Hana
bubbajack
Null
Mario4
Ms Marangal
Scum
Regina
Borophil
Jester
Sound of Silence-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
why does it help us out?In post 767, Mario4 wrote:I don't get why thats the rules. Every time i have played this game you don't need a majority you just need one guy with the most votes. but whatever I guess it technically helps us out.-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
neo, try reading back through the thread, I've explained my reasons for you, bubba and start. that's why you are my top three and possibly bar not I can't really see my vote moving elsewhere today.
What, you aren't reading the thead properly because you are scum? Oh, sorry about that.
not sure what Dry's game is, and whilst I think I admitted I was a bit surprised by the deadline arrival, I actually tried to get a lynch on someone I wasn't convinced on (notscience) to try and stop a no lynch. So, your vote is frankly baffling.
I think you are town, but town having a bad game. I suggest you have another think and try and improve.-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
being on that vote is good enough reason for me. you are trying and failing to turn this into a battle of semantics which is classic scum misrepping behaviour. thanks though for reassuring me that my vote is in the right place.In post 808, Neonizer wrote:In post 618, BoroPhil wrote:Mario is just an easy vote. No way of knowing whatsoever if he is scum/town. but I do imagine scum would be keen to get on it.In post 619, BoroPhil wrote:and of the people on it, I'd say neonizer is the most likely scum. there is time for a counter wagon.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: neonizer
Hahahaha phil no. I didnt miss out 618 that's what I meant when I said your closest is explanation is most likely scum. That's not an explanation as to why out of all those people on that easy vote I am most likely scum. So you are calling me lazy. While you still haven't actually come up for a reason why I am scum. You've come up with a theory of a group if people contains scum and I am most likely.
VOTE: borophil-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK
-
-
BoroPhil Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1844
- Joined: January 7, 2013
- Location: UK